Jerod Venema writes "Today, Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt resigned from Apple's board of directors, citing conflicts of interest. Apple has released a statement that the company and Schmidt reached a decision to split ties as Google enters new markets that directly compete with Apple's iPhone and Mac operating systems. Schmidt had recused himself of portions of Apple's board meetings when conflicts of interest or anything Google-related arose. But Steve Jobs said Schmidt would have to leave much larger portions of the meetings after Google announced last month that it would enter the operating system sphere."
When Google "took over" search they didn't have massively deep financial pockets or huge revenue. The other search providers (including Microsoft, of all people) very much DID have those things.
All it requires to take over search is a better search algorithm. People can switch search providers trivially. Microsoft is using their OS and browser monopoly to try to force everyone onto their search provider every time they get a new PC or download a new browser version. Every internet providers set your hom
Conflicts of interest made it inevitable that Schmidt would leave, but considering the timing, I wouldn't be surprised if GV being rejected was the impetus.
Probably the latest in a long string of conflicts of interest. Schmidt couldn't really honestly get involved in the Google Voice discussions, obviously, since he represents the competition.
As Google wants to eat more and more of Apple's lunch (and vice versa) having the same person on both Boards is almost guaranteed to be an automatic conflict. The timing of this is about right, since Google is getting into new lines of business that compete with almost everything Apple wants to do now.
Funny thing is, one of the reasons I want an Android phone (besides the obvious openness) is that I can load the Last.FM player and listen to music... without requiring a separate device.
How can you compare xserver(a sold product) to googles server farms that are completely in house
Using hosted Google services is an alternative to running similar applications on a local server. For example, there's no need to have a local email/calendaring server if you use Gmail and Google Calendar. In this example, it's really OS X Server that could be conflicting with Google's services.
But the more relevant conflict is between Apple's MobileMe and Google's collection of (free) web apps.
What makes you think Apple has no plans to enter the netbook market with a netbook of their own or some other device targetted to consumers who might otherwise get a netbook (i.e. the oft-rumored Mac tablet)
I of course could be wrong, but I don't think Apple will sell anything cheaper than the Mini. The margins are simply too low for them to be interested in the netbook market, even if that market continues to grow. I think Apple has demonstrated consistently in the last decade that they value margins over market share.
Unless you're into PC gaming, then a netbook surely covers everything that you need to do on a "main computer". In fact I've been using one even for most of my work for the last few months (while connected to an external monitor), and it is the only computer I use now when I'm at home.
I've got my MBP for when I need to do Windows development at work, but I'm happy to just use my netbook 95% of the time. The only difference in use between my MBP and the netbook is that I don't get all the fancy Comppiz effec
The Google Search Appliance (GSA) provides fast, relevant search for your website or intranet. An on-premise, easy-to-deploy solution, the GSA provides your organization with high relevancy right out of the box, can be customized to meet your specific needs, and scales easily as your content grows.
Not exactly as sexy compared to an xserve, but it is a sold product none the less.
iTunes has never "rented" music in the resurrected Napster sense, and even in the "I call DRM renting" conniving sense virtually every piece of music sold by iTunes no no longer carries any DRM, so no matter which way you try to spin it these days your statement is simple FUD.
Apple is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for iphone and Snow Leopard email connection to MS Exchange. Why not license mapping software as well?
Apple is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for iphone and Snow Leopard email connection to MS Exchange. Why not license mapping software as well?
By that reason, Google should switch to VirtualEarth for maps. Google is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for Google Apps. Why not license mapping software as well?
Genentech Inc. Chairman Arthur Levinson also serves as a director on both boards. The Feds are investigating that as well. What about him? The news story keep mentioning that Schmidt would recuse himself from discussions related to Google, what about Levinson? Did he recuse himself from both Google and Apple meetings when the other was being discussed?
The FTC/DOJ would be far more interested in Schmidt since he's not just on both boards, but he's an employee for one of the companies. The primary issue they're seeking to prevent is collusion, which is would usually be accomplished by company employees sitting on each others' boards. A common 3rd party board member on two similar companies is also an issue, but it's not nearly as pressing of an issue since they aren't an employee.
Or to put this another way, they're handling one thing at a time.
Looking forward to that multitouch, and hopefully for those spring animations when a list reaches the end (in Android there isn't any visual feedback when you reach the end of a list except for the mini scrollbar on the right).
Yeah, the internal politics of two of the biggest companies in personal computing in the wake of the Google Voice debacle are of absolutely no interest to anyone. What we need is wiring diagrams, dammit.
Also, I don't think it exists anymore. I may be wrong, but I assume you're referring to the stock that Microsoft bought in the late 90s, which I believe they sold after a couple years. Too bad, too, because I'm guessing the stock is worth a lot more now, and Microsoft would have made a nice little profit if they'd kept their investment.
