Yahoo Purchases Konfabulator 302
NerdyPunk2ML writes "Macworld news has an
article
about Yahoo's acquisition of Konfabulator, which will be announced Monday. Yahoo company executives said they will be
giving Konfabulator away for free, completely doing away with the US$19.95
currently charged for the product. The reason they purchased
Konfabulator was they wanted an easy way to open up its APIs to the developer
community and allow them easy access to the information on the Yahoo web site." From the article: "The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"
Cheap buy? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:5, Insightful)
If I liked things like Dashboard, I'd go for Konfabulator too.
They went win32 in weeks after Apple included same functionality with the OS.
Also don't forget one thing. We, geeks use latest and greatest OS when it ships but many people currently run 10.3 and even 10.2.8. It can run on them.
Well I call this "Happy ending". I don't have spesific "hate" against Apple as zealots assume, I am an Apple user myself. Just I think they should make them a favor, not money or something, credit or a name mention.
Just seek how EA (electronic arts) was founded, you will be surprised.
This is happy ending I think. Everyone is happy including licensed customers of Konf.
ps: For people jumping and saying "They didn't invent it!' etc, I was running Active Desktop at IE 4 times on win32
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Konfabulatorahoo!
This makes me happy, since I have been very unhappy with apples implementation. Many widgets such as iTunes widgets and weather widgets are pretty worthless when they don't say up all the time. Why bring up Dashboard to then get the itunes widget to click "next" when you could just click on itunes. Konfabulator had is right with widgets being able to stay on the desktop all the time.
...to place widgets on desktop: (Score:4, Informative)
killall Dock
Any widget you hold with the mouse while switching from dashboard to desktop will end up as a normal window.
And vice versa.
k2r
Or install the devMove widget.
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:3, Informative)
Enjoy :)
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:3, Funny)
Bwahaha! Thanks for a laugh. If ever Microsoft makes something like these I bet you whatever you wish it will NOT be a simple zip file format for widgets with resource images, xml configs and JS scripts in it. It will probably be a hecked up binary (they will provide a semi-documented interface to work with it. Maybe.) with uncompressed BMP images, UTF16 encoded strings, etc, etc. Expect at least 3-5 megs per widget. Of course only MS signed widgets will run without a
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:2)
Unless VISTA has Widgets like these.. then I'm not sure why Yahoo! spent this money.
Do you mean Vista [vista.com] the software company, or Windows Vista [microsoft.com]? wink, wink [slashdot.org] ;)
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:3, Interesting)
good idea!
I officially declare VISTA the troll miscapitilization of Longhorn to counteract the MAC miscapitalization of Mac(intosh)
on topic:
Some early builds of longhorn had the stupid sidebar that took up 1/6 of a normal (1024x768) screen for things like a clock, and a webcam viewer... think of it as a separate area of the screen (like the taskbar) reserved for konfabulator widgets. It was hyped for a while too. (example [winsupersite.com])
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:2)
Re:Cheap buy? (Score:3, Insightful)
You can still add such components, and script them in any language that implements the WSH interface.
But of course Konfabulator widgets all run in a security sandbox and could never do anything malicious. Right?
fells like dvorak... (Score:3, Funny)
Why use a computer monitor? (Score:2)
Re:Why use a computer monitor? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? (Score:2)
Please, take me seriously! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Please, take me seriously! (Score:5, Funny)
or DiMWiT for short
Re:Please, take me seriously! (Score:2)
Re:Please, take me seriously! (Score:2)
Great news for Yahoo users. (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder if this is at the urging of Yahoo Japan? Here Yahoo is the most popular portal and search engine. I've heard Mac sales, not including the iPod, are way up so maybe there's some pressure to make things more cross platform?
Re:Great news for Yahoo users. (Score:3, Insightful)
You say:
I'd love to to see what these things can do if you're able to hook them into the full range of Yahoo information/services.
Surely what is needed is for Yahoo to publish a rich, well documented set of APIs, rather like Google* has done - this would let any desktop software (Konfabulator, Dashboard, Linux stuff, whatever) access the information.
Instead it seems that Yahoo has decided against this and instead is insulating its core APIs by on
Konfabulator ?? (Score:5, Informative)
After fiddling around with the website I found this:
Konfabulator is a JavaScript runtime engine for Windows and Mac OS X that lets you run little files called Widgets that can do pretty much whatever you want them to.
Hope that helps someone.
What cool/geeky ones exist? (Score:2)
I still run Mac OS X 10.2.8 on my old PowerBook G4 so I wonder if I am missing out with these goodies.
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:2)
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:4, Informative)
Then : "Konfabulator, runner of widgets, this is what you need. Seriously."
