An anonymous user writes, "Apple announced it has begun shipping its Xserve G5, the most powerful Xserve yet, to customers. Single processor is $2,999.00, dual processor is $3,999.00."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
They make the eMac as a low end machine for home users. Duh. Not everyone needs or wants a $1500 computer.
I believe the emacs are focused mainly on elementary schools and a similar environmnet (ie, youngsters). They are heavy and not very mobile like the imacs. Everything is in one case, including the CRT. A CRT is used because it's much cheaper, but also because it is very durable compared to an LCD. Also, if you notice on the apple store if you are buying for an educational institution you have the option of getting them wtih a superdrive, which is not available even for the students buying one for themselves. Visit an apple store and you'll notice (atleast the two near my house) that there is a little kids area with emacs. emacs also look like a redesigned and update version of the older imac models, which you see in tons of schools. i see more powermacs in universities, and more imacs in high schools and even more in elementary schools.
I believe the emacs are focused mainly on elementary schools and a similar environmnet (ie, youngsters).
They were, but are no longer.
Also, if you notice on the apple store if you are buying for an educational institution you have the option of getting them wtih a superdrive, which is not available even for the students buying one for themselves.
False. Any customer can buy an eMac with SuperDrive.
That's not a patent for a mouse. It's disguised as a mouse. The control device described in that patent is the one used on the iPod Mini, Apple just didn't want to tip their hand when patenting it.
I don't know who paid for all of your tuitions, but chez nous, $ is pretty dear. The emac and ibook line are an incredible buy for the student who doesn't necesarily have 2600$ to throw around.
It's always amusing to hear the multi-button mouse button argument being brought up. It's even more amusing that people can't fathom buying a two- (or more) button mouse for their computer.
The mouse that's connected to the Mac I'm using right now to submit this comment has two buttons -- there's no reason your Mac can't have a two button mouse, too.
I use a Dell usb optical scroll wheel mouse with my iBook from time to time. It's funny actually, because I can't use the same mouse with my boss' IBM ThinkPad!
Although, I would think that Apple would sell a mouse branded by them with multiple buttons, seeming as how they sell software requiring multiple buttons. Seems strange to exclude a simple hardware market, just because of idealogy (whether right or wrong).
I think it's the KISS principle in action -- trying to make it simpler for those computer users that have a tough enough time doing simple tasks as is. Whenever I have to help out my parents or others that are not familiar with computers it really is easier for them to remember to just click rather than 'left-button click' or 'right-button click'.
Lame? Yeah, but makes sense I guess for trying to attract those users that are scared of computers.
The computer is not a mystical device. I find it truly amazing that you can sit an intelligent person in front of a computer, and the become absolute morons with no memory! Dumbing down computers to the lowest possible common denominator has made the user experience that much worse (clippy???).
See, Clippy was a pain in the ass to get rid of, and he was everywhere. Apple hasn't dumbed down the user interface, they've just left the advanced features there for the taking, assuming you know you want them. If you want to use UNIX in OS X, go to the terminal, but my mom never has to know about it. If you want to use a mouse with five buttons, have at it, but my mom's perfectly happy with the one that came in the box.
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Wednesday March 24, 2004 @01:05PM (#8658372)
Actually, no, that's not "enough said."
Let's talk about supply chain management for a second. I know that's a big, scary term, but bear with me.
Apple manufactures computers. They build a few standard configurations and put them in boxes, and put those boxes in warehouses. (Not for long, though. Apple has long been lauded as having one of the shortest inventories in the industry.)
When you go buy a computer, you shouldn't have to specify what kind of mouse you want. That's just unacceptable. To the consumer, it's nickel-and-diming. To the company, it's a waste of shelf space and packaging material, not to mention time and effort to track all those separate bills of materials and whatnot.
So the alternative is to make a multi-button mouse a build-to-order option. But the problem is, of the (let's estimate) 10% of Mac buyers who want a different kind of mouse, not all of them want the same kind of mouse. Some want wired, some want wireless. Some want two buttons, some three, some five. Some wheels, some not. So Apple would be faced with stocking a separate build-to-order item that would only satisfy about 2% of the customers anyway, or just throwing the mouse in the box at build time and letting the customer replace it with a third-party item if he chooses.
In other words, if Apple did what you ask--ask, hell, what you practically demand--it would make Macs more expensive. Either that, or Apple would have to eat the additional cost of manufacturing and spend less on R&D.
