Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
EU Apple

Apple Files Suit Against Motorola Xoom In EU 181

CWmike writes "Apple isn't just going after the Samsung Galaxy Tab in Europe, it's also attacking the Motorola Xoom. Apple's lawsuit, which was filed in Germany and led to Tuesday's injunction barring sales of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Europe, makes reference to a separate complaint against the Motorola Xoom. Patent expert Florian Mueller, who told Computerworld on Tuesday that the mounting patent cases could cast a cloud over Android licensing, found the original lawsuit, filed in Dusseldorf, Germany, and pointed out the Motorola action. The reference in the suit says that Apple has also filed a complaint over the design of the Motorola Xoom, which runs the Android operating system. But it's unclear if Apple is seeking an injunction that would immediately prevent Motorola from importing the tablets into Europe."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Files Suit Against Motorola Xoom In EU

Comments Filter:
  • Apple (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11, 2011 @05:25AM (#37053482)

    Is an Arsehole. You are the Apple of my Arsehole.

  • Bad for everyone (Score:5, Insightful)

    by myurr ( 468709 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @05:31AM (#37053520)

    I know the Apple fanbois will be out in force to defend this as they believe Apple should be the only player in the market place, but Apple's new litigious dream of being the only player in the market is bad for everyone. Apple didn't invent the smart phone or the tablet, so if monopolies of these devices were allowed then Apple wouldn't have been able to make their beloved iDevices in the first place.

    The reason Apple themselves are doing this is because they want to control the way everyone consumes media. They want to replace the PC, newspapers, magazines, and ultimately the TV putting them all under their control and charging their 30% fee for allowing access to content producers to their public. For this strategy to work long term, especially in the face of free competition from Android where large corporates can set up their own channels and distribution mechanisms, they need 80+% market share (20 - 40% just isn't enough to command the fees Apple want to charge). They've seen how their early lead in the smart phone marketplace has been eroded and now surpassed by Android, and they fear that the same will happen with the iPad.

    This isn't about protecting intellectual property or Apple wanting just reward for their 'innovation'. This is a land grab aimed at capturing and locking in market share through litigation. Apple *are* scared of Android, and especially these latest tablets like the Samsung, not because they're currently outselling the iPad but because they will most likely be the first steps to Android gaining momentum in the tablet market and establishing itself as a viable competitor. Once that happens it will only be a matter of time as Apple cannot keep up with the huge variety of products their competitors will release - exactly what happened in the smart phone arena.

  • "Patent expert"? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by naich ( 781425 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @05:33AM (#37053530)

    He's not much of a "patent expert" if he can't tell that this case is not about patents. Maybe "clueless troll Florian Mueller" would be more accurate?

  • patent expert? (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11, 2011 @05:34AM (#37053540)

    Since when is Florian a patent expert?

  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @05:56AM (#37053640) Journal
    Actually, I think it's great news. A big company, with a product that's already so successful that they don't need any extra protection, is using the legal system to batter the competition. Those of us who wanted a clear and unambiguous example of the harm that current IP law does now have one to show our elected representatives.
  • by Shivetya ( 243324 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:14AM (#37053702) Homepage Journal

    and my Macs maybe close behind. I am not going to support a bunch of assholes like what Apple has become. I have used a friends Galaxy and found it a bit slow but Android does have features iOs sorely lacks. While I don't think the current tablet implementations are all that wonderful I believe they are good for getting people to rethink how to write and use applications. Apple apparently thinks they invented all of this and considering how the patent office works they could probably buy history to be on their side.

    Very disappointing to see this. Spend your money innovating not suing Apple. Be an ideas company, not one that stifles anyone else having them.

  • by Ant P. ( 974313 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:52AM (#37053844)

    How much are ComputerWorld/ITWorld paying to get this Mueller FUD campaign to the front page?

    I hope it's worth all the subscriptions they cost you guys.

  • by 605dave ( 722736 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @07:17AM (#37053970) Homepage
    If you were a Mac user you wouldn't write it MAC.
  • by SirJorgelOfBorgel ( 897488 ) on Thursday August 11, 2011 @08:37AM (#37054682)

    I am a developer, so I have quite a bit of hardware lying around. I have several 10" and 7" tablets. I strongly prefer the 7" ones. While a 10" is really nice around the house, when you're mobile a 7" is just so much more preferable. And you don't really miss the size at home either. The great advantage of the 7"-ers is that you can comfortably hold them in one hand for long periods, something you cannot do with the 10" tablets.

    Then again, that will depend on what you do with it. However, I find 7" being "a bad choice" in general complete bullshit.

Saliva causes cancer, but only if swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time. -- George Carlin

Working...