Apple, Google: Battle of the Cloud Maps 179
Nerval's Lobster writes "Google has sent invitations for a June 6 event in which it will apparently unveil 'The Next Dimension of Google Maps.' Meanwhile, rumor suggests Apple is preparing its own mapping service for iOS devices. The escalating battle over maps demonstrates the importance of cloud apps to tech companies' larger strategies." I only wish my phone would hold by default the X-million data points that my outmoded (but cheap and functional) dedicated GPS device does, without quite so much cloud-centric bottlenecking, and leave all expensive data use for optional overlays and current conditions.
Google Maps Gripes (Score:3, Interesting)
I just wish that Google would learn some lessons about 2D cartography. Like how to mark toll roads and stuff.
It's kind of frustrating because Google maps is really good at local stuff (zoom in to see individual business names and stuff, and of course street view) but other services are a lot better once you're looking at a range beyond a few blocks.
I have a feeling (Score:4, Interesting)
...it will be a battle in name only.
apple are highly unlikely to put out an API for other to use as they wish like Google did.
While GMaps might take a back-seat on iOS, it will still be by far the most dominant system out there unless Apple allow use outside of the iOSphere.
At the end of the day if it's only available on iOS and Mac then it's essentially on a minority of devices on what is now a minority platform.
Still, it no doubt will have Google scrambling to bring us more cool stuff, so it's win-win all round.
Re:Google Maps Gripes (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm not talking about the turn-by-turn directions, I'm talking about the maps. Quick, where are the toll roads [wisc.edu]? How 'bout now [wisc.edu]? Or now [wisc.edu]?
I guess if you just enter in a start and end into Google maps and blindly follow whatever comes out it works fine, but if you want to scan around for alternate routes (hint: Google doesn't pick the best route for going through Chicago from east-to-west or vice versa) or just want to look around at maps, that's not good enough.
Caching (Score:4, Interesting)
I only wish my phone would hold by default the X-million data points that my outmoded (but cheap and functional) dedicated GPS device does, without quite so much cloud-centric bottlenecking, and leave all expensive data use for optional overlays and current conditions.
No shit dude. I have a fucking 32GB phone of which I'm using about 3GB. The thing I use more than anything is Google Maps. If it's downloaded something, why does it ever delete it? I can cache apparently unlimited 10 mile squares (100 square miles?), but I can't say "Just fucking download the entire state of Iowa" (because, really, who would want to?).
But I suppose they're getting there. Slowly.
fix the accuracy first (Score:3, Interesting)
I do't see Google and Apple being the only players (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe Google and Apple being the most visible players in the cloud competition, but I do not think they will be the only major players
Other firm that have already enter the fray, or will enter in a big way are firms that already have an online presence, such as Amazon or Facebook, or firms that have traditionally offer corporate services, such as IBM, or firms such as Microsoft; Major ISPs and Telcos may also want to branch out in this field
Even major datacenter operators may see cloud computing as an extension to their existing businesses
In fact, Digitimes reported that NTT, a Japanese Telco, has placed an order of 100,000 cloud computing servers to Quanta Computer of Taiwan
URL is at http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120529PB200.html [digitimes.com] [paywall, sorry]
Re:Google Maps Gripes (Score:5, Interesting)
In some cities the toll for tunnels is >$10, people do all sorts of weird things to avoid it.
Offline POI (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Google Maps Gripes (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been using OSMAnd since I got my current phone, and it's so much more useful than Google Maps that comparing them is a joke. The map data (from OSM) has been better in every city I've visited. For example, visiting a friend in Paris, OSM had his building numbered and marked the bank and bakery nearby so it was trivial to find even without GPS. Google Maps just about had the roads labelled. In Brussels, the roads have three names: the one in French, the one in Dutch, and the one on Google Maps. The OSM data had all three. Oh, and the hotel I was staying in was labelled on OSM, while Google Maps thought it was about 100m away from where it really was. Looking for a tango class in Swansea, the building was labelled in OSM, but Google Maps didn't even show the road that it was on. In Cambridge, all of the college and university buildings and cycle paths are labelled on OSM, Google Maps just about manages to label the big university sites and the roads.
OSMand lets you download vector data, so it works fine with no network connection. I've got about 1GB of map data on my phone currently, covering England, Wales, Belgium and the north of France. It can do route finding either online or on the phone. The latter uses quite a lot of memory for longer routes (it's still marked as an experimental feature), but aside from that works very well. Getting to know my way around Cambridge was made very easy by having a navigation aid that understood all of the cycle routes.