Hacker Replaces iPod HDD With Flash Memory 125
Via a Wired Blog, an anonymous reader wrote with a link to a post on the Geek Technique website. There, post author Mark Hoekstra details how to replace an iPod's HDD with flash memory. It's not an inexpensive procedure, as 16 Gigs of flash memory is still a mite expensive, and the post is not a 'how-to'. Just the same, the project took painstaking work and is well worth recognizing. "I guess I can say I found ways of eliminating almost every hard drive out of almost every hard drive based iPod thereby eliminating all moving parts. The only one left is the iPod video which would only need a slightly different adapter. But next to that I've got a gut feeling that one's being upgraded to flash memory by Apple themselves any time soon."
Since Apple makes flash based iPods... (Score:3, Insightful)
I suppose its impressive from a technical point of view, but isn't the point of hacking generally to do something you couldn't already do by just selecting a different model?
Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The point is that he is selling his adapter to people who want more battery life or skip protection out of their video iPods.
Stop using a jackhammer while listening to your iPod. No, seriously, it's not easy to make them skip. And if you simply must listen to your iPod while jack-hammering for more than 20 hours straight, and don't mind having a rather limited hard-drive, why not just get a freaking nano? They're cheaper, with a longer battery life, and already have a flash drive.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
RTFS (Score:2)
Didn't the article say that the one iPod model the guy hadn't yet managed to hack the hard drive out of was the video iPod?
Heck, didn't the Slashdot story submission say that?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
iPod Mini (Score:1)
On second thoughts, on that last criterion, I should probably leave it alone in case I fuck it up...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... (Score:5, Insightful)
Spoken like a true non geek! Why exactly are you on slashdot again?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... (Score:4, Insightful)
Apple does make their three lines of iPods slightly different with different features. The iPod 30GB and 80GB can play video and have a 14 and 20 hr battery life respectively. The iPod nano is 2GB, 4GB, and 8GB models. These models have about 24 hr battery life. While they do have color screens, they cannot play videos. This guy seemingly has customized his iPod to be a hybrid. Twice as large than a nano but can play videos.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It makes a difference only in that the backlight turns on. I don't have a nano but the 5G Video and the lifetime is about 14 hours when I don't skip frequently and turn off the backlight. A friend of mine has the Shuffle and he says it's about 24 hours. You might want to talk to your local Apple store about it. This is the 2G nan
Re: (Score:2)
You can't compare any other ipod model's battery life to the Nano... hard drive models have HUGE batteries in comparison, and the shuffle has hardly any brain and no display (I owned a shuffle too, and the battery life seemed like FOREVER on it).
Yes, skipping a song would turn on the backlight- but just a few seconds. Skipping a song every 15 minutes should be, overall, negligible on total battery life. So either Apple's claims are completely bogus, or my un
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Why not just buy a replacement hard drive?
Re: (Score:2)
Besides, by this fall we'll have true video widescreen iPods (based on iPhone technology) that might include a model with all flash memory that could contain as much as 32 GB of storage.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
How about for my laptop? (Score:2)
Re:How about for my laptop? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
If this is your boot drive, do you have any sense of how is affected boot time?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
how to not write a 'how to' (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Reverse iPhone (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With a rubber band, as I recall. It wasn't a pretty sight.
Inverse (Score:5, Funny)
Go 6 second battery life!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
It's been a long day, and perhaps this Rum & Coke have something to do with it.
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
the standard bat. life was measured at 8:00+ (more than 8 hours) and the modified nano's life was 0:06 (6 minutes)
Waste of time (Score:2)
Re:Waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Of course, I don't even own an iPod, so what the fuck do I know.
Finally... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hacking has always been about using technology to do something you normally couldn't do. The original hackers built the foundations on which the Web lives. The media and other public opinion sources have vilified all the good hackers by lumping them in with the crackers, script kiddies, and other generally nasty online personas.
