Jaguar Free for K-12 Teachers 379
Hugh writes "It seems Apple is giving away for free its newest revision of Mac OS X, version 10.2 (Jaguar), to every K-12 teacher in the U.S."
Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing. -- Roy L. Ash, ex-president, Litton Industries
about time (Score:4, Insightful)
MS gave hardware to schools to sway them to go M$ Apple should be giving gear away as an investment into the end users too.
Re:about time (Score:5, Informative)
Re:about time (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:about time (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:about time (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:about time (Score:3, Insightful)
that the dynamics of hardware markets are different
from those of software markets. They're not exactly
ignorant of microeconomics over there in Redmond.
Re:about time (Score:2)
Re:about time (Score:2)
Giving away software licenses that they can set the price to allows them to create money as part of the settlement for many lawsuits.
Re:about time (Score:3, Funny)
Sorry [microsoft.com], I [microsoft.com] must [microsoft.com] have [microsoft.com] missed [sysopt.com] that [kelkoo.com].
Re:about time (Score:2, Interesting)
then again, i remember talking to the sysadmin one day only to hear him ranting about the difficulty of administrating nt4 as opposed to the mac machines.
Re:about time (Score:5, Interesting)
I see this move as apple trying to convince those educators who bought an apple under OS9 or OSX / 9 to upgrade so that the students coming out of the schools are tutored in OSX helping to foster the OS.
Double standard? Yup. (Score:2, Flamebait)
Now Apple decides to give away their next-gen OS and everyone here thinks that's a great gesture.
Double standard? Definitely. Hypocrytical? It sure looks like it.
Re:Double standard? Yup. (Score:5, Insightful)
Seems to me that the only time that such action on Microsoft's part really brought about a major outcry was when they offered to do such as penalty/in settlement for what the government and many /.'ers deemed monopolistic practices. Now that is a completely different situation than the one that is currently at hand with Apple.
Apple is not offering to give away their software and a bunch of hardware because they've had charges of unfair trade practices leveled against them. Apple is clearly trying to win the hearts, minds and screens of teachers, and thus students, but how is that different from anything that any marketing ploy ever does?
So in a way, you are right, there is a similar motivation between what Microsoft offered to do and what Apple is doing but the reason that your point doesn't stand up, in my opinion, is that the context of their actions is different. Apple is doing it simply as a marketing scheme, Microsoft did it as an attempt to get away without any stronger penalty for the charges brought against them. Therefore, in light of the dramatically dfferent contexts of the two cases, it seems to me that the differential reaction by the /. masses is completely understandable and justified.
-tcp
Re:about time (Score:2)
It didn't do them much good. Whether it was features, price, compatibility, overall usefullness, or some Evil Microsoft Trick, Apple lost this market.
Re:wash repeat... (Score:5, Interesting)
Occasionally, I substitute teach, so I don't think I'm qualified for Apple's give-away, so.
But, from what I've seen, the worse of this advertising stuff is the Channel 1 network.
In exchange for free TVs in every room (and the cable infrastructior [sp] along with it), the school agrees to broadcast this news program into the school rooms.
The actual content of the Channnel one network is supposedly news, but it's biased, heavily, but I suppose that it's hard to keep bias out of news. I mean, just by choosing which stories to cover you've got bias.
CNN's Anderson Cooper and MTV's Serena Alschule (however you spell it) got their start at channel one. It also allowed for a lot of schools to have the means to make their own news shows, some of which were basically some kid reading in monotone the events of the day and the sports scores, along with the cheesy Video Toaster graphics.
But they (Channel 1) pay for it by showing about 4 segments of 4 ads in about 15 minutes to a very specific and very captive audience.
But I remember this stuff back when I was in school. I remember that they had thousands of ads that students were forced to watch, mostly involving OXY cleansers and Pepsi.
Vaguely depressing, because they had the demographic they wanted and the kids had to watch, sometimes there were quizzes based on the content of the show. (Of course, depending how the student cared about his/her grade.)
There's your advertising in schools for you.
At least my school had a pepsi and a coke machine, for choice, you know. They turned them off before first hour started, though my experiences show that the availability has little effect on the students themselves in the classroom. It's more likely the location and the towns' economic situation.
To try and push this into vaguely on topic-ness, I haven't seen an Apple (other than a few Apple IIs [even still]) in a school I've taught at or attended since my college's graphic design lab.
Re:wash repeat... (Score:3, Funny)
Yea that was a VERY bias news cast now that I think about it. Good thing I have a strong will.
