Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Music

+ - 24/192 Music Downloads ...and why they make no sense->

Submitted by milbournosphere
milbournosphere (1273186) writes "Here's an interesting article going into some reasoning as to why 24bit/192kHz mixes are unnecessary. The article goes into some of the science behind the idea. A very good, rather technical, read. From TFA:

Articles last month revealed that musician Neil Young and Apple's Steve Jobs discussed offering digital music downloads of 'uncompromised studio quality'. Much of the press and user commentary was particularly enthusiastic about the prospect of uncompressed 24 bit 192kHz downloads. 24/192 featured prominently in my own conversations with Mr. Young's group several months ago. Unfortunately, there is no point to distributing music in 24-bit/192kHz format. Its playback fidelity is slightly inferior to 16/44.1 or 16/48, and it takes up 6 times the space. There are a few real problems with the audio quality and 'experience' of digitally distributed music today. 24/192 solves none of them. While everyone fixates on 24/192 as a magic bullet, we're not going to see any actual improvement.

"

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

24/192 Music Downloads ...and why they make no sense

Comments Filter:

When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas

Working...