Scalpers Spur Apple To Require Reservations For iPhone 119
thana103 writes "Apple is attempting to block scalpers by instituting new restrictions preventing walk-in sales of the iPhone at Apple Stores in China. Customers must first reserve an iPhone on Apple's website before visiting an Apple Retail Store to complete the purchase."
Apple advise (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
I keep imagining Steve Jobs & mates having a laugh about all this.
Executive 1: It works. If we force them to pre-register they still eat it up.
Steve Jobs : Lets see what else we can do.
Executive 2: How about requiring all purchasers to wear a turtle-neck?
Steve Jobs : Maybe but not enough.
Executive 3: We could make an even more broken product. How about no antenna this time?
Steve Jobs : I love it. We'll say its to reduce radiation.
Executive 4: But then the phone wont work.
Steve Jobs : The iPhone isnt abo
Re:Apple advise (Score:5, Insightful)
It's weird. Every time Apple do something that appears on the face of it to be consumer friendly,
somebody's gotta have a bitch about it.
>I keep imagining Steve Jobs & mates having a laugh about all this.
Actually, I imagine, like any responsible business they sat around and thought
how best to stop these enterprising people who couldn't give a fuck about Apple from
keeping their legitimate customers from having the device they want at the time they want it.
But hey, if you're an evil bastard yourself then I guess you're going to expect others to be the
same as you, and thereby miss the obvious truth of the matter.
Re: (Score:2)
"legitimate customers"? Either way, they're paying for it, right?
Yeah right. Because resellers are customers.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
But hey, if you're an evil bastard yourself then I guess you're going to expect others to be the same as you, and thereby miss the obvious truth of the matter.
You know, you might have had a fair point until that last paragraph where you threw away any legitimacy you had. Even if you disagree with the AC (and his comment came across as somewhat tongue-in-cheek), you're reading *way* more into his motives than any unbiased person would consider reasonable.
It says a lot more about you than it does about him that you ascribe to him the characteristic of "evil bastard". Actually, using your logic (expecting others to be the same as you), this would make you the "evi
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Actually Dogtanian
Ironic that you address me by name- or rather, by nick- since there's no proof that you're the original AC. It's possible- or even probable- that you're someone completely different trying to score points and/or simply trolling.
It is your response which I consider offensive and so biased as to be both obnoxious and cruel.
Really? Please explain why.
I made the basis of *my* accusations quite clear and didn't call anyone an "evil bastard", unlike "your" comment.
I'll be damned if the spirit of what is spoken is allowed to be detracted arbitrarily in the language which it is spoken.
Could you please repeat that in plain English?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What exactly is "consumer friendly" about creating a false shortage?
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly is "consumer friendly" about creating a false shortage?
And your evidence that the iphone shortage in china is false is what?
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that Apple puts out a press release trumpeting the fact that you have to sign up at their web site in order to buy an iPhone.
Sales where there's a "limit" of "one to a customer" are well-known marketing gimmicks. Consumers are so well trained that all you have to do is tell them they can only have one of something to get them to want five of them. So people who may not have even bought one are suddenly having friends and relativ
Re: (Score:1)
The fact that Apple puts out a press release trumpeting the fact that you have to sign up at their web site in order to buy an iPhone.
So if there is no press release, would that mean you are wrong? Okay, show us the press release then.
Re: (Score:2)
You'll have to ask "appleinsider.com". You don't find it interesting that this story appears on "appleinsider.com"?
Re: (Score:1)
You'll have to ask "appleinsider.com". You don't find it interesting that this story appears on "appleinsider.com"?
No. Somebody saw something on a webpage, and it spread - are you new to the internet? Probably, else you would be able to find the press release - unless of course there is none. Which means you are wrong and can't admit it.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, that article doesn't mention ANYTHING about a "press release".
Also, that site is a rumors site. I have no info whether this is true or not, but rumors sites have posted plenty of false info in the past.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The fact that Apple puts out a press release trumpeting the fact that you have to sign up at their web site in order to buy an iPhone.
That is evidence of a shortage.
They did this because scalpers are swooping in and buying them up to resell at inflated prices, which they can successfully do because there aren't enough in the stores for customers to just ignore them and buy directly in the store themselves.
The fact that there aren't enough in the stores is direct evidence that there is a shortage.