*Grabs a Pepsi*
Re:wash repeat... (Score:4, Funny)
I still had fun doing it you insensitive clod!
Are they.. (Score:4, Interesting)
How long till we see the switch ads saying "I got my Mac OS for free... Apple is so nice and 1337"
I got WinXP, Frontpage, OfficeXP, and Visual Studio from MS for being a college student, why didn't we hear about this?
Re:Are they.. (Score:4, Insightful)
How does that work? If they give you the OS for free, can you go to a shop and buy a cheaper Mac? I was under the impression that the cost of OS X is included and not optional. The only people who would benefit from this are those who already have a Mac with OS X.
Re:Are they.. (Score:4, Informative)
of the older ones. Sometimes you have to add
memory though.
Re:Are they.. (Score:5, Informative)
OS X "Jaguwire" requires a 3d video card with T&L engine (ie, Nvidia geforce1 or ATI radeon +)
Then how come I'm writing this on 10.2 with an ATI 128?
Re:Are they.. (Score:5, Informative)
Hardly.
I've been running Mac OS X since beta on my six year old Beige G3/300 which has 256MB RAM and was running off the original ixMicro 3D video card. Once I hit 10.1.5 things ran quite smoothly, although things will slow down if I'm playing MP3s over NFS. (My 10/100 NIC and SCSI hard disk are both sitting on the PCI bus, along with the video card.) I was able to run dual monitors one off the Rage II and the other off the ixMicro just fine.
I recently upgraded to a RADEON 7000 PCI so I get better dual monitor support and can play some 3D games at low resolution.
This is my primary workstation and I am often running ~10 applications including Photoshop, OmniWeb, iChat, Mail, iCal, iTunes, BBEdit, XFree86, Terminal, etc. Things work wonderfully.
Re:Are they.. (Score:4, Informative)
*Mac OS X v10.2 system requirements:
A minimum of 128MB of memory and one of the following Apple products: Power Mac G3 or G4, iMac, eMac, iBook, and PowerBook G3 or G4. (The original PowerBook G3 and processor upgrade cards are not supported.)
Note that a previous version of Mac OS X is not listed, so it must be the full package. Woohoo!
Re:Are they.. (Score:5, Funny)
they are embarrassed to admit it.
What's the difference? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Are they.. (Score:4, Informative)
I do not think you got WinXP and extras for free. Your school likely paid a very significant licensing fee for the right to distrubute the software to all faculty, staff, and students. This fee was in turn paid by you through fees, and, if a public institution, through public taxes. I would say you got an incredible deal, but it was far from free.
Or, as has been mentioned here before, the school was forced to license the software for everyone to avoid the dreaded BSA audit.
Re:Are they.. (Score:4, Informative)
"The membership will run from July through June each year and will cost $799 (USD) per department per year to join. The program was designed to run concurrently with the standard academic year."
List of software:
* Visual Studio Professional
* Microsoft Project Professional
* Windows XP, Windows 2000, and other Microsoft operating systems
*
* Microsoft Visio Professional
* MSDN Library (updated quarterly), documentation, technical articles, and code samples * Software development kits (SDKs), betas, new releases, and updates
* Development tools for Windows CE
* Professional technical support for the program administrator that includes unlimited setup and install support and 4 regular support incidents
* Technical support newsgroups for faculty members
* Regular CD-based software shipments with updated software
MSDNAA FAQ [msdnaa.com]
*Insert joke about how you have to factor in the cost of your soul[d] here*
Re:Are they.. (Score:3, Informative)
Do students need to uninstall the software at the end of the course?
No, students are allowed to keep the software they have installed, but they may not check out or download additional MSDNAA software unless they continue taking courses from a member department. Regardless, they are still bound by the terms of the MSDNAA license agreement.
Remembering one of the major markets (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Remembering one of the major markets (Score:3, Informative)
An apple for the teacher.. (Score:3, Funny)
apple (Score:5, Funny)
AND.. The campain you never heard about; (Score:2, Offtopic)
Apple is serving every xbox developer [microsoft.com] too! ;-)
I'm a teacher. (Score:5, Funny)
What? You doubt that I am a teacher? Well, come here and I'll teach you a lesson or two.
But, wait... it gets better (Score:5, Interesting)
Hardware Costs (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hardware Costs (Score:5, Insightful)
2) Most of this is going to be for the teachers that have an original iMac sitting in their classroom (or their house) that is still running MacOS 9.1 (or even 8.6) on it. No, this will not bring in new users directly, but an argument could be made "Well, if we buy new Macs, Apple might keep us with up-to-date operating system upgrades for free in the future."