If they shipped computers with multi-button mouse, the complaints would just focus on how the Apple multi-button mouse doesn't have 3 buttons, or a scroll wheel, or that the scroll wheel feels icky, or that it should be optical, or that optical mice are too expensive and they should have shipped an optomechanical one and lowered the price by $10, or that it should be wireless or white or aluminum or clear or blue or rounder or more square... or better yet, they should ship it with NO mice so that novice cus
there's no reason your Mac can't have a two button mouse, too
Yes, there is: because I prefer my five-button mouse! Which also has a scroll wheel! Muahahaha. I am the evil anti-Mac Mac user! I have more buttons than you can stick a shake at!
Sorry, but I have to ask this. Is everyone in this thread aware that CTRL-click on a one button mouse produces the equivalent of a right button mouse click in os x? There are a lot of little key presses like this that aren't very well documented, like command ~ scrolls through application windows, command-tab scrolls through applications (like in windows). you can move the little menu icons (airport, time display) by holding command down and dragging them with the mouse... lots more.
It's always amusing to hear the multi-button mouse button argument being brought up.
Some people (like me) just get annoyed that we have to pay top dollar for an expensive bit of hardware *and then* shell out even more to get a decent mouse (and keyboard, IMHO). Not to mention your it's then not going to fit in with the aesthetics of the rest of the package. I don't think Apple should switch to a multi button mouse across the board, however, I do think they should offer an option of an Apple designed "P
For producing such an overpriced POS, Steve Jobs.... you're FIRED!!!!!!!
I guess this is hoping to be modded funny! But the real Donald Trump should be way smarter. This is a great value for the buck. I only wish I had any excuse at all to need one. Seriously drool-worthy!
Dual 2GHz PowerPC G5 512K L2 cache/processor 1GHz system bus/processor 1GB DDR400 ECC SDRAM 80GB Serial ATA drive Mac OS X Server (Unlimited Client) Dual Gigabit Ethernet CD ROM drive
Dell $4,127
PE1750 1U Dual 2.4GHz Xeon 72GB HD 1GB RAM Dual Gigabit Ethernet CDROM NO OS
$5,626 if you get the dual 3.2 GHz chips (1MB Cache, 2MB is more) that Apple compares the XServe to on their website.
Actually that price you quote for the Sun doesn't include the operation system.
It's also worth noting that the Opteron 242 is the 1.6Ghz version.
Sun doesn't sell the Opteron 246 (the 2ghz chips that apple compares it's XServe to on it's site), but either the 244 (1.8Ghz) or 248 (2.2Ghz) would probably make a more fair comparison.
The base prices for Sun's dual 244 and 248 1U servers are $4,445.00 and $6,995.00 respectively.
From the order page:
The Solaris Operating System (x86 Platform Edition) is pre-installed on the server in 32-bit and 64-bit support will be available soon. Includes software, license and documentation.
void main() is not and have newer been legal c or c++ code.
But just for the record, please try this c program.
#define LARGE 1000000000
int main() { int i; for(i=0;i!=6;i++) { // No ram will be allocated because we // don't write to it. int *Mem=(int *)malloc(LARGE); unsigned long long Val=(unsigned long long)Mem; // ll is used to print long long. printf("Pointer value is %ll or %d\n",(unsigned long long)Val,Mem); } }
I hate to burst your bubble, but the Opteron only uses 2 of those 3 6.4GB/sec HT links in the dual-proc configs we're talking about.
The G5 has 2 and uses them both, and they're clocked at 1Ghz (8GB/sec each) as opposed to 800Mhz for the 6.4GB/sec links on the Opteron you mentioned.
And I think we all know gcc isn't as efficient compiling for the PPC970 as we'd like. If you take a look as a benchmark that can be well optimized for both processors (like linpack for instance), you'll find the 970's performan
So then why aren't their Desktop PCs and Laptops reasonably priced too? You could argue that you pay for what you get - so then are you saying that the Dell server is better than the Apple?
So then why aren't their Desktop PCs and Laptops reasonably priced too?
You mean Apple? If so, I think you'll find that the iBooks are very reasonably priced. The last time I did a comparison I found the iBooks actually beat x86 laptops in my price/feature comparison. I'll agree that Apple desktops are overpriced though. (Yes, even the "super-duper-dirt-cheap" eMacs the Mac lovers love to point to).
