Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Australia Businesses The Almighty Buck Apple Politics

How Ireland Got Apple's $9 Billion Australian Profit 288

Posted by samzenpus
from the letter-of-the-law dept.
elphie007 writes "An investigation by The Australian Financial Review has discovered how from 2002 to 2013, Apple has shifted approximately $AU8.9 billion of revenue generated in Australia to Ireland, via Singapore. The article states that last year alone, Apple Australia paid only $AU88.5 million in tax, or 0.044% of estimated potential tax liabilities. What's more, the Australian Tax Office has agreed that this arrangement is acceptable under Australian law."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Ireland Got Apple's $9 Billion Australian Profit

Comments Filter:
  • by rhazz (2853871) on Thursday March 06, 2014 @10:34AM (#46418599)
    Ireland has corporate taxes, they are just MUCH lower than most other developed countries. So Ireland gains by taxing these corporations. It is extremely lucrative for Ireland because they get billions in tax dollars from the shell company that only has a few employees. The social cost to Ireland is nil compared to the tax revenue, but quite the opposite for Australia.
  • by thaylin (555395) on Thursday March 06, 2014 @10:37AM (#46418635)

    Umm, you should read the article. It does not say 30%, it says 4%. In fact the word, or number 30 is not mentioned in the article at all.

    The company is not tax resident in any jurisdiction ... The average tax rate for all jurisdictions in which it operates is approximately 4 per cent.”


    In its ASIC filings the company reported pre-tax earnings outside the US of $US4 billion in 2009 and calculated that 4 per cent tax would be $US160 million. The accounts show the actual tax paid was only $US3.65 million.


    They pay no US tax either because US law disregards where a company is managed and only looks at where a company is legally registered.

IF I HAD A MINE SHAFT, I don't think I would just abandon it. There's got to be a better way. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.