Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media (Apple) Businesses Media Apple

iPod: This Season's Must-Have for Muggers 993

KH writes "West Midlands police have issued a stark warning to iPod users: ditch the white headphones or pay the price." Apparently, muggers recognize the headphones and target passersby for muggage.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

iPod: This Season's Must-Have for Muggers

Comments Filter:
  • by bahwi ( 43111 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:16PM (#8719338)
    Yeah, the white headphones do give it a way, but this paragraph is badly written!

    The thief then asked Baskerville if he was listening to an iPod and, receiving an affirmative answer, he "pulled a knife out and started waving it at me, saying: 'Well hand it over, then.' I gave it to him and he ran off. He must have known I was wearing an iPod because of the white headphones."
  • More FUD (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Draoi ( 99421 ) * <draiocht&mac,com> on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:18PM (#8719364)
    Just more media hype [yahoo.com]

    Apple UK's wave of iPod advertising may be making the product a 'must-have' accessory for street criminals. It's also possible that UK journalists, disappointed at Apple's recent news that its much-anticipated iPod mini won't ship until July, now also have Apple in their sights - as was the case with the recent battery bad news stories.

  • muggings (Score:4, Interesting)

    by zogger ( 617870 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:21PM (#8719405) Homepage Journal
    ...sux. Had some street dude try to mug me before, downtown atlanta. Was getting off work, that day in the merchandise mart doing tradeshow set-up. Was tired and not in the mood to get mugged. This doofus walks up to me in the parking lot across the street as I was loading my tools back in the ride, waltzs right up and demands cash, Sez Mr. mugger wannabe -> "gimmee 20$" then some cursing. I stepped back, swung my vest open and started to draw my piece. Sez me ->" How 'bout 45 instead?"

    heh heh he took off running.

    Just an anecdotal story, doesn't mean much except to point out muggings happen everywhere,all around the whirrled, just sometimes they have a happy ending.

    There's an old saying I am fond of:

    "God made man - Then Colonel Colt made them equal"
  • Oh shut up, geek. (Score:0, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:21PM (#8719407)
    You know you ain't gonna do shit but meekly give up your overpriced audio device when some thug accosts you. The real world isn't some video game you can reset, those people play for real.
  • by js3 ( 319268 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:23PM (#8719447)
    haha yea. you aren't safe if you wear blue headphones cause they are going to ask anyways and you trying to show off will tell them it IS an ipod
  • by jea6 ( 117959 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:25PM (#8719464)
    Not that bad an idea. You generally need iTunes to use and iPod, right? And each iPod must have a unique identifier (presumably for DRM among other reasons), right?

    Well, you could register your iPod as stolen and the next usage connected to iTunes could be noted by Apple. Then either a lo-jack scenario ensues OR your iPod gets locked with a "stolen ipod" screen.

    Of course there are liabilities, jurisdictional, law enforcement, and practical reasons why this would be a no go. But it could be done.
  • Re:Mugging (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Coryoth ( 254751 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:26PM (#8719476) Homepage Journal
    So basically people just want to show off - its expensive, and they want to demonstrate that they have a real iPod, not some cheap knock-off player. Pitching to peoples pride an narcissism has always been a marketing winner - that's why distinctive headphones are so good.

    Compare this with cellphones - the status is in how small they are. Hard to show off how small something is: if it's really small it hides invisibly in your pocket. Personally I think this is where a lot of the whole "Digital Camera on a cell phone" came from... it's a new status symbol element showing off how expensive your cell phone is, but it's quite easy to show off - just go around taking pictures of everything.

    Jedidiah.
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:27PM (#8719503)
    There's an interesting point. An iPod is next to useless without using iTunes. Maybe iPods phoning their serial numbers home might not be that bad a thing afterall. Report it as stolen, and then when it shows up next talking to the iTunes Music Store (or maybe just even the already Internet aware iTunes) and it's instantly located.
  • by adzoox ( 615327 ) * on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:31PM (#8719553) Journal
    I think this has been a long time coming especially because of the "iPod frenzy" on eBay - but someone should create a website that registers serial numbers for iPods. An eBay and Yahoo auction database should check against this database for stolen iPods before the sale can complete.

