Apple Claims Ignorance of Jury Foreman's Previous Tangle With Samsung 186
quantr writes with the news that Apple claims that the company "wasn't aware during trial that the foreman of the jury that issued a $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung Electronics Co. was involved in a lawsuit with his former employer, Seagate Technology Inc. 'Samsung asked Apple to disclose when it first learned about the litigation between the jury foreman, Velvin Hogan, and Seagate. Apple responded in a filing yesterday in federal court in San Jose, California. Samsung is attempting to get the Aug. 24 verdict thrown out based on claims the trial was tainted by the foreman's failure during jury selection to tell U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh, who presided over the case, that he filed for bankruptcy in 1993 and was sued by Seagate."
Apple's Legal Team (Score:1, Funny)
Either incompetent or lying, it would seem.
Re:Apple's Legal Team (Score:5, Funny)
Apple's team is very skilled, so you can replace the 'or' with an 'and'
Re:What's up! (Score:2, Funny)
You saw how long it took them to update their website right ;)
Re:Apple's Legal Team (Score:4, Funny)
Re:1993? Seagate? Samsung? Srsly? (Score:5, Funny)
A big company might not care, but a personal human being can hold a grudge forever. I know I would. This foreman tried to slip one by and now has been caught by the pure luck of the story of two star-crossed lawyers.
Not to mention his going to the media afterwards and talking about how he screwed the verdict.
Re:Apple's Legal Team (Score:5, Funny)
I wouldn't call that lying, I'd call that sleazy.
So in other words, the definition of a lawyer.
Re:What's up! (Score:5, Funny)
Even a bad day fishing beats a good day at work.