Verizon-Branded iPhone 5 Ships Unlocked, Works With Other Networks 100
An anonymous reader writes with this news from Geek.com: "If you're planning to get a new Verizon iPhone 5, there might be a little bonus feature included that neither Apple nor Verizon are keen to admit. As units have started making it out of the stores, it appears that the Verizon version of the device is fully unlocked out of the box and able to connect to any GSM network. Verizon support is apparently confirming to customers that the device is unlocked. At the very least, this doesn't appear to be a mistake. It likely has to do with the way the iPhone's radios are designed along with the implementation of LTE on Verizon. This might make the device a little more palatable to those on the fence about upgrading, especially for anyone that travels."
Re: (Score:2)
But here in the US it makes little difference. What are you going to do?
Sign up for AT&T?
Re:All Phones Ship Unlocked (Score:4, Funny)
Elsewhere?
What, New Mexico or someplace foreign like that?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Most people, U.S. or not, spend most of their time not travelling.
The important difference between U.S. and Europe is that all the networks and phones use GSM. That lowers costs and promotes competition — hence the unlocked phones. When you can move your phone to any network, there's a big market for unlocked ones. With less competition here, carriers can get away with bundling and long-term contracts, which means locked-in phones.
Speaking of which Verizon's network is not GSM. So are these iPhones du
Re: (Score:2)
Well it's GSM/UMTS, and yes, European do have contracts and SIM/NET LOCKs, but one can usually remove the locks easily enough.
Enough people travel, and in Europe, if you want to avoid painful roaming costs, that means swapping the SIM to something prepaid and local.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you're from Europe yourself, or if you are, which country you're from. But there are at least a few countries in EU where locking a phone is prohibited by law and it may actually be an EU directive that prevents that. So in practice, I don't think I've heard of a locked phone now for quite a while.
On the second point, while roaming charges WERE in some cases prohibitively expensive, things are much better now and will continue to improve. Since 2007 there is regulation in effect that forces
Re: (Score:2)
Most people, U.S. or not, spend most of their time not travelling.
The important difference between U.S. and Europe is that all the networks and phones use GSM. That lowers costs and promotes competition — hence the unlocked phones. When you can move your phone to any network, there's a big market for unlocked ones. With less competition here, carriers can get away with bundling and long-term contracts, which means locked-in phones.
Speaking of which Verizon's network is not GSM. So are these iPhones dual-network or what?
You didn't even read the summary, apparently.
TFS:
As units have started making it out of the stores, it appears that the Verizon version of the device is fully unlocked out of the box and able to connect to any GSM network.
Re: (Score:2)
I did read that. You didn't read my question.
Re: (Score:2)
So these are verision phones that are able to connect to any GSM network. So through the magic of logic, they are able to connect over verison's cdma and any GSM network. Doesn't that answer your question if they are dual network? Or was there a hidden question invisble to human eyes?
Re: (Score:2)
And through the further magic of logic, it's a little strange for a company that doesn't use GSM to be selling phones that do. Hence my question and your rather stupid answer.
Re: (Score:2)
You're question didn't make any sense at all. It obviously supports both, and verizion has sold phones for both GSM and CDMA for a long time now. So It wasn't clear what on earth you were confused or excited about.
Re: (Score:2)
You're question didn't make any sense at all.
And yet other people understood it clearly. Please stop trying to prove whatever it is you're trying to prove.
Re: (Score:2)
No, everyone else replied in the same way: TFS explained it pretty well. The only people who understood/understand your question are you and maybe other people who didn't respond.
I'm only replying as much because its just bizarre. I still have no idea what you question really was. my best guess is that it was a rhetorical exclamation of surprise after learning that verizon makes cdma/gsm phones, rather than an actual question.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Speaking of which Verizon's network is not GSM. So are these iPhones dual-network or what?
Yes:
http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html [apple.com]
They just don't work on all LTE bands.
Re: (Score:3)
You can "travel" quite a bit in the US and never leave the US, whereas a similar distance in Europe might consist of crossing the borders of many different countries. If every US state had a different cell company things might be different, but as it stands now you can go coast to coast with the same provider (including Hawaii, Alaska, and Puerto Rico).
Re: (Score:2)
Even if the borders you cross are usually only delimited with a road sign. Often included is also a low speed limit for a couple of hundreds of meters. The only "Europeans" that are used to border controls as a way of life seems to be Brits nowadays.
Re: (Score:1)
What about T-mobile? Or any smaller carriers that use any GSM carriers networks?
Re:All Phones Ship Unlocked (Score:5, Informative)
No, they don't, at least not in most European countries, which is why there are lots of sites that offer 'unlocking' services for specific operators. These include the UK, Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, experience in Austria shows that atypical phones even on a contract are not locked. E.g. data centric phones before the iPhone where heavy duty geek stuff, hence sold in small numbers, hence even on contract the carries didn't bother to produce a locked batch.