What is you
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but in what way are the people who are "swooping in and buying them" not customers? Should I not be allowed to buy iPhones to give as gifts to my family because I'm not the end user?
And is the fact that the stores are not getting enough of them really evidence that there is a true shortage?
Do we know that this "one customer/one phone" policy is not just a way for Apple to make sure that they have personal
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but when I pay a bunch of people to go into all the local shops and buy up their entire stock, you won't be buying any at all. Not for yourself, and not as gifts for your family.
When this happens, people get even more pissed off and the blame will fall to Apple, not my team of scalpers that are reselling them at double the price.
So, if this somehow also benefits Apple's bottom line, then great. But, in the mean time, it has a definite benefit to the people that are just after buying a phone.
There is n
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sorry, but in what way are the people who are "swooping in and buying them" not customers?
Who cares exactly what you classify them as?
a) They don't benefit Apple by increasing sales. (Given there is a shortage, 100% of the product will move regardless.) They don't represent additional demand. They don't actually want the product except to resell it. Zero sum game.
b) They hurt apple by pissing of many potential customers who see the phones they wanted to use being marked up 100% right in front of their e
Re: (Score:2)
And you believe that Apple can not get "enough out there"?
In breaking news, Apple will be limiting the lumps of coal you can purchase in Newcastle and bags of ice in Nome.
Re: (Score:2)
And you believe that Apple can not get "enough out there"?
I have no reason not to.
I will concede that Apple may have made a series of business decisions that they should have known would lead to their being a shortage... launching in a major market without enough product in the warehouses, and not enough suppliers of crucial components (such as the display) to ramp up production quick....
But that doesn't make the shortage less real.
Demand exceeds supply, and there is nothing apple can do to satisfy that dem
Re: (Score:2)
Do you say the same thing about ticket scalpers?
(Personally, I think ticket scalpers are an example of the free market... There are already measures like this, and laws preventing scalping on premises, to fight against ticket scalping.)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Then they should raise the price of the iPhone so that they get the markup.
And also distribute the price hike fairly among everyone who wants it, not just the few lucky scalpers who get in early.
This is a simple case of supply and demand.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that people are able to flip them in the first place means that there's a shortage. People are willing to pay more than the sale price or they wouldn't be doing business with the scalpers to begin with.
I think it would be fairer for apple to get a level price hike skimmed from every customer equally than for the lucky few early birds to get theirs at a bargain.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Thank you!
I'm not sure why so many people think this struggle against basic economics is a normal thing. Why should people be prevented from buying and reselling an item simply because Apple's pricing is stupidly low?
Same story with "price gouging" laws. Here's a hint: there's no such thing as price gouging.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Same story with "price gouging" laws. Here's a hint: there's no such thing as price gouging.
Yes, raising the price of food or medicine a hundredfold following a disaster that limits supply and access to alternatives is exactly the same as reselling an iPhone for profit. Because in both cases lives are at stake.
While I would never hope there will be a disaster, they happen from time to time, and I truly hope you find yourself in a position in which you must give up your car, home, and life savings to get a few days' clean water for your kids. Maybe then you'll see the difference between that and
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing wrong with price gouging. If you have 50 [insert valuable good here], either the first 50 people to run to your store will get the good or the 50 richest people get the good. In either case, 50 people get it. Just because lives are at stake, that does not mean that the laws of supply and demand get overturned.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Just because lives are at stake, that does not mean that the laws of supply and demand get overturned.
Overturned? No. Altered? Yes.
And by altered I mean do feel free to charge whatever exorbitant price you feel is appropriate for ice, food, water, medicine, etc. Just be aware of one thing. If you raise prices too high and you may find that some people will feel it is simply easier to take the goods from you without offering payment, although some may be generous and give you your life in return for your goods. The less generous will simply take your life and take your goods.
Re: (Score:2)
Clearly you have never played the finest [nethack.org] of them.
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to think there is a Law of Supply and Demand. There isn't, not as a natural law or as a law of man: it is an economic model. The law (the legal one) on the other hand does say that price gouging is illegal -- at least this is true in all legislations I've lived in.
So... it looks to me like your "laws of supply and demand" do get overturned when necessary and that most civilizations seem to disagree with your interpretation of right and wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an economic model of reality.
