probably not such a bad thing - no way Apple can get to carbon net zero allowing stadia or any form of cloud based game streaming. Simply not possible yet these kinds of services quite frankly shouldnt even be a consideration at this juncture in the climate emergency.
Okay, all else aside, how exactly would someone else's server farms impact Apple's net carbon emissions? Aren't those owned by Google and Microsoft, who each have their own renewable power goals?
Conflicts with their aims (Score:2)
probably not such a bad thing - no way Apple can get to carbon net zero allowing stadia or any form of cloud based game streaming. Simply not possible yet these kinds of services quite frankly shouldnt even be a consideration at this juncture in the climate emergency.
Re:Conflicts with their aims (Score:2)