    Technically I think this would be a neat feature Apple could integrate into .Mac for all it's products.

  • by tomcrick ( 687765 ) <tomcrick@gmail.com> on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:35PM (#8719602) Homepage
    ...thats why muggings dont happen in America.

    Surely that was said in jest!

    Seriously though, I bet Apple are loving this - how much more hype could you want! Let's all say it together....

    ...STATUS SYMBOL!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:38PM (#8719646)
    The Telegraph claims iPod Web sites have received "numerous reports" claiming users have been targeted by such criminals. Macworld has even received phone calls in recent days, including from the BBC and ITV asking if we are aware of any such incidents. We are not. In the end the BBC dropped its planned report as it could find no one to back-up the story.
  • Re:Mugging (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Vellmont ( 569020 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:44PM (#8719713) Homepage
    The fact remains that you're walking around with a 300-500 device with you that's easy to sell and run off with. If you advertise the fact that you don't have just a cheap walkman, you will increase your chances of being mugged.

    Walk around in the wrong neighborhood with those distintive headphones, and you could quite easily be mugged. Do you walk around with a big fat wallet with hundred dollar bills sticking out because worries about being robbed are only "media fearmongering"?
  • by squarefish ( 561836 ) * on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:50PM (#8719784)
    I've had my ipod since the 3rd generation came out about a year ago and I've been using black headphones for about 7 or 8 months- I foresaw it as an obvious downfall to wear white headphones at night in chicago if I keep the fscking thing. I still have it and no one is the wiser about I'm using for music anymore- it's none of their business.
  • by wibs ( 696528 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:52PM (#8719810)

    Way back when I was the one of the few people to have an iPod, I was always very self concious when I pulled it out of my pocket. It's distinctive, but I don't want that kind of attention... I just want to listen to my music without feeling like some elitist rich snob. The problem was that even after I put my iPod back in my pocket, those damn white headphones were still trailing down over my customary black jacket... a little like the iPod advertisements these days. I couldn't stand it, and ended up buying new headphones [akg.com]. The new ones are great, incredible technical accomplishments that cost quite a bit more money, but without that distinctive white cord I feel like so much less of an elitist rich snob, and now the only people that give me a second look while wearing them are audiophiles.

    Nowadays the whole rich elitist snob thing doesn't apply, because every college kid has an iPod of his very own. I have some friends with iPods that never felt the way I did before, but now that the dangling white cords are everywhere they've bought new headphones because they feel like they're trend followers. I know all of this must sound terribly vain, but in my profession appearances are very important (yes, even while listening to music).

    My story doesn't seem to have much of a point, I know. I guess what it comes down to is that if I were to pick my least favorite facet of the iPod, the white headphone cord would definitely be it. I don't like being a walking billboard for anything, no matter hor subtle the advertisement.

  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:56PM (#8719847)
    Usually the punk with the knife is more likely to want to cause pain than the punk with the gun. I've put them both down and away (IALEO (Law Enforcement Officer)), the punks with the knives know that they will have to get in close to do anything, the punks with the guns are in it for the quick 'scare' from a distance. UNLESS they're dopers or pros. Dopers are completely unpredictable except about being unpredictable; and if Joe Citizen runs into a pro it's probably over already. Generally speaking, there's not many material goods worth (risking) dying for.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:59PM (#8719882)
  • fickle editors (Score:3, Interesting)

    by kevcol ( 3467 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:01PM (#8719895) Homepage
    Jeez- I submitted the original telegraph.co.uk story yesterday, it being rejected then too. These editors are so fickle.

    And someone needs to reboot images-aud.slashdot.org so my little mozilla firefoxy thingy stops spinning.
  • Re:hrm... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by gilgo_22 ( 460990 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:02PM (#8719912) Homepage
    Most of the people would agree that the Alhambra (in Granada, Spain) is one of the most beautiful buildings in the world... on the inside. On the outside is completely plain and boring.

