Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Hot Comments

Comments: 128 +-   Google CEO Schmidt Leaves Apple Board on Monday August 03 2009, @09:17AM

Posted by CmdrTaco on Monday August 03 2009, @09:17AM
from the slightly-less-billions dept.
google
business
internet
apple
Jerod Venema writes "Today, Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt resigned from Apple's board of directors, citing conflicts of interest. Apple has released a statement that the company and Schmidt reached a decision to split ties as Google enters new markets that directly compete with Apple's iPhone and Mac operating systems. Schmidt had recused himself of portions of Apple's board meetings when conflicts of interest or anything Google-related arose. But Steve Jobs said Schmidt would have to leave much larger portions of the meetings after Google announced last month that it would enter the operating system sphere."
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Blahgerton (1083623) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:19AM (#28926941)
    Surely this has nothing to do with Google Voice being rejected from the App Store.
  • by robinsc (84714) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:21AM (#28926983) Homepage

    Well if you look
    Safari => chrome
    Mac os => google os
    iphone => android
    xserve =>google server farms

    probably the only thing he didn't have to recuse himself from would be mp3 players....

    • turtle necks => t-shirts

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      how about the actual computers themselves?
    • by RichardJenkins (1362463) on Monday August 03 2009, @10:32AM (#28928103)
      I read somewhere that Apple also has a line in consumer PC hardware.
    • Funny thing is, one of the reasons I want an Android phone (besides the obvious openness) is that I can load the Last.FM player and listen to music... without requiring a separate device.

      • by nxtw (866177) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:49AM (#28927403)

        How can you compare xserver(a sold product) to googles server farms that are completely in house

        Using hosted Google services is an alternative to running similar applications on a local server. For example, there's no need to have a local email/calendaring server if you use Gmail and Google Calendar. In this example, it's really OS X Server that could be conflicting with Google's services.

        But the more relevant conflict is between Apple's MobileMe and Google's collection of (free) web apps.

      • What makes you think Apple has no plans to enter the netbook market with a netbook of their own or some other device targetted to consumers who might otherwise get a netbook (i.e. the oft-rumored Mac tablet)
        • by MightyYar (622222) on Monday August 03 2009, @11:32AM (#28929129)

          I of course could be wrong, but I don't think Apple will sell anything cheaper than the Mini. The margins are simply too low for them to be interested in the netbook market, even if that market continues to grow. I think Apple has demonstrated consistently in the last decade that they value margins over market share.

      • Unless you're into PC gaming, then a netbook surely covers everything that you need to do on a "main computer". In fact I've been using one even for most of my work for the last few months (while connected to an external monitor), and it is the only computer I use now when I'm at home.

        I've got my MBP for when I need to do Windows development at work, but I'm happy to just use my netbook 95% of the time. The only difference in use between my MBP and the netbook is that I don't get all the fancy Comppiz effec

      • by dissy (172727) on Monday August 03 2009, @12:02PM (#28929565)

        How can you compare xserver(a sold product) to googles server farms that are completely in house

        It isn't too hard. One just needs to realize that googles server farms are not completely in house and are also a sold product.

        http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html [google.com]

        The Google Search Appliance (GSA) provides fast, relevant search for your website or intranet. An on-premise, easy-to-deploy solution, the GSA provides your organization with high relevancy right out of the box, can be customized to meet your specific needs, and scales easily as your content grows.

        Not exactly as sexy compared to an xserve, but it is a sold product none the less.

        Google Appliance Pict [wikimedia.org]
        Xserve Pict [wikimedia.org]

      • by MBGMorden (803437) on Monday August 03 2009, @11:32AM (#28929131)

        Since I don't rent music, iTunes adds no value.

        iTunes has never "rented" music in the resurrected Napster sense, and even in the "I call DRM renting" conniving sense virtually every piece of music sold by iTunes no no longer carries any DRM, so no matter which way you try to spin it these days your statement is simple FUD.

      • by MightyYar (622222) on Monday August 03 2009, @11:34AM (#28929157)

        FYI, the two big music stores, iTunes and Amazon, don't use DRM of any kind anymore for their music.

        Video, on the other hand...

  • by Canazza (1428553) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:26AM (#28927041)

    I thought he was just being dull at meetings...

    Given that he was leaving Apple bored

  • coming in iPhone OS 4

    Apple is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for iphone and Snow Leopard email connection to MS Exchange. Why not license mapping software as well?