It couldn't be more clear than that, how can you not understand?
Its a watchyamacallit for Smurfing Marclars!!!
Re:Konfabulator ?? (Score:2)
You're confusing confabulate [reference.com] with confounded [reference.com].
Good press begins with the Mac (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't find this surprising. Lately, it seems that Yahoo has been getting some of the positive internet buzz that used to be reserved solely for Google. I imagine that releasing products specifically for Mac users is aimed at garnering similar buzz.
While Macs have a relatively small share of the market, they are, however, well represented among popular bloggers, technorati (ugh) and the mavens of the web: inform or impress these folks, and you will begin to inform and impress the rest of the web. This is a move to grab mindshare.
Re:Good press begins with the Mac (Score:5, Interesting)
They're definitely providing at least a couple of services which I'm surprised that Google isn't heavily involved in just yet.
One of them is YahooGroups [yahoo.com], for running mailing lists (along with several additional group-like features latched on). I guess Yahoo picked up a lot of this market by default, especially after Listbot [listbot.com] was shut down by Microsoft. The other is Yahoo Calendar [yahoo.com], which I'm admittedly only just starting to play with, but I'm finding it useful.
The biggest reason that I'm surprised Google hasn't touched these areas is that they're both very search-oriented, or can be. Just about everything Google's done in the past has been based around some kind of searching, or generally helping people to find things. That's where Google's expertise is.
Re:Good press begins with the Mac (Score:2)
Good point. Until checking just now, I hadn't realised that they'd extended it to anything more than a wrapper around Usenet.
Re:Good press begins with the Mac (Score:2)
Clutter (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Clutter (Score:5, Interesting)
Of these, only the weather one "could" be shown through a browser.
I have mine set to only be seen as part of the background, so none of the widgets are on top of any windows. But they are visible if all windows are minimized
My only complaint is the memory footprint (20MB just for the engine, plus 1-5MB per widget), and some widgets are CPU hogs, causing my battery to drain faster than usual (one of the battery monitors!) and cpu to stay hotter.
Re:Clutter (Score:2)
I just bought Konfabulator (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:2)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:4, Funny)
You must be new here.
Quite hard to write too! (Score:2)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:2)
Re:I just bought Konfabulator (Score:2)
Yahoo! is the greatest (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yahoo! is the greatest (Score:5, Funny)
Konfabulator is awesome, if MicroSoft had released it, it would cost $69.95 in the form of an OS update.
That's nothing. If Apple released it, said OS update would cost $129. Oh, wait a sec...
Incredibly annoying. (Score:2)
Re:Incredibly annoying. (Score:4, Informative)
http://widgets.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com]
Enjoy.
looks like the semantic web is taking off (Score:5, Insightful)
It certainly has the potential to. It's a platform-independent application framework, just like Java-on-the-browser was supposed to be, but this iteration is free from the one-size-fits-all constraints that browser-based development imposed (plus, widgets don't have to be stateless). In fact, this has all the earmarks of a disruptive technology, with the added advantage that it's based on well-deployed standard technologies.. i.e.: stuff Microsoft can't mess with as easily as Java.
Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off (Score:2, Insightful)
Now admittedly, Javascript as a language sucks rocks but you can depend on it working cross-browser, cross-OS, cross-dang-near-anything, and the user doesn't have to do a thing to get i
Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off (Score:2)
No argument there..
I cherish a hope that if this whole thing really does become popular, we'll start to see drop-in modules for other languages. Then people will be able to use Perl, Ruby, Java, Python, or whatever they already like best. Most of the popular interpreted languages today already have pretty good cross-platform support, and it wouldn't be too painful to find subsets that are safe, but replace Javascript.
Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off (Score:3, Insightful)
RSS is helping this, but it's only providing the content. I think people are missing an important point on these Web-based desktop applications: it lets a web site (such as Yahoo) provide content-specific logic with their data to increase traffic.
RSS: "Her
Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off (Score:4, Interesting)
And it's good for Windows users too (Score:2, Insightful)
While the acquisition of Konfabulator and its removal of the pricetag is great news for all users of the program, do note that Konfabulator, while originating on the Mac, also has a competitor on the Windows side. That side has been dominated by Stardock's own DesktopX application where it's been around for quite a while now.
Re:And it's good for Windows users too (Score:2)
Dashboard has been a smash hit on MacOS, owning the rights to a Windows equivalent could be a powerful asset.
Cross-platform? (Score:2)
Maybe Mac in this case simply means not Window, which could imply linux is included?
Re:Cross-platform? (Score:2)
to gnome and runs fine on my KDE desktop.