Re: (Score:2)
Or do Euro carriers not subsidize phones and have contract early termination fees, as in the US? (in which case there would be no reason to lock them at all)
Re: (Score:2)
In Europe it is common for people to get contracts to just subsidise the phone, but not the data and calls. You often hear people saying "I've bought my high-end phone for 50 Euros", but then pay 20 Euros per month on 24 hour contract, and 40 cents/minute and 20c/SMS. So it is not like in the US that you only get a full package. You can also get full packages in Europe, but once again this is not the rule.
A more economical approach at the moment, at least in Germany, is to buy your own phone at full price
Re: (Score:2)
Re:All Phones Ship Unlocked (Score:5, Informative)
You might want to revise the "everywhere", because phones are certainly sold locked here in the UK.
Re: (Score:2)
And so they are in Canada, too. Maybe "everywhere" really means "Europe"?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure, the last time I looked, the UK was still considered part of Europe ;)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure, the last time I looked, the UK was still considered part of Europe ;)
Not by the French. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also Spain. I know a guy who has a locked Samsung Galaxy S II from Orange España.
Re: (Score:2)
Not true. There are other places where they ship locked, if you buy them on contract. Canada, for example.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It's not just SlashDot. Pretty much all media outlets do a huge amount of what boils down to free Apple advertising.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
iPaid.
Re: (Score:3)
Oh please. I'm an Android user, and I'm not noticing a dearth of Android articles. In any case, this is newsworthy.
Re:Re:What's up with all this iPhone astroturfing? (Score:1)
If you're that bothered about updates for android, you can download and install it manually its no more fuss than getting the update when the manufacturers push it out the door. Besides, unless there is some game changing new feature you can't live without on the new version what's the point in updating anyway? The fool is the person who bases his choice of phone on bullshit.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
This being Slashdot, would it not make sense for there to be more Android articles? Is there just too much Apple astroturfing going on Slashdot or is it just me?
I was just thinking that there is a slightly less iPhone astroturfing on Slashdot compared to the iPhone launch in previous years. In the past you would get 3 or 4 stories in a row on the iPhone here.
So IMHO things are improving.
sellable without contract and without account? (Score:2)
the real question is that if i can go to a verizon store and buy one without having an account and without contract for people like me that don't live in the US but sometimes visits.
i know that you eventually will be able to buy it online and unlocked at the apple store, but for example in Venezuela you can't spend more than 400$ over the internet in a year.
Re: (Score:1)
That has always been possible, you just have to pay the 'off contract' price which is $600-$1000 for an iphone. It is my understanding that these phone usually come unlocked (although make sure you confirm with the store before you pay for it...)
Unlocked or useful? (Score:2)
They gloss over the real point, which is dropping a new SIM into it while traveling so you are always local.
Re: (Score:2)
Well the weird thing is that Verizon is a CDMA network....
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Unlocked or useful? (Score:5, Informative)
Yep it's dual radio. From Apple's offical tech specs page, Verizon model iPhone 5 (A1429) supports:
CDMA EV-DO Rev. A and Rev. B (800, 1900, 2100 MHz);
UMTS/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz);
GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz);
LTE (Bands 1, 3, 5, 13, 25)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm fairly certain. The sim size is different from my iP4, so I can't test it (I'm not willing to chance damaging my old SIM just yet). However, this is an evolution from the "new" verizon iPad, which I did verify would connect with my AT&T GSM SIM just fine (and I used it for the remaining 20 days on my AT&T prepaid) as well as the Verizon LTE network. I was a bit disappointed that the iP5 couldn't do LTE for both V and AT&T bands, but having GSM fall back is nice for use where there is no CDM
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not the iPhone 4. There are two models of iPhone 4 - the GSM (Infineon chipset) and CDMA (Verizon iPhone 4 - Qualcomm chipset). The GSM part is not enabled on the Qualcomm chipset, so it's Verizon-only. (You can tell the difference by looking at the back - the Verizon one lacks all the regu
Open Access rules (Score:5, Informative)
You can thank Google for pushing for Open Access [gpo.gov] rules during bidding for the spectrum:
"(e) Handset locking prohibited. No licensee may disable features on handsets it provides to customers, to the extent such features are compliant with the licensee's standards pursuant to paragraph (b)of this section, nor configure handsets it provides to prohibit use of such handsets on other providers' networks." [bold mine]
Verizon recently got smacked down [gigaom.com] according to these rules and had to permit tethering without a fee.
Re: (Score:1)
AT&T didn't get any of the specturm during the FCC auction that Verizon uses for their LTE network. Remember AT&T is still using 3G data service, just at what they call 4G speeds...
Re: (Score:2)
Right, but AT&T is doing LTE, just as VZW is, on different bands. Their "4G" HSPA+ rollout is much larger than their HSPA+ network, but eventually you'll probably see two pretty strong LTE networks. VZW just has a headstart.
Having the two biggest networks on the same technology is nice - someday, if they both do LTE only (and get rid of their legacy networks) then you could have a multi-band NA handset that you really could take between carriers.
AT&T not having bought any of the new spectrum makes
Presumptious (Score:2)
you're planning to get a new Verizon iPhone
No I'm not.