Hackers continue to advance the state of technology, whether its writing new bits of the Linux kernel or by upgrading a typically non-user-servicable iPod. The article says it itself: Apple will eventually offer a Flash-based model. Granted, they might have done this themselves eventually, but if the populace starts modding their iPods to run Flash, it only pressures Apple to move forward. Think about the early case modders: Windows, lights, case paint other than beige....Now about 70% of cases I see on Newegg have windows and LEDs.
Whether Fox News wants to admit it or not, hackers will continue to drive innovation. Not MS, not Apple...
Re:Finally... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Hacking has always been about using technology to do something you normally couldn't do. The original hackers built the foundations on which the Web lives. The media and other public opinion sources have vilified all the good hackers by lumping them in with the crackers, script kiddies, and other generally nasty online personas.
Whenever I hear "cracking" I think of removing annoying copy protection from video games. I've always seen hacking as being morally neutral. As you say, it's using technology to do something you normally couldn't do, such as gaining root access on a system or making free long distance phone calls. The word cracker seems to be an after-the-fact invention to subdivide hackers based on morality.
Re: (Score:2)
That is Phreaking...
Re: (Score:2)
We all need to cease using the term "hacker" despite what it originally meant once upon a time long ago. The term has been successfully hijacked by the media and now is associated with evil by virtually the entire non-techie public.
Judges 12:4-6.
Not exactly hard (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not exactly hard (Score:5, Informative)
This makes not exactly hard into not exactly easy.
Re: (Score:2)
This makes not exactly hard into not exactly easy.
Hehe, or you could just buy a 1.8" flash drive [nextwarehouse.com]...
I know, I know, not nearly as l33t. And of course CF is still a lot cheaper, so if the guy's intent is to actually produce this adapter it may be worth the proof-of-concept stage. Of course there's a good chance that one of the companies that make these sort of adapters will pick it up and s
Re: (Score:2)
Also not as much capacity. The linked page lists 2, 4 & 8 Gig model flash drives. The hack is a 16 Gig model.
CF is definately cheaper. A quick search turned up 16 Gig CF cards for $234
http://www.flash-memory-store.com/16gb-compact-fla sh.html [flash-memory-store.com]
The 8 Gig flash drive on the other hand is $382. It is over $100 more for half the capacity.
Apple don't already have a 16GB Flash model. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
They'll always be buying at greater scale which will get them better terms than a single buyer.
So by the time it is practical Apple likely to have the puppies in iPods anyway, and it'll still be more expensive to hack one together.
It's interesting that it has been done, but not sure it's really a great suprise.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Less storage then a regular size iPod. More than twice the cost of two 8GB iPod nanos. Other than for the sheer sake of proving it can be done, why is this hack impressive again?
Well, for one thing, he got you and many thousands of other people talking about it and thinking about it. That's how new things are learned and discovered. Trying new things and learning from them. At least he actually DID something, rather than just questioning why other people do things on /. .
meme strikes again! (Score:2)
So, I guess what you're trying to say is that... for use in a Video iPod, this flash memory HD replacement is not adequate... in space? [slashdot.org]
The correct put-down (Score:2)
No, no, no. It goes like this:
Cheap iPod mini (Score:3, Interesting)
Give me a break... (Score:1, Troll)
Hardly...reminds me all too much of those car magazine titles "How to Spend $10grand and turn your 89 HP Honda sedan into a 92.4 HP Honda screacher!!!"
More iPod Hacks (Score:4, Informative)
Is there such a thing as an MP3 player ... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
He wants to make these adapters? (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The point is (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Cracking, for the most part, is the illegal aspects of hacking.
Hacking, among the geeks, is normally a term for tinkering or modding, regardless if it's software or hardware. It doesn't imply a state of legality since crackers are hackers in their own right.
Re: (Score:1)
Way to go! Thank you for applying the stereotype that hacking is always the malicious modification of someone else's hardware or software.
There is also a legitimate reason for hacking on your own system, which is used to add functionality to an existing product for experimentation or functional use.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Toast? (Score:1)
Or is it just breakfast?
http://geektechnique.org/images/1387.jpg [geektechnique.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Mark.. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)