Hackers Finally Unlock iPhone 3G 186
nandemoari quotes a story at Infopackets:
"2009 has gotten off to a great start for a team of iPhone enthusiasts with little regard for Apple's licensing requirements. They've finally figured out a way to get the phone to work with any cell phone carrier (and not just AT&T). The iPhone Dev Team is best known for their work on 'jailbreaking;' the technique of altering an iPhone so that you can run any applications on it, not just those approved by Apple. Given the company's questionable vetting policy for entry to the official App store, it's not surprising many users approve of jailbreaking."
Finally (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm hoping we can get Android fully running (including supporting all hardware devices) on it.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, Android has been made able to support all the features of the iPhone (or so it seems), just need some crafty driver developers now.
Re:Finally (Score:5, Informative)
Except for a multitouch screen. And Android doesn't support Bluetooth any better than Apple's nearly worthless level of support.
What exactly do you even have in mind when you say "all the features"? Because the features of the iPhone that are novel are not supported in Android, and those that are nothing special. What sets the iPhone apart is mainly its user interface, its software store, its smart integration into iTunes/iPod stuff. Android offers none of those things. It give users a DIY-UI, a software "store" without security, merchandising, or sales, and no PC connectivity.
Google's Android Platform Faces Five Tough Obstacles [roughlydrafted.com]
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Apologies, I had misread regarding Android's capabilities for multitouch. And when I said features, I was of course talking about the hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually I like all the "lacks" of Android except the user interface part, but I'm sure it will improve, it's the first version damnit ..
Re: (Score:2)
Why on earth would you buy an iPhone to run Android on it?
(I'm not saying "use OS X it's much better", I wonder why one would consider Apple hardware if Android is the choice. It's like buying a Macbook for Windows or a Mac Pro for Linux (Yeah I know plenty of reta... err.. casual users do that.))
Re: (Score:2)
I can use Opera Mini on my iPhone.
Unlocking an iPhone has nothing to do with that. To quote the introduction to the article:
They've finally figured out a way to get the phone to work with any cell phone carrier (and not just AT&T). The iPhone Dev Team is best known for their work on 'jailbreaking;' the technique of altering an iPhone so that you can run any applications on it, not just those approved by Apple.
"Finally, I can use Opera Mini on my iPhone" would be a response to jailbreaking an iPhone, not to unlocking one.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, huh? Since when is there a version of Opera Mini for the iPhone?
Re: (Score:2)
i can ride my bike with no handle bars...
Re: (Score:2)
... I can keep on ignoring the iPhone and wait until I can get an Android phone internationally such as the Kogan one.
Sure Android don't look nearly as polished but atleast if offers potential, can be hacked and tweaked with less issues and will likely offer me a better phone than the one I bought two years from now..
Apple seem to do decent user interface guidelines but that's kind of it. I could have said applications but most of them is so very limited I won't.
Re:Finally (Score:5, Informative)
Um, you should probably watch the iPhone Dev Team's recent presentation at CCC [google.com] if you want to sound like you have any idea what you're talking about. This wasn't some simple privilege escalation coming out of a buffer overflow in the web browser. Apple signs the shit out of every binary on the phone. The kernel won't execute a binary in userland unless it's signed; the firmware loader won't execute the kernel unless it's signed; the low-level bootloader won't execute the firmware loader unless it's signed.
The iPhone 3G is a paragon of embedded device security, at least by way of making sure unapproved code doesn't run on the device, and it's a testament to just how amazing the iPhone Dev Team guys are that they actually found a way to (a) defeat the whole chain of trust in the iPhone firmware in order to jailbreak it. This by the way doesn't even take into account their real genius, the hack into the baseband firmware for the S-Gold radio device, which executes code in its own universe, completely separate from the S5L application processor.
In short, this hack wasn't some bunch of script kiddies having a sleepover and cracking the copy protection on Arkanoid 2 for the C64. This was a brilliant circumvention of some of the tightest security ever found on a PDA or mobile phone. So please don't disrespect the people who made it possible.
This is also an excellent case study (Score:5, Insightful)
In why DRM is retarded. As you say, this is some of the tightest security ever found. Yet, it has been broken by some very smart people. Such is the fate of any DRM that is sufficiently widespread that smart people care to go after it. You can be as clever as you like with your DRM scheme, you are going to find someone as clever as you will likely break it.