Disclaimer: I do not now, nor have I ever, owned anything made by Apple.
I just went to dell.com and configured a 1750 just as you said: the price came to $1,948.
Am I missing something?
Go here [dell.com] and add a second CPU, one GB of RAM and the 72GB, 10K rpm hard disk.
that's $1499+ 2nd Processor Intel Xeon, 2.4GHz w/512K Cache, 533Mhz Front Side Bus [add $299 or $8/month1] + 1GB DDR SDRAM (2X512MB) at a 512 price (mail-in rebate not valid) Dell Recommended + 73GB,10K RPM, 1in (Ultra 320) SCSI Hot Plug Hard Drive [add $150 or $4/month1]
Apparently the difference is that he configured the system through the medium & large businesses link (starting at $3474) [dell.com] while you used the small businesses configuration (starting at $1499).
I think the difference lies in the warranty and/or service contract.
$4127 from Dell? The problem with this figure is that you picked the wrong service contract. Look at what Apple offers with their AppleCare program, then look at what you got with Dell.
That's the price Dell gives you with their uber service, but Apple's service doesn't match up with it. You're looking at $2714 with a service contract equilivant to Apple's *and* 2.8 ghz Xeons instead of 2.4s.
So that's $2,714 minus the 15% off coupons you get bombarded with for being a Dell customer (or signing up on their website for that matter) - that would bring it to $2,306. Or just over half the price of the Apple offering.
Minus the 15% Dell discount coupons that are ever-present. Just because Apple always charges MSRP doesn't make it valid in a price comparison. That brings the Dell price down to $3,500. And it comes with features that the XServe doesn't, like redundant power supplies. I mean, come on Apple - these are standard (or at least available) on pretty much every single rack machine these days...
So far i only know of one compant that sells xserves (and only g4's, at the moment) with redundant PSU - Grande Vitesse Systems (or GVS). they also sell this hot 5 x 17" LCD panel display
I got an offer at the Apple Store Europe online for a 4-node Xserve cluster. I was given a substantial rebate of about 15 % on the grounds that I will use the hardware for scientific research -- albeit for a commercial company. Extra memory is also on sale at the moment. Check it out before you buy a Dell or something.
I configured the same system. Are you adding a bunch of stuff that you aren't listing there? Im not exactly sure how you got that price. Here's the price I came up with using the components that you listed for the Dell:
Dual Xeon 2.4ghz No Operating System 1GB Ram 73GB Ultra 320 SCSI HDD Dual Intel Gigabit Ethernet CDROM
$2075
Or if you would like Dual 3.2ghz Xeon procs, the price is $3574. I'm not a Dell fanboy, but Im really interested in how you arrived at that price.
I looked at the results and figured, ok the Apple is faster, but the Opteron will be cheaper and faster on a per dollar basis. That's not what I found:
G5 server as configured for Apple's linpac test: dual g5, 1gb ram, dual 250gb sata $4799.00 at apple.com achieved 9 gigaflops in Apple's test $533/gigaflop (its worth noting that in Apple's tech paper (link below), they quote $333/gigaflop, but that in a footnote, #5, they base that on a MSRP of 2799 and 9 gigaflop performance. Now where they are getting that price from I don't know, and the math doesn't work out either, so I'm going with my numbers.)
IBM e325 server as configured by Apple for linpac test: dual Opteron 246, 1gig 2700, dual scsi 15k 36gb (user installed linux os) $5191.00 at ibm.com achieved 5.9 in Apple's test $878/gigaflop
generic server with similar config as Apple used for IBM server for linpac test: dual Opteron 246, 1gig 2700, dual sata 7200 80gb preinstalled linux os $3126.00 at asaservers.com assuming 5.9 in Apple's test $529/gigaflop. (sure you could probably build something cheaper yourself, but this comes with a warranty and support.)
So, for this benchmark, Apple looks like the best performer, and at a good price/performance standpoint too. And to get similar performance, you would need more Opteron blades, which means more space, heat, juice, etc.
Yes, this still leaves a lot up in the air; it would be nice to see these tests run by an independent party, etc, using an AMD hardware configuration that was optimized for the test as the Apple surely was, etc. etc.
Apple's notes on test configurations and performance results for the xserve G5: http://a192.g.akamai.net/7/192/51/0c5b0d0ef0f 03b/w ww.apple.com/server/pdfs/L301323A_XserveG5_TO.pdf
The $333 per gigaflop figure is for the XServe cluster node - which, if you configure it to 1 GB of RAM, is actually $3149 at checkout, not $2799, making that figure slightly higher - but still much less than the Opterons!
