Apple Releases Mac Mini 1212
cranesan writes "The rumors of Apple releasing a small PC are confirmed. The Mac mini can be found at Apple's website. As expected, the box uses a G4 processor. You can order one today; estimate 3-4 weeks shipping date. Base unit starts at $499."
samzenpus? (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyone notice that all the stories on the front page are now listed as posted by 'samzenpus'? The fact that such a glaringly obvious dupe was posted kinda raised the 'this website has been hacked' alarm.
Re:Headless Alternative for Less (Score:5, Interesting)
But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?
It's ALL about the software, stupid! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Previous link and Financial results (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm a PC person really but have been looking to do the mac-thing for a while... at this price it's definately a winner.
And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, this begs the question: does the mini allow user upgrades? Can't check because the Apple site isn't responding at the moment, but that little box looks to be shut tighter than a virgin's iPod.
*-*
What I see more focus on hardware design, the exact opposite of the clone fiasco. They are getting, and supporting, higher margins on their hardware because of their design engineering. No other MP3 player looks or feels as good as the iPod. The Mini looks looks like another homerun, their first small form factor PC and its uniquely Apple and great looking.
Apple's focus has shifted to perfecting the Human-Computer interface. This is what it was all about originally. They are focusing on the look and feel of products, both hardware and software.
Get the details right, and they will come.
*-*
The Mac Mini will be a perfect X-Terminal to use with a Linux box in another room. You'll have a silent and small box on your desk and the fat and loud server is down in the basement. Great.
*-*
Another thing to note. A DIN slot (car radio standard size) is 2"x7", the mini mac is 2"x6.5".
If it had a radio faceplate and a laptop drive, this would be the best car stereo ever.
*-*
Say hello to *real* "Media Center" Machine
(1) add a RAM stick BTO - cheapo
(2) add bluetooth BTO - cheapo
(3) add Wifi card BTO - cheapo
(4) sit unobtrusively to my way-cool existing TV and hook up A/V - nothin'
(5) hook to already existing wifi ADSL-powered network - nothin'
(6) bring in my already existing Sony-Ericsson Z600 - nothin'
(7)
(8) Profit!
Lemme see what I get from this:
(A) iTunes playback
(B) VLC playback
(C) DVD playback
(D) UNIX development
(E) Surf web
(F) Check mail
(7) Photo slideshow
(8) Remote control via Z600 (see 2,6,A,B,C,E)
All in the living room sitting comfortably on the sofa (see D)! Yay!
*-*
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Select proper post
2. Copy and paste into the reply box
3. Submit (no need for preview!)
4. Profit
The news is (Score:3, Interesting)
Luckily, my order got through early, so mine is expected to ship Jan 28th or earlier. This is pretty good since official release in Denmark is 29th.
Re:samzenpus? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yep. Also, MetaModeration is severely out of whack.
[Yes, I do MetaModerate from time to time...]
bitch all you want, would a headless Dell have... (Score:3, Interesting)
I have always been a sucker for the coolness factor in Apple products [but I didn't buy a Lisa!] and this [apple.com] has me drooling.
Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been a vocal critic of Amiga for going this route, ever since it was announced, but here's yet another example of why their plan is dumb: You can now buy a complete PPC machine (sans mouse, keyboard, and monitor) for less than you can buy an Amiga OS 4 board!
Yes... They'd have to get their OS to boot on the machines, but as a growing number of Linux distributions prove, it's not too hard to do.
I think, after seeing this machines price, and the price of the (yet unreleased, other than in alpha/beta form) Amiga board/CPU combo, that there must only be one or two nails left before the Amigas coffin is finally sealed shut.
Serious question: who will buy this? (Score:2, Interesting)
I was thinking about buying myself a second hand G4 Cube from ebay, but thought better of it when I heard about this (because it's an up-to-date design that is comparable in size to the Cube).
Then I realised that it's not a hugely powerful machine and is intended perhaps as a second-machine for the iPod users who are inerested in OS X. But it's not really got enough meat to it to compare with its PC contemporaries (and I wouldn't make the mistake of comparing its 1.42 and 1.25GHz G4 chips with a Pentium 4 at 2.8, 3.2, 3.4 etc. GHz), and its G4 chip already looks outdated next to its G5 PowerMac brothers. I understand that the PowerBooks and iBooks contain G4 chips at present, and it appears to me that this Mac mini might be a laptop-derived design. I think it may end up lumped in the 'great for e-mail and web' trough. I expect people will find ways to turn these pretty boxes into PVRs (hacking a video-in) or expensive STBs, silent home servers and the like, but will not use them for second computers.
