Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Medicine The Almighty Buck Apple

Transplant Surgeon Called Dibs On Steve Jobs' Home 291

Posted by timothy
from the so-are-you-an-organ-donor? dept.
theodp writes "The Commercial Appeal reports that Dr. James Eason, the surgeon who performed Steve Jobs' liver transplant, found himself grilled at length Monday by Shelby County Commission members. The Univ. of Tennessee-Methodist Transplant Institute, which Eason heads, is in a bitter dispute over the distribution of human organs. Pressed for details by Commissioners West Bunker and Terry Roland about the 2009 liver transplant that Eason performed on the late Steve Jobs, Eason acknowledged that he's now living in the Memphis home that Jobs used during his convalescence. Bunker asked, "Was that a deal cut to get him a transplant here locally?" Eason: "I understand. It's a fair question. Absolutely not." Eason said a company lined up the housing for Jobs. "I took care of him and visited him in that home. And when I learned that it was going to be going on the market, I asked him, I asked the administrator of the LLC, if I could purchase it." So, is it time for Apple to shed some light on The Mystery of Steve Jobs' Memphis Mansion? It was reported that Apple lawyer George Riley, reportedly a friend of Eason's, helped Jobs with the arrangements for the Memphis mansion, which was acquired at a bargain price of $850,000 from the State of Tennessee by the mysterious LCHG, LLC on 3/26/2009. LCHG was formed on 3/17/2009, apparently just days before Jobs received his liver (on 3/21/2010, Jobs noted he was coming up on the 1-year anniversary of his transplant). Records show that title to the mansion was transferred to Eason in May, 2011, about three months after the National Enquirer painted a grim picture of Jobs' health. LCHG, LLC was dissolved in February 2012."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Transplant Surgeon Called Dibs On Steve Jobs' Home

Comments Filter:
  • Re:No idea (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheRealMindChild (743925) on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @10:11AM (#40452627) Homepage Journal
    Not only that, he wasted a liver that could have been used for a lifetime by a person who should have gotten it
  • by trout007 (975317) on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @10:20AM (#40452761)

    This is the type of stuff that always happens when there is a prohibition on something. It makes the gatekeepers so powerful that people will use whatever means necessary to influence them.

    Acknowledging that people own their bodies would allow them to sell parts of their bodies. Those that can be harvested while they are alive like bone marrow, kidneys, parts of the liver, would be pretty straight forward. Those that are harvested after death might involve getting a deal on life insurance if you transfer ownership of your organs to the insurance company after death, or you could will them to a family member.

    This would make organs so readily available that no black market would exist.

  • No idea? Really? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @10:43AM (#40453109)

    Isn't it interesting that Jobs, a California resident, was able to get a transplant in Tennessee? Bypassing all those sick little children and other in that state who were on the list before him, btw.

    The whole thing disgusted me almost as much as the fact that David Crosby was bumped up the list for his liver transplant to just go back to his ways again.

    And in the meantime, there these poor kids who just got dealt a bad deal going without because they're not rich and shameless.

  • by muecksteiner (102093) on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @10:58AM (#40453289)

    It is of course fairly obvious the home was only purchased to game the transplant waiting list system in place in the U.S. That he was placed ahead on the list in that state by the doctor in question is pure conjecture, though.

    Not everyone can receive every organ that comes up for being transplanted. AFAIK, you need a fairly complex match of genetic compatibility for an organ to be actually useable for a given patient - and even in case of a "match", you need to keep taking fairly heavy immunosupressants during the rest of your life to keep your body from rejecting it. And since I would assume that there is a separate list for each (for lack of a better word - IANAMD) genetic category that donor organs come in: maybe SJ was indeed the front of the waiting list for the liver he ended up with? Without access to the relevant medical records that question is absolutely impossible to answer.

    What does surprise me is that he got a transplant at all in the first place. In Europe, advanced stage cancer patients usually are not eligible to receive any transplants whatsoever, due to the general scarcity of donor organs, and the low expected benefits of transplantation in such a patient. This seems to be different in the U.S., though, otherwise someone else would already have commented on that?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @01:39PM (#40455893)

    Not to mention the huge incentive for the hospital to let you die so they can harvest your organs and make multiple millions of dollars off of the transplant patients who receive your organs. I've read some horror stories about people who were not properly declared dead, who had their organs harvested and exhibited signs of extreme distress during the surgery.

  • by spire3661 (1038968) on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @02:23PM (#40456547) Journal
    Everyone else in the chain gets paid, why shouldnt the donor?

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..." -- Isaac Asimov

Working...