I'd buy an XServe Cluster node if I had the money...
OK, not trying to troll, just a serious question: why on earth would anyone pay $1000 more for the dual-processor XServe over a dual-2ghz G5? I don't get this pricing discepancy at all.
The XServe has hot-swappable bays, but doesn't the Powermac have hot-swappable drives? (I know it's part of the SATA spec) Is the thousand bucks just for OS X Server? What if you already have a copy and want to transfer the license?
On a loosely related note, it's too bad they aren't still manufacturing G4 XServes... there could be a huge market for Cobalt-style, low cost OS X servers for small offices.
0) It is a 1U Rackmount. Significantly smaller. 1) *Dual* onboard gigabit ethernet on an independent bus. 2) 3 SATA drive channels w/ *hardware* RAID 0, 1, 3, and 5. This is opposed to the Tower's support for Software RAID 0 and 1. 3) ECC RAM. 4) Lower heat and possibly power. This is (strictly) a guess based on them using a newer revision of the processor. 5) A DB-9 serial port. 6) Blinkenlights:-) 7) Yes, OS X Server.
I made the same comparison and I too came to the conclusion that the cost delta is the price of OS X server. An unlimited license of Server (which is what X Serve's ship with) is ~$1000.
The scary thing about that comparison isn't the hot swap drive issue if that diference exists, it is the lack of Superdrive and low end video card that come with the X Server - that makes it even harder to buy one unless you really need the small footprint and pre-installed Server OS.
No flame bait intended:
Looking at Apple's history, I would definately not buy the first model of a new Apple product. Especially the portables have had some pretty severe teething problems for a while.
It's not like the first versions of PC / laptops explode or anything. But they have some design flaws that range from annoying to just plain wrong. But, it's not like it's Apple's fault. Many companies have the same problem (even car companies).
First generation 12" PowerBooks ran a lot hotter than they do now, and warped (some still do, but not as often).
First generation 15" Aluminum PowerBooks had white markes (splotches) on the screen.
I think the early Powerbook Ti's suffered from the keyboard press
I had a 15" 1.25Ghz PowerBook and I thought it sucked for the price I paid, i paid developer price as well which took 1/5 of the price off. This WAS a mint condition PB with no flaws like everybody else was getting.
I sold the PB after 2 months and got a 1Ghz eMac which is far better for the performance price ratio. Now I await the G5 12" to be released... after everybody else has bought one so they discover the flaws first.:)
Re:how long to ship (Score:1, Insightful)
When will people stop trolling Slashdot? They make the eMac as a low end machine for home users. Duh. Not everyone needs or wants a $1500 computer.
Re:how long to ship (Score:4, Interesting)
I believe the emacs are focused mainly on elementary schools and a similar environmnet (ie, youngsters). They are heavy and not very mobile like the imacs. Everything is in one case, including the CRT. A CRT is used because it's much cheaper, but also because it is very durable compared to an LCD. Also, if you notice on the apple store if you are buying for an educational institution you have the option of getting them wtih a superdrive, which is not available even for the students buying one for themselves. Visit an apple store and you'll notice (atleast the two near my house) that there is a little kids area with emacs. emacs also look like a redesigned and update version of the older imac models, which you see in tons of schools. i see more powermacs in universities, and more imacs in high schools and even more in elementary schools.
Re:how long to ship (Score:3, Informative)
They were, but are no longer.
Also, if you notice on the apple store if you are buying for an educational institution you have the option of getting them wtih a superdrive, which is not available even for the students buying one for themselves.
False. Any customer can buy an eMac with SuperDrive.
Re:how long to ship (Score:1)
Whoops. My mistake. Buying for a school allows you to buy a cdrom only model.
$699.00
1GHz PowerPC G4
128MB SDRAM
40GB Ultra ATA drive
CD-ROM drive
Apparently it is identical except of for the cdrom and absence of a 56k modem.
Re:how long to ship (Score:4, Informative)
When was the G5 xServe announced? Does anyone care now that it is finally shipping?
It was announced in Jan: See here [apple.com] (I think).
And VT cares. As does a my local university.
When is the PowerMac going to be updated?
In the very near future. When? No one can say for sure.
When is there to be a G5 iMac?
Not for a while
Why does Apple still make the eMac?