The "laws of supply and demand" would tell us that if the price is made artificially low, as you apparently advocate, then there will be a shortage. And look, that's exactly right!
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
In my world, food and water will exist; they may be expensive as you describe, but it will be possible to get them.
Price-gouging laws ensure that such goods aren't available. At all. Is that an improvement?
Re: (Score:2)
This is why we can't have nice things.
Re: (Score:2)
Only in the former soviet east europe, where enforced low prices created more demand than supply. In a free market where businesses are forced to makes as much profit as possible they would never set prices so low that they can not fullfill demand.... except as a gimmick... Then again by planting stories in newspapers, then even have to do that, they can just pretend that is what they have done...
In other words. Unless Apple is secretly communist, then this is a gimmick ;)
Use the computers in the store? (Score:4, Interesting)
I have, on several occasions, walked into an Apple store solely to use the internet. Especially useful if you're out of the country and don't have a local sim card with data (assuming you're in a country and city with an Apple store and happen to be nearby it...) They don't seem to mind and the wi-fi is free and open, so if you have a smartphone you don't have to take up one of their computers (I have an N1 and an Apple Store worker in London gave me a dirty look for loitering in the store using that on their network - I guess he'd have been ok if it was an iPhone?)
I don't really see how any system like this will stop dedicated scalpers... I am not sure why they don't just limit them to one per customer (one iPhone policy... ahem).
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Ya, right (Score:4, Informative)
As if people in China can really afford a real iphone to begin with, they just buy a knock off. Only the snobs in China care about buying a "real" iphone.
You might find this article [mir.com.my] of interest. It's a few years old, but the basic story is that Nikon sell a low-end, mediocre-quality camera made by Cosina under their own name to developing markets like China because people there want to own a leading brand like Nikon, regardless of the actual quality of the camera. (As the article states, the Centon camera- which was intended for expert to the West- was a higher quality device).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem with doing that, is it devalues your brand...
Re: (Score:2)
Only if that model is exported out of China.
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't export it out of china yourself, then the chinese will...
If it has your brand on it legitimately (ie not a fake) then it will command a higher price in the west (somewhere between its price in china and the price of higher quality units) until people realise what it really is.
So now... (Score:1)
I agree with a comment above, this is purely a marketing gimmick.
Re: (Score:2)
Which pretty much just makes this a gold mining type of operation, rather than having to get out prior to the launch and sleep on the steps of an Apple store, they can get up an hour before pre-order launches and get their reservation.
iBay? (Score:5, Insightful)
Scalpers exist wherever there's a shortage. Shortages exist wherever the price of something is held below what the market will bear. So it seems the best way to eliminate scalpers is to raise the price.
Perhaps an auction would be called for here.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Hmm I think Apple wants to eliminate the high price that people have to pay to get a phone, not the scalpers directly.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:iBay? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re:iBay? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not too long ago, Costco had a choice to pay the stock-holders a higher dividend, or give their customers lower prices. They chose to give customers lower prices, and were punished for it by stock-holders. The thing is, companies are run by individuals, and not every individual is motivated by gouging their customer to the maximum amount possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
>That, and not every company is out to gouge their customer to the maximum amount possible. I never thought I'd hear that phrase with regards to Apple. Pardon me while I go look out my window, I need to check for flying pigs.
I didn't see you complain against any of the posts bashing Apple for not jacking up prices.
Re: (Score:2)
yeah, if people are willing to pay that much, at least get the money yourself rather than let scalper middlemen pick it up.
Maybe the list price attracts more people than can fit in the arena or more than your manufacturing capacity, maybe the scalper premium attracts fewer people than can fit in the arena or less than your manufacturing capacity, a problem of sorts either way.
If directly sold, but at the scalper premium price, you eliminate some of the difference as-is, because you've worked around the scal
Re: (Score:2)
yeah, it makes sense to open up with a price that errs on your side, to be adjusted later if necessary.
Scalpers? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Scalpers? (Score:5, Insightful)
Both underwriters and car dealerships purchase in structured deals with contractual boundaries that set wholesale pricing structures.
Scalpers are people who buy something at retail, turn around and sell it at retail for a huge markup, preventing other retail purchasers from buying at the merchant-set rate and intentionally causing scarcity issues. Think tickets for concerts, or the shortages of Wiis and PS3s when those first released.
