Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

×

Macintosh... The Naked Truth Book Review 15

Posted by pudge on Wednesday May 01, 2002 @01:25PM from the just-in-case dept.

If you didn't see it on the Slashdot home page, be sure to check out the book review of Macintosh... The Naked Truth. Barrels of fun for the whole family!

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Macintosh... The Naked Truth Book Review

Load All Comments

Search 15 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

WTF? (Score:2, Insightful)

by spencerogden ( 49254 ) writes:

Is this really neccessary? I thought the purpose of slashdot was wo pick up stories from around the net, not from slashdot itself! Ever consider that some people have the apple section on their frontpage, so we see the review, and then a story pointing us to the review, fucking retarded...
This has to be the quickest repost, EVER! (Score:1)

by pcmills ( 83944 ) writes:

WOW
9:15am First 12:25pm second. It's just confirms the fact that the editors don't even read slashdot.
This is stupid (Score:1, Redundant)

by n-baxley ( 103975 ) writes:

This is dumb. Please don't cross post articles.
- There IS a Reason (Score:2)
  
  by JabberWokky ( 19442 ) writes:
  
  Okay, there actually was a reason for this, although they did mess up.
  The first article didn't appear on apple.slashdot.org, so they posted a pointer to it for the readers of apple.slashdot. Unfortunatly, it also appeared on the main slashdot site as well. Oops.
  --
  Evan
  - Re:There IS a Reason (Score:1)
    
    by pudge ( 3605 ) writes:
    
    It only shows up on the main Slashdot page if you have "collapse sections" set. Yeah, it is not ideal. I think someone is working on code to allow you to assign a story to multiple sections. But until that happens ... c'est la vie.
Naked Truth (Score:1)

by gus goose ( 306978 ) writes:

So naked you can't even see it ... like the emperor's clothes.

How about "Apple makes a comeback ... again ...;-)"

gus
enough naked pc already (Score:1)

by repoleved ( 569427 ) writes:

we heard you the first time...
I figured the reason was... (Score:2)

by Dephex Twin ( 416238 ) writes:

because they couldn't classify the article as both "Apple" and "Book Review" so they chose book review, and then also linked to that article here.

Still silly though.

mark
score(-1, redundant) (Score:2)

by Bastian ( 66383 ) writes:

I just wish I could use my last moderation point on this article insead of a post.

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

346 commentsApple Bows To Kremlin Pressure To Remove Leading VPNs From Russian App Store
332 commentsApple Faces 25% Tariff Threat Unless iPhone Manufacturing Moves To US
293 commentsSysadmins Rage Over Apple's 'Nightmarish' SSL/TLS Cert Lifespan Cuts
282 commentsTrump Tells Apple CEO To Avoid Manufacturing in India
278 commentsTrump Says Tim Cook Called Him To Complain About the EU

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.