Because not all schools want LCD monitors for their kids to poke pins into
When are the horribly outdated (aside from the largest size) LCD monitors going to be getting refreshed?
Not untill the resolution becomes too small.
Will Apple ever make a multi-button mouse?
Not likely
Apple mouse (Score:1, Informative)
Could this be their future?
Re:Apple mouse (Score:2, Interesting)
eMac (Score:2, Informative)
emac= well priced.
Re:how long to ship (Score:3, Funny)
[Not likely]
In fact, they have done away with the button altogether. But the stupid trolls continue to moan about the lack of a multi-button mouse.
Get with with the program, you morons. Isn't it about time you started bitching about the Apple mouse not having a button at all?
Re:how long to ship (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:how long to ship (Score:2, Interesting)
Although, I would think that Apple would sell a mouse branded by them with multiple buttons, seeming as how they sell software requiring multiple buttons. Seems strange to exclude a simple hardware market, just because of idealogy (whether right or wrong).
Re:how long to ship (Score:2, Interesting)
Lame? Yeah, but makes sense I guess for trying to attract those users that are scared of computers.
Re:how long to ship (Score:1)
Re:how long to ship (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
Re:how long to ship (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's talk about supply chain management for a second. I know that's a big, scary term, but bear with me.
Apple manufactures computers. They build a few standard configurations and put them in boxes, and put those boxes in warehouses. (Not for long, though. Apple has long been lauded as having one of the shortest inventories in the industry.)
When you go buy a computer, you shouldn't have to specify what kind of mouse you want. That's just unacceptable. To the consumer, it's nickel-and-diming. To the company, it's a waste of shelf space and packaging material, not to mention time and effort to track all those separate bills of materials and whatnot.
So the alternative is to make a multi-button mouse a build-to-order option. But the problem is, of the (let's estimate) 10% of Mac buyers who want a different kind of mouse, not all of them want the same kind of mouse. Some want wired, some want wireless. Some want two buttons, some three, some five. Some wheels, some not. So Apple would be faced with stocking a separate build-to-order item that would only satisfy about 2% of the customers anyway, or just throwing the mouse in the box at build time and letting the customer replace it with a third-party item if he chooses.
In other words, if Apple did what you ask--ask, hell, what you practically demand--it would make Macs more expensive. Either that, or Apple would have to eat the additional cost of manufacturing and spend less on R&D.
You choose.
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
Re:how long to ship (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, there is: because I prefer my five-button mouse! Which also has a scroll wheel! Muahahaha. I am the evil anti-Mac Mac user! I have more buttons than you can stick a shake at!
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
so there d-:
Re:how long to ship (Score:5, Funny)
Huh. My mouse has a replica Concorde dashboard with 2520 switches, 28 levers, a control yoke and a drooping nose canopy for landing visibility.
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
Re:how long to ship (Score:1)
Re:how long to ship (Score:1)
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
1) Select "Mac Help" from the "Help" menu
2) search for "Shortcuts"
Re:how long to ship (Score:2)
Some people (like me) just get annoyed that we have to pay top dollar for an expensive bit of hardware *and then* shell out even more to get a decent mouse (and keyboard, IMHO). Not to mention your it's then not going to fit in with the aesthetics of the rest of the package. I don't think Apple should switch to a multi button mouse across the board, however, I do think they should offer an option of an Apple designed "P
Re:Steve Jobs (Score:1)
I guess this is hoping to be modded funny! But the real Donald Trump should be way smarter. This is a great value for the buck. I only wish I had any excuse at all to need one. Seriously drool-worthy!
Most powerful yet... (Score:2)
Also available... (Score:4, Informative)
Price Comparison (Score:5, Informative)
Apple
$3,999
Dual 2GHz PowerPC G5
512K L2 cache/processor
1GHz system bus/processor
1GB DDR400 ECC SDRAM
80GB Serial ATA drive
Mac OS X Server (Unlimited Client)
Dual Gigabit Ethernet
CD ROM drive
Dell
$4,127
PE1750 1U
Dual 2.4GHz Xeon
72GB HD
1GB RAM
Dual Gigabit Ethernet
CDROM
NO OS
$5,626 if you get the dual 3.2 GHz chips (1MB Cache, 2MB is more) that Apple compares the XServe to on their website.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:3, Informative)
$3,945.00
2 AMD Opteron Model 242 Processor
2-GB Memory
1 36-GB 10000 RPM Ultra320 SCSI Disk Drive
2 10/100/1000 Ethernet Ports
Sun Solaris 9
Re:Price Comparison (Score:5, Informative)
It's also worth noting that the Opteron 242 is the 1.6Ghz version.
