Ex-Apple CEO John Sculley Dishes On Steve Jobs 417
digitaldc writes "Here's a full transcript of the interview with John Sculley on the subject of Steve Jobs. It's long but worth reading because there are some awesome insights into how Jobs does things. It's also one of the frankest CEO interviews you'll ever read. Sculley talks openly about Jobs and Apple, admits it was a mistake to hire him to run the company and that he knows little about computers. It's rare for anyone, never mind a big-time CEO, to make such frank assessment of their career in public."
Control (Score:5, Insightful)
His tradeoff was he believed that he had to control the entire system. He made every decision. The boxes were locked.
It wasn't only back then, it's especially true today. I don't know why everyone on slashdot seems to give him a free pass but say DRM, locked-down hardware, restrictions, end user licenses and so on are bad. Apple and Steve Jobs is basically everything that we should be against. Even Windows is open, even if you don't get the source code. Linux is obviously the best choice.
Steve Jobs still is extremely fanatic about having full control in everything. So much for all us geeks who like to play around with the hardware and learn things. If everything back in the day was as closed as Steve Jobs wants it to be now, do you think we geeks could have learned so much ourself? Just to code some simple hello world application you would have needed to buy a "coding" license from Apple. Not really feasible for a 10 year old kid who is just starting to learn programming.
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know why everyone on slashdot seems to give him a free pass
One word: Shiny.
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
When did nerds stop saying "wow, technically impressive" and start saying "ooh, shiny?" I always thought it was the artsy types that went for Apple, not nerds. When did nerds start caring what they looked like or what normal people thought about us or how pretty our computers were? I mean, a cool looking handmade computer case is one thing, but fashion?
Re:Control (Score:4, Insightful)
I wish I could tell you...finding people that are more impressed by what's inside a computer than outside is getting harder and harder.
Re:Control (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's because it matters less each day.
Especially in the lowend segment. Now an inexpensive netbook has enough "oomph" for most users daily tasks. It used to be that even a entry level user would have to check specs to make sure the computer would run whatever software they wanted to run. Now caring about specs and performance is left to high-end gamers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
I think some of the technologies from apple - for example Grand Central Dispatch [wikipedia.org], chunks of WebKit, etc, are very cool bits of tech.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, a cool looking handmade computer case is one thing, but fashion?
Stepping back for a moment, I'm failing to see the difference between the two.
You're attaching value to the pedigree of the object instead of its function. Caring about how the computer case was made instead of the end result isn't really any different from gushing over the designer label on your handbag.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, it is, in my mind at least. the hand-made custom case isn't fashion, it's art. The designer label is just commercial snobbery.
Re:Control (Score:4, Insightful)
When did nerds stop saying "wow, technically impressive" and start saying "ooh, shiny?"
The same geeks never stopped or started.
There's the Linux crowd who prefer openness and always did, believing that the best way to stay on the technological frontier and staying out of bueracracy is to stay open and close to the community.
And then there's the Apple crowd who prefer coherence and functionality whatever the cost. It's not as important to those to always do the very latest hip stuff technology-wise, but the stuff should always work and it should be an ultra-smooth experience that may very well be the result of an iron fist. They also agree with the iron fist's philosophy in design, minimalism, and ease-of-use. There's no reality distortion field. That's an annoying myth. There's an agreement in philosophy though, a philosophy that is miles away both the Linux one and the Windows one.
And then there's Windows. Windows is neither open, on the technological edge, coherent, or well-engineered. So there's no surprise here that it's bashed from both sides.
I don't think many Linux users jump ship to Apple or vice versa though, as you seem to believe.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
When did nerds stop saying "wow, technically impressive" and start saying "ooh, shiny?" I always thought it was the artsy types that went for Apple, not nerds.
About 1998, when the Internet picked up steam and the computing universe became filled primarily with people accomplishing non-computing (ie, not math, engineering, science or data processing) tasks.
Now the computing universe if full of people who apparently "do things" with computers who have no idea how they work, just how to accomplish things with
Re: (Score:2)
It's because the competition sucks so much. The general public want PCs that look nice and just work. It's not just design, it's also.. design.
- most hardware is fugly, or as overpriced as apple stuff
- other OSes and Apps are screwier than Apple's. My WinMob 6.5 phone can't synch mail with my Win7 desktop, and never will... no wonder Apple sounds so polished...
Computers are today's cars... nerds pretend they're looking for cool tech stuff. In truth, they're looking for social recognition and a comfort zone.