Even the quality of the copy-and-pastes is declining around here.
How about Sprint? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
No, sprint does not use SIM authentication for LTE
What about the different iPhone 5 models? (Score:4, Informative)
More at the link:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/iphone5-lte-model/ [wired.com]
Is the Wired story incorrect? Is there more to this? Or is "able to connect to any GSM network" totally bogus?
More details here, including this blurb from Verizon:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/09/want-global-lte-roaming-on-iphone-5-dont-buy-it-from-att/ [arstechnica.com]
Perhaps this should read "able to connect to any LTE network that runs on compatible frequencies"?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a huge surprise (Score:4, Informative)
Why would Verizon care? The V phone won't work on almost any other network at LTE speeds, because the antenna/firmware hasn't been tuned to allow it to work on ATT bands. Your minimum contractual commitment is 24 months at $50+/mo, even for high end corporate clients, so $200+1200>>sales price, and if you go anywhere else with the phone you're not using their network so it's like free money.
FWIW, this is identical to the way Verizon iPads are provisioned. I can drop in a Verizon SIM or an AT&T SIM and it works with both carriers (though on the 3G/GSM network for AT&T). It's why I bought the Verizon iPad to begin with.
Of course, you'll have to go cut down a SIM to fit in the !@#@#^ microsim slot if you want to switch.
Odd bit of trivia: did you know that really big corporate clients get unlimited data on the iPhone (well, probably any phone) for $20/mo? Strange but true.
Re: (Score:2)
I find it strange that all phones sold on some plan and subsidised aren't unlocked. In theory having every phone unlocked simply increases the amount of money available to companies as consumers make rash decisions and take their service elsewhere.
I can't magically stop paying my telecom company if I wanted to switch. I would either need to keep paying the monthly rate or buy out the contract at some extortionate amount which covers the cost of the handset + many months worth of now unused calls.
It makes no
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You'd think so. Many "industry" groups have negotiated rates for their members, which are often small shops (1-8 phones), so the only advantage is one of marketing. My current deal is $27/mo per phone plus $20 for unlimited data. That's it - $47/mo. For that I get 200 minutes per phone on my plan in a pool (2 phones = 400 shared minutes, about what we use), 250 texts per phone (neither of us are teenagers), and - as mentioned - unlimited internet.
I just find it odd, given how stingy they are with unlimit
and yet.... (Score:2)
The bastards will NOT unlock any of the iPhone4S phones. Verizon is still scumbags because of this.
Re:and yet.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Sure they will. Call and ask for global-access or something like that. Assuming you've had the phone for more than 60 days, they will unlock it and you can use a SIM card in it to get GSM/3G access when outside the US - simple and easy. They do "claim" that you can't use the SIM card while in the US - that Verizon CDMA will take preference - this may be true - I didn't test it. I sounds like the iPnone5 doesn't have that (potential) limitation. I think the unlock is permanent, or mostly so, since when I upgraded my iPhone4S to IOS6, the first message to pop up on iTunes was 'congratulations, your phone is unlocked now.'
Re: (Score:2)
I did that and it is still locked from US GSM carriers. in fact many people online also have and posted articles about how the Verizon 4S works great in GSM outside the usa, but put in a USA carrier sim and it's "unsupported sim"
SO they refuse to unlock the iPhone 4S, a partial unlock is still not an unlock. And it still makes them scumbags for keeping my personal property hostage.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcwebertobias/2011/12/22/how-u-s-carriers-fool-you-into-thinking-your-iphone-4s-is-unlocked/ [forbes.com]
Forbes article on how verizon is not actually unlocking the iphone 4S
unlock or selectable (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That's a mostly accurate summary of the outwardly visible effects a nontechnical end user who only wants to "surf and talk" might see, but it doesn't quite describe the actual problem. If you know exactly what's going on behind the scenes, there ARE ways to do simultaneous voice + data on Sprint (though most of them require spending more money for thirdparty services and doing an end-run around Sprint itself).
Let's start with voice calls. If you want to terminate a voice call through Sprint, there's exactly
Re: (Score:2)
GSM networks went through the exact same hardware problem 10 years ago when they transitioned from TDMA-based GSM/GPRS/EDGE to WCDMA-based UMTS/HS(D|U)PA(+).
Hmm
My understanding was that UMTS has mostly the same protocol stack as GSM (with a new physical layer) so from the networks point of view there isn't much difference between a phone moving between 2G and 3G than there is with a phone moving between cells. Is that understanding wrong?
Words have meanings (Score:2)
"neither Apple nor Verizon are keen to admit" "Verizon support is apparently confirming to customers that the device is unlocked"
Fuck, why bother?
Over the fence (Score:1)
This might make the device a little more palatable to those on the fence about upgrading
There's no way in hell I'd consider an iPhone an "upgrade."
Amazing (Score:2)
What will they think of next?
I still don't want one.
Did I just read that right?? (Score:1)
One of the worlds newest phones uses *GSM*??
While we sufficiently technically advanced to not require hill beacons for communication are in the middle of deploying 4G...