Sun doesn't sell the Opteron 246 (the 2ghz chips that apple compares it's XServe to on it's site), but either the 244 (1.8Ghz) or 248 (2.2Ghz) would probably make a more fair comparison.
The base prices for Sun's dual 244 and 248 1U servers are $4,445.00 and $6,995.00 respectively.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:4, Informative)
From the order page: The Solaris Operating System (x86 Platform Edition) is pre-installed on the server in 32-bit and 64-bit support will be available soon. Includes software, license and documentation.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
But just for the record, please try this c program.
#define LARGE 1000000000
int main() {
int i;
for(i=0;i!=6;i++) {
int *Mem=(int *)malloc(LARGE);
unsigned long long Val=(unsigned long long)Mem;
printf("Pointer value is %ll or %d\n",(unsigned long long)Val,Mem);
}
}
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1, Informative)
The G5 has 2 and uses them both, and they're clocked at 1Ghz (8GB/sec each) as opposed to 800Mhz for the 6.4GB/sec links on the Opteron you mentioned.
And I think we all know gcc isn't as efficient compiling for the PPC970 as we'd like. If you take a look as a benchmark that can be well optimized for both processors (like linpack for instance), you'll find the 970's performan
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
DL140 1U
Dual 3.06 Ghz Xeon
1MB L2 Cache/Processor
1GB ECC DDR
80GB ATA/100 HDD
Dual Gigabit Ethernet
$1849
Add a CDROM, +$100, add Red Hat Enterprise Server 3.0 Basic, +$349.
Total: $2298
Don't compare to Dell. Their servers are *way* overpriced.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:5, Informative)
Unlike the XServe, the Dell, and the Sun, that HP's drives are not hot swapable. (and I'd be willing to bet alot of other internals aren't either)
It has the least cache of the x86 offereings.
It has the by far the slowest memory of any of the servers in the thread (it has DDR266, where most have DDR333, and the XServe has DDR400).
It has only one PCIX slot, where most of the offerings in the thread have 2 or more.
etc...
You get what you pay for.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
You mean Apple? If so, I think you'll find that the iBooks are very reasonably priced. The last time I did a comparison I found the iBooks actually beat x86 laptops in my price/feature comparison. I'll agree that Apple desktops are overpriced though. (Yes, even the "super-duper-dirt-cheap" eMacs the Mac lovers love to point to).
Disclaimer: I do not now, nor have I ever, owned anything made by Apple.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1, Informative)
I just went to dell.com and configured a 1750 just as you said: the price came to $1,948.
Am I missing something?
Go here [dell.com] and add a second CPU, one GB of RAM and the 72GB, 10K rpm hard disk.
that's $1499+ 2nd Processor Intel Xeon, 2.4GHz w/512K Cache, 533Mhz Front Side Bus [add $299 or $8/month1] + 1GB DDR SDRAM (2X512MB) at a 512 price (mail-in rebate not valid) Dell Recommended + 73GB,10K RPM, 1in (Ultra 320) SCSI Hot Plug Hard Drive [add $150 or $4/month1]
$1948 dude, not $4127.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
I think the difference lies in the warranty and/or service contract.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:3, Interesting)
That's the price Dell gives you with their uber service, but Apple's service doesn't match up with it. You're looking at $2714 with a service contract equilivant to Apple's *and* 2.8 ghz Xeons instead of 2.4s.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:5, Insightful)
if(apple_price > dell_price) most_important_thing = price;
else most_important_thing = some_other_feature();
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
AppleCare is frankly crap in the corporate world.
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:2)
Xserve: AU$6,499
2x 2Ghz G5
1Gb RAM
1x 80Gb 7200 RPM SATA drive
CDROM
Dual Gb ethernet.
OS X Server
1 year (next day response ?)
Dell 1750: AU$6,560
2x 3Ghz Xeon (512k cache)
1Gb RAM
1x 73Gb 10k RPM SCSI drive
CDROM
Dual Gb ethernet.