Re: (Score:2)
There used to be a time when one person could understand the entire machine. I had a C64. It came with a single instruction manual which described the hardware board, the chip interrupts, and how to program in BASIC (which came built in). Today things are not that simple anymore. This means people are increasingly turned off by computers. Even computer "experts" usually only know a narrow niche. There are few generalists with good all around knowledge.
As computers get more mobile they are also turning mo
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
Let me see if I can explain. I do software development for a living. I used to build my own computers and that used to take a lot of time. Now, all nerds know that the "it just works" mantra of Apple is pretty much bullshit, all computers have issues at some point, but I have to say that I spend far less time screwing around with the OS using OSX on Apple hardware than I did with windows or Linux. It's not that it's trouble free, it's that it's a lot less trouble, in my personal experience. Plus under the hood it's basically UNIX and since I was using UNIX before windows even existed I can use all the shell scripting stuff I learned in the 80's. (yes, I can use it with Linux as well, refer to prior statement). And there is nothing wrong with ascetics either. I appreciate the machined aluminium case of my MBP. I've watched the videos of the CNC machines making the cases, plus the case is exceptionally rigid. If hunting down videos of how the case is machined isn't nerdy, I'd like to know what is.
For me the Mac is the best tool for the job, and the 25% premium I paid over a comparable Windows machine has been more than repaid by the time I didn't spend uninstalling crap ware and dealing with typical window maintenance issues, and for me, using an environment that lets me work how I want to work. There are always going to be a large number of people what buy something because of how it looks. How many people actually take their 335is or M3 to a track for example? Personally I don't really care what anyone thinks of my choice of computer, car, watch, cell phone, whatever. I use what works best for me, and right now that is OS X on Apple hardware. If that changes in the future I will too.
Re:Control (Score:5, Interesting)
Why does every single discussion about Apple on Slashdot has to be so polarized?
Why don't you make any effort to understand why nerds could like Apple products?
I'm a nerd, and I like my Mac Mini because:
* it doesn't consume much power
* Lightroom/Photoshop work flawlessly
* Portal/Counter Strike work
* I have access to a yakuake-like terminal, and I can administrate my Linux servers with ssh+zsh+vim without having to install any third party app on my client. Last time I tried, cygwin & putty terminals on Windows were close to unusable in comparison.
* I know how to build a computer from scratch, install any Linux flavor on it with virtual machines in order to be able to do all the above. Been there, done that, but sometimes I want to get things done instead of experimenting with yet another setup.
* If I want to feel good, I go write some bug reports for Ubuntu or answer newbie questions on forums.
See? I suppose those points could be valuable for nerds, and I didn't mention any "ooooohh, shiny!" factor.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
When Apple started selling certified UNIX, that's when.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know why everyone on slashdot seems to give him a free pass
I don't know what comment threshold you browse at to think that EVERYONE (or even close to that) gives Jobs a free pass.
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
His tradeoff was he believed that he had to control the entire system. He made every decision. The boxes were locked.
It wasn't only back then, it's especially true today. I don't know why everyone on slashdot seems to give him a free pass but say DRM, locked-down hardware, restrictions, end user licenses and so on are bad. Apple and Steve Jobs is basically everything that we should be against. Even Windows is open, even if you don't get the source code. Linux is obviously the best choice.
Not really feasible for a 10 year old kid who is just starting to learn programming.
I think the reason that Apple is so celebrated here is that OS X provides what many long-time Linux users/developers have wanted: a highly functioning unix-like system under the hood with a nice polished user interface.
I do all of my "real work" on Linux systems, but my desktop and laptop are Macs because for most needs, it just works and I get a full bash shell and unix OS when needed. Yes, I pay a premium for that shiny hardware, but for me it's worth it not to have to deal with finding device drivers or re-compiling kernels, and it's nice to be able to view all forms of media, too.
Don't get me wrong. I still believe that Apple's DRM is evil and I wish that ever format was open and non-proprietary. I used to fight that fight when I was younger. But, now that I'm old, working full time, and have a family, I just don't have any energy left to get into fights with my desktop OS just to get some Dora The Explorer video to play for my kids.
Re: (Score:2)
"now that I'm old, working full time, and have a family, I just don't have any energy left to get into fights with my desktop OS just to get some Dora The Explorer video to play for my kids."
My sentiments exactly. Wish I had mod points!