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by shadow349 (1034412)

      Apple is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for iphone and Snow Leopard email connection to MS Exchange. Why not license mapping software as well?

      By that reason, Google should switch to VirtualEarth for maps. Google is already in bed with Microsoft and ActiveSync for Google Apps. Why not license mapping software as well?

      • by alen (225700)

        apple doesn't have it's own mapping software for one. google needs a reason to keep it's eleventy billion servers running and doing something

  • nothing more to say

  • Arthur Levinson? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Faizdog (243703) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:42AM (#28927291)

    Genentech Inc. Chairman Arthur Levinson also serves as a director on both boards. The Feds are investigating that as well. What about him? The news story keep mentioning that Schmidt would recuse himself from discussions related to Google, what about Levinson? Did he recuse himself from both Google and Apple meetings when the other was being discussed?

    Just curious.

    • Re:Arthur Levinson? (Score:4, Informative)

      by rsmith-mac (639075) on Monday August 03 2009, @10:35AM (#28928147)

      The FTC/DOJ would be far more interested in Schmidt since he's not just on both boards, but he's an employee for one of the companies. The primary issue they're seeking to prevent is collusion, which is would usually be accomplished by company employees sitting on each others' boards. A common 3rd party board member on two similar companies is also an issue, but it's not nearly as pressing of an issue since they aren't an employee.

      Or to put this another way, they're handling one thing at a time.

  • Finally (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 03 2009, @10:11AM (#28927697)

    I've always said that fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. It's about time Apple realized that.

    -Anonymous CEO

  • by Zebedeu (739988) on Monday August 03 2009, @11:49AM (#28929395)

    I'm happy for these news because rumours have it that Google didn't implement some features such as multitouch in Android at Apple's request.

    Now that they aren't buddy-buddy anymore, maybe Google will say fuck it and implement those features anyway (much as Palm did with the Pré).

    Looking forward to that multitouch, and hopefully for those spring animations when a list reaches the end (in Android there isn't any visual feedback when you reach the end of a list except for the mini scrollbar on the right).

  • by inode_buddha (576844) on Monday August 03 2009, @03:00PM (#28932291) Journal
    "Schmidt Happens"
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by pha7boy (1242512)
      I thought Microsoft had a big stake in Apple (which would assume that someone from MS would be on Apple's board). maybe i'm wrong.
      • by pha7boy (1242512) on Monday August 03 2009, @09:40AM (#28927249)
        nevermind. it was 150mil stake of non-voting stock. So I guess no board of directors position.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          by nine-times (778537)
          Also, I don't think it exists anymore. I may be wrong, but I assume you're referring to the stock that Microsoft bought in the late 90s, which I believe they sold after a couple years. Too bad, too, because I'm guessing the stock is worth a lot more now, and Microsoft would have made a nice little profit if they'd kept their investment.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Nerdfest (867930)
      They're nowhere near going down. Even if they get fined for anti-trust, they'll get past it and do fine. If they're forced to open up their app store, it may even be good for them in the long run. At this point it probably is just a routine conflict of interest, but the timing adds some entertainment value.
      • Re:Or perhaps? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by je ne sais quoi (987177) on Monday August 03 2009, @12:16PM (#28929811)
        Just to emphasize here, according to the NYT [nytimes.com], last month, in the middle of the worst recession in decades:

        Apple recorded its best nonholiday quarter ever when other electronics makers were hurting because of a downturn in consumer spending.

        They saw increasing revenue and profit in every single division of the company. Compare this to Microsoft, who last quarter [nytimes.com] saw:

        On Thursday, the world's largest software company reported its worst fiscal year since it initially sold stock to the public in 1986. Year-over-year revenue and full-year sales of Microsoft's flagship Windows software dropped for the first time.

        Microsoft saw billion dollar reductions in revenue [betanews.com] in both the windows (Client) and office (Business) divisions, and it's xbox (entertainment) and search (on-line) divisions were actually in the red and are losing the company money.

        Apple is not a "ship going down", this statement is demonstrably false, people are even calling it recession proof. You could say that about Microsoft however and not be contradicted by facts.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by kklein (900361)

      Android is the game changer, and both Google and Apple know it.

      Yes, 18 new devices; 18 ways for them to suck differently. You don't really get why Apple products do well, do you? You're one of those people who think it's the aesthetics, right?

A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James