For example, most concerts and sports games are not truly sold out. Scalpers purchase blocks of tickets, and resell them at much much higher rates. Because of their profit margins, they have no incentive to sell all their tickets, causing an artificial scarcity. People who were willing to buy at the set price get blocked out, and the venue ends up with empty seats.
Car dealers and stock underwriters on the other hand, have every incentive to sell every item they purchase. Unlike scalpers, they are providing a benefit to their service by organizing distribution and sales channels. In these situations, the original product source (IPO, factory) doesn't want to sell direct, they prefer to sell wholesale and let someone else take on that responsibility. Scalpers on the other hand are simply injecting themselves as an additional layer post-retail and do not add any value with their service.
What the summary describes is clearly a scalper, someone who's taking advantage of a situation and causing even more scarcity issues and driving up prices, just to garner profit with little risk or added value.
Re: (Score:1)
Scalpers provide a needed service as well, though, by providing last minute tickets for people who don't think far enough ahead to purchase them at the box office.
While their net impact maybe negative, they also provide a service.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Scalpers? (Score:4, Insightful)
They do, in that the can choose who they sell to. In particular they can choose to only sell one per person until such point as the manufacturing ramp up covers demand.
And it's all good if the filthy scalpers are cut out. And yes, scalpers (or touts in British vernacular) is exactly what they are, not underwriters.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not at all hard to get around the one per customer rule. But as it's one per credit card, it's enough to clip the scalpers wings.
Now clearly YOU don't think there's anything wrong with scalping, just as spammers don't think there's anything wrong with spamming. But as far as the rest of us are concerned a rapid removal of both types of parasite from the gene pool would make the world a better place.
And you're deluded if you think there's an economic justification. Scalpers don't provide a service. E
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Scalping is a common term used to described a particular type of buy/sell situation. Feel free to read numerous other posts above as to why it differs. Pay attention to how artificial scarcity is created by the act of scalping, thus further driving up the price.
In pure economic terms, Apple could just raise the price on the iPhone until the supply catches up to the demand. But, Apple doesn't want to be a bastard, nor does it want to let someone else bastardise the process.
Also, you were lucky to get your co
Re: (Score:2)
OK, I guessed your support of scalpers came from some personal experience. I could change my point to people buying viagra from spammer don't think there's anything wrong with spammers, but the rest of us...
But the more fun analogy that comes to mind is the kid who was given a lollypop by Ronnie Kray and spent the rest of his life saying the Kray Twins were just misunderstood.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronnie_Kray [wikipedia.org]
I once arrived at a concert without a ticket, thinking there would be tickets available on th
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
(2) Apple can make more iphones. So the analogy to concert ticket sales in not apt.
The analogy to PS2 and Wii scalpers does apply. And the situation arises not just because the supply is mere limited. The problem is the demand at the time exceeds the supply. For concert tickets, those particular shows are restrained and the artist is popular at the time. If the artists falls dramatically from popularity when they visit the next year, then there might not be the need for scalper
If the 'scalpers' buy all the iphones, apple can make more to satisfy customers. Now, when the scalpers turn around and dump the iphones this will pressure the retail price, which is what apple doesn't like. So apple doesn't like scalpers because meeting scalper + retail demand may lead to lower prices - they lose price control.
That assumes that (1) scalpers have no common sense and (2) Apple cannot control the manufacturing process i
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Im not saying underwriting isn't necessary, I'm saying underwriting and what is termed scalping both serve the same purpose.
The difference you're not grasping is "collaboration". That makes their purposes different. An underwriter works with the company. A scalper works only for himself.
So pardon me, but buying a few iphones and trying to sell them for more money is no different than what most people try to do all day.
That's your right to do what you want; but my opinion of you is that you're a scalper not an underwriter. You don't get to change my opinion.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Both underwriters and car dealerships purchase in structured deals with contractual boundaries that set wholesale pricing structures.
So it's not scalping because of the collusion? BTW: Car dealers will not hesitate to sell a car above sticker price (at a premium) if there is a big demand for it.
Scalpers are people who buy something at retail, turn around and sell it at retail for a huge markup, preventing other retail purchasers from buying at the merchant-set rate and intentionally causing scarcity issues.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the artificially-low official prices often seem to be a case of irrationality, on both the part of the retailer and the part of the average customer.