Re:Control (Score:5, Informative)
Ever since Ubuntu came out, I've never had to recompile a kernel or find device drivers myself. I can still view any media I want, have a bash shell, and have a unix-like OS. I was amazed at how the Ubuntu installation found all drivers (even wireless!) for my wife's HP laptop with a Broadcom wireless chip (and that was 3 years ago on a fairly new laptop).
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu installation found all drivers (even wireless!) for my wife's HP laptop with a Broadcom wireless chip (and that was 3 years ago on a fairly new laptop).
Really? Until 10.4 I have always wrestled with wireless drivers for my wife's laptop (uses a broadcom chip). I've been wrestling with broadcom drivers for a decade it seems (then they finally opened their specs).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Over the past seven Ubuntu releases, I've needed to (a) dick about with partitions to allow the upgrade packages to fit in /var, (b) never had an upgrade of X that didn't trash my video and make me dick about with xorg.conf, or (c) dick about with fstab to get the system to recognize existing partitions. And don't get me started on the sound software which only started to work about two releases ago. And even then, the players still have no decent networking interface unless you mount your audio file serv
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't had to find device drivers or recompile kernels for about 5 years now. Perhaps you should just try a modern Linux distribution. If you want to view all forms of media just install VLC. I see people on Windows and MacOS X using it as well.
I have replaced the applications I use on Windows with open source versions. If it wasn't for games I would have left the Windows platform a long time ago.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Somebody earlier this year wrote an article about this very topic: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset [diveintomark.org]
Re:Control (Score:4, Insightful)
If everything back in the day was as closed as Steve Jobs wants it to be now, do you think we geeks could have learned so much ourself? Just to code some simple hello world application you would have needed to buy a "coding" license from Apple. Not really feasible for a 10 year old kid who is just starting to learn programming.
Hmm. Apple provides XCode and examples for free, installs perl, python, and a variety of other programming languages for free by default..
I think you might be mistaken about what Steve Jobs is trying to control. The handset market? Sure.The desktop market? .. Not as much as you'd like to lead us to believe.
There is a thriving home-built plane community (Score:3, Insightful)
...but those guys don't sit around all day and whine that they're not allowed to tinker with the engine on their United Airlines flight.
Your example about software is absurd--you don't have to buy a "coding" license to write hello world on a Mac box. Absolutely absurd. I've compiled open source apps on my MacBook and I never gave Steve Jobs an extra dime for the privilege.
Wanting a phone or a computer that "just works" for nontechnical family members or even myself doesn't make me less of a nerd than you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Control (Score:5, Insightful)
If anything OSX is more open than Windows; the guts are open source (Darwin). It's just higher levels that are closed. On top of that Apple uses and contributes to a number of F/OSS projects to provide things like printing (CUPS), remote file system access (SAMBA), remote shell access (OpenSSH) and lots of others. I'd venture to say that more than 50% of of OSX is F/OSS code and Apple has generally been quite good about working with the projects they use. Apparently there's been some friction with the FSF a few times, but given that Stallman and Jobs are like oil and water...
Say what you want about the closed nature of the iDevices (and personally I like my iPhone, but think the iPad might be to limited ), but the Mac itself is way more open than Windows. It also represents, as another poster pointed out, what I've always really wanted. A reliable, Unix based, workstation with a good user interface, decent library of available commercial software, and capability to use pretty much all the F/OSS stuff I need.
If you want to see what Linux on the Desktop should look like, look no further than OSX. Not the design per se, though I like it well enough, but the way the OS works from a user point of view. In OSX you have a consumer OS. You never, ever have to go to the command line. You do anything you need to configure the computer in any way you need from simple easy to understand GUI tools. You can run all your software without hiccups, dependency issues, or driver headaches. BUT if you want to, and you know how to, you can quickly and easily open a command prompt, use the all the standard Unix tools, script to your heart's content, even install a Linux style package manager and use all the tools available to any of the free *nixes.
Re:Control (Score:4, Interesting)
You never, ever have to go to the command line.
I never quite got why so many people are allergic to command lines. The greatest revolution in the web was reintroducing the command line in the form of the search bar. You can see search based interfaces on everything today including Windows 7 and iOS. Linux systems today are also auto-configuring to such a large extent I seldom have to configure anything at all. I still remember when I had to manually generate the X11 configuration. Today X11 automatically detects everything on startup, from your keyboard, to your graphics card, to your monitor. It also manages to do this with a much wider spectrum of hardware then the small sample MacOS X needs to deal with.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I never quite got why so many people are allergic to command lines.
