Mac OS X 10.4.3 Released 219
parry writes "Software Update just delivered the Mac OS X 10.4.3 update to my PowerBook.
Key changes include improved responsiveness when searching in Spotlight, Safari now passes the Acid2 test, better performance for MS-DOS formatted volumes and numerous bug fixes."
What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:2, Insightful)
Unfortunately there are more than a few stories about OS X updates that broke peoples machines around the internet.
Usually nothing major mind you, and typically easy to resolve. The bad thing is that there are many people who don't have other machines around or are missing the original install disks, and a non-booting computer presents a problem.
On the whole though, I would say Apple does a better than average job with these upgrades. It
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:3, Interesting)
Yeah, there is a chance that this update will wreak havoc, but considering how responsible Apple is about these sorts of things, I can't imagine that it would.
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:2, Interesting)
I administer an office of 15 macs, and I mostly share your confidence in installing Apple updates. I do, however, remember setting up a 15" Al p'book, and running software update on it right after I plugged it in. It updated from 10.3.x to 10.3.(x+1) (perhaps it was 10.3.4 or something - i don't recall) and promptly refused to restart.
My local Mac store (where I had just purchased it) informed me that OS version didn't work well on that model, so I re
Apple's record isn't that great (Score:2)
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:4, Informative)
The only two that I remember are a version of--I think--10.2.8 that broke ethernet interfaces on one non-current model of powermac, and a recent 10.4 update that broke fat applications (which mostly don't exist yet). I may very well be forgetting a couple, but twoish instances of very limited breakage in the span of every osx update ever released does strike me as "few".
Certainly true. Unfortunately, the more common data set is "all the people that had problems and complained", which of course isn't any more useful for predicting failure rates.So while yes, there have been complaints in the past, my best judgement still leads me to happily installing updates as soon as they're available, rather than waiting for other people to guinea pig them. Neither I nor anyone I know directly have had any cause to regret this yet.
I guess this puts me with the grandparent, sans jest.
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:3, Informative)
My guess was it was attempting to communicate with every Firewire device to query if it was a capture device and for drives the query was written atop the start of the disk. After it ate my drive the 5th time I disconnected all Firewire driv
Re:What will it be for early downloaders... (Score:2)
That should probably read:
Some updates from Apple have been retracted in the past, since they caused more problems than they fixed.
Reading it a second time, it sounds like I'm stating this about many updates. Which I'm not.
Re:No firewire on Blue and White or FireLynx (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, it is snappier! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:2)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:5, Informative)
to disable spotlight try spotless [macupdate.com]
and instructions [macworld.com] on disabling dashboard.
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:2)
When I first got 10.4, I configured a small bunch of applets for the Dashboard. A week or two later, I was running Top, and noticed just how much memory/CPU these things chew up. I immediately disabled them all.
If Apple wants Dashboard to succeed, they've got to make it much more resource efficient. Even switching to the Dashboard on my iBook G4 1GHz is sluggish - like several seconds while things slowly come up.
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:5, Informative)
Seriously.
I had been watching Activity Monitor, and an app called WindowServer was taking vast amounts of CPU, especially during startup of other apps (things would bounce 'forever' in the doc before opening.) It wasn't a pre-binding problem either. I finally thought I might clean off my computer's desktop (there were about 340 items there, as it's both my default download folder and the place I drag images and clippings to from Safari.) I simply dragged everything into a folder that I created on the desktop, restarted for luck, and all the snappiness was back.
WindowServer is behaving itself now, and everything loading quicker and working more as expected. I don't know exactly what WindowServer does, but I do know it hates a 'dirty desktop.'
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:2)
Likely, WindowServer got itself all tied into knots for some other reason entirely, and rebooting put an end to all that, not clearing off the desktop.
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:2)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:3, Informative)
Yes and no. WindowServer, or to be more specific, the Quartz Compositor (itself a part of the WindowServer process) is also responsible for compositing all the windows into one image to send to your graphics card. While the Finder draws the items that reside on the desktop, it sends them to WindowServer to
Re:How is this different than 300 items in a folde (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:3, Interesting)
Holy crap. 340 files on your desktop?
