Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Networking The Internet Apple

Apple Under Fire For Backing Off IPv6 Support 460

alphadogg writes "Apple Computer came under fire for back-pedaling on its support for IPv6, the next-generation Internet Protocol, at a gathering of experts held in Denver this week. Presenters at the North American IPv6 Summit expressed annoyance that the latest version of Apple's AirPort Utility, Version 6.0, is no longer compatible with IPv6. The previous Version, 5.6, offered IPv6 service by default. While home networking vendors like Cisco and D-Link are adding IPv6 across their product lines, Apple appears to be the only vendor that is removing this feature."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Under Fire For Backing Off IPv6 Support

Comments Filter:
  • by JoeMerchant ( 803320 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:10AM (#39693225)

    is all the world will need for the next 20 years, right?

  • IPv7 (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:14AM (#39693253)
    Apple is secretly working on IPv7, where there's just a single light-weight packet type, and is exclusively available on the AT&T backbone (at a premium rate).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:21AM (#39693299)

    The input boxes/fields became to big considering the maximum size/length of an ipv6 address. UI design just doesn't allow such huge elements.

  • Non-sense! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:22AM (#39693301)

    Actually, the expertsare divided on whether IPv4 addresses will be exhaused. There may be many more addresses hidden out there. Before this is properly investigated it is too early to take action on IPv4 exhaustion. The idea that addresses are running out is only scare-mongering spread by the left-wing media. We should focus more on the controversy and less on IPv6 support.

  • Re:IPv7 (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:28AM (#39693335)

    Do those packets have rounded corners?

  • Re:IPv7 (Score:5, Funny)

    by Idbar ( 1034346 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:28AM (#39693337)
    No, they are just pissed that the initial letter is capital. They are probably coming up with iPv6 for Mac.
  • Re:IPv7 (Score:2, Funny)

    by game kid ( 805301 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:34AM (#39693389) Homepage

    Close, It'll be called iPv5, actually. It'll work only with HTML5, and its packets will only support one standard transfer protocol. Google, Mozilla, and Apple disagree on whether it should be HTTP, FTP, or FTTP respectively, even though FTTP [wikipedia.org] is not even a transfer protocol.

    Also it'll make canvas and video faster somehow, possibly through the patent-pending technology called "magic".

  • by TheGratefulNet ( 143330 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:37AM (#39693409)

    you are right. we should 'teach to the controversy'.

    IPv4 addresses are less than 6000 years old. they are our god-given right and no heathen lefty is gonna convince me otherwise.

    USA USA USA!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:45AM (#39693469)

    Yet another reason I'm glad I didn't "upgrade" to OS X Vista, aka Lion.

  • Re:IPv7 (Score:4, Funny)

    by Idbar ( 1034346 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @11:57AM (#39693537)
    Well, if they name it
    the new revolutionary internet Protocol for enhanced experience on devices.

    You could actually claim "iPeed on an iPad".
  • Re:IPv7 (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 15, 2012 @12:10PM (#39693639)

    You joke but the rounded corners make the packets move through the series of tubes better.

  • by udippel ( 562132 ) on Sunday April 15, 2012 @12:39PM (#39693827)

    Inside the facility, who cares?

    Patronizing, are you? What makes you think you may prescribe the type of internal addressing (size of RAM, internationalisation, etc.) to anyone and everyone?
    I for one do care. Be it to work with IPv6 islands in an IPv4 shop, or student and research work. Maybe someone wants the same IP address wherever she goes?

    It can be understood from your post that you say "as long as the Apple box allows a connection; by whichever means and difficulties including eventual downgrades and encumbrances, I will defend its weaknesses to the very end".
    Though you could have said so.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...