I love command lines, which is why I love the OSX terminal. Two sentences on from the line you quote I mention that as an advantage. It's great that I can script stuff in Bash and Perl when the GUI tools seem too limited. Note that in most (nearly all) cases though, when I open the terminal to do something, I *could* have done it in the GUI. It was just quicker or more elegant to use the CLI. That's critical because most people wouldn't know how to do it in the CLI.
The one instance I've *ever* encounte
Re:Control (Score:5, Interesting)
Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
Steve Jobs is a minimalist, heavy-handed, hard-driving, design-obsessed prick?!? Not exactly news.
And I'll say it once again. Considering the observation that Sculley makes that MS is all about hiring geeks and smart people and Apple is all about hiring designers and marketers ("Apple is a designers company, not an engineers company," as he says), it still amazes me that MS is so bashed on /. and Apple so celebrated. You would think the opposite would be true here. Are we still longing to sit at the cool kids' table or something, or have we just bought into that "lifestyle" shit too?
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
ven worse, if the company closes the hardware, forces everyone to buy every piece of hardware from them, it is ok, but if someone else tries to support every hardware provider, we call it a close system and we condemn it.
Are these the new type of judgments from technical people nowadays?
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
Quite possibly, actually. (Score:3)
I started using Linux in 1993. This summer I switched to Mac OS X in frustration over usability issues, despite my technical preferences. I'd gladly pay $$$$ for a Linux based system with the integration, polish, and commercial-product-availability of Mac OS.
Unfortunately, such a system doesn't exist and is unlikely ever to exist, which is why I am now a Mac OS user.
For my own part, I believed the "shiny" argument (Score:5, Insightful)
for far too long. I owned nothing Apple and had limited experience with Apple products from about 1985-2008. My biggest experience was with Newton, which I actually liked a lot, but of course that was some time ago.
In late 2008 I got an iPhone 3Gs. The device impressed the living hell out of me in comparison to other smartphones. iPad came out and the same thing happened; my first experience testing one made clear to me that this device was light years ahead of the other tablets I'd owned -- a Vadem Clio, a Fujitsu Stylistic, a Toshiba M200 -- in actual *usability* for general-purpose consumer information tasks.
So this summer I started playing with "hackintosh" OS X distros on a Thinkpad T60, even as my frustration with KDE4 (and the pending switch to Gnome Shell) grew to epic proportions. Within a few weeks it was clear I would eventually switch and the only question was when.
By September I'd become a Mac user with Linux installed on a drive (just because I'd somehow feel naked without Linux around somewhere) but not actually in use for day-day computing at all. With iTerm and Mac ports on Snow Leopard, I have a more stable and serious Unix feeling than I think I've had since the days of SunOS on a Sun 3/80 when I was a CS undergrad. It just feels right. It feels more Unix than Linux did in a surprising way, despite the odd filesystem layout and massive changes in things like the init system.
And the software purchasing ran downhill like a flood. I thought I was an OSS person, but within a month of switching I'd also bought Adobe CS5, Aperture, Office 2008/Mac, and iLife. And using these things seriously makes me regret the years spent coaxing every last bit of life out of GIMP, Gthumb, OpenOffice.org, and so on, not to mention the total absence of things like pervasive drag-and-drop from Linux environments.
Really, it amounts to growing up. I didn't realize how much productivity I lost to the ideological limitations of OSS platforms over the years (and I wrote a number of Linux and OSS books in the '90s and early '00s, so I'm no n00b) until the last few months with OS X.
The /. crowd may hate Apple, but if this were a three-way to-the-death between Microsoft, KDE/GNOME, and Apple, I'd be cheering for Apple all the way. They may be totalitarian, but their totalitarian world is damn near the utopian system that makes totalitarianism okay.
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
I think a large amount of confusion here is the use of the word "Design." Design is mistakenly interpreted by some as the way something looks. Design is actually the way something WORKS (as well as looks). How I interact with a tool can be as important as how well it works.
If you had 2 hammers, one with a rubberized grip on the handle, and another with metal spikes on the handle, I'd choose the rubberized one because it's more comfortable for me to use, even though both can drive a nail effectively. I'll respect everyone's intelligence enough to not continue the metaphor - but you get the idea. When Apple talks about design, they are not talking about making something that looks good and works terrible, they are talking about something that is thoughtful, inside and out.
I would say that Dell actually does more 'flashy" designs designed to catch the eye, but on the inside, it's still the same old rotten crap.