I've been in IT for a while, and this seems to be a particular neurosis or Mac users. Inexperienced Windows users will throw everything on their desktop, but with Mac users, even many of the experienced ones do it. Everything is on their desktop, or just on the hard drive (by which I mean, not sorted at all, but in the root directory), a
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:4, Funny)
I'd guess there's some compulsion to try to simply drag files to My Computer on windows machines for some people.
As a more stereotypical guess, mac people tend to have relied on visual layouts in folders to deal with filesystem issues, so those people like to see all of their files in one view. A professor I have to deal with during the course of my job is like this; he has 400 files on his desktop, and then on top of that he keeps nested folder after nested folder of files for his class presentations on his drive. I have no clue whatsoever how he gets anything done, especially as one of his main subfolders is labled with his name.
Ugh.
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:2)
"Whatever you want" may be fine for some users of single-user systems to don't care much about security, but it's not what I would call a "proper file structure". I'm not saying the system should necessarily keep you from doing whatever you want, but users should understand that storing your files in some places makes sense, and storing them in others does not. The OS should also encourage the proper behavior (using so
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:3, Insightful)
For files not viewable in Safari, however, Apple faces a dilemma. Do you allow people to open them, supposedly without saving them, and have people wondering where those files went?
Re:Yes, it is snappier! (Score:3, Interesting)
Now THIS is what they REALLY need to fix. *sigh*
As for the rest, I sometimes forget about the need to idiot-proof (or at least, newbie-proof) things. I think the ideal solution would go something like this:
- You click a file that opens in an external program, like preview or WMP.
- You get a dialog box where the choices are "Save to..." and "Open and Store a copy in *path of temp directory*" (The temp directory shouldn't be as w
Seems to work fine... (Score:5, Interesting)
Safari 2.0.2 (v416.12) has not been tested with the plugin PithHelmet 2.6.1 (v70). As a precaution, it has not been loaded. Please contact the plugin developer for further information.
Any ideas on getting this working?
RE: getting PithHelmet to work (Score:5, Informative)
here is probably the easiest way, since I don't know if you're using Apple's Finder or not. Path Finder [cocoatech.com] (which I use instead of Apple's Finder) allows you to look at the contents of a package or app, which would be easier for this edit if you want to use the GUI all the way.
first of all, you may want to make sure you have version 2.6.1 of Pith Helmet [culater.net] (the latest version). then open the Terminal. paste or type this line, all on one line:
open "/Library/Application Support/SIMBL/Plugins/PithHelmet.bundle/Contents/Info.plist"
(this will open the file you need to edit in the Property List Editor.)
click the triangles to expand "Root", then "SIMBLTargetApplications", and then "0".
Change "MaxBundleVersion" to "416".
it should look like this [pankurokku.com].
then hit Cmd-S to save, Cmd-Q to quit, and you're all set to use Pith Helmet. i've tested it for a bit, and so far it works perfectly.
let me know if you have any questions.
NOTE: If you didn't install the Developer Tools (Score:3, Interesting)
someone brought it to my attention to that you will only have the Property List Editor if you installed the Developer Tools. not to worry, if you don't have it. all you need to do is use TextEdit (or BBedit if you have it). the command for that looks like this (again, all one line):
open -a "TextEdit" "/Library/Application Support/SIMBL/Plugins/PithHelmet.bundle/Contents/Info.plist"
about two-thirds of the way down, you want to change this bit:
<key>MaxBundleVersion</key>
<string>
Re: getting PithHelmet to work (Score:2)
Re: getting PithHelmet to work (Score:2)
I love my MacC (Score:2)
Re:I love my MacC (Score:2)
If I was a Slashdot subscriber I'd ask for my money back.
Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't want 6, yet.
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
Maybe. I'm new to Apple and their package updating scheme, so I'm worried the update might change other dependencies or my ability to update it back to 6, later. Anyway, no harm in asking and avoiding an issue, than having to fix it later.
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:5, Informative)
There speaks a Windows refugee...
Fear not! A - the iTunes updates are always separate, so if it shows up in the list just deselect it and B - it is just an app, so if you make an archive of whatever you've got then if you did accidentally grab 6 by mistake just delete that, un-archive and you're good to go!
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
I'm quite a fan of Apple and osx, and filled with loathing for Microsoft and Windows, but I think it's fair to admit that this is an area in which Apple has been guilty of exactly the type of behaviour about which the grandparent was concerned.