Re:Hardware Costs (Score:5, Insightful)
throat. I agree with you that people who run
schools should weigh the costs and the benefits.
But that's their responsibility, not Apple's.
I think it's pretty clear that this is meant to
boost OS X at the expense of OS 9. I don't see
why that would put a bad taste in your mouth.
If you're just saying that this shouldn't be
viewed as philanthropic, then I agree wholeheartedly.
If I ran the IRS, Apple would be allowed to write
off the cost of the materials, but not the retail
value of the software.
Re:Hardware Costs (Score:2, Funny)
windows has this auto built, no need to install newer os to get the once blazing fast computer to act like it had stuffed a bottle of valium up the re****. (and no need to tell this doesnt apply to 2k/xp, it does, the reg system gets pretty clogged up after doing dozens of installs of stupid software and cleaning it needs 3rd party products unless you're hc and use regedit for that..)
Not only that... (Score:2)
Re:Not only that... (Score:2)
colleges left out in the cold (Score:2, Interesting)
so.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Eligibility... (Score:5, Insightful)
I always love these descriptions. Define "teacher." I work at a residential high school as a resident counselor. True, the name "teacher" is not in my title. However, my job description (as written by the state of Illinois) involves teaching students.
Border's refuses to give me a discount on books (even when purchased for programs with students) because they claim (at least my local Border's) that the discount only applies to people that work in a classroom.
I work with very technology-aware students (I work at a the Illinois Math and Science Academy [imsa.edu]) and, as a big geek, I am often discussing tech issues and comparing computers with students.
(An upcoming program I am putting together will discuss recent copyright debates that are ongoing, for example).
I think that Apple would want nothing more than for me to have a copy of Jaguar to show off to the students.
And Apple might very well send me a copy of Jaguar, who knows...
Of course, being the good little geek, I pre-purchased an educational-discounted copy and got it before it was available retail. That was $75 out of my pocket that I am guessing Apple is not going to reimburse.
I have to wonder how many teachers have already purchased Jaguar.
I might take them up on the offer and give one of the copies to a student.
Re:Eligibility... (Score:2)
Re:Eligibility... (Score:2)
IMSA is almost certainly qualified.
Re:Eligibility... (Score:3, Insightful)
Unless they've substantially changed RC's jobs in the last few years, there's really no educational purpose to giving him free software, nor does it serve the marketing purpose I imagine Apple has for this.
Bottom Line (Score:5, Insightful)
The bigger problem is having school districts reponsibly spend the extra money they will save.
Re:Bottom Line (Score:2)
So you're for the type of school privatization that we're seeing in the UK then, where companies pay for textbooks, buildings, teaching materials in return for students using only branded stuff, and only being able to buy new stationary etc from one location?
I'd think it's pretty easy for local authorities to turn a blind eye to corporates giving schools free stuff, only to later find that their budgets are now dependant upon corporate aid.
Re:Bottom Line (Score:2)
Thankfully, no, not yet. It's been talked about a lot though, and a few experiments have been done. I believe one or two "failing" state schools have been taken over by a company, and that sort of thing has indeed gone on. The schools got new buildings (schwag), but had all sorts of conditions placed upon them.
Note that New Labour isn't really left wing at all, they have privatised pretty much everything they possibly could. We still pay for TV because the BBC is far too big and popular to change now.
That's what I'm worried about in a way - these companies seem to be using schools as a kind of playing field for their products. If their products didn't involve any other conditions I'd be fine - no problems with giving out free textbooks etc as long as no favours were expected later. The main problem I see is that a proprietary platform by definition has conditions attached, namely that in future you will be under pressure to upgrade when discounts may not be available, and that it's hard to stop using them etc etc.
Re:Bottom Line (Score:2)
program is only useful to those who've already
invested in Macintosh hardware.
Re:Bottom Line (Score:2, Interesting)
That is a huge problem. One of the local schools near where I live just finished spending $12 million to upgrade the sports complex. Astroturf football field, bigger stadium, clay running tracks, etc. The best part is that they've always had a parking problem and they built a bigger stadium where the parking lot used to be and didn't build any more parking. Doh!
Its Called Keeping the Edu Market (Score:3, Insightful)
What do we have here? (Score:2, Interesting)
(btw, check the site [apple.com] for refference, it's on the right)
Give the gift of X (Score:5, Informative)
Go to:
http://www.apple.com/education/macosxforteac
fill in the zip code of the school of your favorite teacher, and then enter their name and email. OSX will be sent to them. Takes 90 seconds.