Re: (Score:2)
Closed hardware? Custom *nix systems are very often embedded in custom chips to do very specific things, it's about as closed as you get.
Limited hardware, closed *nix system: Apple.
Varied hardware, open *nix system: Linux
Varied hardware,
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
geeks appreciate good design
How is a phone with an easily shorted antenna good design? How is making what should be a durable object (a phone) with a glass front and back "good design?"
When form doesn't follow function it's not good design. If you'd have said "geeks appreciate a good interface" I'd agree with you.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess geeks don't like VMS then since Dave Cutler, the main guy associated with VMS development, went to MS and oversaw development of Windows NT.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
Obviously Apple isn't "all about hiring designers and marketers". All the designers in the world can't create a working product. That still takes engineers, programmers, etc.
What Apple does is come up with a nice design and have the technical people make it real. Most other companies have the techs make a product then have designers spray perfume on it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
All the designers in the world can't create a working product. That still takes engineers, programmers, etc.
Sorry, but I call BS on this.
I'm not an engineer, but I've designed a lot of products, and have several patents. Don't assume engineers can't design and designers can't engineer. The best people tend to be multi-talented (programmer/musician, engineer/photographer).
I have noticed that a LOT of people attribute their success to their degree, and wrongly assume someone with no degree cannot be successful. I think your "without engineers..." line of thinking smacks of this.
But you are spot-on about most com
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:4, Insightful)
May I remind you that we also celebrate Linux here?
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh FFS leave the antenna alone already. First, it seems the problems is hardly limited to iPhones, other phones demonstrate the same problems, they just don't have to hype and hate built up to make seem like such an issue. Second, there was a relatively straightforward fix within a week or two. Third, point me at a company that hasn't released a product with an engineering flaw. The devices were tested with cases on them, because they didn't them being leaked (lot of good that did). Was it a mistake? Of course. Was it an understandable mistake? Yes. It happens. Apple's initial reaction could have been handled better, but in the end it there was a reasonably painless resolution and they won't make the same mistake again.
No one is saying Apple is perfect. All they're saying is that Apple tends to fit engineering to the design rather than vice versa. It's bit them before (I think is was called the X-cube? Back about 8-9 years ago used to crack at all its joints?) it'll bite them again. It's generally been successful though, and I'd venture a guess that they've had no more engineering disasters than any other major tech manufacturer.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Considering the observation that Sculley makes that MS is all about hiring geeks and smart people and Apple is all about hiring designers and marketers ("Apple is a designers company, not an engineers company," as he says), it still amazes me that MS is so bashed on /. and Apple so celebrated.
That's because Microsoft has been too busy proving the opposite of the infinite monkey theorem: "Thousands of smart geeks typing on thousands of typewriters for an infinite amount of time will almost surely create the shittiest piece of work known to man."
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Funny)
I think you just succinctly described /.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ignoring your blatant trolling there, Apple may not be perfect, but they are certainly not as evil as M$. Apple wants you to use their hardware, they don't force you to use their software, which I'm ok with. Microsoft on the other hand tries as hard as they possibly can
Re: (Score:2)
I have a two word response to that: App Store.
Re: (Score:2)
The App Store is overwhelmingly dominated by non-Apple software.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
But Apple has to approve it or you can't use it.
And, BTW, since when has MS "forced" me to use Windows or any other MS application? Last time I checked, I'm free to install whatever OS I want on my computer. I'm free to install whatever apps I want in Windows too. When Netscape was suing MS in the 90's, even they acknowledged that MS never tried to block anyone from installing Netscape (or any other browser) in Windows--which they could have. I've never once had MS tell me I *had* to use any of their softwa
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
As much as I don't like Apple, you're comparing the wrong things. You can also install whatever you want on the Apple computers you buy. You can even install Windows on the Mac now.
With the new Windows Phone 7 phones, there's probably going to be an app store and no sideloading, just like the iPhone. And because of that I have an Android phone instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
But Apple has to approve it or you can't use it.
Apple has to approve every OS X application? Since when has this been true? Oh wait you're talking about iOS which is a different area than their desktop. And BTW, MS has decided to used the walled garden approach with Windows Phone 7 so your point is moot.
. When Netscape was suing MS in the 90's, even they acknowledged that MS never tried to block anyone from installing Netscape (or any other browser) in Windows--which they could have.
Were you following the same antitrust trial I was following?
