Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Android Patents The Almighty Buck Apple

Apple Has Spent More Than $100 Million Suing Android Manufacturers 184

Diggester writes with an excerpt from an article at Gizmocrazed about the absurd amount of money Apple has spent suing HTC et al: "The never-ending war on Android has cost Apple more than $100 million, according to latest estimates. While a huge chunk of that money was spent (read wasted) in claims against HTC. So far, 84 claims have been filed against different Android manufacturers (HTC, Samsung, etc.) for patent infringements, out of which only 10 were proved to have been infringed and only one ruling has gone in Apple's favor."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Has Spent More Than $100 Million Suing Android Manufacturers

Comments Filter:
  • True Evil - Apple (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Spiked_Three ( 626260 ) on Tuesday January 24, 2012 @05:17PM (#38810801)
    This article caught me at a good (or bad depending on how you look at it) time. I am so sick of Apple fanatics and how they are willing destroying the personal computer industry. They hold their limp wrists high (no intent to offend gays, but it is such a fitting description) in celebration of their superior operating system, with no clue as to how they are being brainwashed into supporting abandonment of all personal rights.

    I gave in a year ago after a stroke and bought an iPad. I loved it, supported it for a year. Then one day Apple decided I was a security risk. Now whenever I turn on my iPad it says it has been 'locked for security reasons'. There is no way to get anything resembling technical support since I didn't choose to pay their extortion, err, support plan. The web has no help. And I'm stuck with a $599 soft drink coaster, and not a very good one at that..

    Now, has anyone read about their plot to hold the education system at gunpoint? Give away authoring tools, promise the world, and hahahaha, only sell through Apple, requiring all schools to buy iPads for every student, every time Apple needs a cash influx and upgrades the iPad. That borders on illegal criminal scheming, and due the stupid nature of our government, will probably work..

    Fuck Apple, please let them burn in hell.
  • Re:True Evil - Apple (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24, 2012 @05:23PM (#38810899)

    Yep. Absolutely, utterly impossible to get anything resembling tech support. A Google search for "ipad locked for security reasons" turns up this Apple knowledge base article [http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2446], titled "Apple ID: "This Apple ID has been disabled for security reasons" alert appears". The article tells you how to reset your password.

    It's an absolute shame there's no way to get this information from anybody, much less Apple.

  • by ArcherB ( 796902 ) on Tuesday January 24, 2012 @05:55PM (#38811407) Journal

    Right.

    And the OP's point is that it doesn't matter if the money received would only cover 0.1% of the litigation cost or 100.1% of the litigation cost.

    The only thing "Insightful" about the GP's post is to question just how biased the summary and article are. It's not hard to read them as being pro-Android and/or anti-Apple (or just indifferent and making shock claims to drive traffic). It's not a bad thing to question the source - whether there's some merit or whether they're just generating FUD headlines. But as the OP points out, beyond the source's integrity, it really doesn't matter.

    The summary author could be Pro-Apple-Stockholder and is outrage that the company his retirement depends on has wasted $100,000,000 on frivolous lawsuits.

  • by laughingcoyote ( 762272 ) <barghesthowl.excite@com> on Tuesday January 24, 2012 @06:09PM (#38811641) Journal

    Doesn't this show one more reason we need to get rid of software patents?

    There are a limited number of ways to make a usable smartphone interface, especially when competing with an already-established method. Of course they're going to be similar. There are a limited number of ways to make a handheld device that comfortably fits in the hand and pocket. Of course they're going to look similar.

    Didn't we used to require "non-obviousness" as a requirement for a patent? Aren't these things obvious?

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...