Apple Wins VT in Cost. vs. Performance 105
danigiri writes "Detailed notes about a presentation at Virginia Tech are posted by by an attending student. copied most of the slides of the facts presentation and wrote down their comments. He wrote some insightful notes and info snippets, like the fact that Apple gave the cheapest deal of machines with chassis, beating Dell, IBM, HP. They are definitely going to use some in-house fault-tolerance software to prevent the odd memory-bit error on such a bunch of non-error-tolerant RAM and any other hard or soft glitches. The G5 cluster will be accepting first apps around-November."
mfago adds, "Apple beat Dell, IBM and others based on Cost vs. Performance alone, and it will run Mac OS X because 'there is not enough support for Linux.'"
Power concerns (Score:0, Insightful)
Full operation by Jan 1 2004- that's cool.
Re:Clueless Sysadmins... (Score:3, Insightful)
IANAS, but:
Re:Clueless Sysadmins... (Score:5, Insightful)
So they could equip one G5 with a radeon9800 and let that one display the results. No need to buy another 1099 Radeons.
Re:Interesting (Score:3, Insightful)
At least, that's the way I've been parsing it.
-Ster
Re:Why was bidding secret? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:For those in the know (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Cost Analysis (Score:5, Insightful)
Just enough to demonstrate that Apple *would* have a solution, and enough that VT could narrow down the decision to a possible, pending the actual production and purchase of a single machine... then, the contract being 99% complete, they just had to sign a couple papers and purchase, overnight, 1,100 dual G5s.
On the flip side I bet they had a similar contract in the wings with other vendors, all pending on 'simple' bottlenecks.