Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Comments: 101 +-   UK Gang Caught After $750K Online Music Fraud Scam on Friday June 12 2009, @12:46AM

Posted by timothy on Friday June 12 2009, @12:46AM
from the dj-felonious dept.
money
business
media
music
apple
news
LSDelirious writes "10 individuals in the UK have been arrested in connection with an online fraud gang, whereby the group created several songs, had the songs uploaded to iTunes and Amazon, then used thousands of stolen credit cards to repeatedly purchase the songs from these services. It is estimated that they charged approximately $750,000 worth of fraudulent purchases, netting the group over $300,000 in royalties payments."
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by P1aGu3ed (979864) on Friday June 12 2009, @12:49AM (#28304681)
    I say we go back to the outdated model of printing CDs and using stolen credit cards to buy boxes of them. So much easier, and they would never have been caught. No really.
  • Follow the money (Score:4, Interesting)

    by QuantumG (50515) * <qg@biodome.org> on Friday June 12 2009, @12:51AM (#28304689) Homepage Journal

    A new creative way to get cash off credit cards. Woop. At least it's better than getting goods delivered to a drop house and selling them at a pawn shop.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2009, @01:55AM (#28304943)

      Is it? A good drop house is a useful thing, and if you fence the goods properly, you're not easily traceable. It requires feet on the ground to catch you.

      This, on the other hand, is retarded. There's a simple digital "paper trail" right to your bank.

      • by QuantumG (50515) * <qg@biodome.org> on Friday June 12 2009, @01:58AM (#28304961) Homepage Journal

        If you're a moron, yes.

        Money laundering is all about getting suckers to do your banking.

        • Money laundering is all about getting suckers to do your banking.

          I got a spam email a few months back that sounded something to this effect. Basically they were looking to hire someone to deposit checks into someone else's bank accounts.

          Can't seem to find it so must have deleted it, but I thought it amusing because it basically was money laundering.

      • Usually you need to register the credit card to the same drop house. That can sometimes work, but it does make things more difficult, and there is a limit to the number of cards you can have at one address.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Either way it is stupid to have some nexus to all of your crimes. The least they could have done was to buy iTunes gift certificates and *then* buy their own songs so it's not like the victim's credit card companies are sending them a bill saying a thousand songs were purchased from such and such band.

      They are also taking a big hit on their percentage.

      After thinking about it for a bit, this is my idea: you sell stuff on ebay that you don't have, but when someone buys it, you use the stolen credit card

      • by QuantumG (50515) *

        I think you just described one of those "Make $$$ From Home" schemes that the botnets run.

        Yes, that's right, there's scams that are not being run by *people* but by a network of infected computers. Depending on how many contingencies and upgrade paths for command and control there are, these things can be insanely difficult to shut down. There's something about computers hiring people to perform jobs that seem legitimate with no concept of the overall scam that is strangely erotic.

      • by julesh (229690) on Friday June 12 2009, @03:15AM (#28305263)

        But if it is at all possible to shuffle money between bank accounts in an anonymous way (I have no idea whether it really is?)

        Yes it is. You use an advanced mechanism that isn't very popular these days, called "cash".

        • Yes it is. You use an advanced mechanism that isn't very popular these days, called "cash".

          The problem with any serious quantity of cash - certainly in the UK where this fraud took place - is that people start to ask awkward questions. (In fact, at banks they're legally obliged to start asking awkward questions)

          Which is not to say there aren't other ways to launder money. Buy a car, insure it then drive it into the wall and abracadabra! You don't have £30,000 in unmarked notes which raises eyebrows. You've got a cheque for £20,000 from an insurance company. Yes you've

          • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

            If your laundered money is shrinking, then you're doing it wrong. Never put it in the dryer; you should always hang it out to dry.
  • Nothing new... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Manip (656104) on Friday June 12 2009, @12:52AM (#28304699)

    Just traditional money laundering via a slightly new route. They used to do similar things with Auction Houses, they'd list an item of no real value and then buy it. Dirty money into clean money!

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      They used to do similar things with Auction Houses, they'd list an item of no real value and then buy it.

      Not too different from pretty much any auction dealing with modern art.

