Consumers Unlikely To Pay $500 for iPhone 412
narramissic writes "A survey by online market research firm Compete Inc. finds that of the 26% of those who said they're likely to buy an iPhone, only 1% said they'd pay $500 for it, while 42% said they'd likely buy the phone for $200 to $299. Sixty percent of likely iPhone buyers would be willing to make the switch to AT&T wireless to get it."
Skip the phone... (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm getting one (Score:1, Interesting)
The iPhone is more than a media player, it's the ultimate PDA. That is what I'm looking for. Something ultra modern, but without the lame keypad at the bottom. Can't tell you how many times I've had to open up my Treo to fix the keyboard when a letter get's pushed the wrong way....
Wait a sec. . . (Score:5, Interesting)
Sloppy.
Backwards (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd be more interested in what percentage of people who are willing to buy a $500+ phone are planning on getting an iPhone.
(And I'm going to skip the obvious commentary about wanting an iPhone but being "willing" to buy it for as cheap a price as the survey allows because many others are already making those (insightful) comments...)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm getting one (Score:3, Interesting)
Or, rather, my wife is getting one.
Her birthday is in June, and she needs a new iPod and a new cell phone, and we're already with Cingular and are happy with the service. She saw that you can show pictures to people on that wide screen and said "I want to be able to do that." And now that we've got a baby on the way, it will make it a helluva lot easier than having to lug photos around or view it on my iPod's comparatively small screen, or the tiny screen of an iPod Nano. And having her address book and calendar with her would be very convenient.
So it's not for everybody, but for her it can replace having to carry around two larger items that, were I to buy them separately, would cost about the same price.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Interesting)
There will likely always be a $600 model, it'll just steadily improve in capabilities while the abilities of the previous $600 model finds their way into the new cheaper versions.
Although I will say that one reason that this strategy has worked so well with the iPod is that all version tied in very well with iTunes, which is an excellent piece of software. I don't know what sort of computer software Apple might have that will augment the use of the iPhone, but I think that that could be a big piece of the puzzle.
Re:Well then? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I hear... (Score:3, Interesting)
Furthermore, will the SIM card be user changeable? If not, they'll not be able to get a large portion of the European market, who use pre-paid plans overwhelmingly and expect to buy an unlocked phone. Apple's love of locking the user out could really hurt them here as people find they cannot do all the things they expect to be able to do with a phone.
No, you won't see an iPhone for $300. (Score:5, Interesting)
All signs indicate Apple's trying to position the iPhone a step-up from the iPod, not a replacement. I really doubt it will ever drop below the price of the most expensive iPod, even with a contract.
Consider me a 1%er (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Inflation depends on how you measure it (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:My Macbook Pro would disagree with you. (Score:2, Interesting)
I appreciate what Apple can do by compartmentalizing their entire line into a few models (they can be very price competitive and with good manufacturing turnover times), but I don't think that Macs always have the price - performance ratio over a PC. It's almost like they're competing for different markets, no?
That said, yes, I agree, the design is cool, backlit keys and anodized whatever it's made out of metal or what not. I almost bought one too. =)