Yes, Apple happens to have never updated iTunes as part of a system software package. But they regularly update Safari, Mail, Terminal, and the like without them being separately-selectable packages. Indeed, the very update we're discussing alters Mail and Safa
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
That's a very good point. Anyone coming from Windows could be expected to assume a similar implementation of iTunes for the OSX version.
However, to be fair, all except the DRM (which is also present in the OSX app) is baggage that is required by the Windows environment!
So the baggage-less OSX version is much more self contained and better behaved...
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:3, Interesting)
What do you mean? Does it come up as iTunes 6? If so, you should be able to get videos from the iTunes store.
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
I don't have it yet, but iTunes is not mentioned in the list of changes from Apple: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301 984 [apple.com].
JP
Re:Anyone with iTunes 5 done the OSX upgrade yet? (Score:2)
Anyway, the OS update went fine, and didn't mess with iTunes, that I could tell.
Non-iMacs using Front Row beware (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Non-iMacs using Front Row (Score:2)
By the way, for those who tried the "Bezel" thing, it doesn't seem necessary (and didn't in 10.4.2). The little applescript app was not really necessary too, just press ctrl-esc when Front Row menu is there.
As a remote I use my phone + Romeo (and a simple plugin to start, map keys, quit), the only tricky thing is the fast forward that works with long cursor key down, which is not simple with a ph
Quartz 2D Extreme disabled? (Score:2)
I'm confused. Is Quartz 2D Extreme a Mac OS X "Tiger" feature or not? Quartz is listed as a Tiger feature [apple.com] and there's a page that describes it [apple.com]. But 10.4.3 sounds like it disabled it.
Then again, John Siracusa at Ars Technica [arstechnica.com] says it super fast, but I thought I had read it wasn't ready for 10.4.0. so is it there or not? Was it eve
Re:Quartz 2D Extreme disabled? (Score:5, Informative)
Quartz 2D (often just Quartz) is the 2D rendering system used on OS X. It uses a display list format that has a 1:1 mapping with PDF display lists, allowing resolution-independent UI elements to be drawn.
Quartz Extreme was the hardware accelerated compositing system introduced with (I think) Jagwyre. Each window in Quartz 2D is rendered to a buffer. Originally, these were then composited in software. With QE, they were rendered to OpenGL textures and then composited in hardware. This allowed things like translucent windows to be drawn quickly, and made effects like Exposé possible.
Quartz 2D Extreme moves a lot of the things in Quartz 2D into hardware. For example, each character in a font is rendered into an OpenGL buffer with Q2DE, and then composited in the window by the GPU. This makes text rendering much faster with Q2DE (assuming that the GPU is fast enough).
Apple never advertised Q2DE. It was mentioned at the WWDC, but that is a developers conference - and developers can enable it for testing purposes. They advertise Quartz 2D and Quartz Extreme, because these are shipping features.
Re:Quartz 2D Extreme disabled? (Score:2)
Apple never advertised Q2DE. It was mentioned at the WWDC, but that is a developers conference - and developers can enable it for testing purposes. They advertise Quartz 2D and Quartz Extreme, because these are shipping features.
Q2DE was, once upon a time, listed as one of the coming attractions in Tiger on www.apple.com, back before 10.4 was released. Like, months before. So it's an understandable disappointment that it didn't actually ship working. Anyway, from the 10.4.3 release notes I get the i
Insight from ArsTechnica on this. (Score:5, Funny)
One small change (Score:2, Insightful)
One interesting thing I noticed is in the Finder's preview pane for applications. It basically lists the architectures the application is built for, the information does not appear in the 'get information' window. At this point in time, only the developers tool include the intel binaries. Maybe it was there before, but I did not notice it.
Is MacGPG OK with the update? (Score:2)
Re:Is MacGPG OK with the update? (Score:3, Informative)
kybred
mail.app snafu? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:mail.app snafu? (Score:2)
Re:mail.app snafu? (Score:3, Informative)
I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:5, Interesting)
Perhaps not. Part of the Acid2 test is to test various positioning mechanisms. Some are static, some are more relative. It may just be that the elements which were left behind were the static elements.
AFAIK, Acid2 isn't really designed with scrolling in mind. I'm surprised you're able to scroll the page at all.