I don't want to spark a Mac-antiMac flame war, but do think that these questions remain outstanding. Please honour my non-troll intentions by replying...
Shipping date... (Score:3, Interesting)
It'll be interesting seeing whether it can be easily set up for TV out.
Re:Headless Alternative for Less (Score:1, Interesting)
How about size? (The Dell is the size of 50 Mac mini's)? How about noise? My Dell Dimension at work is louder than the HVAC.
And on the model with the free monitor you get less memory, slower memory bus, and smaller hard disk...
And the "on site" warranty only applies to the one with the free 17 inch monitor - but not the other two (the other two are better computers but come with not as much stuff).
Those aren't bad deals - but I think they are in an entirely different market or demographic...
Internal or external power supply? (and a fantasy) (Score:3, Interesting)
Imagine a mac mini. Add a battery pack. Add wireless option. Throw it in your backpack. Add wireless screen (sort of like a tablet PC but just enough computing power to be a remote desktop client...for the mac mini you have in your back ack). In your home office, add a dock, and a real screen, keyboard and mouse. And so on.
In my dreams, at least.
Seems a little impractical.... (Score:2, Interesting)
.... for a desktop, as they seem to be attempting to pass it off as. Sure, you could use it as one, but it would seem more appropriate to use it as a portable, in which case, why not just get a laptop?
Where's the mic port? Is it just my ignorance of Apple hardware showing, or is there not one?
Re:*Gasp* (Score:2, Interesting)
Right, because paying more for a color accurate LCD with built-in firewire and USB 2.0 hubs isn't worth it to some people.
Re:Previous link and Financial results (Score:4, Interesting)
I also figured iPods would be doomed to failure. Why would people spend $400-600 on harddrive mp3 player, instead of say $150 on a flash mp3 player? How small could they get those disks anyways? As for Mac OS/X, come on...if someone could put an elegant GUI on a robust unix kernel don't you think Microsoft or IBM would have done it already??? And Apple was clearly doomed financially...has any company ever lasted long after a Microsoft payoff?
Now, in 2005, 20 years after I gave up on Apple, everything is falling into place. They finally have production costs under control, and long term strategic chip partnership with IBM. iPods are more popular than Sony Walkman's in the day. Mac OS/X is perhaps the best operating system in the market.
And now this. Although there's alot of Mini-ITX cases available for the PC (Apple appears to be copying the PC market), this one DOES IT RIGHT. OS is included; several very good tools and software are included. You won't be using this mini-Mac for gaming, but for internet/digital photos/word processing its an awesome setup.
Kudos Mr Jobs. I finally consider Apple a true market player once again.
Re:Reasoning for the mini (Score:5, Interesting)
With all the new free time I'll have, I'll need a new hobby. Maybe I'll finally start drinking.
Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! (Score:2, Interesting)
I have an iBook G4, and personally I've never found a need to use the iLife stuff outside iTunes. For example, what's the point of having iMovie on my machine (which they included) when it doesn't have a DVD writer? To make
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:2, Interesting)
The Mac mini is completely user-serviceable. If you want to add your own RAM, do it.
Freakin' paranoids.
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:2, Interesting)
I have also heard this, many times (net forums, word of mouth and vendors).
The RAM I've got in my old G4 began its life in a Dell server. It runs OS X just fine. It ran OS 9 and 8.6 just peachy, too. I have trouble believing that an OS could identify the difference between OEM and 3rd party RAM, or behave any differently.
The difference lies in the latency. CAS 3 SDRAM which worked fine in OS9, prevents OSX from running. I don't know if this always happens, but that is apparently where the trend shows the difference. Supposedly, Apple only provided CAS 2 SDRAM (when SDRAM was the best they could offer).
I saw posts in newsgroups and forums more than once about this.
Whether this is a performance issue or detection issue, I don't know. But the specs of a RAM stick can certainly be read by the OS from the little serial EPROM which is typically found on SDRAM and DDR RAM.
I always seek out high quality RAM and run a 24 hour burn in and I also always take great pains to seek out the lowest latency RAM for Macs because of this issue.