I tried to like Konfabulator (Score:4, Insightful)
A weather checking widget? Check. But I have a web browser with a tab to my local weather up at all times anyway.
A package tracking widget? You bet. But I only have one or two packages to track every year. I always have a tab open to that page.
A calculator widget? Of course. But it's still slower than asking google, since my web browser is always open.
Konfabulator (and Dashboard) can do some pretty interesting things, as long as you don't have any other utilities on your machine. Unfortunately, it's unable to consolidate and replace the bunch of utilities that you already have, since you're unlikely to give up big things like your web browser.
I'm sure there are a bunch of people out there that really like it, and find it super useful. That's awesome. I'm glad someone appreciates the hard work that the Konfabulator (and Dashboard) guys did. I just can't find a single useful widget that isn't better implemented or accessed somewhere else.
I like dashboard better... (Score:3, Interesting)
I share your concern over the need for some widgets when web or utilities work fine. (Wikipedia widget, I'm looking in your direction!)
There's a dashboard widget called SysStat -- pretty much the same as 'top' or 'Activity Monitor' -- but unlike those, it only uses CPU when dashboard is showing. I use this thing an awful lot...
Re:I tried to like Konfabulator (Score:2)
Screw that. I live in Los Angeles, where the weather's the same all the time anyways.
Re:I tried to like Konfabulator (Score:3, Funny)
A weather checking widget? Check. But I have a web browser with a tab to my local weather up at all times anyway.
Wow. Slashdotters are the only people that when you say "open the window" to they immediately turn to their computers.
A Better News Article on Konfabulator Sale (Score:5, Informative)
It says Konfabulator has only three employees!!! Now we know which three households have champagnes popping tonight.
How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac (Score:5, Insightful)
No Supermode
No Audibles
No new features for years now.
Yahoo, when are you going to update Messanger for the Mac.
Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac (Score:2)
Yahoo's own client has webcam support, though there are many ways to crash it while you are serving video, and while doing so, the video tends to stall consistently within 10-15 minutes; voice chat isn't supported at all, as Yahoo uses a Windows-only voice protocol.
It's a cool multiclient with fun stuff like tabbed IMs, but not ready to replace most other clients fo
Oh well (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, anyway - then along comes Tiger, and Apple announces Dashboard. It's Konfabulator done right - the widgets can be brought into view whenever you actually need them rather than having them hiding back on your desktop. Of course after this announcement, it wasn't long before the Konfabulator guys copied the idea of (gasp!) not having the widgets hidden back there - what a concept!
But you know what? Even Dashboard seems pretty pointless. I've got a web browser open all the time, so it's just as fast to click on my weather bookmark, or go to ups.com to track packages, or leave a tab open to my gmail account all the time (after all, if I get a new message I'm going to have to open it anyway). While Dashboard certainly seems to be a better implementation than Konfabulator, but it's still basically an idea that is of no practical use to me. At least the price is right, either way now...
Re:Oh well (Score:3)
Re:Oh well (Score:2)
The only Dashboard widget I really use is the one for the Oxford American Dictionary, and that's because it's not available (for free) on the web.
Re:Oh well (Score:3, Informative)
First, Konfabulator widgets could always be layered along with other windows. They were never "stuck on the desktop" (although that is one of the layering options; layering settings are per-widget).
Second, Konfabulator planned what came to be called "Konsposé" long before anyone knew about Dashboard. It just so happened that Dash
Re:Oh well (Score:2)
You could always use Expose' to do that. Trust Apple to come up with a new scheme that makes it impossible to have a widget that you want to keep an eye on sitting around all the time.
Ah well, hopefully someone will come up with a Dashboard/Konfabulator "Amnesty" hack that will let you use both kinds of widgets from whatever interface you want. There's al
You dont get it. (Score:3, Interesting)
I get all this current information the second I hit F12, it ta
Rivalry/Adoption (Score:4, Interesting)
Konfabulator will be free and cross platform. Dashboard is part of OSX. Running both just seems real redundant to me. Konfabulator may attract a much larger following of developers simply because it's available to Windows users, and the fact Yahoo's widgets will at some point only run on Konfabulator (not that someone else could probably come up with an unoffical one).
If a converstion tool is made to transfer Dashboard Widgets to Konfabulator Widgets, you may soon see people moving over to Konfabulator. Will the original third party product find itself overbearing the one in your system you can't remove (for Mac users)? Then again, Dashboard widgets run as separate processes (each one) so an empty dashboard prolly uses little if any system resources. It's also a possibility someone will write a converstion tool to move Konfabulator Widgets back to Dashboard.