Yaz.
Re:I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:2)
Unfortunately (as you know) there are no other ACID2 compliant browsers to test against.
Re:I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:2)
I do however use a userContent.css draw an inner border for divs. I find this works around a problem with some pages on Apple's website where, if your browser window isn't wide enough, content is positioned off the left side of the window where you cannot scroll to it.
Re:I Broke Safari's ACID2 Support (Score:2)
Bugfixes are nice (Score:2, Informative)
But hey, I've only been a Mac owner for three weeks. The Finder still drives me batty.
Re:Bugfixes are nice (Score:2)
Re:Bugfixes are nice (Score:2)
Also, try opening 20-or-so QuickTime Player video files at once and watch your display get corrupted beyond the borders of the windows. Try it with files that use various codecs and video sizes.
I'd try it myself, but I can't do it until tonight, and the one report of failure to recognize the built-in Firewire ports on a B&W G3 is
Despite rumors, no tabbed iChat (Score:2)
New version of Safari Enhancer... (Score:2)
Can be found at http://www.lordofthecows.com/ [lordofthecows.com]
Tinker Tool still appears to work with 10.4.3, but it's pretty safe given that it makes changes to preference files that can also be made through terminal.
some issues on a G5 2x1.8GHz (Score:2)
Restarted. Logged in. KP while trying to type first KP report.
Restarted. Logged in. Send in KP report. Spotlight remix kicks off and things seem OK.
Only other thing I've noticed is that the fan behavior and power supply noises seem to have reverted sorta to the way they were before the 10.3.3 update. PSU noise is more intermittent and unpredictable and the fan behavior has the aggressive responses of pre-10.3.3 but total average
Crash/Quartz 2D Extreme? (Score:2, Funny)
iChat encryption - but fist you have to pay tax (Score:2, Interesting)
"You need to sign up for a
What the Frell? I have to pay the
Additionally, I had a major issue when I upgraded, and I wasn't alone according to the discussions on the Apple support site. All my firewire devices freak
Re:iChat encryption - but fist you have to pay tax (Score:4, Informative)
Re:iChat encryption - but fist you have to pay tax (Score:2)
Re:iChat encryption - but fist you have to pay tax (Score:3, Informative)
Q: Can I continue to use my
It's in there already... (Score:2)
From what I can tell from the little information available (I'm not running Tiger), all this means is that Apple's supporting Jabber protocol on the
WARNING!!! 10.4.3 render iBook G4 not bootable!!!! (Score:2, Interesting)
Updated two machines simultaneously. PowerMac G5 1.8GHz single processor and iBook G4 1GHz.
The PowerMac G5 was sent for reboot after finish updating. While iBook was sent to shutdown after update completed.
Now, iBook G4 is spinning wheel at grey apple. The longest I waited was about 15 minutes before hard shutdown. I have put it into Target Disk Mode to be Verified by PowerMac G5, the filesystem is not corrupted.
I can hear the harddisk clicking in iBook which makes me salivate (I don't know why). Migh
Re:WARNING!!! 10.4.3 render iBook G4 not bootable! (Score:5, Informative)
Looks like I am not the only one. [apple.com]
Re:WARNING!!! 10.4.3 render iBook G4 not bootable! (Score:3, Interesting)
I think I found the culprit: the updated system didn't like my version of /etc/ttys (that used to work under 10.4.2). Therefore, loginwindow couldn't start. I figured that out when adding my extensions file by file...
I had /etc/ttys configured to open a LoginHook, and seems there somehow was an additional newline character.
All seems to be working fine, now. Thanks for all you
Re:WARNING!!! 10.4.3 render iBook G4 not bootable! (Score:3, Interesting)
Singular events cannot be used as a basis for generalisations.
Thank you.
My iBook G4 is running very well. So far it's 50/50 and we do not have the numbers for a significant statistical analysis.
First reboot WILL BE LONG !!! (Score:2, Informative)
A lot of minutes on G5 2x1.8 (YMMW)
Just wait.
And after second reboot all will be ok.
There are some heavy things system doing during first reboot.
Don't shut it down or hard reset!
Re:First reboot WILL BE LONG !!! (Score:2)
Probably depends on the system, it took about a minute on my 1.7GHz iMac.