3 year next day warranty
Redhat AS
Nice things about the Dell box missing from the Xserve:
Redundant PSU option
Hardware RAID (w/128Mb cache) without sac
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
Discount at Apple Store Europe online (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Price Comparison (Score:1)
Dual Xeon 2.4ghz
No Operating System
1GB Ram
73GB Ultra 320 SCSI HDD
Dual Intel Gigabit Ethernet
CDROM
$2075
Or if you would like Dual 3.2ghz Xeon procs, the price is $3574.
I'm not a Dell fanboy, but Im really interested in how you arrived at that price.
Price per gigaflop (Score:5, Informative)
G5 server as configured for Apple's linpac test:
dual g5, 1gb ram, dual 250gb sata
$4799.00 at apple.com
achieved 9 gigaflops in Apple's test
$533/gigaflop
(its worth noting that in Apple's tech paper (link below), they quote $333/gigaflop, but that in a footnote, #5, they base that on a MSRP of 2799 and 9 gigaflop performance. Now where they are getting that price from I don't know, and the math doesn't work out either, so I'm going with my numbers.)
IBM e325 server as configured by Apple for linpac test:
dual Opteron 246, 1gig 2700, dual scsi 15k 36gb
(user installed linux os)
$5191.00 at ibm.com
achieved 5.9 in Apple's test
$878/gigaflop
generic server with similar config as Apple used for IBM server for linpac test:
dual Opteron 246, 1gig 2700, dual sata 7200 80gb
preinstalled linux os
$3126.00 at asaservers.com
assuming 5.9 in Apple's test
$529/gigaflop.
(sure you could probably build something cheaper yourself, but this comes with a warranty and support.)
So, for this benchmark, Apple looks like the best performer, and at a good price/performance standpoint too. And to get similar performance, you would need more Opteron blades, which means more space, heat, juice, etc.
Yes, this still leaves a lot up in the air; it would be nice to see these tests run by an independent party, etc, using an AMD hardware configuration that was optimized for the test as the Apple surely was, etc. etc.
Apple's notes on test configurations and performance results for the xserve G5:
http://a192.g.akamai.net/7/192/51/0c5b0d0ef0
fixed link to Apple's test notes (Score:1)
Re:Price per gigaflop (Score:4, Interesting)
Obligatory G5 Powerbook post (Score:2, Funny)
-psy
Re:Obligatory G5 Powerbook post (Score:2)
XServe vs... Powermac? (Score:3, Interesting)
The XServe has hot-swappable bays, but doesn't the Powermac have hot-swappable drives? (I know it's part of the SATA spec) Is the thousand bucks just for OS X Server? What if you already have a copy and want to transfer the license?
On a loosely related note, it's too bad they aren't still manufacturing G4 XServes... there could be a huge market for Cobalt-style, low cost OS X servers for small offices.
I can think of a few... (Score:5, Informative)
1) *Dual* onboard gigabit ethernet on an independent bus.
2) 3 SATA drive channels w/ *hardware* RAID 0, 1, 3, and 5. This is opposed to the Tower's support for Software RAID 0 and 1.
3) ECC RAM.
4) Lower heat and possibly power. This is (strictly) a guess based on them using a newer revision of the processor.
5) A DB-9 serial port.
6) Blinkenlights
7) Yes, OS X Server.
Re:XServe vs... Powermac? (Score:2)
Sorry, couldn't resist.
-fred
Re:XServe vs... Powermac? (Score:1, Interesting)
I made the same comparison and I too came to the conclusion that the cost delta is the price of OS X server. An unlimited license of Server (which is what X Serve's ship with) is ~$1000.
The scary thing about that comparison isn't the hot swap drive issue if that diference exists, it is the lack of Superdrive and low end video card that come with the X Server - that makes it even harder to buy one unless you really need the small footprint and pre-installed Server OS.
BTB - Anyone out there know what so
Re:Hopefully the rumors will hold... (Score:5, Insightful)
Looking at Apple's history, I would definately not buy the first model of a new Apple product. Especially the portables have had some pretty severe teething problems for a while.
Re:Hopefully the rumors will hold... (Score:1)
Re:Hopefully the rumors will hold... (Score:3, Informative)
First generation 12" PowerBooks ran a lot hotter than they do now, and warped (some still do, but not as often).
First generation 15" Aluminum PowerBooks had white markes (splotches) on the screen.
I think the early Powerbook Ti's suffered from the keyboard press
Re:Hopefully the rumors will hold... (Score:1)
Re:Hopefully the rumors will hold... (Score:2, Funny)