Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Programming Businesses Apple IT Technology

Mac OS X Innovators Contest 40

lisam writes "Have you created a Mac OS X application, plug-in, or some other type of innovative software that you believe is top in its class? Then check out the Mac OS X Innovators contest. Prizes include a ADC Premier Membership, WWDC pass, pass to the O'Reilly Mac OS X Conference, etc, etc. You can enter more than once, but the deadline is March 28, 2003."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mac OS X Innovators Contest

Comments Filter:
  • Coding on Non-Mac (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hellraisr ( 305322 ) on Thursday March 13, 2003 @04:37PM (#5506147)
    Is there any way to create a Mac application without actually owning a Mac?
  • by heldlikesound ( 132717 ) on Thursday March 13, 2003 @04:45PM (#5506220) Homepage
    I've written a small, yet (I think) innovative content management system (read: fancy blog) on OSX using Apache, PHP, and mySQL all in my humble little iBook. However, the rules seem a bit vague. The submissions:

    "May be an application, an application plug-in, System service, device driver, code library, kernel extension, user interface widget, or anything else of a similar nature."

    Anyway, it runs and was developed on OSX, so does that make it eligble???
    • Let the judges be the judge! Seriously, if you think it's eligible, submit it. Make them reject it :) They may even tell you why!
    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 13, 2003 @09:39PM (#5508387)
      I wouldn't bother. If you read the link, you'll see that applications will be based on 4 criteria (criteria 1-3 get 20 points each, criteria 4 is worth 40), and winner is highest culmulative score out of 100. Here are the criteria:

      1) Ease of Use -- Does the software deliver ease of use, including installation (Drag Install where appropriate), troubleshooting, easy completion of tasks, stability, clarity of displays and messages, smooth, uncluttered interaction with the user, etc?
      How easy is it to install MySQL, PHP and setup Apache? Not that difficult if you know what you're doing, but definately not for the "drag n' drop" crowd.

      2) Adherence to the Mac OS X Human Interface Guidelines -- Does the software comply with, for example, the Aqua layout guidelines, system appearance (including anti-aliased display of text), and correct organization of menus and use of keyboard shortcuts?
      If this is one of the criteria, then it looks like you'll probably get a "0" in this one... maybe you've done something to mimic a regular Aqua application, but why bother?

      3) Use of Mac OS X Technologies -- Does the application make use of relevant technologies (i.e. Quartz, Quartz Extreme, Velocity Engine, Rendezvous, Core Audio, AppleScript, ATSUI, MLTE, QuickTime, Apple Help, Etc?)
      Looks like another fat "0" in this category... none of the technologies you listed are Apple-brewed.

      4) Innovation -- Is the software a new, category-defining type of product with unique, groundbreaking features, functions, or interactions for Mac OS X? Does the application deliver a highly innovative solution to a common problem or set of problems faced by users? This is perhaps the one category you might be able to get a decent score in, but is another blogger "category-defining", "unique" or "groundbreaking?"

      Sorry to burst a bubble, as I have written a blog-type application as well and was dissapointed by the criteria.
      • 1) Couldn't you have a script to install or HUP and restart any services you need to? Making hard things easy is what Apple is about.

        2) Why couldn't a blog be Aqua compliant?

        3) Again, why couldn't an actual blog-creation app make use of Help, Drag-n-drop, or Quicktime? ATSUI? What if you want to blog in Japan?

        4) How many people blog? Why don't most average joes blog? Because its currently limited to digerati, or bleeding edge folk. If you made it as easy to blog as email, or let people know it's easy, th
  • by sporty ( 27564 ) on Thursday March 13, 2003 @05:03PM (#5506356) Homepage
    Tight deadline, but I know how I'm gonna win. Instead of doing one project and doing it well, I'll do a ton of little projects with good intentions.

    How will I win?

    VOLUME! VOLUME VOLUME!

    Sorry.. too much caffine.. damned Sprites ;)
  • Winning entries (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 13, 2003 @05:31PM (#5506631)
    ..will have their ideas [karelia.com] ripped off and incorporated into other products [apple.com]!

    I know, it's tired, but it still annoys me.

  • question (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Pudge, do you just wait a day or so and post links from MacSlash [macslash.com] or is apple.slashdot.org just using the MacSlash XML feed? I mean, why even bother?
  • Konfabulator (Score:2, Interesting)

    I sure as hell hope that the makers of Konfabulator [konfabulator.com] submitted their app. They're hands-down a winner in almost all of the categories.

    Man, I LOVE Konfab! So....COOL....must....register......
    • I like Konfab too, but I think it probably loses on this one:

      2) Adherence to the Mac OS X Human Interface Guidelines -- Does the software comply with, for example, the Aqua layout guidelines, system appearance (including anti-aliased display of text), and correct organization of menus and use of keyboard shortcuts?

      It's anti-aliased.... but that's about it. Some of those widgets are like refugees from KPT Bryce. About as non-standard as you get.

      However, it might win on point 4 (innovation).

  • Unsanity (Score:2, Interesting)

    by owlicks58 ( 560207 )
    I sure hope the guys at Unsanity pick up some prizes. They have had the most polished little helper apps/preference panes for OS X. I use Silk, Windowshade, Fruit Menu, and Shadowkiller all from them, couldn't get by without that stuff.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...