Also annoys me since I think some of these technologies are a good idea, if they weren't implemented in an assholish way. Code signing, for example. I really like the idea as a potential security measure for users/administrators. When I download Firefox, the fact that it is signed by Mozilla gives me a pretty high degree of certainty that it is legit, safe code. It's not 100%, of course, someone could break/steal their certificate, or someone inside could sign bad code, or my system could be compromised, but it is a good additional check. Also if anyone trys to break something like that, I'll say they are up to no good.
However when it is implemented in this "You may only run things we bless," well then you are being a jerk. People are going to break it because they want to be able to run their own stuff.
Personally I think Apple should have gone the route of having store with signed code but allowing unsigned code. If you install a signed app from their store, it installs with no question. If it is another app you get a "Warning, this code is unsigned and could be unsafe," box with a button for more info. Ask for more info and it explains that Apple has looked at signed apps and decided they are ok and aren't going to mess up your phone. They haven't looked at unsigned apps so they don't know, and if it messes up your phone they can't really help you.
Yes, that would mean people could have apps that'll mess up your phone... You know just like every other smart phone out there. Doesn't seem to have killed that market, I don't think it'd kill the iPhone.
Fortunately, there are people like this that will break their DRM, so you can use it as you wish.
Re:This is also an excellent case study (Score:5, Interesting)
To be fair, at least for the iPhone itself, the DRM wasn't very good. Apple used the same S5L processor and encryption key set on both the iPhone 2G and iPhone 3G. With the iPhone 2G at launch, everything ran as root and a trivial Safari exploit could be used to remote execute code as root - being able to run that code allowed key retrieval. Since Apple did fix the root security issues with iPhone OS 1.1.3 and later with all applications now running as the very limited user Mobile, but since they did not change the keys for the 3G it was not very hard (in the scale of breaking DRM at least) to crack open the firmware of the iPhone 3G and jailbreak that too. The iPhone's primary hardware should not be considered a strong DRM platform because Apple did not properly implement it before it was broken for good.
This of course does not apply to the S-Gold radio; that was completely changed between the iPhone 2G and iPhone 3G, and the Dev Team beating that is indeed an amazing hack. Never the less, it took them 5-6 months to break it, which is actually rather remarkable. This was another case where Apple learned its lesson, as the 2G's radio was not properly secured, either.
Futhermore, if you want to look at an iPhone device properly secured, look at the iPod Touch 2G. Apple did change the keys that time, and so far it has not been possible to break it for 4 months. At a bare minimum, a remote code execution exploit and a local privilege execution exploit must be found in the Touch in order to have a chance at capturing its keys, and that's just to decrypt the firmware. We have no idea what other surprises are on the Touch since no one has made it that far yet.
I'm not entirely convinced that it's impossible to build an unbreakable device. DRM has been getting better over the years, the Xbox 360 still doesn't have a way to execute unsigned code (without hardware modification), for example.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is also an excellent case study (Score:4, Insightful)
How well would it reflect on Apple if some of their most popular apps were unsigned ones?
DRM might actually work for iPhone (Score:5, Informative)
If you watch the video, you'd see the only reason they're able to break it is because the bootrom (initially run by the hardware) is modifiable yet not signature checked. I suppose that's because they want to be able to upgrade the bootrom but signature checking is only implemented in software and not hardware. All the NOR and NAND flash memory and the processor is built inside an integrated chip, so it is possible that future revisions of the chip will also integrate a TPM to verify the signature of bootrom. Let's suppose Apple will do that. You will then have a completely working DRM framework on the iPhone.
TPM doesn't work on PC because you always have access to hardware without TPM, allowing you to run whatever you want and patch the software that requires TPM such as the hackintosh Mac OS X. However, for the iPhone, you can only buy the hardware from Apple that always has TPM on it (or settle for a previous generation iPhone without TPM). The whole point of iPhone craze is that you want to buy iPhone made by Apple, and all the restrictions follow from that, including choice of carrier and applications you can run.
Do you have any means to verify that Firefox certificate is signed by someone you could trust? I could generate a certificate that looks like it's issued by Mozilla, and then sign a tempered copy of Firefox with it. Even if you can verify the mozilla.org certificate, the chain of trust ultimately leads to a root certificate that you must trust. Are you really sure that VeriSign or Thawte or other certificate issuing institutions cannot be compromised? I remember a past Slashdot story about one of the root issuer happily generating certificate for any domain name without verification.
