The SEC Is Getting Closer To Jobs 154
Strudelkugel writes "CNN is reporting that Apple's ex-CFO warned Steve Jobs about backdating options. From the article: 'Apple's former finance chief Fred Anderson blamed Apple CEO Steve Jobs for a 2001 stock option grant that was backdated, according to a statement from Anderson's lawyer released Tuesday. The statement was released by Anderson's lawyer, Jerome Roth, after Anderson settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission related to Apple's stock option plan without admitting or denying any wrongdoing.' This is serious business. It is quite possible that the SEC could someday require Jobs to resign from Apple."
Despite it all (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Despite it all (Score:4, Interesting)
His salary may only be $1, but he received about $8 million worth of options last year. The $1 salary is purely symbolic now.
And for the record, Jobs is easily worth millions to the company. There's no way Apple would be where it is without him, and he is worth every penny they give him.
I'm not convinced either are guilty (Score:1, Interesting)
Note that this whole Apple stock "scandal" is about something that isn't even illegal. The only thing they did wrong was to file taxes on the stock issues incorrectly, which is wrong, BUT they self reported to the SEC and the IRS. There absolutely no evidence of any intentional wrongdoing.
I say both are more related to the US Attorney purge than anything else. The Chair of the SEC is trying to "do his job" by applying heat to prominent liberal democrat contributors (which stewart, and jobs and Apple are). That's what I think is going on.
Re:Despite it all (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:More Likely than Resignation (Score:5, Interesting)
See this article [chron.com] and this other article [law.com] from back in January. Interesting that back in January, from the article, Anderson's statement is
Yet, now having claimed he knew that Jobs was awarded or considering these backdated options, he would either violated his SEC ethics obligations, or was so insanely incompetent he should have been fired anyway. So by settling with the SEC he basically admits he did act improperly. It's obvious he most likely lied (or sneakily phrased his statement) back in January.
In light of this contradiction, why should anyone trust his word now?
Re:Despite it all (Score:4, Interesting)
As someone else pointed out, his salary is $1 per year, but of course he owns significant shares of Apple, Pixar, and other stocks where the real money is made.
Since Jobs never exercised the options, his only guilt in this scam is in having been awarded the options by his company (where the options backdating was approved by Anderson himself who's making the accusation now).
It's kind of like your friend giving you a forged check from a rich person's account, and then him getting busted for writing these forged checks. Since he's busted he wants to claim you as an accomplice, even though you never cashed that check.
SEC can require resignation? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Yeah we could try that. Then again..... (Score:3, Interesting)