    I was told it is like that, because muslims used to consider that showing off wealth was bad, because it incites other people to commit a sin. So, showing off makes you partially responsible for the other person lost soul.

    (I know: tourist guides are not reliable sources, but it still is a cool idea).
  • Re:West Midlands (Score:5, Interesting)

    by henele ( 574362 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:13PM (#8720037) Homepage
    The police are right in saying West Midlands criminals are targeting specific groups.

    As a Birmingham student in halls of residence, both my next door neighbours, and then their neighbours, have all been broken into. One of the guys on the end had his room hit but he didn't have the notebook they were looking for so they left.

    I guess you could be it as some sort of social equilibrium in practice - students with so much near to areas of high unemployment, but what *really* pisses me off is when international students are (again intentionally) targeted - these are going to be important people who never want to come back to this city or country again. I guess the muggers aren't thinking of the global future but they really do a lot of unbalencing harm as well...
  • Re:Mugging (Score:5, Interesting)

    by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:17PM (#8720084) Homepage Journal
    Pepper spray is OC, OC stands for Oleoresin Capsicum, the same stuff that's in habanero and jalapeno peppers (among most others.) You could certainly put a little of it in your chili for effect, but putting it on tacos is just showing off.
  • by elbarrio ( 592330 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:34PM (#8720255)
    From my rooftop in Spanish Harlem I have had the pleasure of witnessing a couple of muggings. From what I can tell muggers tend to prey on whomever they think is the easiest target. They generally don't go after you if you're with someone else, especially if you're two guys. They won't go after you if you look big and strong. And, no one ever seems to believe this, they will not go after you if you walk too fast. Part of mugging someone is the element of surpise and if they have to run to catch up with you, then their cover is blown. I have witnessed at least one case where I actually had the cell in my hand about to dial 911, but the person who I thought was going to be mugged, walked too quick for her would be attacker to catch up, and he gave up.

    Okay, all that slightly offtopic stuff said, wearing white headphones will not get you mugged. However, if some guy on an empty street stops you and asks you if you have an ipod, and you stop walking, look at them, and respond... well that may get you mugged, as it did the victim in the story.

  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:35PM (#8720271)
    back when i was in high school, I bought a stun gun. Thought it'd be funny to go around shocking people. It was funny, until my buddy stunned me. I was out of it for 5-10 minutes. Not "fuck that hurts roll around on the ground" like if you get kicked in the nuts. Not "fuck I can't see/breath" like when you get hit with pepper spray. It was pass out and fall to the ground wake up 10 minutes later feeling like shit (all your muscles sore) and minor burns where you were stunned. It was another 10-15 minutes before I regained my balance.

    So tell me where to find you and we'll see if it tingles.

  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Creedo ( 548980 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:43PM (#8720344) Journal
    Seeing as this is a thread on mugging, I think that my electric fence story is on topic.
    When I was around 6, my uncles decided that it would be fun to give me a metal hook(like the kind used on tow chains), and tell me to go and put it on the little wire running around the field in the back. I did. Note: the hook prevents you from losing contact with the fence. The cramping muscles keep you from letting go of the hook. Nuff said.
  • Re:Mugging (Score:5, Interesting)

    by phoneyman ( 706381 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @07:49PM (#8720402)
    Anonymous nothing, my name is right there.

    I'm not saying Tasers don't work, I'm saying that they work only in the right context - self-defence by an individual is not that context.

    Getting a Taser to work properly requires that both probes get a good seat in the subject. A common problem is that only one gets in, or that both get in, but one falls out. In the article you sent me the Officer is clearly dressed only in a light, tight, shirt to ensure a good contact by the Taser probes. That's fine for a demo, but that's not how things go on the street. Now imagine him in loose clothing, layered, telling you to give him the fucking iPod right fucking now and tell me you're willing to bet your life on something as fragile as a Taser.

    Here's [selfdefenseforums.com] a thread that illustrates what I'm talking about.