Then there's the Java. Among other things, Intel wanted to develop a JVM for Java on their processors. MS hinted that AMD would get "preferential" treatment in their next version of Windows if Intel did that.
I've never once had MS tell me I *had* to use any of their software. There have always been competing OS's and applications, and no computer manufacturer has ever blocked them (nor has Windows ever blocked applications that competed with Internet Explorer, Office, etc.).
You know when I tried to load Mozilla onto my Mac it plain refused to work. VLC doesn't work either. MSN Messenger is completely nonfunctional. OpenOffice does nothing--Oh wait--none of that is true--they all work.
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:4)
Yeah, that's bullshit — I have a metric crapload of UNIX apps on my Mac.. Oh wait, you're talking about native apps in iOS? But you can't be, because then you go on to babble about desktop computers. Conflating the two would lead to a comment from me about the XBox, but that would be too easy.
They don't — in fact, they can't, since they don't make the computers. However, 90 of the PCs you order have it already installed, which means that you've paid for Windows whether you use it or not, so why would they care at that point?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ignoring your blatant trolling there, Apple may not be perfect, but they are certainly not as evil as M$.
Would you like to back that up? So far your defense is, "I like Apple, so they're less evil, and when they do bad things, it's because I deserve it or for my own good.", which makes you one black eye from Steve Jobs away from being the basis of a Lifetime movie of the week.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Steve Jobs is a minimalist, heavy-handed, hard-driving, design-obsessed prick?!? Not exactly news
In your professional assessment, you forgot "turtleneck-wearing"...
What I find interesting is that his followers are materialistic, light-handed, lazy, status-obsessed pricks.
Not quite the opposite, but tangential in some ways.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, the whine of someone who can't afford something.
I couldn't give a damn about status or materialism. I don't buy designer labels or expensive watches, and don't even own a car any more. But when it comes to computing, I want the best tool for the job, and because I haven't been lazy, I can afford it. For about 7 years now, that's meant buying Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, the whine of someone who can't afford something.
I couldn't give a damn about status or materialism. I don't buy designer labels or expensive watches, and don't even own a car any more. But when it comes to computing, I want the best tool for the job, and because I haven't been lazy, I can afford it. For about 7 years now, that's meant buying Apple.
Actually, it was meant as a joke. Perhaps my subtle sarcasm about the "professional assessment" and "turtleneck" wasn't enough. I actually own an iPhone 4, iPod, and have a Mac mini at home. I also own a few Windows machines. Both machines have their strengths, but Apple is the #1 pusher of their products as a status symbol.
The reason why I purchased an iPhone 4 after my Blackberry was the email support. As a sysadmin, I push Blackberry at work because of the exchange, vpn, and admin functions. The reason w
Re:Not exactly a revelation (Score:5, Informative)
Steve Jobs is a minimalist, heavy-handed, hard-driving, design-obsessed prick?!? Not exactly news.
And I'll say it once again. Considering the observation that Sculley makes that MS is all about hiring geeks and smart people and Apple is all about hiring designers and marketers ("Apple is a designers company, not an engineers company," as he says), it still amazes me that MS is so bashed on /. and Apple so celebrated. You would think the opposite would be true here. Are we still longing to sit at the cool kids' table or something, or have we just bought into that "lifestyle" shit too?
Well, there is more to the interview than that, although I'd say yours is a fair summary. Still, I'd recommend everyone RTFA, it's an interesting, deeply personal account of the way Jobs works, and the reasons for Apple's phenomenal success. It is even more interesting how Jobs has changed in the past few years compared to Scully's account. One point that stands out in this interview is Jobs rejection of looking at anything the competition does, or others do in general. Yes, he had his own heroes like Akio Morita and SONY, but generally he was far less obsessed with what others do than today.
His attack on Android in the latest quarterly earnings press conference was positively hysteric:
"We think Android is very, very fragmented"
"We think integrated will trump fragmented"
"... we will triumph over Google's fragmented approach"
"...where PCs have the same interface, Android is very fragmented
The new bogeyman: fragmented FRAGMENTED FRAGMENTED!!!
There's a nice spin in there. At any given time, all important apps will be present in all markets (or at least the top three markets). What really happens here is that markets are actually forced to compete with each other a) for developers b) for users (markets that would demand exclusivity would simply die, even if anyone was stupid enough to pull something like that). This is good news for everyone, and the antithesis of everything Apple stands for. No matter how much he SJ tries to spin it, fragmentation is not a problem. Here's another real jam, the app itself (TweetDeck) was discussed earlier here on Slashdot.