It will be interesting to see how much malicious widgets become a problem on the Windows side once Konfabulator becomes free and adopted more widely.
link to the yahoo site (Score:2, Informative)
Re:link to the yahoo site (Score:2)
Also, not specifically related to Konfabulator...
Once the download finishes, a disk image will be mounted automatically.
I hope that everyone has already disabled automatic mounting of downloaded disk images, along with all other "open safe files after download"-style actions.
Kind Of Funny (Score:2)
Which is kind of funny to me, since Konfabulator seemed to be making a slow move from the Mac to Windows since Dashboard was so similar. Still, Konfabulator is a nice piece of software (although its name makes it sound like it should be part of KDE), and free is always nice. Let's hope that Yahoo is good about maintaining it.
long time coming... (Score:4, Informative)
in the pre-OSX days, arlo was known by millions of macintosh
users for making 'Kaleidoscope' - it basically let users of
above-average graphic skill to theme the entire mac OS
interface down to the pixel without a lot of programming
knowledge. this was way ahead of anything that was done
in windows or linux. millions of mac users had custom UIs
because of this man.
but such a theme manager was closely tied with OS9,
and so when time came time for OSX, arlo started an even
more clever hack -- konfabulator.
now this was already very close to what apple always had with
desk accessories, but it was javascriptable (whereas DAs required
a separate development environment to compile); they were
internet enabled (desk accessories only lived in the time before
the internet); and they also had a really nice photoshop-able
front end (DAs couldn't utilize quickdraw as nicely as OSX's
incredible quartz graphics); and because CPUs were finally
fast enough, you could run them interpreted instead of
compiled.
these factors made konfabulator really nifty for quick, beautiful,
useful little utilities. but they fell too closely to apple's own revival
of the desk accessory concept, and so it looked like all of arlo's
hard work had all the chance of a netscape against a bundled browser.
so now yahoo buys them up, they all still got jobs, and it opens up
possiblities for them better than they ever had before -- this is a
good fate for these amazing mac developers. they have long been
a credit to the mac community. its great to see that they've come
across good fortune at this time. congratulations arlo & team!!
we love ya!
j.
Great! But... (Score:3, Interesting)
"The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"
OK, great. So start by making it possible to browse everything on Yahoo from a Mac! It's really annoying getting a message that my browser (nay, platform) isn't supported by a website. It's not like I'm using an obscure operating system like OS/2 or something.
Furthermore, I'm a cross-platform guy. I grew up using Macs & PCs, though I definitely prefer OSX. Recently, I've found a new love for my old Dell Latitude simply because of the awesomeness that is Yahoo Music Unlimited. What sucks is that I can't use it on my iBook.
For those who don't know, for less than the cost of a case of beer every month, Y! Unlimited is, essentially, a music on-demand system with DRM that's easy to live with. Personally, it's not very important that I "own the music." What's important to me is that I've discovered new music in a way I've missed since the original Napster was destroyed. Only LAUNCHcast and Y! Unlimited is WAY better than everything out there that's currently like it (I'm looking at you remixed Napster and Rhapsody.)
Sure, the download catalog isn't as deep as iTunes Music Store... but I'm sure the gap will eventually shrink. Yahoo is a large company with enough resources to make that happen.
LAUNCHcast, Yahoo's "radio" service, lets me rate music then taylors future songs to my preferences and tastes. It basically serves songs up on the fly without ads. It's really fucking slick.
At any rate, I wish they'd offer Y! Unlimited (or more to the point, Yahoo Music Engine) for OS X, but since it uses WM9 and whatever portable management system requires WinXP, I'm guessing that a port to Macs will probably never materialize. Which is too bad. I'd love to be able to use YME with Airfoil so I could stream it to my Airport Express... without Virtual PC.
A guy can dream...
Re:Great! But... (Score:2)
And the obligatory Linux version is... (Score:4, Informative)
For those asking the obligatory question: "But does it run on Linux?", the answer is "No, but..".
Linux (and BSD) have gDeskLets [gnomedesktop.org] which provides the exactly the same/similar functionality with arguably more applications available for it.
It is these two exact projects which spurned the creation of Apple's "Dashboard" product available in Tiger.
Yahoo! is following Google's lead (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:4, Funny)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:2)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:2)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:2)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:5, Interesting)
Apple later came up with Dashboard, created the mother of all smokescreens about Desktop Accessories to plead that it was not inspired by Konfabulator and the rest is history.