  • by santax (1541065) on Friday June 12 2009, @12:53AM (#28304701)
    When compared to the 'guys who stick up for artists (and take 95+ % of the earnings' these guys are saints. Give them a medal! At least they made their own music!
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by bitt3n (941736)
      Furthermore, who's to say that all those credit card holders wouldn't have bought these songs anyway? Perhaps they should all get charged an extra convenience fee.
  • And yet... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2009, @12:59AM (#28304731)

    The Spice Girls remain at large.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    ...or stolen credit card *numbers*? TFA and TFS claim "cards". How exactly to you steal thousands of cards?

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Plunky (929104)

      ...or stolen credit card *numbers*? TFA and TFS claim "cards". How exactly to you steal thousands of cards?

      Now listen carefully I will say this only once. Copyright infringement is not stealing!

  • by Shag (3737) <dan@@@birchalls...net> on Friday June 12 2009, @01:04AM (#28304759) Homepage

    ...and where can I get a torrent of them?

    • Seriously - are the songs still on iTunes and Amazon?

      With all this publicity, it's chance to sell them to the curiosity seekers (at least one copy...)
      • by zobier (585066)

        I don't see why not, it's not as if the music is illegal.
        I'm curious who this is and what the music sounds like too.

    • by Anenome (1250374) on Friday June 12 2009, @01:31AM (#28304851) Homepage

      They were all third rate covers of "Money, money, money, money!"

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by flonker (526111)

        They sold so many copies, these songs were HOT!

      • So third rate, in fact, that they managed to get the number of "Money"s in the title wrong.

        Unless this is a medley of Pink Floyd's "Money" with Abba's "Money, Money, Money"? I'd pay good money to hear that.

        • Add that song by Barrett Strong, and that other song by John Lee Hooker, and you'll get the medley: "I Need Some Money, Money, Money, Money, Money, Money (That's What I Want)".
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2009, @01:47AM (#28304903)

    Remember when they first came in in the UK?

    The premium rate phone number renter was paid their cut monthly by BT.

    But ordinary subscribers are billed quarterly.

    So here's how some people made a lot of money.....

    Start two companies. One of them rents a load of premium rate numbers and phone lines. The other rents a load of ordinary phone lines.

    Company 2 then calls Company 1's premium rate lines incessently.

    For three months in a row, Co1 gets cheques from BT.

    At the start of Month 4 both companies get phone bills.

    At around the start of Month 6 Co 2 gets final reminders, and is possibily cut off from service and threatened with all sorts of legal actions.

    But, no matter, both Companies have vanished with around 6 hefty BT cheques.

    Profit!

    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2009, @08:49AM (#28307367)

      Listen to this one then; you open a company called the Arse Tickler's Faggot Fan Club. You take an advert in the back page of some gay mag, advertising the latest in arse-intruding dildos, sell it a bit with, er... I dunno, "does what no other dildo can do until now", latest and greatest in sexual technology. Guaranteed results or money back, all that bollocks. These dills cost twenty-five each; a snip for all the pleasure they are going to give the recipients. They send a cheque to the company name, nothing offensive, er, Bobbie's Bits or something, for twenty-five. You put these in the bank for two weeks and let them clear. Now this is the clever bit. Then you send back the cheques for twenty-five pounds from the real company name, Arse Tickler's Faggot Fan Club, saying sorry, we couldn't get the supply from America, they have sold out. Now you see how many of the people cash those cheques; not a single soul, because who wants his bank manager to know he tickles arses when he is not paying in cheques!

      -- Tom

  • Copy(right)cat (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nausea_malvarma (1544887) on Friday June 12 2009, @01:55AM (#28304947)
    A criminal gang that scams people out of their money with recorded music? Looks like the RIAA is inspiring copycat crimes.
  • The BBC is reporting that nine people were arrested. Six men and three women. And not ten like many other articles are reporting.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8094748.stm [bbc.co.uk]

    Nevertheless what everyone is really waiting other than the name's of the individuals arrested obviously...are the names of the albums that they put up.

    As soon as their real and DJ names are released we can find out what albums they worked on and see if those compilations were actually good. I wonder if they'll get enoug

    • by julesh (229690)

      I also wonder if Amazon/I-Tunes will have to forfeit the money?

      You mean from any legit sales they get? I'd imagine not, but the gang themselves probably wouldn't be allowed to benefit -- the money owed to them would likely be seized using the Proceeds of Crime Act, which gives the government very wide ranging powers to take criminals' posessions without having to actually prove they were obtained illegaly.