If you have to use Apple's iPhone, your freedom is already automatically compromised, if not now, sooner or later.
Re: (Score:2)
Certificates don't do away with the fact that eventually you have to trust someone, and no one said that they did.
Re:This is also an excellent case study (Score:4, Insightful)
If people paid for everything they got, and there was no piracy -- there wouldn't be DRM.
Nope. See DVD region codes, which are used to create market segmentation and remove first sale rights. And DRM would still be used to create lock-in and artificially cripple devices so that you have to pay the provider for functionality that you could normally add yourself.
I'm not attacking you here, just the idea that Apple's doing something dumb by protecting their assets and their market. That's capitalism for better or for worse.
DRM backed up by laws like the DMCA is not capitalism; it's a removal of our property rights.
Re: (Score:2)
"What we pay for is convenience. It doesn't just cost money, it costs your rights as well."
Giving up rights for convenience... sigh. Thats a road full of landmines.
One didnt have to give up rights to buy a CD in the same way one has to give up the right to dl a song. Well you say this is a fair trade for convenience, and I'm not sure thats the case.
Convenience, is having the ability to do whatever you want with the music/movies that you buy. I wouldnt consider DRM a convenience. I just dont see it as "givin
Re: (Score:2)
All of what you are saying would make ethical sense in the absence of the DMCA. That is, they sell what they want, we buy what we want. They encrypt the DVD so that it can be region-locked, we acquire hardware and software that either ignores the region coding or strips the CSS.
That was before the DMCA, however. Now, the situation has changed, because we have laws that make it illegal to break encryption *regardless* of whether or not fair use provisions apply.
That's the part that I don't understand: how th
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You know, I'm really tired of explaining how this works over and over and over again. So here's the short version:
You're wrong. Completely. You're either a shill for the music industry, or you're an idiot who drank their kool-aid. They may try to t
Re:Finally (Score:5, Interesting)
And to add to this, they explicitly say they don't want any donations.
We've seen some comments about you lovely people wanting to donate money to us. We'd just like to say that we DO NOT accept donations. There is no paypal account associated to us, there is no way to donate to us, we do this as a hobby and don't want to be paid and we fund all of this ourselves and it works out just fine.
Anyone who says "donate to DevTeam" in our name is lying, so don't send them anything, you'll just fund their crack habit.
Keep your dough for the lovely shiny Apple products, we think you'll need it.
If you do want to send us something, please send a scan of a postcard from your city, handwrite a nice message scan it and sent it over to blog@iphone-dev.com
http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/41744653/donations-to-dev-null [iphone-dev.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, no.
(as they say)
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, what have they got. A free (as in freely usable) iPhone. But still an iPhone. Who the fuck seriously wants that piece of shit (old but funny) [thebestpag...iverse.net]?
Re: (Score:2)
Good post.
Hopefully the sophistication of this community and the hopelessness of DRM will further encourage those who make decisions about DRM to abandon this sinking ship. Anyone with a brain knows that all DRM can eventually be circumvented, and that there is no such thing as perfect security - thus, it makes much more sense to come up with a cooperative model that works with the community of users. I am not saying that anything goes, but what I am saying is that if Apple were to embrace the enthusiast co
Re: (Score:2)
Running Opera Mini requires jailbreaking the phone, i.e. finding a buffer overflow. The original jailbreak exploit was in Safari. My point was that if they'd have used Opera in the start there was less chance of finding something like this.
This exploit SIM unlocks the iPhone which requires cracking the radio, which is something else entirely.
Actually the best thing to have done would have be to allow people to run whatever browser they wamt but SIM lock the radio for subsidised phones but leave it unlocked
Re: (Score:2)
This is bad for Apple and the operators because it means people can buy a phone subsidised by AT&T, unlock it and use it on another operator. AT&T loses around $200 in subsidy each time this happens.
The original iPhone was unlocked in (I think) early 2008. They must have learned their lesson with the 3G because you couldn't get one of those without activating it in-store. But now it's the same as the original and you can activate it at home. I'm guessing that it was annoying customers because now the activation for the 3G is the same as the original (at home, with iTunes).
