The Profit Margin on the iPod nano 246
Ant writes "BusinessWeek Online reports that researcher iSuppli took a look inside the iPod Nano to find out how much Apple is making off it, and who supplies its parts. From the article: 'Apple has sold some 16 million iPods in the first nine months of fiscal 2005, and 21 million since its inception. Thus far in fiscal 2005, the iPod has brought in $2.6 billion in revenue, accounting for about 25% of Apple's total.'"
Apple paving the way to thin consumer devices (Score:5, Interesting)
No input on the Nano is crummy, but it's form factor makes it much more likely I will take it someplace.
There might be more to it than the cost of parts (Score:5, Interesting)
Apple Brand (Score:5, Interesting)
Necessary to be an innovator (Score:5, Interesting)
To pay for the R&D, marketing, etc ... I'm surpised that Jobs doesn't demand a higher return.
I'm wondering if Apple will go the way of Sony. Innovating firms have a tendency to be eaten up by firms who copy and then sell for a lower price. The only way to stop copiers is to create a closed format - basically kill competition before it happens - or to keep innovating to stay ahead of the copiers - easier said than done.
Re:Too bad that's so simplified (Score:5, Interesting)
I would agree with the parent. The only hardware that seems to be sold at a loss are gaming consoles and cell phones. The console makers do it because they assume they will make up the loss on game sales. The cell phone makers aren't selling at a loss, it is the providers that base the loss on the length of the contract. And the providers only seem to be giving the crappy phones away. The good cell phones will still cost around $200. Profit on the hardware is why Apple won't offically release a version of OS X for generic x86 hardware. There's not enough money in it for them if the hardware sales are missing from the equation.
Re:Necessary to be an innovator (Score:5, Interesting)
-cough- Dell -cough-
Re:Apple paving the way to thin consumer devices (Score:5, Interesting)
My wife just got a 6GB iPod Mini and it's terrific. Also picked up one of them iTrip doohickies too, and it's excellent for using in the car. Shame it's illegal in the UK really!
Now what with more and more (top end) car manufacturers building Bluetooth into their cars for Hands-Free Mobile use, using the Stereo, why not have a "bTrip" (er - "iTooth"?) that connects automatically to the car Stereo as well. That'd sure be neat!
Build the BlueTooth into the iPod/iNano/iVimto and you presumably don't need the USB connector anymore either! Maybe permit swapping songs with other iPeople on the train etc, or even listen in to whatever other people are playing?
Re:The part of the article that applies (Score:5, Interesting)
The Pocket is the New Platform. (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple are pretty savvy to this. iPod nano is a keyboard and mouse interface away from being a Classic.. its not unusual that the same sort of 'monolith screen slab' form factor of the original Mac is still resonant in their current design path.
But now, it fits in your pocket. And it won't be long until the LED projector segment shrinks to the same form-factor, and we'll see, perhaps, even the death of laptops
[.. there's nothing quite so cool as having torrent in your pocket
Re:Too bad that's so simplified (Score:3, Interesting)
If you're talking about physical goods sold at a loss by a third party service provider, there are lots of other examples beyond cell phones of that -- satellite resellers, some of the "free PC" companies, the satellite radio companies, etc.
Re:In the meanwhile... (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe I am in the minority (Score:4, Interesting)
What I have seen is that they will most likely buy ANOTHER iPod. The only few who considered buying an Apple computer got immediately turned off by the price.
It is all about price points. The iPods are doing well now because they are at that magical number of being below $299 and most being $199 and under. Look where the largest iPod market is, it is that lower price range.
Meaning, if Apple can come out with other items in that range people might just stop and buy, may I suggest a media center type solution. An Apple PVR with more functionality?
Re:Engineering costs? (Score:5, Interesting)
(I mean, let's not kid around, there's no way in hell Apple is gonna fail to make its fixed costs back on this one. They'll probably do it in the first week.)
Re:Tooling? Investment? (Score:3, Interesting)
Marketing is a G&A expense and is below the gross margin line as well.
Re:Forgot a Couple (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Engineering costs? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How does this work? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The part of the article that applies (Score:3, Interesting)
You'd be surprised. Did you know that the average computer store loses money on the computers they sell? Not only is Apple making money per unit (a good thing!) They have attachments [apple.com] attachments [apple.com] attachments [apple.com] attachments. [apple.com]
Did I mention they have attachments? [apple.com]
Their margins on the iPods are pretty good. Their margins on the attachments must be insane. $40USD for earbuds? I've seen the margins on similiar items, and they're usually around 80%. Also, don't forget that when you RMA an item, Apple will fix whatever is wrong with it, and then sell [apple.com] it again, re-couping some of those RMA costs.
Just think, until recently the ITMS was actually losing money. This means that the profits from Apple's iPods + Dog are enough to make up for everything AND still make a profit. Now that ITMS is breaking even, Apple has got to be making a killing.
Re:The part of the article that applies (Score:3, Interesting)