      On the whole, though, Amazon and iTunes will lose out here. They'll have had thousands (if not more)

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by SnowZero (92219)

      The BBC is reporting that nine people were arrested. Six men and three women. And not ten like many other articles are reporting.

      That's because Keyser Soze got away.

  • Where dem tracks at?? This should be the most authentic gangster music!! Almost sounds like a project vom Weird Al ...

  • I would really love to have one of these songs (I often use musically esoteric materials in my classroom). The article doesn't mention what the music was. Anyone know? From other sources?

  • by Speare (84249) on Friday June 12 2009, @07:47AM (#28306689) Homepage

    I think "from the felonious-monk dept." has a better ring to it.

  • by Punto (100573) <[puntob] [at] [gmail.com]> on Friday June 12 2009, @08:56AM (#28307463) Homepage

    that's nothing, in the process of pulling off this scam, they lost $2 billion to piracy! nobody's safe!

  • by noidentity (188756) on Friday June 12 2009, @10:04AM (#28308497)

    UK Gang Caught After $750K Online Music Fraud Scam

    Let's see, at $150K per song [geek.com], that comes out to 5 songs.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by adavies42 (746183)
      they should have developed a thousand-dollar iphone app instead [wikipedia.org]
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by carlzum (832868)
      Yeah, they should have just put the song on a Russian MP3 site and sued them for $1.65 trillion [cybernetnews.com]
    • by EdIII (1114411) * on Friday June 12 2009, @01:57AM (#28304953)

      $30k each just doesn't seem worth it. What a waste of criminal talent.

      Talent? These guys are morons. You make it sound like they were Lex Luthor or something. Truthfully, I think Pinky and the Brain would of come up with a better plan.

      They created an artificial product. Maybe that is too harsh, I dunno. Their music could be decent for all we know. Putting this product up for sale on iTunes and then generating what was probably 99.99% fraudulent sales was a huge tip off. The fraud investigators would certainly label the musicians as prime suspects with such a percentage.

      Follow the money. Good judges do that, and so do good detectives.

      The person committing the fraud as the customer was receiving no money, just product. Is it a coincidence that nearly all of the customers were using fraud to obtain the product? Highly unlikely.

      The musicians selling their product to these customers, were receiving the money, laundered even.

      With so many damaged parties involved, I find it laughable that these criminals thought that nobody would even suspect the "musicians" of fraud and start to investigate them.

    • On the contrary, $30K each seems too much. Make it $5 each, and how many people will query it? Even if they do, the credit card companies are more likely to just eat the loss than pursue it (it will cost way more than $5 to recover it). With this sort of scam, hitting a lot of people for a small amount is a lot more lucrative (and less likely to get you caught) than hitting a smaller number for more.
    • i don't see why not. In Apple's case, they don't own the music, they just charge for the bandwidth usage and credit card transaction fees. Not sure if Amazon is the same way.
      It would be the right thing for them to return their cut since it's only chump change for them, but who knows if they'll actually do it.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by mike2R (721965)
        Hmm, I'd have thought quite the reverse. iTunes and Amazon are the merchants here as I understand it; they've charged the cards and hold the funds. Presumably they have then paid out commission to these crooks for the "sales".

        So now that the fraud has been spotted, the card holders will obviously do chargebacks, and since they obviously had no part in these transactions their card issuers will refund them, same as for any other fraudulent use of a card.

        And as for any other chargeback, the banks will si
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Regardless of how you feel about the RIAA and big music, trying to equate their business activities with stealing credits cards and using them to purchase tracks as part of a fraud operation is moronic.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by stewbacca (1033764)
        Credit card fraud is a crime, regardless of your socioeconomic status, and regardless if you try to dismiss is as "trying to make a living". You don't have a right to etch out "some sort of living" by purchasing stuff with stolen credit cards.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by hmar (1203398)
        This is NOT copyright infringement. This is fraudulently using someon else's credit card to purchase products. Night and day difference, and the riaa is not involved, as far as I can tell (how can they be? these people put their own music up, and purchased it). The $750,000 is not damages, it is fraudulent charges. By taking this incredibly thin excuse to push your agenda, you discredit it.
I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. -- Leo Kessler