    I'm completely willing to give this a shot. If I could convince the PD here to do it, I'd go get it done in a heartbeat. Barring that, if you want to shoot me with a Taser, let me know. Like I said in a previous post, I can get to Washington State pretty easy - maybe down to Oregon, or over to Idaho.

    I used to think a lot of things were true that weren't. Popular media likes to hype crap like Stun Guns, but the reality is far different.

    Pierre
  • Re:Mugging (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ePhil_One ( 634771 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @08:43PM (#8720835) Journal
    Its hard to imagine, because Police Chiefs are never fooled [battlecreekenquirer.com]
  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Jabber3776 ( 649927 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @08:50PM (#8720882)
    Mythbusters may have proved this wrong with the rail test. BUT I have personally heard the aftermath of someone not heading my advice to watch out for the fence. See I grew up on a dairy farm. We had this pipe that would always get clogged so you would have to snake it and it was in the middle of a holding area for some of our cattle, namely the bull. So this pipe was cut open in the field to unclog we needed and we put an electric fence around it to keep the bull out. The bull thought it entertaining to tear the fence down sometimes and you would find the fence down. We had a male work hand that had issues with working with me and that a kid in high school didn't know what the hell they were talking about. SO being a man, and doing and men do as needed he proceeds out to take a whiz. I try to warn him that fence was down to no avail. The next thing I know I hear help quite a few octaves higher than normal. He comes stomping back in the area I was working and starting to chew me out for not warning him... I told him next time he'd listen to me when I had something say....
  • Re:Mugging (Score:5, Interesting)

    by shadowbearer ( 554144 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @09:02PM (#8720986) Homepage Journal
    Parent does make a good point. If one is wearing really thick clothing (like, say, a insulated winter jacket) it's likely that the taser probes won't make good contact. A decent leather jacket may even be enough. Leather is pretty tough.

    That said, I've always wondered if a good defense against a taser might not be a conducting layer (worn beneath light upper layer clothing) that is hardy enough to stop and seat the probes, and which is connected to a metal plate at the bottom of one's shoes, thereby grounding the charge. I would think you'd get tingled, but it wouldn't be debilitating.

    I've never read about such a thing (and I'm obviously not willing to conduct the experiment :) - I've had a few 110 shocks and one much higher, argh) but does anyone here know enough to tell me whether it would work? I'm fairly cognizant with electricity but not enough in the high voltage realms tasers work in.

    In a self-defense situation, myself, I'd prefer something that can stop them more permanently if necessary - but I'm old-fashioned :)

    SB
  • by shadowbearer ( 554144 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @09:26PM (#8721144) Homepage Journal
    I think the real point is that some people may want it, while many others don't.

    So build the capability into it, but don't turn it on by default. Let users know they can. Those who want it, will. Those who don't, won't.

    Let those paranoid enough have their choice, yet let those of us who don't want it have it completely disabled. Fair enough?

    (I hate the whole damned idea of tracking, too, but some people won't - or don't, at least with respect to stolen laptops, eh?)

    SB
  • by parkanoid ( 573952 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @09:27PM (#8721153)
    I'm not quite sure how this works. You no longer feel like a rich slob because you're wearing $160 headphones instead of the free bundled pair?
    Don't get me wrong, I usually use a pair of Sennheisers with my mini (the headphones cost about as much as the iPod, heh), the sound is great, but how the hell do you feel more down to earth toting a pair of studio headphones?
    Now, the advertising/trend following aspect is a valid point, although most tradeshow shirt-clad geeks (myself included- I only use the sennheisers for sound quality and isolation) won't give it a second thought.
  • by h00dLuM ( 630451 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @09:43PM (#8721244)
    Also, when strolling solo through a high crime area, it's a bad idea to be wearing headphones in the first place, you've realy gotta be aware of what's around you.
    The folks who are likely to mug you recognise a very clear profile when you've got on particularly fancy gear, and a dude with an ipod also tends to broadcasts body language that they pick up like a homing beacon and they'll be circling like vultures in no time. On the other hand, I can't imagine anyone with money for an ipod in my humble hood so this must apply to muggings pulled by bored suburban mini-eminems.
  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by darkpixel2k ( 623900 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @09:50PM (#8721280)
    I volunteer to stun you and I live in Washington!