Apple's behaviour apparently wasn't breaking any law as such but it was the equivalent of some kid leaning over your shoulder and copying your homework. I expect the Dashboard apologists will appear shortly pointing to a piece of FUD called daringfireball, but the question remains:
would Dashboard have existed in the form it does, using the underlying technologies it does, trying to serve the purpose it does and look how it does if Konfabulator never had existed ?
answer: um...ah....oh
I say good luck to Konfabulator, hope they got a good price from Yahoo
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:5, Funny)
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:4, Informative)
>underlying technologies it does, trying to serve the purpose it
>does and look how it does if Konfabulator never had existed ?
Meanwhile, other posters are complaining that Dashboard *doesn't* copy Konfabulator and requires (barring developer mode) looking at all of them at once.
Yes, Dashboard would have existed without Konfabulator. Dashboard is based on WebKit. WebKit is part of OS X. WebKit is what powers Safari and Mail's HTML rendering (and probably most other third-party HTML renderers at this point).
http://webkit.opendarwin.org/ [opendarwin.org]
Dashboard came at the same time that Automator did; Apple appears to be trying to ensure that their technologies are easy to automate and script into small, useful apps. After AppleScript, Automator, and the various scripting languages on the command line, it made perfect sense to build a javascript/HTML development tool based on WebKit.
I suspect that the only thing that would have changed if Konfabulator did not exist is that Apple would not have called their widgets "gadgets" for a few days.
Jerry
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:5, Insightful)
It may or may not make perfect since for Apple to develop a javascript/HTML tool based on Webkit, but one that looks and feels almost identical to Konfabulator? Let's face it. If Windows had done Dashboard, Mac users worldwide wouldn't be able to shut up about how Windows ripped off poor Konfabulator.
On the flipside, if Dashboard's popularity made the Yahoo deal happen (which, come on, it probably did), then Konfabulator probably just made out better than they'd ever imagined.
(disclaimer: typing this in Tiger)
mod up! (Score:3, Interesting)
Yup. sometime getting copied in the software business is a GOOD thing. I, for one, never heard of konfabulator untill apple announced dashboard.
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, Windows did do "Dashboard" back in 1998, but the widgets were stuck to your desktop, and your PC only had 64MB of RAM, and the stock widgets seemed to be mainly spamish RSS-type newsfeeds, so it didn't seem all that. But it was the same basic idea.
The MS widget list is here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/previous/gall
(Wow, there's a grand total of 3 which still work, I'm amazed.)
It was interesting for about 10 minutes and then forgotten (much like I expect Dashboard and Konfabulator to be). As for Mac users, they've shown that they are totally immune to things Windows implemented years before Apple did.
Karamba, SuperKaramba and GDesklets (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, it's true kids!! Apple is copying Linux this time!
Daring. (Score:3, Informative)
I don't think you understand what FUD [wikipedia.org] means.
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:2)
Actually, it's more like being assigned the same problem and coming up with a similar solution. And there's no law against fair competition.
I expect the Dashboard apologists will appear shortly pointing to a piece of FUD called daringfireball, but the question remains:
"FUD" does not mean what you think it means. Also what on earth is a "Dashboard apo
Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
What? I know that Slashdotters aren't all on the same page, but most people here generally agree that software patents are bad. Especially the vague, hazy, and overbroad ones that look like obsfucated user manuals (claiming entire kinds of software or user interfaces) rather than looking like nice detailed technical USENIX conference papers. Only Konfabulator wasn't patented.
Now you're saying that even though Konfabulator wasn't patented, wasn't a trade secret, Apple isn't a monopolist, and no part of the Konfabulator code was used by Apple, Apple should be barred from making a similar product? Pray tell, what is this argument based? Should Apple's product suck just so that these small fry can make a couple bucks? Are you saying Apple should do it just to be nice? (It would be nice if Apple sent me a check for $50k so I could buy a Lexus. Just to be nice.) Comparing the free market of the software industry to an elementary school math test is a little facile, eh?
Surely you know, since you pointed to the daringfireball website, that there was nothing in Konfabulator, other than the general idea of JavaScript desktop accessories, that would have been useful to Apple. The reason Apple chose to write Dashboard from scratch is that it could save a lot of system resources and make a more polished product by leveraging existing parts of OS X like Web Kit. Konfabulator was a monstrously heavyweight framework based on Mozilla -- each desktop accessory was bigger than many Mac applications. The people at Apple aren't stupid. If buying Konfabulator would have saved them time and money, they would have done it, just like they bought SoundJam.
Konfabulator made a lot of money on Windows, as well as Mac, and now they got their payday from Yahoo!. No tears shed there, I'm sure.
Re:too lazy to google right now (Score:2)
Re:Too bad (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Too bad (Score:2)
Re:From the konfabulator webpage. (Score:2)
Re:Apple's implementation is better? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Apple's implementation is better? (Score:3, Informative)