P.S. This was announced days ago. What took it so long to make
This is a very good thing (Score:2, Interesting)
Microsoft has a similar program in place already (Score:3, Informative)
Granted, Microsoft's program isn't as broad or open as Apple's, but it certainly is worth noting.
Perks of the job... (Score:5, Funny)
I know they want to attract people to the teaching profession, but surely giving them a free sports car is overdoing it a little?
Re:Perks of the job... (Score:4, Funny)
I spose Apple figure they'd make a good and educational class pet.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Did they buy Atari? (Score:4, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Only until December 31? (Score:2)
As many people note, Macintoshes are not cheap machines, and may be out of the price range of the average teacher(and do not tell me it is out the price range of all or most teachers, because I know that that statement is false). Apple is also losing market share in the education market mostly due to better marketing by Dell. By offering teachers free OS, they reduce future uncertainty over cost, give then a reliable simple OS, and free them from the MS licensing nightmare.
If Apple were to give away the OS to teachers, that would help a lot, and would not cost them a lot. An apple will generally last through 2 to 3 major upgrade cycles, which may be a couple hundred dollars lost to Apple. That seems a small price to help convince millions of teachers to make their next computer a Mac.
BTW, one issue sometimes brought up but not often fully discussed is the licensing of software to schools by MS. For many people the cost of the computer is only a small part of the total IT cost. Buying software can easily get to be 2/3 of the cost over the life of the machine. Part of the reason that MS is gung ho to force schools to license MS software is so that the software will appear free to the end user, thus artificially reducing the cost of the wintel machine, and increasing the number of student who will buy wintel machines. Although MS also licenses software it makes for the Mac, there is far more 'free' software available for the PC. I have known several people who would have and should have bought Macs, but bought Wintel machines because of the 'free' software.
Boy, would I like to run OS X at home... (Score:4, Insightful)
That computer would cost me over $3000. Looking over at Dell's website, a similary configured PC, which a better video card, and a 2 Ghz P4 instead of the 2x1Ghz G4's, would run me about half that.
Some specifics that jump out at me: Apple wants $400 for 512MB of PC2700 memory. Dell wants $200. I can get the appropriate module from crucial for $170, so Apple's markup is well over 100%.
The LCD is similar; apple's 17" LCD display runs $1000. Dell will charge me $500. I can get a nice samsung model for about $590 online.
I really, REALLY like what I've seen of OS X, but I won't pay 100% premiums on hardware just to be able to run it.
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home... (Score:5, Informative)
and generic LCD screen with a Mac. I just bought
256 MB of RAM for an old iMac for the princely
sum of $42 -- from Crucial.
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home... (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't want 512 from Apple for $400? Fine, buy it elsewhere. Don't want to pay $1000 for an Apple LCD? Fine, buy one elsewhere. Suddenly your $3000 machine is $2500. And why do you need dual-GHz for OS X? It runs fine on my dual-800, and fine on my roommate's dual-500.
Switch to a base dual-867, and we're down to $1700 plus tax.
Quit yer bitchin and do your research.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
I hope the i386 port is on the CD! (Score:3, Interesting)
i am a seventh grade teacher (Score:4, Insightful)
i bought an ibook a couple of weeks ago. it has 10.2. i love it. but the problem is more hardware than software. a few years ago, schools began moving toward PC's, and os x is just not going to work.
Why they're doing this (Score:4, Interesting)
Apple's not hoping to push hardware sales with this; any new Macs will come with 10.2 on it. They just want people to get away from OS9.
Missing the point COMPLETELY (Score:4, Insightful)
Apple is giving away OSX to TEACHERS, not schools. There is quite a big difference here; the teachers get a copy of it, and can do whatever the heck they want to with it.
This does NOT mean that Apple is giving OSX to schools for the use in classrooms, labs, etc. Microsoft's products for K-12 teachers/students are licensed so that they are for (educational) use by the teacher or student, but not the school, as sepearate (more expensive) versions exist for schools. The copy of the software belongs to the teacher, and unless it's being installed on a computer which is property of the teacher, it's a copyright violation (and rightfully so - the school is essentially "stealing" the software from the teacher). I'm sure apple has a similar clause in their agreement. Still, I think it's a great offer.
Besides, isn't product placement one of the most effective forms of advertising?
The likely motive(a highschooler's perspective) (Score:5, Insightful)
Giving educational institutions a break (Score:3, Interesting)
How is apple supposed to expect support from the developer community or the student community when no one is being trained on using macs in school (other then graphics design people)?