They're nowhere near going down. Even if they get fined for anti-trust, they'll get past it and do fine. If they're forced to open up their app store, it may even be good for them in the long run. At this point it probably is just a routine conflict of interest, but the timing adds some entertainment value.
Just to emphasize here, according to the NYT [nytimes.com], last month, in the middle of the worst recession in decades:
Apple recorded its best nonholiday quarter ever when other electronics makers were hurting because of a downturn in consumer spending.
They saw increasing revenue and profit in every single division of the company. Compare this to Microsoft, who last quarter [nytimes.com] saw:
On Thursday, the world's largest software company reported its worst fiscal year since it initially sold stock to the public in 1986. Year-over-year revenue and full-year sales of Microsoft's flagship Windows software dropped for the first time.
Microsoft saw billion dollar reductions in revenue [betanews.com] in both the windows (Client) and office (Business) divisions, and it's xbox (entertainment) and search (on-line) divisions were actually in the red and are losing the company money.
Apple is not a "ship going down", this statement is demonstrably false, people are even calling it recession proof. You could say that about Microsoft however and not be contradicted by facts.
I wish people would stop propagating such silly misinformation. It read more like "Don't Panic" and it was never a motto, just a note poorly scribbled on a towel that was used as a replacement air filter for the first Google Server [com.com].
Android is the game changer, and both Google and Apple know it.
Yes, 18 new devices; 18 ways for them to suck differently. You don't really get why Apple products do well, do you? You're one of those people who think it's the aesthetics, right?
Google Voice Rejected (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Google Voice Rejected (Score:5, Insightful)
No. It has more to do with a pending antitrust lawsuit by the DOJ.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
When Google "took over" search they didn't have massively deep financial pockets or huge revenue. The other search providers (including Microsoft, of all people) very much DID have those things.
All it requires to take over search is a better search algorithm. People can switch search providers trivially. Microsoft is using their OS and browser monopoly to try to force everyone onto their search provider every time they get a new PC or download a new browser version. Every internet providers set your hom
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Conflicts of interest made it inevitable that Schmidt would leave, but considering the timing, I wouldn't be surprised if GV being rejected was the impetus.
Re:Google Voice Rejected (Score:5, Informative)
As Google wants to eat more and more of Apple's lunch (and vice versa) having the same person on both Boards is almost guaranteed to be an automatic conflict. The timing of this is about right, since Google is getting into new lines of business that compete with almost everything Apple wants to do now.
Parent
Re:Google Voice Rejected (Score:5, Funny)
No, and don't call me Shirley.
Parent
Yes, you're being a little paranoid (Score:3, Informative)
Even more chatter prior to that due to conflict of interest on various topics dating back to Feb of this year
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/03/justice_department_investigating_hiring_practices_of_apple_others.html [appleinsider.com]
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/05/04/ftc_investigating_antitrust_ties_between_apple_google.html [appleinsider.com]
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/02/10/multi_touch_omitted_from [appleinsider.com]
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Apple apparently signed that contract with AT&T, so trashing them seems to be in order.
only mp3 players left (Score:5, Informative)
Well if you look
Safari => chrome
Mac os => google os
iphone => android
xserve =>google server farms
probably the only thing he didn't have to recuse himself from would be mp3 players....
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:5, Funny)
turtle necks => t-shirts
Parent
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:4, Funny)
free spirits => free beer => free speech?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
free spirits => free beer => free love.
=> free chlamydia
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Funny thing is, one of the reasons I want an Android phone (besides the obvious openness) is that I can load the Last.FM player and listen to music... without requiring a separate device.
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:4, Interesting)
Using hosted Google services is an alternative to running similar applications on a local server. For example, there's no need to have a local email/calendaring server if you use Gmail and Google Calendar. In this example, it's really OS X Server that could be conflicting with Google's services.
But the more relevant conflict is between Apple's MobileMe and Google's collection of (free) web apps.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:5, Insightful)
I of course could be wrong, but I don't think Apple will sell anything cheaper than the Mini. The margins are simply too low for them to be interested in the netbook market, even if that market continues to grow. I think Apple has demonstrated consistently in the last decade that they value margins over market share.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you're into PC gaming, then a netbook surely covers everything that you need to do on a "main computer". In fact I've been using one even for most of my work for the last few months (while connected to an external monitor), and it is the only computer I use now when I'm at home.
I've got my MBP for when I need to do Windows development at work, but I'm happy to just use my netbook 95% of the time. The only difference in use between my MBP and the netbook is that I don't get all the fancy Comppiz effec
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:4, Informative)
How can you compare xserver(a sold product) to googles server farms that are completely in house
It isn't too hard. One just needs to realize that googles server farms are not completely in house and are also a sold product.
http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html [google.com]
The Google Search Appliance (GSA) provides fast, relevant search for your website or intranet. An on-premise, easy-to-deploy solution, the GSA provides your organization with high relevancy right out of the box, can be customized to meet your specific needs, and scales easily as your content grows.