Trying too hard to be "Fair", and Failing
Re: (Score:2)
So it's not scalping because of the collusion? BTW: Car dealers will not hesitate to sell a car above sticker price (at a premium) if there is a big demand for it.
Oh, how quaint. The sticker price is already at a premium. It's set above what they expect to get, because they expect you to haggle. "invoice" is the new "sticker" and they make plenty of profit at that price, too....
Re: (Score:1)
Scalpers are people who buy something at retail, turn around and sell it at retail for a huge markup, preventing other retail purchasers from buying at the merchant-set rate and intentionally causing scarcity issues [redundant, ed.]. Think tickets for concerts, or the shortages of Wiis and PS3s when those first released.
That would be a rare animal---a.k.a., super-efficient scalper maximus, or Ticketmaster. They're in a league of their own.
Before you flippantly retort, I said, they're in a league of their own. Contrast your example as an etude.
Apropos, let's not exaggerator the effect of these zhonguo ren scalpers.
Chinese Scalpers? *Squeeee*! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's just traffic control (Score:3, Interesting)
This is just because the retail outlet had a temporary traffic jam, not because it's a big deal. Foxconn can make more of the things than Apple can sell.
I'm surprised the scalpers bother. They're only marking up the thing by 10%. All it takes is one truckload of new units to put them out of business and leave them stuck with inventory they'll have to sell below retail.
That happened when the PS3 came out. People were buying them to sell on eBay. Once production ramped up, the resellers were desperately trying to unload their inventory at a loss.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You're right... in the long term.
However, looking short term, iPhone4 supply is being overwhelmed by enormous demand from China, Korea, and other Asian countries. Enough opportunities for scalpers.
I live in Korea, so I know that -- over 300k units have been supplied to Korea alone in September. After China joined in the fray, Korea too is suffering from lack of supply -- there are more than 150k unfulfilled reservations right now. You can bet there are people willing (more like desperate) to pay 20-30 % m
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
what? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, given that the scalpers are almost certainly in the employ of the store and get to buy the items in bulk before the store is open, this reservation system in the control of Apple outside of China is a futile effort that had to be made.
Re: (Score:1)
What does this have to do with Google?
TFA uses Google Translate to translate (who'd have thought) the page from the Apple China web site. Why, do you mind the Google slashvertisement?
Reservations required? (Score:5, Funny)
I can see where this is going. In a few more years, you'll need to dress up in Formal Wear to pick up your Apple Gizmo.
Scene at swanky Apple Store. A bouncer scowls at the line forming up, as desperate customers try to slip the Maître d' a little something to find a spot for them. Meanwhile, inside...
Customer: Monsieur! Your finest iPhone, if you please.
Snooty Waiter: Our very best from Shenzhen, China. A Foxconn 2018, very good year.
Snooty Waiter cuts shrinkwrap and offers it to the customer.
Customer: *sniff* Excellent bouquet, Polyolefin with just a touch of plasticizer.
Snooty Waiter: Excellent choice, sir!
Logo (Score:1, Insightful)
It is not entirely obvious to me why of all the possible logos you could have chosen for this story you picked the Google logo.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> This being China (where I live) it's a pretty damn solid guess that the scalper in question is, or is in the employ of, the Apple store local management.
> If people are willing to pay (or can be tricked into paying) more than the Apple sanctioned price then any store manager or employee here who didn't take the chance to skim a
> chunk from the marked up price would be physically and verbally abused by his (Yes, "his", not "his/her". This is China) mother when he got home.
-- 40% Flamebait
-- 30%
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Call it Glassgate.
Apple claims to be using aluminosilicate glass for those things. That's a tough material, but it's not a flexible one. For a device which depends on its outer glass layer for rigidity and impact protection, a laminate with a polycarbonate interior layer would have been a better choice. Most devices with a glass surface have a raised exterior ridge which usually hits before the glass does. The newer iPhone does not.
Adding an aftermarket rubber bumper ruins the aesthetic, so that's
Re:This is what the zealots do not know yet... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This is what the zealots do not know yet... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not calling any negative situation any name with gate at the end. It was stupid the first time anyone did it after the Watergate affair and it's only gotten worse with time. Give it up now or keep looking stupid when you say repeat the meme.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Graffgate