Apple Finally Approves Google+ App For iPhone 162
CWmike writes "Apple approved the Google+ app for the iPhone on Tuesday, and posted it to the App Store. It's unclear whether Google has created an iPad-specific app. Two weeks ago, a Google employee said that the company had submitted Google+ to the App Store ... on July 4. According to that timeline, Google's app took twice as long as the majority of submitted apps to win Apple's approval."
!news (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously, how is this even remotely news? Why would Apple not approve Google+ app when there are Facebook app and tons of other social networks apps? Why would it be important to note that it took twice as long as statistically approval process takes, especially when there were major holidays during that timeframe? Please explain me. It's not like Apple has any kind of relationship with Facebook. Microsoft does, and I would still be fairly certain that even Microsoft would accept it to Windows Phone 7 app store.
Oh, it's ComputerWorld and I guess they needed some visitors from slashdot again.
Approval time is around 2 weeks for all right now (Score:5, Insightful)
Is it any suprise this is from"Android Power" blog (Score:4, Insightful)
the author clearly states his bias - the name of the blog is called "Android Power". His bio states he's out to irk apple fans.
there is no information in the article whether the delay is Apple's fault or Google's fault. Yes, you can have delays in the approval process of your own doing, not because of a conspiracy that Apple caused.
And all in all, google+ is not even a service that's available to the majority of people. It's in limited beta, meaning that the affected user base who didn't have access to the "delayed" client is small.
Re:!news (Score:5, Insightful)
How do you know they were dragging their feet on this? I bet that the google + app is more than twice as complicated as the average app on the iPhone, especially when you consider all the total bullshit fart apps that probably take minutes to approve or deny. Whats more it makes extensive use of a lot of features, it communicates externally, it uses the camera for stills and video and probably also the GPS system. These are sensitive areas and even a cursory check to make sure the app is doing what it claims to do is going to take time. There is a lot of ground to cover there that is unnecessary in some other apps. I'm sure apple has some automated tools that tell the people doing the approval what APIs are being used and ones that are not using many important APIs probably get approved a lot faster.
Basically, you have no idea if this is reasonable or not, you have simply decided that it was unreasonable so you can complain about it.
Re:iPhone ONLY. (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a separate ipad app, it's still awaiting approval by apple
.
Re:!news (Score:5, Insightful)
You really believe that not being able to change the background initially was because of control and not simply because they had limited developer time and decided that time would be better spent on a different feature or on fixing bugs?
Re:Mild censorship (Score:5, Insightful)
I understand Apple's philosophy of only allowing the best apps in their istore.
Have you been on the appstore lately? Since its inception it's been filled to the brim with crap. Finding decent apps consists of downloading featured apps or looking at the top 100 list. Anything beyond that is probably junk. Make no mistake the app approval process is all about control of the content on the app store, not the quality.
Re:iPhone ONLY. (Score:4, Insightful)
And yet my computer does not have all of those and they still allow me on G+.