This was all following techniques using SIM-cloning devices, however. Those will always be around.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually..I think the Tivo has been opened for a LONG time...
Do some reading on this forum, best one out for tivo hack stuff [dealdatabase.com].
Just googling a bit..found this too: a related article for DRM off the tivo [engadget.com]
Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
I can't wait to put Windows Mobile on my 3G!
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
At the very least, a wine environment.
What?
Re: (Score:2)
At the very least, a wine environment.
What?
No wine! Beer [hottrix.com] please!
Is it worth it? (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been thinking about one, but:
a)How do you get around activation at purchase time?
b)Does Apple break this later on, especially when I need it?
I could buy a legally unlocked iPhone from Hong Kong, but it costs $700+. In the unlocked countries, Apple prices it through the roof, I suppose. Although there has been talk about a prepaid version here for some time...
Re: (Score:2)
That's an easy one...you buy it used on eBay, Craigslist, etc.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't imagine the odds of someone selling their new iphone 3g while still under contract. Wouldn't the odds of such a thing for sale being hot be incredibly high? Those things have serial numbers (SSIDs) that they will need to activate the phone wherever so if you do get a hot iphone you probably won't have it for long.
Re: (Score:2)
So they cancel their account, pay the termination fee, and keep the phone. At this point they can sell the phone for a profit if they want.
Re: (Score:2)
But the "early termination fee" is going to be ugly. Add that to the cost of the phone to begin with, and either it won't sell cheap, or if it does, it's hot.
Re: (Score:2)
It generally will not sell cheap, as the auctions on eBay show. Buyers will pay a premium to get an iPhone sans contract to unlock and use on the carrier of choice. Also, the early termination fee only applies if you cancel service entirely. I just canceled my data plan and went back to my RAZR, no termination fee required since I kept the voice service. Now I also had my service for four months so that may have been a factor.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like a very good deal. One question: is the prepaid locked to O2 somehow? The only prepaids I'm used to are the cheap ones like tracfone, which are locked to the carrier for life (but they're $10 phones to begin with).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you need to go back and read the article summary again.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
If one wants to be an app junkie, by something that runs the Android. That way one cdan not only run any app available, but can write personal custom apps. This has never been the case with Apple, so is a non issue. When the iPhone came out is had no apps. When apps
Re: (Score:2)
What to do when it finally breaks...
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you want to combine an iPod with a not terribly useful phone you're wasting your time (and money). The iPhone is not multitasking so app switching (which always needs to go via the "home" screen) means unloading one app and loading another making it dog slow. I use a Sony Ericsson P1i and after 3 weeks of iPhone I use the Sony again as it's much faster for what I need it for - the iPhone is now only a form of non-RIM crackberry (mine's from work). The whole UI is far overrated, it doesn't even hav
All comments on this story (Score:3, Funny)
I'll summarize every comment on this story, which will be of two types:
1) OMG APPLE IS TEH EVILZ, SUPAR CLOSED. Information wants to be free!!1 All things apple fail, apple will close all business and lose EVARATHING coz I think they suxxor even though I would never try it!
2) Apple is heaven and they're just doing this for your own protection, it saves you and gives a you a better phone experience! Now suck on Stevies cock like a good little bitch.
There are 3 type of comments, not 2 (Score:3, Funny)
The 3rd type is the comment about other peoples stereotypical comments.
There are 4 type of comments, not 3 (Score:2)
There are 5 type of comments, not 4 (Score:2)
Our FIFTH type of comment... No, AMONGST our types of comments... I'll come in again.
Rather than linking to some random blog... (Score:5, Informative)
Why not link to http://blog.iphone-dev.org/ [iphone-dev.org] themselves ?
Oh wait ... this is /.
My Bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
We NEVER link to the most appropriate site for the story, that's what digg is for.
Re: (Score:2)
Whippersnapper!
Get off my lawn!
- From the guy with a uint16 uid
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You must be new here.
Reading TFA?
LOL!
Trusted Computing (Score:5, Interesting)
Trusted Computing used to be treated as one of the most evil things here on Slashdot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgFbqSYdNK4 [youtube.com]
The appstore (where Steve decides what is trustworthy and what is not, to quote the video) sold the "I am rich"-app for cryin' out loud. Among a bunch of other crap. Other apps that are very useful are not given a chance and won't run.
