Apple's Hiring Spree of Biosensor Experts Continues As iWatch Team Grows 62
An anonymous reader writes "As the rumors surrounding Apple's mythical iWatch continue to swell, Apple has continued to hire folks with deep biomedical and sensor technology expertise. A previously unreported addition to Apple's growing cadre of medical device experts is Marcelo Malini Lamego, who began working at Apple this January. Before joining Apple this past January, Lamego spent 8 years as the CTO of Cercacor, a medical devices company with a focus on developing noninvasive monitoring technologies."
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:Apple is making Jewelry? (Score:4, Insightful)
A beta-loving nonce wrote:
Quite the opposite. They're perfectly aware of the discrepancy which is why they call foul, in a vain attempt to educate any feckless hipster fucktards like you whose mom's might be reading slashdot to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Whereas this [slashdot.org] would make Oscar Wilde jealous, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps if they actually made the claims you thought they made.
Re: (Score:2)
But I do see a connection between Apple marketeers and their faithful.
Yo dawg (Score:2, Interesting)
Because they're imitating Apple's lawyers?
Re: (Score:3)
Why is the public perception that everything Apple does have to be something new that has never been done before?
Especially given the fact that Apple has never done anything that hasn't been done before...
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Ah yes! I had one of those. I loved my Casio calculator watch with biomedical sensoric, music and player and communication capabilties.(!)
Apple should also be ashamed to have released a cellphone 2007. Didn't Motorola already make cellphones like in the '70 and '80? I remember frying parts of my brain with one of those. There was Apple little late to the game as well it seems.
The total lack of inovation and success of Apple in the mobile industry and the currently brillant success of Motorola in this branch
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You are giving credit to the iPhone as being different enough from existing phones. However you are judging the iWatch (if there is such a thing) without knowing anything about it. For all you know the gap between existing "smartwatches" and the "iWatch" will be greater than the gap between then existing smartphones and the iPhone.
Re: (Score:1)
Everyone jumped on the smartwatch game...and then Apple followed.
That's absurd. Watch with higher funktionalities like calculator, PDA or so exist since the '80. There have been multiple models form a lot of different sources that have been released on regular basis. Some companies released a new model a year since 2000. For some reason there has been a recent hype on smart watches, mostly driven by rumors on nonexistent Apple products and by the Samsung Gear release. I wouldn't qualify a media hype on something that has already been there for decades and is well implant
Re: (Score:2)
That's absurd. Watch with higher funktionalities like calculator, PDA or so exist since the '80. There have been multiple models form a lot of different sources that have been released on regular basis. Some companies released a new model a year since 2000.
The thing that makes a smartphone is not calculator and PDA facilities. It's the ability to run third party apps as "first class citizens". i.e. downloadable software that has the same possibilities and UI as the built in apps (so featurephone stuff such as WAP and J2ME doesn't qualify.)
So surely a smartwatch should have the same qualification. Show me a watch that has an app store with full featured apps, and I'll accept it's a smartwatch. Show me a Casio calculator watch and I'll just laugh.
Re: (Score:2)
The thing that makes a smartphone is not calculator and PDA facilities. It's the ability to run third party apps as "first class citizens". i.e. downloadable software that has the same possibilities and UI as the built in apps (so featurephone stuff such as WAP and J2ME doesn't qualify.)
So surely a smartwatch should have the same qualification. Show me a watch that has an app store with full featured apps, and I'll accept it's a smartwatch. Show me a Casio calculator watch and I'll just laugh.
I don't know where your are pulling these definitions out. Did you come with those up yourself? Where's that normativ commity that qualifies what is a smartphone and not? Because last time I checked, the accepted understanding of what a smartphone (or smartwactch) are, are quite a bit broader. And if your think that the smart watches available in the last two decades limit themselfs to have PDA and calculators funktionalities, which were funcitonalities found in the '80, as I clearly mentionned I believe, y
Re: (Score:2)
Definition is from working mostly in the mobile industry since 1997, including on the teams making some of the early smartphones. The smartphone definition is widely misused. But if you look for a distinction between the functionalities of a "featurephone" and a "smartphone", you'll find it is what I told you.
And if your think that the smart watches available in the last two decades limit themselfs to have PDA and calculators funktionalities, which were funcitonalities found in the '80
I merely commented on what you brought up. I'm reasonably aware of the various watches that computer companies have tried since the 80s. Though less so than I am of mobile phones. Nevertheless, I don't
Re: (Score:2)
I consider someone turning to ridicule an action or person based on a obviously and willingly flawed logic a troll, that especially when it is wirtten in a tone like the one you use.
I tried to illustrate how flawed your logic is. I do not care about your opinion and I will never comment or judge an opinion here. But a flawed logic of false statement, I will. If I believe the facts your state are false, I will comment on it. And that is what I did.