"Twitter client, Twitter Deck [sic], recently launched their app for Android. They reported that they had to contend with more than 100 different versions of Android software on 244 different handsets. The multiple hardware and software iterations present developers a daunting challenge." Steve Jobs
Here is what the developers had to say about Jobs' remark:
Did we at any point say it was a nightmare developing for Android? Errr nope, no we didn't. It wasn't."
Indeed I recall reading their blog post about this, and the tone was more along the lines of "look how cool it is that TweetDeck runs on the craziest, wackiest combinations of ROMS and hardware. Looking at the list, it's amazing indeed (10 NOKIA N900, and even a few iPhone 3GS ... wtf?).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple products (if they existed at all) would be sold out of 1969 Volkswagen vans by couples with long hair and beards (male and female). The products would be powered by solar cells created out of fair trade hemp.
They would boot up using a special floppy.
There would be no iPod.
Bill Gates would be Sauron and Steve Ballmer would be Saruman.
You will be eaten by a Grue.
It's the Woz legacy (Score:3, Insightful)
Why is apple so celebrated? Girls (Score:2, Insightful)
Girls like Macs and Ipods and iphones. The nice thing about girls with macs is they dont bother you asking for free tech support since they rarely
need it and when they do they go to the apple store. They love their macbook with the same intensity as they love their cats. If a girl lets
you touch her macbook you know you are in a serious relationship. If a girl shows you her macbook she is expecting a compliment like complimenting
her shoes or her dress, it is not a random piece of technology for her it is a l
Re: (Score:2)
I agree; this may sound like a shallow idea of why Apple is so popular, but there is little disagreement that women care more for style and fashion than men. I think this has been a driving force for several thousand years during evolution, in order to maintain healthy homes and so on (evolution doesn't care for the current trends in gender equality politics). Heck, the biological differences go so far as to make women more sensitive to smells. So it's not just esthetics.
So I also think that Apple gain a qu
Re: (Score:2)
Apple, unlike Microsoft, sometimes brings some pretty good pieces of ideas to market. Their products aren't anything I'd want, but they are fascinating and inspiring technological previews.
Take the iPhone. People have long known that really neat phones will be on the market any-day-now (whenever the hell that'll be) but the iPhone really showed that some day, someone really could make a phone that doesn't suck. It's not a mere idea any
Level of Perfection (Score:2)
So what the hell happened with System 7 and then OS 8? So much for "perfection."
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Level of Perfection (Score:4, Informative)
So what the hell happened with System 7 and then OS 8? So much for "perfection."
When he came back to Apple in '97, he put OS Classic on death row, but he had to keep it alive because it would take six years to develop a stable, workable version of OS X out of NeXT's OS and there were no alternatives to bridge those years and there was a bunch of software to support.
The height of CEO arrogance (Score:2)
Just because Sculley didn't know about computers at the time, he assumes that nobody did?
Bloomberg video of Apple's history (Score:5, Interesting)
Bloomberg recently posted a 48 minute video of Apple's history here [bloomberg.com]. A lot of Sculley's interview comments made it into this video as well.
Better standards breed better products (Score:5, Insightful)
These standards create better products that are deemed superior. Once that catches on, then others trying to compete will HAVE to match those standards in order for them to sell. This is a good thing for everyone. For example, Japanese cars were (and some still argue are) far superior than US cars. In order to stay in business US car manufacturers HAD to improve their design and quality standards to even compete with the Japanese. Now, US cars are much better quality than they were in the 70s, 80s and 90s and this is a good thing for everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
These standards create better products that are deemed superior. Once that catches on, then others trying to compete will HAVE to match those standards in order for them to sell. This is a good thing for everyone. For example, Japanese cars were (and some still argue are) far superior than US cars. In order to stay in business US car manufacturers HAD to improve their design and quality standards to even compete with the Japanese. Now, US cars are much better quality than they were in the 70s, 80s and 90s and this is a good thing for everyone.
While we are at cars, lets take the analogy a bit further. What if American manufacturers, instead of competing and trying to improve their products, started litigating against Japanese companies, asking the courts to ban imports of cars with infringing technologies. What if the courts granted their requests. Fast forward to today's patent wars. APPLE wants HTC gone from the US market. Nevermind that HTC was first one of the first companies to develop wireless touch devices, and that they designed the Palm
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My personal view... (Score:5, Insightful)
I dislike Steve Jobs a ton, I dislike the overly proprietary nature of Apple devices, I dislike most of my alternative options more. I've been into Linux since 1995, I've been in IT even longer, I appreciate open standards and things that work properly and freely. My next laptop and computer? Macbook Pro and an iMac. This coming from someone who has built computers since the 386 days.
