The Death of Folders? 607
saintlupus writes "There's an interesting article on Wired about the interface changes in Tiger being a precursor to the demise of the classic folder-browsing Finder." From the article: "Users type search queries more or less as they did pre-Tiger, but 'the quality, scope and presentation of the results are significantly better, so users get good benefits without having to change their behavior.'"
The Death of Folders? (Score:2, Funny)
Hmm.... (Score:3, Funny)
Folders?!? (Score:3, Funny)
err...yea...
I don't think so... (Score:5, Funny)
MyFolders died a few days go (Score:2, Funny)
My File Search (Score:5, Funny)
It'd be very efficient, I could then just think of finding a file, and there it would be. Or better yet, I could imagine a beowul...NO CARRIER
Misread (Score:4, Funny)
hiding (Score:1, Funny)
Ten levels of folders with scary names like "SYSX.dat" keeps them
the hell outta my pr0n.
Re:Removable media (Score:3, Funny)
"Please insert the CD on which you wrote "MY NUDIE PICS' in blue marker."
Re:What's wrong with folders (Score:2, Funny)
You could for instance label all pictures with your buddy John Doe "john". That way you can quickly find those pictures, even though they lie in different folders ("drunk in florida 2001", "drunk in hawaii 2003").
Re:Misread (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Folders?!? (Score:4, Funny)
Call it a toast to the benefits of the initial Windows 95 file naming scheme. :-)