Not being able to post on what I believe is a flawed statemen
Re: (Score:1)
Your post is just about as stupid as the Slashdot beta.
You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Beta must die...
Nitpick, it was the Phoenicians who founded Carthage which in software parlance would make this first Carthage the Alpha version. It was the Alpha version that was destroyed by the Romans, not the Beta version. Carthage Beta came into existence when the Romans refactored the whole Carthage project after the fiery destruction of Carthage Alpha. Carthage Beta was eventually destroyed by the Arabs and what remained of it has today been absorbed by the still ongoing and highly successful Tunis project. Hope tha
Not sure what they're doing (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't see going after the market for fitness buffs because there just aren't enough of them who care about heart rates, etc. Everyone who goes to the gym isn't training for a triathlon.
I CAN see going after the chronically ill. That is a huge piece of the US/world population. If you could monitor things like blood sugar, heart rate/rhythm, blood pressure, blood oxygen/CO2 levels,etc., and detect anomalies and sound alarms this thing could be huge. I suppose all the fitness stuff would be a subset of this capability, so you'd get the fitness nuts and the ill with one device.
Knowing Apple, it will probably only work with iTunes, the worst POS software since Windows...
Re: (Score:3)
If it can monitor blood sugar level non-invasively and continuously and can make a iPhone/iPad/Mac do something on set thresholds, i am buying one for my mom, no matter the cost.
I wish you all to never have to witness first-hand a loved one almost dying from an accidental insulin overdose.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't see going after the market for fitness buffs because there just aren't enough of them who care about heart rates, etc.
Yet. Don't forget marketing can make people want a facility they hadn't thought about before.
I don't think they'll go after the chronically ill specifically. I think they'll go for the people that want to be fit, and the people who are concerned about staying healthy. And they'll do that offering the kinds of measurements you mention.
Knowing Apple, it will probably only work with iTunes, the worst POS software since Windows...
It's been a few years since iOS devices have required iTunes. They can do updates, sync, backup, purchase software and media etc online without ever being connected to iTunes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
email, dropbox, and if you have a Mac - iCloud.
Re: (Score:1)
Knowing Apple, it will probably only work with iTunes, the worst POS software since Windows...
You clearly haven't used Samsung Kies .
Re: (Score:1)
Nobody has to use Samsung Kies.
Most Android users don't even know it exists.
iTunes is no longer mandatory to use an iOS device, but it used to be. Kies is outright obscure.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody has to use Samsung Kies.
Obscure or not, it's still a good counterexample to iTunes being "the worst POS software since Windows". Alas. It's also hardly unique. There are times when I hate this industry.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody has to use Samsung Kies.
And nobody has to use iTunes. But many people do use iTunes, because unlike Kies it isn't a piece of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Knowing Apple, it will probably only work with iTunes, the worst POS software since Windows...
I'd go further than that. No iTunes compatibility at all. Requires an iPhone.
Re: (Score:1)
It's Apple. If they use their normal strategy, the product they release will not have every feature that everybody wants. It's going to have 80% of the features that 80% of people want, but done in a very nice way. There will be fitness features, but they will be aimed at the average slob who keeps telling himself he needs to get fitter, not experts. Fitness buffs will complain that it doesn't do X, but they'll end up using it anyway because it's convenient because lots of other things will start integ
hiring now = little progress yet (Score:3, Interesting)
And Here's The Bad News (Score:2)
Why else would they call it that?
Privacy regulations (Score:5, Interesting)
There are all kinds of biosensors available that don't connect to the Internet. An Apple device presumably will.
There is enough concern with the amount of information being collected with an iPhone. Consumers should be cautious about providing their personal health info with Apple. I would only hope whatever information is stored on Apple servers, it is regulated like other HIPAA info. At the least, if Apple needs to be HIPAA compliant and information is breached, big fines and other penalties will/should follow.
Re: (Score:2)
Next up: AppleCare Health Insurances (*)
(*) only people in the intended target population can apply; your iWatch can tell you;
the rest can find themselves another insurance company.
Re: (Score:2)
Man, they are smart... (Score:2)
Disclaimer: I am an Apple product user. I like my iPhone 5. However, I tried and could not like iOS 7 (my primary iPhone is still on 6, and I'll stick with it for as long as possible), and admittedly for a few years I felt about my iDevices about the same as anything else - they serve the purpose, annoy me sometimes, whatever. Mildly ambivalent.
At the same time, I wasn't too excited about wearable computing. Watch-like devices that came out so far seemed to be trying the form factor without actually having
Imagine the marketing angles (Score:2)
Wonder if I should send them my resume. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If this is any example, top tier companies putting together a hit squad don't look at resumes. They first make a key hire by making a can't-say-no offer to a professor at a top univ
A watch that you have to take off and charge? (Score:1)
I am not sure that this will catch on given that iDevices need it every day.
Vapor-wear (Score:1)