The only people I know who know anything about macs are the graphic design people who will probably never own a mac because they will be supplied one from their employer.
Apple should really try and get the techies into macs at school. For example, a local college here offers a 3 year "Computer Systems Technician" Diploma and not once do any of their students touch a macintosh.
Graphic designers won't be developing software for your macs Apple.. clue in.
Re:This sounds familiar (Score:4, Insightful)
I know many teachers who have old iMacs and couldn't justify paying the price for Jaguar. Now they can.
Re:This sounds familiar (Score:5, Insightful)
There is a magic concept at work here: CONTEXT
What makes an action by MS reprehensible or not, is not the actual sequence of events, but the context in which they occur. This is in fact, the determining factor about anti-trust law. A legitimate form of promotion by one entity becomes a prohibited leverage of dominance in the market by a monopoly player.
MS has been determined - in unquestionable legal language - to be a Monopoly player.
Now, make your crack - is MS the Shoe, Top Hat or the Scottie Dog...
Re:This sounds familiar (Score:5, Insightful)
IANAL either, but no, giving something away is not illegal in general, although it can be under specific circumstances. Donations to schools are, I believe, generally covered under "charity", and far from being illegal, probably even qualify for a tax write-off.
From what I recall, it wasn't the integration of IE with Windows that landed Microsoft in court originally, it was their practice of giving it away for free in order to get an advantage over Netscape.
MS was violating the terms of their earlier consent decree, where they had agreed not to try to put potential competitors out of business by bundling new stuff with the OS. Remember, the rules are different for a monopoly, and even more different for a monopoly that repeatedly violates anti-trust laws.
I'm no fan of Apple, I wouldn't switch on a bet, and if you gave me a Mac, I'd wipe off that OS/X junk and install Debian in a heartbeat, but Apple is clearly doing nothing wrong here.
Re:This sounds familiar (Score:2)
Hmm, any M$ emplayees sneaking around Slashdot? If so I think you've found your new slogan:
"Think 'even more different' ".
Re:This sounds familiar (Score:2)
against unfair competition, generally of the
foreign variety.
Who but Apple sells operating systems for the Mac?
Re:MOTHERFUCKERS! (Score:2)
How does this fuck you over? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:How does this fuck you over? (Score:2)
False logic - lots of business have just upgraded to Windows XP due to some fillip of the new licensing regime rather than because they thought it was worth it for instance. If you decided that 10.1 did everything you would ever need and didn't want to upgrade, as time passed your computer would become more and more obsolete, incapable of running newer apps that took advantage of new features added into later versions.
How many people still run Windows 95, even though 98 had few compelling reasons to upgrade (except perhaps real usb support)? The answer - not many. Even Microsoft doesn't support 95 anymore.
Re:How does this fuck you over? (Score:2)
That's exactly my point. Whether an OS upgrade is "worth it" often has little to do with the OS itself, and is more to do with how painful would it be to get left behind, how easy would it be to switch to another OS etc. MacOS is not really any different from Windows in terms of licensing, hence all the bitching and moaning about the price of 10.2 - those people clearly didn't think that remaining on 10.1 for ever was really an option.
Re:the right direction (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Wow (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Informative)
[Insert standard "Mhz Myth" argument here]
[Insert standard "One Button Like God Intended" rant here]
Also, you forgot to factor in the labor involved in building and troubleshooting the computer. Most teachers would have to hire somebody to do this. Since this is a one-off build (I know if you're making dozens of the same computer you can do it faster, since you only need to troubleshoot once), assume four hours at $25/hour to build and troubleshoot. Since most teachers add Windows XP Home for $186.99, and Office XP Standard for $416.99, and you're looking at a total of $1,508.96 for your system.
Anyway, you're missing my point. My point is not that low end Macs are a better deal than low end PCs (they probably aren't). My point is that there are low end Macs which are affordable on a teacher's salary.
Re:Wow (Score:4, Informative)
The eMacs offer Firewire, USB, ethernet, a 17" flat screen monitor, nice speakers, a compact form factor, and they are very durable. Sure if you buy some no-name, do-it-yourself pc you can get a computer cheaper, but these prices are pretty good for a pre-built, quality machine. On top of all of this you get MacOS X, tons of great free software such as iTunes and iMovie, and the ability to run almost any software written for Linux or other Unix-like operating systems. Not a bad deal at all.
