IBM Open Source Firmware Download for PowerPC 36
Nora writes "IBM developerWorks has posted an open source
Slimline Open Firmware (SLOF) download intended to aid the development of operating systems and virtualization layers for PowerPC-based machines. One thing that's kind of neat about it is that it is under a pretty liberal "BSD-like" license -- something I have not often seen IBM do. If I am not much mistaken (and please correct me if I am), this license makes it compatible with both GPL'd and BSD'd projects, among others. And in the interest of full disclosure, I'd like to add that I *am* affiliated with the developerWorks site."
Re:Open-source firmware?! (Score:2)
Apple? (Score:2)
Re:Apple? (Score:1)
I cancelled Apple brand from my mind (for future), it fires its liar CEO again, I am back to buying.
Re:Apple? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Apple? (Score:3, Informative)
However I'm sure IBM have released this to try to bolster the credibility of PowerPC as a platform now that the major desktop vendor is leaving.
The question is, is there any future in PowerPC on the desktop if Apple is no l
Dancing with PC Vendors (Score:1)
What was the point of dropping that hint, at that time, in that way, if Apple really doesn't plan to license Mac OS X to other PC vendors?
Re:Dancing with PC Vendors (Score:2)
Why warn your major competitor before you can announce any deals or get any momentum? First they have to manage the switch to Intel, then they can start doing deals with other vendors.
Re:Apple? (Score:2)
On Apple's currently selling systems, the profit margin is significantly les
Re:Apple? (Score:2)
You know, they are expensive, hot , slow etc, Steve says so
Very relevant.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:1)
Think of all the XBoxes running Linux distros currently. The new XBoxes are going to have 3 970 chips in them -- that's a hella-powerful box for $399.
If I'm not mistaken, the code released by IBM will help developers port OSs for the processor. How long until someone uses it to port Windows or (gasp) OS X to the XBox, among other game consoles and devices using the 970 processor?
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:1, Insightful)
I don't think that the two things (the Apple announcement and the Open Firmware download) are in any way related. To paraphrase an earlier post, I think the timing is too close for it to be anything *more* than coincidence.I could be totally wrong though =)
But don't forget that one of the largest markets for PowerPC (if not "the" largest) is in embedded -- often deeply embedded. That's an environment where writing your own firmware and/or OS is more relevant -- and one of the reasons it seems particular
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:2)
And for the nth time, the Xbox 360 does not use 970s.
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:1)
Most of the people with access to the full windows source code probably have access to the the full xbox specs as well. Unless you think open firmware is the only thing that's preventing legions of hackers from porting the leaked windows source code to PPC.
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:3, Informative)
The lead engineer of the Cell project spoke at my university a while back. He pointed out that the flight simulator demo on the cell ran 50 times faster than it did on the 970 where they developed it, but the Cell was somewhat slower than the 970 on integer benchmarks.
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:2)
Naw, never mind, you are probably right. Most likely, nobody will want to do anything with the 20 million PPC boxes coming out over the next few years. Nobody ever uses hardware in unintended ways.
Not that I am suggesting that this will be something that can be put directly on a PS3, but it may prove interesting, and educational to people wanting to make low level software...
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:1)
PPC isn't dead, IBM still uses it for their AIX/Linux servers, XBox 360 uses it, the embedded market uses it.
But really, how many people care if their processor is x86 or not? If it matters, you're probably going to be buying a Sparc or RS and not a macintosh.
The Return of BeOS? (Score:1)
Put Be in a dual-PPC, portable, system, such as (but only similar to) the PSP/DS scenario, and we may not be so bothered with 'desktop winners and losers' any more, war-wise
Same with Linux of course, and all its buildkits-de-jour among the CPU-du-jour folks..
Oh, and one more thing: Apple taking over x86 is bec
Re:The Return of BeOS? (Score:1)
Re:Very relevant.... (Score:3, Informative)
Meanwhile Apple's announcement has no effect on the embedded market that SLOF is intended for.
IBM & Public Licensing (Score:1)
IBM's pretty serious about releasing things to the public community:
Cloudscape
Eclipse
XML4J
Am I missing some? Unless you're talking about it being more liberal than GPL, then I might agree with you.
Re:IBM & Public Licensing (Score:3, Insightful)
Am I missing some?
Postfix
PearPC? (Score:2)
Would this help PearPC (and countless commercian vendors) any? Or is it for making virtualizations, say of x86, on PPC? It sounds more like the latter, but for some reason, that also seems like it might be a good thing...
PowerPC != Apple (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyway, I guess soon generic PowerPC articles won't be dumped into the Apple section anymore. Heh.
xbox (Score:2)