I can still run Windows or Linux on them, they are solidly built with all of the features I need, real battery life on the MBP, iLife which is perfect for my photos and music hobby work, my graphics apps run better, no antivirus/malware/B.S. All this comes at about a few hundred dollar premium, but the time not spent delousing an infection here and there over a few years alone makes up for it.
The problem is that I used to love to hack and play and even if things were kludgy or inelegant, they worked. As I've gotten older I really don't need 4,000 choices, I just want one that works like it should the first time and every time. Does that mean I'd ever think of renting movies/TV from Apple or play into any number of their lifestyle and hip and trendy stuff? No. It's simply the right tool for the job for me and denying it for image or trend reasons is silly. If a purple hammer sunk a nail each and every time on the first blow, I'd happily use the purple hammer.
Incorrect details (Score:5, Informative)
He's also wrong on many details. The one that's most jarring to me is:
"... Herman Hauser, who had started Acorn computer over in the U.K. out of Cambridge university. And Herman designed the ARM processor, and Apple and Olivetti funded it."
Herman Hauser was a VC. He was one of the people who set up Acorn, but he didn't design the ARM CPU. The ARM CPU was principally designed by Sophie Wilson (instruction set) and Steve Furber (hardware architecture). Herman Hauser bankrolled it, he didn't design it.
Re:Incorrect details (Score:4, Insightful)
Here is where the geeks (engineers, programmers, etc) don't see the viewpoint of the suits (marketers, C-suite people).
He PAID for it, so it is HIS, all the work is HIS. HE did it, 'cause he financed it.
That is just how suit-thinking works, and it is why geeks and suits are never going to see eye-to-eye on IP.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
CEOs (Score:2)
It's rare for anyone, never mind a big-time CEO, to make such frank assessment of their career in public."
That's not true, but it does reflect the media's obsession and perception of CEOs are rock stars, even using the reference to conjure the image of larger than life these people who head companies.
Frankly the truth is that business media, which is rarely actually news oriented (as in novel events and objective reporting; versus press release regurgitation), doesn't actually investigate the non-celebrity business leaders. In the present day United States they are mostly limited to privately held corporations,
RTFA (Score:3, Interesting)
Atleast slashdot editors should RTFA
This is for all the folks who aren't going to RTFA
- When Sculley says it was a mistake to hire "him" - he means it was a mistake to hire Sculley
- Sculley doesn't diss on Steve Jobs in the interview.
- The whole interview is a love poem about Jobs by Sculley.
Power PC Processor (Score:4, Insightful)
I think it is a bit unfair to call the choice of the Power PC processor a mistake. At the time the 68K family was running out of gas and Motorola and IBM were pouring lots of money into the development of the RISC processor. RISC is a confusing acronom. What's important about RISC ISN'T the limited instruction set, but the fact that the small instruction set allows hardwiring of the processor rather than having to use a rom driven micro sequencer and lots of micro code. As Moore's law progressed and more transistors could be stuffed onto a chip you could build a CISC processor the same way. As a result the advantage the PPC had was slowly eclipsed and Intel's x86 designs pulled ahead. But there was a window of time where the PPC was a more powerfull choice. And Apple was in that window.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
He meant himself: Sculley admits it was a mistake to hire Sculley to run the company.
Re: (Score:2)
He is admitting that Steve Jobs made a mistake hiring John Sculley.
Apple never hired Steve Jobs, they bought his company (Next).
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
...but given this statement:
I find it very difficult to believe that the man who has presided over Apple's astonishing march back into relevancy over the last couple decades could possibly be labeled "a mistake".
RTFA - he refers to himself, not Jobs.
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
As seems pretty typical of large corporations one person at the top takes credit for the brilliance of innovator's below.
Re: (Score:2)
Where were all those innovators below before Jobs took over?
I take it you also blame all the un-named employees at Enron for that company's failure?
Re: (Score:2)
Sure that sentence is ambigiuous.
But the ambiguity resolved in the very next sentence. And if you know about the "march back into relevancy" then it should be clear which of the possible meanings are actually intended.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So Scully says exactly what you said, but he needs to STFU and let the anonymous cowards have their voices heard?