Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media (Apple) Television Media Hardware

TV On Mobiles: Not Yet There? 232

rustbear writes "It seems that perhaps Apple did their homework when they decided to downplay the video capabilities of the new iPod. The Guardian reports that "Most [British] people have no desire to watch television on mobile phones, preferring to use home computers to watch TV while on the internet, according to new research. Although 65% of British consumers surveyed cite the mobile phone as their most desired gadget, 70% of mobile owners said they did not want to watch television on their phone at all. Nearly 45% of consumers said they would watch TV on their home computer, because it enabled them to choose what they wanted to watch and when." Is the mainstream market not yet ready for portable video?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TV On Mobiles: Not Yet There?

Comments Filter:
  • Japan (Score:5, Informative)

    by ajohnj1 ( 534707 ) <adjohn@ g m ail.com> on Monday November 07, 2005 @11:46AM (#13969696)
    TV on mobiles have been 'there' in Japan for awhile now. It is pretty much a standard feature on all of the "free" phones you can get when you sign up for new service. Whether people actually watch TV on their phones is another question...
  • Verizon (Score:3, Informative)

    by everphilski ( 877346 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @11:49AM (#13969723) Journal
    Verizon still stocks basic cell phones. They don't flip, no color screens, etc.

    -everphilski-
  • by Red Flayer ( 890720 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @12:18PM (#13969959) Journal
    Several reasons there isa market for them:

    Business Travel -- if you want to watch a movie at a hotel, you have to pay big bucks (US$10) for a limited selection via the hotel's distribution system.

    Traveling with the kids -- makes road trips a lot easier to handle. And to stave off the "but good parents wouldn't need to foster the kids off on an electronic babysitter in the car" crowd -- it's a lot safer to drive when the kids aren't interrupting your focus every 20 seconds.

    Commuters -- Those of us who responsibly take mass transit to the office have another way to pass the time.

    Crowded houses -- Allows someone to watch a movie without dominating the living room. Can easily be carried from room to room, a better solution than having a TV and DVD player in every room.

  • by rustbear ( 852420 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @12:47PM (#13970176)

    Let me clarify the point that I was trying to make with my one sentence question (i'm the story submitter).

    I feel that you are lumping demand for a specific functionality with demand for a specific bit of technology. In your HDD example, people may not have wanted slower hard drives with less capacity, but they clearly liked the idea of smaller drives, which is why the drives took off. Likewise, portable music players didn't sell well before the iPod, *NOT* because people didn't want to have portable music (they very much did), but because all the players were crap in some way.

    On the other hand, in the "TV on mobiles" case, here we potentially have research indicating that people may not even want the underlying functionality at all, no matter how well implemented, and potentially no amount of product maturation will make people want it.

  • by Bruce Perens ( 3872 ) <bruce@perens.com> on Monday November 07, 2005 @01:04PM (#13970325) Homepage Journal
    The first reason is that spectrum regulation for VHF and higher frequencies is not, in general, carried out on a global basis. Part of this is historical, and part that governments and their people want more versatility than global spectrum allocation would offer. Regulation for the convenience of manufacturers isn't a good idea, because they can handle the economies of scale in a whole nation's worth of customers. Regulation for the sake of roving devices and their users is a good idea.

    The second reason is that a nation's own manufacturers lobby for their system. All of the D-AMPS 800 MHz base stations now seem to have gone to GSM because they can get more voice channels out of a single cell. Not because of the tiny minority of their users who roam internationally.

    Bruce

  • I think it's just as easy to conclude that people can't imagine themselves using mobile video. I don't think that's the same conclusion as yours...

    Hell, 100 years ago, who would have been able to imagine themselves going from London to Tokyo in less than a month or three? Does that mean there's no demand for air travel?

    Demand can be manufactured. Build a better mousetrap...

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...