Is anyone else seeing this problem? (Score:2)
Safari Problem with graphics (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not a problem with Safari... (Score:3, Informative)
Yep, and I'm not even using Safari. I just tested it, and it's doing the same thing for Safari 1.3.1 on Panther, on Camino, on Firefox/Mozilla.
Complain to the people who run the site, their HTML is broken... I suspect they only tested it on one version of Internet Explorer, ever.
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2, Insightful)
What a bunch of idiots. No-where on earth is it illegal to download a file. Thing is, they could make it illegal tomorrow and no-one would complain because you're all happy being criminals.
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:5, Informative)
Copyright infringement is the infringement of any of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder, per 17 USC 501. One of the exclusive rights is the right to reproduce the work in copies, per 106(1). As it happens, the courts have generally considered the reproduction of works into RAM, hard drives, etc. to qualify, and to be infringing. The MAI and Intellectual Reserve cases are examples of this.
This is too well settled for you to be able to truthfully dispute it. You can argue that it's dumb, but that doesn't mean that it's not the current law.
The only question left is whether it is criminal copyright infringement, which is a subset of copyright infringement generally. Per 506(a), copyright infringement of the reproduction sort is criminal if it is willful and either a) is for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or b) involves the reproduction during any 180 day period of works with a total retail value of over $1000.
Private financial gain is defined in 101 to include the "receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works." That's what the NET Act added, to cover warez trading. Presumably it isn't applicable for a mere downloader. Of course, making a copy through downloading, where you anticipate someone will return the favor by making a copy of something for you would qualify. Uploading without any receipt or expectation of receipt would not. So it's more complicated than whether data went up or down, as you seemed to think.
In any case, if the retail value of the downloaded work -- or all the downloads over the last 180 days, as your typical downloader probably downloads a lot -- is over $1000, then it is irrelevant whether or not he planned to trade warez. He's a criminal infringer anyway, if he infringed willfully.
You really ought to try reading the statutes instead of relying on just the laws that tweak them, or more likely, the sort of gossip and hearsay that most people on the net seem to believe in.
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2)
First, the NET Act is merely a modification to title 17. No one is prosecuted under that act alone; rather they're prosecuted under the Copyright Act as a whole. As already noted, it is entirely possible to be a criminal copyright infringer without touching on the provisions added by the NET Act. Why you have such an obsession about that specific act, I cannot imagine.
In fact, even if you were to upload the work in question, I suspect that a case prosecuted under FECA (i.e. 506(a)(1)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2)
No, they prefer their corporate paymasters.
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2)
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:2)
Besides, simply downloading alone is enough to infringe. You've already been owned by other posters over this, so I leave it to them.
Re:Shnappy Shnappy (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, in fact, it does. I've got a Developer Transition Kit machine and 10.4.3 was actually released a few weeks ago (Oct 13) on the ADC site.
(posting anonymously due to NDA)
Re:Quartz 2D Extreme Disabled? (Score:5, Informative)
This is not the same thing as Quartz or Quartz 2D - those are still enabled. There is a post a few above yours that explains the difference more fully.
Re:Q2DE (Score:2)
I'm at somewhat of a loss myself. I've never had any problems with Q2DX enabled -- no kernel panics, no video corruption.
I only have two guesses as to what is going on here:
Quartz Debug still claims that it has enabled Q2DX (when you run it and turn Q2
Re:And the newest Finder Fukup is... (Score:4, Informative)
No, if this were true, they'd make it easier to get windows to open in column view by default. I adore column view, but it's a bitch to get it by default. Sure you can tell it to "open new windows in column view" - but that only works when you actually choose "New Finder window" or hit command-N, neither of which I ever do. If you open a window by double-clicking on a folder or drive, it opens in some other view - anything but column. I finally found out on the Apple discussion forums that if you hold shift when you close a window, the next time you open that particular folder or whatever it will open in whatever view you closed it in. Which is nice, but until I've closed every folder that way I still have to change stuff back to column view a lot.
Personally, I was wondering why they gave us this great new view and then made it so incredibly hard to make Finder use it.
Re:And the newest Finder Fukup is... (Score:3, Informative)
Finder > Preferences > General
Tick the box that says 'Open new windows in column view' and be happy.