Re: (Score:2)
The number one seller is iFart, which was raking in over $10,000 per day for a while. It's still #1, so it's obviously continuing to pull in massive amounts of money.
Re: (Score:2)
It also PULLED the I am rich app, sticking to their policy of deciding what's appropriate and what's not. Don't forget to leave out that little detail; you might not like them taking that responsibility/power upon themselves, but they DO do it rather consistently. They're not perfect, clearly, which is why the app made it to the store at all.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm curious what you think about your siblings' iFart comment.
Why most people unlock... (Score:3, Insightful)
So just running unapproved apps is not the reason for the unlock. The reason is so one can take their locked phone and use a different carrier. A great example is so I can use Kyivstar in Ukraine while traveling (or any other GSM/GPRS provider) and not pay thousands of dollars to roam from ATT while in Europe. Instead pay 50-60 USD and buy a local prepaid SIM. BTW. They sell at most airports. So if traveling, research first before you pay 75 dollars to have a 10-15 dollar SIM card kit mailed to you in the US.
And as this is BETA software, be patient while the bugs are worked out. Me especially as a Ukraine user reported Kyivstar was not playing nice yet.
Defective by design? (Score:2)
So where's that "defective by design" [defectivebydesign.org] tag - isn't this a story about DRM and its negative effects?
Oh, but this is Apple. Nevermind...
Great, but so what? (Score:2)
I love to watch the hackers go as much as anyone. But the main thing about jailbreaking was that it was important in the early days, before the App Store. I would be nice if I didn't have to sign a deal with AT&T, but it would be nicest if all the cell networks were looped together in one big Internet thingie, too. AT&T is a crummy company, but so what? They're all just conspiring to take my money and screw me over.
99% of people will buy an iPhone, take out the deal with AT&T, and load it up on
Re:I do not understand... (Score:5, Insightful)
Because it meets their requirements, and the manufacturer support and aftermarket accessory selection is second to none.
Re:I do not understand... (Score:4, Interesting)
Except it's still not the smart phone of choice for business users, due to its poor ability to type out messages. Apple needs to learn from two LG smart phones, the Voyager with its flip-open keyboard or the Incite with its haptic-response touchscreen; a third-generation iPhone with a haptic-response touchscreen (including the ability to type out messages when displaying in landscape mode) would make the iPhone a VERY serious competitor against the Blackberry or Palm Treo series of smart phones.
Re:I do not understand... (Score:5, Informative)
Haptic response?
If that's the case, why do critics HATE the Blackberry storm and rumor has it that Verizon is dealing with a ton of returns?
Just get firemail for iPhone and type your emails in landscape mode
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You have to remember haptic touch response is still in its infancy and as such the Blackberry Storm and LG Incite may have limitations in terms of usability. But once we understand how to improve haptic touch response, I'd like to see Apple incorporate this technology into the third-generation iPhone, because with reasonably fast typing the iPhone can become a true competitor to the Blackberry and Palm Treo devices so commonly used by business customers.
Re: (Score:2)
understand how to improve haptic touch response
buttons?
(ducks)
Re:I do not understand... (Score:5, Interesting)
Luckily there are apps for a jailbroken iphone that build on the functions of the default apps. iRealSMS is a brilliant messaging app for the iphone, of course it will never be avaliable on the appstore as it competes with their rubbish sms app. Its got real inboxes outboxes and sent messages templates drafts landscape typing.
This is why un-jailbroken iphones arent as good. If an apple official app sucks, well thats just too bad.
Not from what I saw (Score:2)
Except it's still not the smart phone of choice for business users
At the last large company I was at, I saw a number of the highest level executives with iPhones.
It's not that much slower than a keyboard to type out a message once you get used to it, and for business communications the predictive text would work optimally.
It's also appealing for some companies to get away from having to send email through a third party server, and serious companies can have their own App Store.
Re: (Score:2)
The highest level executives may own iPhones, but is that their primary messaging device? Most professionals still use the Blackberry or Palm Treo devices, which have real keyboards.
That's why I'd like to see the next-generation iPhone either incorporate a flip-open keyboard like the LG Voyager or an improved version of the haptic touch response technology the LG Incite uses. Do that and Apple will effectively take over the business market for smart phones very easily. :-)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
"Because it meets their imagined requirements and is trendy and makes them look cool"
Fixed it for you
Re: (Score:2)
I'll ask one more time: where is the evidence for "It also has one of the best UIs on any mobile device."
