Verizon Rejected iPhone Deal 290
SnowDog74 writes "According to an article in USA Today, Verizon Wireless rejected an Apple deal over the iPhone. The article says that Verizon wasn't happy with the strict terms Apple demanded — a Verizon Wireless VP is quoted saying that Apple wanted a cut of monthly revenues and control of the customer relationship. What's perhaps equally interesting, however, is the implication from sources that say Cingular's exclusive 5-year deal with Apple applies within the United States only. If this is true, it undermines some of the criticism Apple has been receiving for their business strategy surrounding the iPhone, given the size of the cell-phone market outside the US."
interesting? no. (Score:5, Insightful)
What's perhaps equally interesting, however, is the implication from sources that say Cingular's exclusive 5-year deal with Apple applies within the United States only.
duh... perhaps Cingular isn't used outside the US (or very much?) They aren't in
Re:interesting? no. (Score:5, Insightful)
As a Verizon customer (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple iPhone (Score:5, Insightful)
Whats the big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Service & retailers: the other side of the (Score:1, Insightful)
I've never been a Verizon customer... but from what I've heard [blogspot.com], "customer satisfaction" is not their top priority.
Lucky us (Score:3, Insightful)
While I understand that many people find Cingular to be joke, I am happy that cingular was flexible enough to adopt a phone that will likely force them to reevaluate their business model. They will certainly have rethink the data rates, and they are not likely to make any money off music downloads.
In a couple years, I am sure verizon, and it's customers, will be perfectly happy with the iPod knockoff Zunefone, with it's verizon only music downloads and it's DRM protected overpriced ringtones. I am sure everyone will continue to say how great Verizon is, and how the Zunefone surpasses the Apple phone is copies, although even today, with existing products, neither is true.
Five years? Thought it was two. (Score:4, Insightful)
Ah well, the hardware looks great and it's certainly a platform which could handle almost everything you could want from the current generation. Too bad it's going to be on a crappy, slow network run by a company which is gloating about how badly it can treat its customers due to having a monopoly.
Good news: this will make Linux-based phones much better, much sooner.
Re:Five years? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:foreign iPhone sales (Score:2, Insightful)
http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch2en/conc
Re:Cingular needs all the help it can get... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Five years? (Score:3, Insightful)
- Play music crippled by DRM
- Surf the net
- A few features that all PDAs have, such as calendar and notes
The interface is nice because it's a big touch screen, but if my experience with Apple hardware is anything to go by, it won't be very durable.
The only thing the iPhone has over other PDA phones is Steve Jobs and Apple marketing it. By the time it comes out there will probably already be a different PDA phone with similar capabilities that can run 3rd party applications. That will lead to interesting possibilities while the completely proprietary Apple fanatics lock themselves into DRM hell.
Fuck Verizon (Score:3, Insightful)
And I can't help but think that I'm not the only person who feels this way. Their customer-hostile antics will eventually bite them in the ass, and I am going to enjoy watching that happen as much as I'd enjoy watching Microsoft implode - maybe more.
Re:Fuck Verizon (Score:1, Insightful)
What is it about cell phone carriers that brings out the Big Big Whining? As in: "I went over my limit to the tune of $600 and Verizon wouldn't help me out." Well, duh. They're under no obligation to do so, no matter what one rep said. This is cell phone service, not electricity or water.
Cell phone companies are not your pals. They're massive faceless corporations dedicated to making a profit. Get over it.
I use Verizon for voice and data, have for years, and have had zero problems with them. When my i700 kicked the bucket for no apparent reason after a year, they sent me a new one for free. I used their EVDO service while traveling across the entire country last year (with the exception of western Kentucky where, apparently, VzW has decided that hill folk don't need service), and no other company can provide that coverage right now.
I pay my bills on time, every time, I don't go over my minutes, and--surprise!--both parties in the contractual relationship are content.
If you aren't content, vote with your wallet.
Re:Yet More Examples of Steve Jobs/Apple Arrogance (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Five years? (Score:3, Insightful)
Land of the Free to be shafted and used by the corporations?
Re:Mono, what? Poly or something? (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Premature death (Score:3, Insightful)
If they are inclined to do so (and given the hype around the iPhone), the established phone developers can come up with something very similar and have it out earlier and at a lower cost. Nokia's Aeon concept [engadgetmobile.com] looks like a promising candidate to build on as does the Siemens-Benq's Black Box [gizmodo.com] concept. In addition, IIRC the Aeon prototype was fuel cell powered.
At least from a European and especially Japanese perspective the iPhone is already severely outdated. No 3G, no GPS etc? It's a beautiful phone, but the eye candy can be imitated and cloned and used in a better phone. Assuming that the other phone companies are complete nitwits they can easily create a more attractive package and get it out earlier and cheaper.
Re:interesting? no. (Score:2, Insightful)