No Levy on iPods in Canada 236
colinemckay writes "The fight over a levy on iPods and other digital music devices ended Thursday when the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear any further arguments on the matter. That means there will be no levy applied to digital audio recorders such as Apple's popular iPod and iPod Shuffle as well as other MP3 players like iRiver."
Re:A fair comparison of Java and Perl -- interesti (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, he has his reasons.
Who the hell is Levy? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How about CD media? (Score:4, Funny)
Here [justice.gc.ca] is the law that enforces the levy. It just says "blank audio recording medium". I don't see how a CD is a blank audio recording medium any more than a hard drive is, but let's not tell them that. Before we know it we're paying the levy on RAM too.
Re:NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR FUCKING IPOD (Score:3, Funny)
Re:IRiver and XClef vs iPod (Score:5, Funny)
You misunderstand the purpose of the levy (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Gee. (Score:2, Funny)
Can someone please STEAL the music of Celine Dion and Brian Adams already? Please?! I'm tired of hearing them in stores and around town.
Re:Pack of Rats (Score:3, Funny)
The CPCC is a completely seperate company; it's like saying that SCO is microsoft, just because we don't like them... well, bad example, but you know what I mean. It's like saying that stealing and piracy are the same thing. OK, another bad example on slashdot. OK, like the difference between free beer and free love. Wait, that's not a good example for slashdotters either. Maybe like saying that...
OK, so using slashdot logic, I guess they ARE the same. Nevermind.
Re:Pack of Rats (Score:3, Funny)
It therefore makes sense that there's a government department somewhere which has the authority to give you a refund if you've used a CD for something else. Why don't you give them a call and see if they can help you?