That any questioning is modded down rather than answered suggest this evidence clearly doesn't exist.
(Hint to abusive mods - discussing the Iphone on an Iphone article is not off-topic.)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Because the iPhone happens to be an alternative to the iPhone alternatives.
Re:I do not understand... (Score:4, Insightful)
... why people NEED to have an iPhone. There are alternatives in the market.
Few people NEED to have an iPhone. Many people WANT to have an iPhone. I won't buy an iPhone due to the operator locking-thingie/price, so I'd be happy to hear about the alternatives.
Please, somebody tell me why anyone should buy an iPhone.
It is a nice device. It reportedly works very well.
What the nerd community most often fail to realize is that all features aren't equal. A well implemented and well integrated feature in a convenient interface is worth way more than the same feature implemented crappy, or accessed through a annoying interface.
Re:I do not understand... (Score:4, Informative)
It is a nice device. It reportedly works very well.
It's just like every other device out there... It has its good points and it has its really bad points. What it does really well is viewing webpages as they were meant to be seen and playing music/video. These things are second to none on any device I have used.
What it doesn't do well are too numerous to list. Do I own one? Yes. Why? Because I ride the bus every day to work and I wanted music/video as well as good web surfing. Unfortunately what it doesn't do is type with ease, which I am used to from the 4 years I used a Sidekick, and run applications in the background. Seriously, that is the hardest thing for me to get used to (what do you mean I don't have IM running all the time?)
If T-mobile didn't suck so hard and the Sidekick wasn't marketed to douchebags, I'd probably go back to owning one in a heartbeat over the iPhone. But for now, it does most of what I want it to and I'm about 50/50 with the device.
Re: (Score:2)
run applications in the background
Jailbreak and install backgrounder - it's a nice little app (you can either add a plist containing a list of applications for which you want backgrounding enabled) or just hold down the home button until it alerts you that backgrounding has been enabled. I use it with pandora, siax (a voip app) and im apps. Very handy, and having several background processes running (with the exception of pandora, playing music) has little to no noticeable impact on my battery life.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I've been there and done that to no avail:
1. Jailbreaking causes applications on my iPhone to randomly stop working. Once one goes south, eventually all the applications on the phone do -- one at a time. The only option is to continuously reinstall the applications that stopped working -- except when it gets to something like your contacts or phone. Then you're more or less fucked. Removing the jailbreak stopped this.
2. I tried the backgrounder and while you had no n
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you could buy a G1 Dev Phone. That way you get an iPhone like device but you can do a lot of stuff to it - including reflashing the entire OS with a custom build (there is no locking of any kind).
Is it as good as an iPhone? Eh, no, not really. I have one beside me. On the other hand, is it better than other phones I've used? Yes I think so. I never used a BlackBerry so I can't compare to that, but I've used feature phones and WinMo phones and Symbian phones, and I'm pretty sure that right now the worl
Re: (Score:2)
so I'd be happy to hear about the alternatives.
This is the crux of the problem - that we don't hear about the alternatives, because Slashdot gives so much attention to this one single particular model of phone.
It is a nice device. It reportedly works very well.
I should hope it does work, else I'd be taking it back. My several year old £90 phone is nice, and works very well, but I don't see weekly Slashdot stories about it (a Motorola V980).
What the nerd community most often fail to realize is that all
Re: (Score:2)
I cite two reasons why people are buying iPhones:
1) Built-in full iPod functionality, so you can play music and videos processed through [i]iTunes[/i].
2) The App Store has allowed for a lot of very interesting third-party applications that you don't see on other "smart phones."
My major gripe is that typing messages on an iPhone still leaves much to be desired, which keeps the iPhone from being a serious competitor to a Blackberry or Plam Treo phones. They really need to either a) integrates a real keyboard
Re:I do not understand... (Score:5, Interesting)
Those are good reasons, but the most important reason I think is that the user interface just works so damn well. It does for me... I am no Apple fanboy (the only other Apple device I own is an iPod, the rest is all Windows stuff), but I bought one, despite
- no out-of-the-box todo lists
- no notepad that is actually useful (and syncs)
- no cut & paste (a major omission), and poor (if any) communication between apps
- crippled Bluetooth (only works with headsets, can't use it to hook up a Bluetooth keyboard or other peripherals).
