Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Government

+ - Stallman's solution to "Too big to fail"-> 1

Submitted by lcam
lcam (848192) writes "Richard Stallman's opinion appears on Reuters.com addressing the "Too big to fail" view that has recently caused large corporations to be bailed out by taxpayer dollars. His solution is elegant however needs some refining, for example his measure would create a required minimum "Return on Investment" scale that corporations need to follow to be viable, these types of metrics are very industry specific. Another issue is that many large corporations don't fail because they don't take unnecessary risk; companies like Intel, Lockhead, Wallmart are very large and have a very low chance of failure and yet Stallman would have them be split up as a result of excessive risks that banks and insurance companies where seen to have taken.

And lastly, in a global market, the United States has the distinct advantage over countries like Brasil because they don't have as much government regulation/meddling that cuts into their competitively. If Stallman's idea should be taken seriously, it should not undermine competitive in the global market, else multinationals may find it better to simply "move out" to a country that doesn't compromise their business models.

How can this genious idea be made better?"

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Stallman's solution to "Too big to fail"

Comments Filter:
  • Or we could just let bankruptcy take its source. "Too big to fail" never meant more than "has the politicians' money".

    The entire bailout was obviously hypocritial.

    Government tells fed banks (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) to get more poor peole into owning houses.

    Government leans on private banks to loan more to poor people, which they sorta have to do anyway because the fed banks are sucking up the mortgage market.

    Housing prices boom due to increased demand, and supply follows suit.

    People use all that artifi

Felson's Law: To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research.

Working...