Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Desktops (Apple)

+ - Sealed-box Macs: should computers be disposable?-> 2

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Apple's new Retina MacBook Pro is essentially completely non-upgradable, a sealed-box, following a trend started with the MacBook Air in 2008. It's a given that hardware companies are in the business of selling hardware, and would love for computers to have iPhone-like replacement cycles of 1-3 years, but does this mean we're moving irresistibly into an era of "sealed-unit computing," even for power users?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sealed-box Macs: should computers be disposable?

Comments Filter:
  • Traditional mainstream computers will become disposable. The advent of mobile device apps which connect directly to back-end severs are becoming so prominent that app developers will continue this to push this model of software delivery onto the desktops and laptops of users. It is a good bet that the hardware vendors will attempt to align themselves with this industry change. It makes sense for them as it is much cheaper to develop and build a non-modifiable platform than one which is "compatibile with

  • For better or worse, Apple has increasingly led the industry in many ways, especially in terms of design. If Apple goes "sealed-unit" even for high-end machines, others will follow suit. At the same time, in large part because of Apple's efforts, the market is increasingly dominated by consumer-class devices. How much incentive is there for Apple (or any other hardware vendor) to cater to power users, who are a diminishing proportion of the revenue picture?

IF I HAD A MINE SHAFT, I don't think I would just abandon it. There's got to be a better way. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

Working...