Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents The Almighty Buck The Courts Apple

Apple's $1B Patent Award From Samsung Gets Cut By $450M 56

New submitter charlesj68 writes with news that U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has cut Apple's $1.05 billion patent infringement award from Samsung down by $450.5 million. She also said Samsung deserves a new trial over claims related to some of its smartphones. "Koh rejected Apple’s request to enhance the jury’s award, saying the amount Samsung owed was heavily disputed and the jury wasn’t bound to accept either side’s damages estimate. 'It is not the proper role of the court to second-guess the jury’s factual determination as to the proper amount of compensation,' Koh said in her ruling. Apple is entitled to additional damages for sales of infringing products that weren’t considered by the jury, Koh ruled, saying she intends to calculate the amount beginning on Aug. 25, the day after the jury reached its verdict. As the case has been appealed, Koh said she would delay considering evidence of actual post-verdict sales and pre-judgment interest until the appeals are completed."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple's $1B Patent Award From Samsung Gets Cut By $450M

Comments Filter:
  • by Kwyj1b0 ( 2757125 ) on Friday March 01, 2013 @06:27PM (#43049895)

    No victim, no crime.

    But corporations are people, and rounded corners belong to Apple - clearly if Samsung had used razor-sharp edges on their tablet, people would have bought iPads instead, and so Samsung did steal from Apple.

    This is depressing. On a slightly related note, I'm looking at my (physical) desktop and can't find one single device (including keyboards, monitors, computer cases, etc) without rounded corners.

  • by arbiter1 ( 1204146 ) on Friday March 01, 2013 @06:45PM (#43050109)
    One the biggest issues in this case was use of a double standard. The jury ruled that cause prior art couldn't run on iOS device it wasn't valid prior art. But if you use same logic the iOS patents wouldn't run on Andriod hence no infringement, but they ruled that part didn't matter and found Samsung did infringe. Its what i like to call the Political standard, commonly employed by Obama.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 01, 2013 @06:55PM (#43050245)

    It's also pretty obvious that Samsung is astroturfing social web sites. After all, their marketing budget is bigger than Apple & Sony combined.

  • Re:Ummm... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by arbiter1 ( 1204146 ) on Friday March 01, 2013 @06:59PM (#43050295)
    Sad thing about this case, its a Shorter list of what jury did right then what they completely screwed up on

Receiving a million dollars tax free will make you feel better than being flat broke and having a stomach ache. -- Dolph Sharp, "I'm O.K., You're Not So Hot"

Working...