Not exactly as sexy compared to an xserve, but it is a sold product none the less.
Google Appliance Pict [wikimedia.org]
Xserve Pict [wikimedia.org]
Parent
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:5, Informative)
Since I don't rent music, iTunes adds no value.
iTunes has never "rented" music in the resurrected Napster sense, and even in the "I call DRM renting" conniving sense virtually every piece of music sold by iTunes no no longer carries any DRM, so no matter which way you try to spin it these days your statement is simple FUD.
Parent
Re:only mp3 players left (Score:4, Informative)
FYI, the two big music stores, iTunes and Amazon, don't use DRM of any kind anymore for their music.
Video, on the other hand...
Parent
mis-read title (Score:3, Funny)
I thought he was just being dull at meetings...
Given that he was leaving Apple bored
next up, Apple switches to VirtualEarth for maps (Score:2)
coming in iPhone OS 4
Apple is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for iphone and Snow Leopard email connection to MS Exchange. Why not license mapping software as well?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
By that reason, Google should switch to VirtualEarth for maps. Google is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for Google Apps. Why not license mapping software as well?
Re: (Score:2)
apple doesn't have it's own mapping software for one. google needs a reason to keep it's eleventy billion servers running and doing something
it's about time (Score:2)
nothing more to say
Arthur Levinson? (Score:5, Informative)
Genentech Inc. Chairman Arthur Levinson also serves as a director on both boards. The Feds are investigating that as well. What about him? The news story keep mentioning that Schmidt would recuse himself from discussions related to Google, what about Levinson? Did he recuse himself from both Google and Apple meetings when the other was being discussed?
Just curious.
Re:Arthur Levinson? (Score:4, Informative)
The FTC/DOJ would be far more interested in Schmidt since he's not just on both boards, but he's an employee for one of the companies. The primary issue they're seeking to prevent is collusion, which is would usually be accomplished by company employees sitting on each others' boards. A common 3rd party board member on two similar companies is also an issue, but it's not nearly as pressing of an issue since they aren't an employee.
Or to put this another way, they're handling one thing at a time.
Parent
Finally (Score:5, Funny)
I've always said that fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. It's about time Apple realized that.
-Anonymous CEO
Re:Finally (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Ohh, but which Steve?
May be good news for Android (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm happy for these news because rumours have it that Google didn't implement some features such as multitouch in Android at Apple's request.
Now that they aren't buddy-buddy anymore, maybe Google will say fuck it and implement those features anyway (much as Palm did with the Pré).
Looking forward to that multitouch, and hopefully for those spring animations when a list reaches the end (in Android there isn't any visual feedback when you reach the end of a list except for the mini scrollbar on the right).
Well, you know what they say... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
don't forget the pr0n!
Re: (Score:2)
don't forget the pr0n!
I don't think he had to recuse himself from those parts of the board meetings.
Re:Slooooow news day, huh? (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, the internal politics of two of the biggest companies in personal computing in the wake of the Google Voice debacle are of absolutely no interest to anyone. What we need is wiring diagrams, dammit.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
yeah, Idle's not had a new story in 4 days
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:First thing on my mind (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Or perhaps? (Score:5, Interesting)
They saw increasing revenue and profit in every single division of the company. Compare this to Microsoft, who last quarter [nytimes.com] saw:
Microsoft saw billion dollar reductions in revenue [betanews.com] in both the windows (Client) and office (Business) divisions, and it's xbox (entertainment) and search (on-line) divisions were actually in the red and are losing the company money.
Apple is not a "ship going down", this statement is demonstrably false, people are even calling it recession proof. You could say that about Microsoft however and not be contradicted by facts.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
"Don't be Evil"
I wish people would stop propagating such silly misinformation. It read more like "Don't Panic" and it was never a motto, just a note poorly scribbled on a towel that was used as a replacement air filter for the first Google Server [com.com].
Re:Sorry Eric (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.google.com/corporate/tenthings.html [google.com]
Read #6.
It's more than a towel, it's their ideals.
Parent
Re:Why? (Score:5, Funny)
The Board tells Jobs the CEO what to do. Jobs, Chairman of the Board and major stockholder, tells the Board what to do.
Parent
Re:Why? (Score:5, Funny)
Jobs has altered the corporate charter. The Board should pray he does not alter it further.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Android is the game changer, and both Google and Apple know it.
Yes, 18 new devices; 18 ways for them to suck differently. You don't really get why Apple products do well, do you? You're one of those people who think it's the aesthetics, right?