I actually don't mind because it's good to get the lower latency RAM. A year or two ago, I found that PC100 CAS2 SDRAM was almost as fast (transfer rate) as PC133 CAS3 SDRAM. Making me want PC133 CAS2. ; )
Cheap, flaky RAM, on the other hand, can hose a machine no matter what OS you're running.
True, but in this case, it was a very black and white case of OS9 versus OSX cropping up suddenly when people started to upgrade to OSX.
Open your mind. Just because you have a few little successes, does not mean that your experience reflects that of the norm.
Re:Reasoning for the mini (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm a 24 year-old network admin that's tired of dealing with Windows falling apart, or having to beat my Linux box into submission to make it do what I want.
I've used OSX before, briefly, before; the university was covered in iMacs. But only to print papers, or check a website. Then, just after Christmas, I was house sitting for my sister, a technophobe that manages to use an older G4 iMac. Having a week to sit down with the OS, my reaction now is this:
I'm not running any sort of heavy duty server, so fucking forget dealing with Linux. And if I'm going to pay for an OS, OSX runs rings around the best things Microsoft could even conceive. Now, how can I justify buying a full-priced Mac when I already have a pretty uber gaming PC?
This announcement couldn't have been more perfectly timed. I adore my iPod. I'm tired of PCs. And this thing's affordable and works with the pretty pricey monitor I've already got.
If they had an option to upgrade the video card in this thing to something like a 9600/9800 Pro, I'd be absolutely sold, but as it is, I'll probably buy one, anyways.
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:4, Interesting)
Mac mini offers plenty of juice to power your digital life, but you can kick it into overdrive with extras. Add the SuperDrive option to burn DVDs of your home movies or to make a backup of the music or audiobooks you buy at the iTunes Music Store. You can minimize the desktop clutter of cables with wireless connections. Surf wirelessly with an AirPort Extreme Card installed in your Mac mini. Or configure your Mac mini with internal Bluetooth to use wireless keyboards and mice. You can also choose up to 1GB RAM and increase the 40GB hard drive to 80GB. Some of these options must be installed by Apple at the factory; the rest can be added in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller.
Re:Headless Alternative for Less (Score:1, Interesting)
You need to do some more research! My salmon tinted Apple LCD disagrees with you. The color problems with the Apple displays are well-known.
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:3, Interesting)
To quote the Mac Mini tech specs page [apple.com]:
5. Memory upgrade must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider.
You won't find this on other Mac models. The iMac, for example, explicitly marks various parts like the RAM and the hard drive as user-serviceable.
"Easily accessible once you get the case open" is laughable. The original iBook's hard drive was "easily accessible" once you get the case sufficiently open, but getting to that point took an hour and a half, and putting the thing back together took another hour and a half. It's a meaningless statement, and I would like to know how hard it really is to upgrade the RAM.
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:0, Interesting)
Apple THEMSELVES fit Crucial / Micron RAM, so why would fitting it yourself cause any problems? I've been fitting 3rd party RAM to Macs for over a decade now without ever experiencing problems.
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:3, Interesting)
---
CT372707 is specifically for the Apple iBook (G4 1.2GHz) as standard
parts CT6464X265 can sometimes be incompatible. This is due to a change
in the JEDEC standards.
Apples with standard memory will sometimes give the error "Bad memory"
or "kernal panic". The memory however is not faulty.
---
While that doesn't completely answer the question for me, it does give *some* insight.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:And here are the more interesting posts: (Score:3, Interesting)
Sure, and ArsSineArtificio [slashdot.org] has already pointed out [slashdot.org] that OS X increased the strigency of its memory checking. I didn't say that I doubted an OS could detect out-of-spec RAM; I said I doubted it could detect third party RAM. I still doubt it. You're not really disagreeing with me, anyway.
Open your mind. Just because you have a few little successes, does not mean that your experience reflects that of the norm.
Spare me. I've been supporting Macs since 1985. I bother to do things like check the specifications before I install memory. My experience simply doesn't reflect that of those who install any old RAM that fits in the slot, and then wonder why they experience mysterious problems.
Open your mind to the idea that other people might be competent.
Re:Headless Alternative for Less (Score:2, Interesting)
Hey now! Don't act as if Dells don't come with lots of software. They do come with lot's of software!
On a serious note: It take me at least an hour to uninstall all the crap that comes with each new Dell system I have to configure.