- locked down OS (can't replace the standard keyboard with a custom one, for instance).
- rumours of poor battery life and poor reception (I haven't noticed any of these. Tip to increase battery life: turn off location services; the GPS chip is power hungry... like it is on any other cell phone).
So why are people buying despite all this? I don't think having a built-in iPod and some amusing apps make up for this. The following, however, does:
- Form factor. It's small. And I thank Apple for not putting a damn physical keybord inside, which would make it considerably bulkier.
- Ease of use. The UI is simple and responsive certainly compared to WME.
- The multi-touch screen: brilliant not because of the cute "pinch" zoom gesture, but because I can operate it with my fat fingers. Whereas my other smart phones required me to use a fingernail or the stylus, I can operate the iPhone 1-handed using my thumb.
Typing messages is actually pretty good on the iPhone. As you'd expect, typing speed is somewhere between the on-screen keyboard & stylus of WME phones, and phones with a physical keyboard. But that's not what Apple needs to work on to capture the business market. Apple needs to address security by offering a mandatory PIN login that cannot be disabled by the user, and a remote wipe function. Without those two, you can forget about corporations allowing these things to VPN in and access the Exchange server.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The remote wipe [apple.com] was added with the 2.0 software. From the Apple website:
IT administrators can securely manage any iPhone that contains confidential company information using remote wipe and enforced security and password policies. These device configuration and remote management capabilities allow IT departments to quickly and seamlessly deploy iPhone throughout their companies.
This may also answer your concern for mandatory password/PIN protection.
Re: (Score:2)
And there are some people, believe it or not, who actually like buying music and video through the iTMS.
Re:I do not understand... (Score:5, Insightful)
Pretty much *everything* I wanted to be able to do previously is now possible in an elegant way, and I'm serendipitously finding that loads of oh-so-simple intuitive shortcuts have been quietly added and left to be discovered.
I won't bore you with details, but there is a good comparison to be made with open source - you sometimes need the BDFL to bring out the best in a project, simply to avoid the endless conflicts and design by committee which can lead to a product which does everything poorly, rather than doing a small number of things in a superbly polished way.
I have only bought an iPhone in the last three months, having held back since their launch on the grounds that slack-jawed fanboi drivel was not something to take seriously, but I've had to grudgingly admit that Apple have got something very right. Perhaps best summed up with Oliver Wendell Holmes' famous quote (take note, usability engineers!):
"I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity."
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
A good example; you're standing on Oxford Street and feeling hungry. You open maps, get it to pull down your current location. Then type 'Italian' into the search. You look at one of them, e.g. Carluccio's*. From there you can get to their webpage, get directions to it and call them, all with one press of a button. After you eat there, you decide you like the place. Pull out your search results and add it to your contacts. Whenever you want to find it again you can pull it out of your address book.
It's pret
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because the apps in the iPhone are integrated. On other smartphones - not so much.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh sure, there are things like the HTC touch (with windows mobile... yerk) or blackberries, but I can't get any of them for anywhere near the same price because the iPhone was subsidised by Apple. I'm a poor student, I can't afford to sp
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You're confusing jailbreaking with unlocking.
Jailbreaking=running third-party apps from sources other than the app store. Lots of people have jailbroken phones that are still SIM locked to AT&T. I used to have one until I sold it on eBay.
Unlocking=using a wireless carrier other than AT&T.
Re: (Score:2)
A classic - this proves my point:
I see moderation on Apple stories is back on form - if anyone else slagged off a product using terms such as "patheticly ugly, clunky" rather than using evidence, and then threw ad-hominems of "troll", they'd be modded down in an instant.
Since arguing pro-Iphone posts with "Grumpy Featurism" is +4 Insightful [slashdot.org], but arguing with pro-Motorola V980 posts as "Grumpy Featurism" is apparently Flamebait:
I get so tired of the grumpy "featurism" of Slashdot posters. The Iphone might do
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Mod Parent Up. I'm debating between a iPod Touch 2G and a Nokia N8X0.
Re: (Score:2)
yeah i want the ipod touch 2g to be jailbroken too so I can add songs without itunes. and I suppose run non app store apps potentially.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's also a completely different story. Unlock != Jailbreak.