Re:Wow (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wow (Score:3, Insightful)
I find it somewhat funny that I can walk into something such as a music studio and still find a ton of old Mac Classics sitting next to dual G4's. When your dealing with multimedia tasks such as midi Mac classics still just "work"
People rarely want to keep a Wintel box around for more then 3 years. You get desire to migrate a lot sooner. (and by "migrate" I mean "huck that slow, difficult, outdated POS out the window")
I used to work in a campus IT dept, and I fail to comprehend why anyone in their right mind would want to spend thousands of dollars on Wintel computer labs. I guess people simply like to purchase what they know. Mac labs last longer (especially in multimedia labs), they are more secure, they have the same damn productivity software, they require a much smaller IT dept, software licenses are not a royal pain in the butt, kids can comprehend how to use the desktop workspace faster, teachers can admin class networks and netboot machines with virtually no training, etc etc etc. I'm also fairly sure Apple gives institutions a fairly nice price break when they buy in bulk.
I'm all about white box PCs if your going to stick linux on them and set up as word processing machines or library terminals. That's a smart low maintenance move. But for the love of god, keep those things out of the media labs
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ... (Score:2)
Maybe it's just a tactic to get mindshare. Get the newest, freshest OSX out there and viola! everyone in class will "switch".
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ... (Score:2)
Ah, the irony of it.
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ... (Score:2)
Kids don't need to help Bill Gates rule the world, and they don't need to become experts on Word features they'll never use that'll be obselete after MS' next release.
They need creativity and problem-solving skills. They need basic tools that are a means to an end, rather than an end. Apple provides such tools and as such their computers are the right choice.
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ... (Score:2)
> customer base from eroding, I can't see what
> this will gain them.
I think that's exactly the point of this promotion.
Excuse me? (Score:2)
You're way over generalizing. I know plenty of "regular" physics, chemistry, ECE, EE, CS, and [insert your major] majors who are completely unmotivated, are as slow as molasses, and really didn't take much away from high school. They aren't stupid, per se, they just don't care. I'll grant that some teachers aren't the sharpest, and some of them were probably referred to teaching because they weren't very successful in other areas. But the majority of the rest of us that feel a calling to help students, partly because we saw such horrible teaching in the past, don't fit your description.
And I believe Apple has a program for home schoolers as well. I'm not sure about this specific deal, but you can read more about Apple's home school connection here:
http://www.apple.com/education/k12/homeschool/
Matt Fahrenbacher
Senior in Mathematics and Education
University of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign
Homeschoolers Need Not Apply (Score:4, Interesting)
"You must be a K-12 teacher currently employed in a public, private, or charter school to qualify for participation in this program. This offer is limited to eligible K-12 teachers and is not available to resellers, institutions, home schools, non- teacher K-12 school employees, preservice/student teachers, or higher education faculty (including college of education faculty)."
I'm really quite surprised at this snub. Apple has always had a very positive history of supporting homeschoolers, even offering institutional discounts to HS'ers. Until now, I suppose.
Thanks for nothing, Apple.
Re:So Jobs wants to corner the NEA market... (Score:2, Informative)
Even more politically incorrect than that observation will be this question: I don't suppose Jobs will be interested in the millions upon millions of American parents who have taken to home schooling their children - or will he?
I believe Apple has a program that gives discounts to homeschoolers... The same discount they give to teachers. So if you're in the market for Apple hardware, homeschool your kids for a couple months :).
Re:Pathetic Sellings Points (Score:3, Funny)
I guess they don't. Better write a lengthy post on Slashdot about them.
Re:Pathetic Moron Ranting Above (Score:4, Insightful)
If you can't figure out why easy-to-use, effective and free movie and image editing software isn't good for education you're totally pathetic. There are numerous stories at the Apple site, testimonials from ACTUAL teachers detailing how Macs are making a difference in their schools...so STFU.
You ask why the applications should matter to you when you don't use any peripherals? Maybe they don't. But to rant about email servers and forget that students can pick up a hell of a lot from the tools given to them is just lame.
Re:Pathetic Sellings Points (Score:2, Offtopic)
hard drive space who wants to turn their computer
into a smart jukebox.
I guess that's not you, but it doesn't require
iPod, digital camera, or video camera.
I think it's good for kids to create stuff, and
they like to do that sort of thing. So digital
editing for schools makes a lot of sense to me.
My fifth-grade class performed The Mikado, and I
imagine it would have been pretty cool if we could
have filmed it and made a DVD from it. I think
kids should know that DVDs don't have to be made
by Hollywood, they can be made by people too.