Apple Launches iTunes Affiliate Program 206
An anonymous user writes, "Apple has launched an affiliate program for their iTunes music store that earns participants 5% commission. Affiliates can link directly to songs, albums, and artists, as well as apply to the Apple Store affiliate program to sell hardware. It costs nothing to join and people that sign up prior to September 15 can win one of five free iPod minis. Apple has also assembled a handy FAQ."
Fight the Enemy (Score:2, Insightful)
FAQ? (Score:4, Insightful)
1) "Frequently Asked Questions"? How long has this been around that there are questions asked frequently?
2) In the FAQ, there is the sentence "You can only use approved creative provided by iTunes." When did "creative" become a noun?
Incentive for smaller labels? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not exactly sure how Apple signs labels (or individuals) even after a bit of browsing on their site.
SSN + No encryption = ??? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:SSN + No encryption = ??? (Score:5, Insightful)
Beginning of a Revolution? (Score:5, Insightful)
If iTunes is starting to offer an affiliate program, then it will encourage websites to develop song lists and various tools that analyze your current listening tastes and then recommend songs that you can buy from iTunes. Obviously there'll be a flurry of crap and SPAM, but eventually some pretty cool services are going to emerge.
Services which can avoid the traditional music labels entirely. Artists can produce a song, a vast network of freelance marketers can promote it (instead of 5 big media conglomerates), and music buyers can pay for it.
Re:Beginning of a Revolution? (Score:3, Insightful)
wtf? and those 'tools' aren't going to be a new thing.
what you will see however for certain is google-spam. because it's not 'really' spam to have spam google. it just needs ten people to do linkfarms of all pop songs going between them or so and you'll be completely fucked for finding a site with real content about these songs.
apple would probably be able to weed out spyware 'recommenders' and nasty stuff like that but they can't really weed out those zombie websites with generated content that's just links to other sites of theirs with generated content(and adverts)..
Re:Recursive marketing sucks. A lot. (Score:3, Insightful)
Even worse are things like "Targeted" advertisements on the internet. Google's getting better, but internet ads still fall into the basic categories.
None of these catergories comes close to informing me or making good use of my time. My friends, on the other hand, have a pretty good idea of what I like and have a pretty vested interest in giving me honest opinions. Music is meant to be a question of "Hey, Bob, come listen to this song, it's got a really catchy tune.", not of "LOOKIT THIS GIRLS BOOBS! AND SHE SINGS!". It will happen, and this is it.
It's like the old joke about lotteries... (Score:4, Insightful)
The odds are still terrible you'll win an iPod Mini, but it looks like the only thing signing up for this will cost you is your time.
But Context is everything... (Score:5, Insightful)
I, for example, have a political website. Right now there are lots of good political books that relate exactly to the content of my site. It makes sense to have a "click here to buy this" after book quotes. What doesn't make sense is putting them on every page even where they don't belong. (Not that I take advantage of this because I can't find a good affiliate program that does this, amazon IIRC doesn't offer this anymore).
Sure, you'll get google-bombed pages which have nothing but "buy this song" links but out there someone can turn his or her hobbie into a cash cow. It may not be much money - but to the site's readers it means the site may be up next year come domain/hosting renewal time.
Although, can you imagine the possibility with iTunes affiliate programs? Music has a much broader appeal. I can put my favorite song's name and artist name in my Slashdot sig, just to get people turned on to their music. It would be annoying for everyone to link to Britney Spears or some other pop-star, but obscure music could be marketed for almost nothing.
The cool thing is that you can help support your favorite artist and get a kickback while doing it. The reason that Britney and company are so popular is because people vote with their dollars. If there is suddenly a huge surge in Jaco Pastorius songs sold on iTunes maybe radio stations will get a clue and stop following the RIAA's lead.
btw... get a freeipod already! [freeipods.com]
Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)
My Very own IPOD compatable Music Store. (Score:5, Insightful)
in the latter case, To get the protected AAC files to your iPod, you still need iTunes (to handle the drm keys), So Apples presence will still be there.
How much differences will there realy be?
Re:So... (Score:2, Insightful)
How to *really* win an iPod Mini (Score:3, Insightful)
Yup. So it consumes some chunk of your time for an incredibly small chance to win an iPod Mini.
You really want an iPod Mini, with a 100% chance to win (and help out the other folks in the Open Source world)?
Do a GNOME Bug Bounty [gnome.org], and just *buy* an iPod Mini.
Apple wins, you win, the Open Source world wins, and the musicians win.
Affiliate vs. Artist Share (Score:1, Insightful)
Already been linking to songs on my site ... (Score:5, Insightful)
[Note that one thing the parent is not mentioning
I realize that 5% isn't much, but it's actually a huge percentage considering what Apple makes. [I take it that their estimated 3 profit per song has gone up]
This could be a great way for websites such as mine - who are also Apple oriented to get a tiny bit of operation revenue.
I hate banner ads - so it 's neat that I can now have a story element as part of my revenue.
Some examples:
Is It A Sin To Buy A Mac [jackwhispers.com] Devil Inside ~ INXS
How To Avoid An Auction Scam Without Really Trying [jackwhispers.com] eBay ~ Weird Al Yankovic
What Kon Man! [jackwhispers.com]Confunkshunizeya ~ Con Funk Shun
I really appreciate that Apple has now made me a part of the not only the downloading process but the true sharing process. Because sharing does involve some form of compensation or benefit.
Re:*WARNING* not a secure form! (Score:2, Insightful)
I have to give my SIN out for anything that pays me money. My employer gives me paychecks, the bank pays me interest and the affiliate program gives me commission cheques. That institution is responsible for telling Revenue Canada I've made money -- and Revenue Canada doesn't want my name, it needs my SIN as well.
So the institution is required by law to have my SIN. There are supposed to be severe restrictions on how they use that number though.
Re:Canada still too cold for AAC quality music (Score:1, Insightful)
We already pay music industry tax, no point paying twice.
Re:I don't quite understand... (Score:3, Insightful)
How is that sleazy? The end user was clicking to buy the song and would have to use the client necessary to play that song. It's not exactly spyware here folks. It's money in exchange for goods and services. To take advantage of that service, you have to download a really excellent media player.