    I really doubt you could 'power on through' the stun effect. But if that fails, Succinylcholine [fpnotebook.com] always works. Always.
  • Re:Mugging (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dandelion_wine ( 625330 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @10:04PM (#8721362) Journal
    I recommend the book Dead Men Do Tell Tales -- forensic pathologists tracking down apparent suicides, in many cases.

    There is a case -- from Toronto -- of a man doing just what was described as impossible by Mythbusters. Did they control for saline content? It was determined that the high saline content of this man (must have been dehydrated) allowed the arc. It had previously been thought a suicide.

    (and just for fun, in the telling that is, another man tied a dagger to his radiator point-up and stabbed himself 7 times in the head -- in this case, ruled a homicide because they figured no one could possibly manage this feat -- wrong again)

    DW
  • Re:LOL (Score:5, Interesting)

    by HoneyBunchesOfGoats ( 619017 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @11:07PM (#8721757)
    I find it interesting that someone modded you interesting.
  • DIE DIE DIE! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ravenspear ( 756059 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @11:17PM (#8721813)
    If a thief tries to take my iPod, I'll just bludgeon them to death with it [liquidgeneration.com].
  • by Jodka ( 520060 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @11:42PM (#8721958)
    "And the thing you don't realize is this also means the muggers have guns."

    If guns are legal then muggers will have guns. If guns are illegal then muggers will have guns. Gun control laws insure that law-abiding citizens will be out-gunned by criminals. The gun control debate is not about whether we allow criminals to carry guns. Criminals will carry guns regardless of the law. Criminals, by definition, break the law. The gun control debate is really about whether it should be legal for potential victims to carry guns.

    "Having a gun is useless when a mugger pulls one on you first."

    It usually works that way in movies and TV. You might be confusing those things with the real world. The possibility that potential victims and bystanders are armed is a significant deterent to crime. The actual fact of the matter is that victims and bystanders do draw and fire. When I was living in Tennesee two guys in black ski masks pulled up to an all-night convenience in a stolen van, burst in with semi-automatic rifles and opened fire on the clerk. The clerk pulled his pistol and fired five shots; Three bullets into the heart of one assailant and two into the heart of the other.

    You seem too focused on this one scenerio of an armed attacker holding up one person in isolation. Armed assailants have no advantage in a crowds where the average citizen is packing. They are immediatly outgunned. You can "get the draw" on one person or perhaps a tightly clustered group of a few people. You can't get the draw on a crowd of people scattered around a bank lobby or convenience store when ordinary citizens are carrying concealed weapons. This goes for city streets and iPods too.

    Gun control laws are an aberation created when a society stops taking crime seriously. In a society under threat law-abiding citizens need the right to be as well armed as are their attackers.
  • Bear Spray (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jcsehak ( 559709 ) on Wednesday March 31, 2004 @12:38AM (#8722203) Homepage
    It's prolly illegal, but I imagine bear spray would stop just about anyone, if it would stop a charging grizzly.

    I was hiking once, and got near a mom and cubs (I saw a cub dart up a tree and heard a big thing coming through the brush). I took off the other way, pulling out my bear spray as I ran*. When I got it out, I turned around and saw nothing. The bear was just fronting a little. But I walked backwards for a while, away from that spot.

    Here's the point of my story: I realised that I had never even tested the thing to see if it worked. So I pointed it downwind (I'm not an idiot, but the wind was very slight), and let loose as short a burst as possible. Then, satisfied tha tit worked, I walked away -- upwind -- and a few seconds later had trouble breathing for the sharp peppery shit that burned my sinuses. It soon cleared up, but I couldn't imagine getting a facefull of that stuff. Seems like it'd stop anyone. Of course, I've never been up against anyone on PCP...

    *I later learned, there's literally a 1 in a million chance of getting mauled by a bear. You really don't need bear spray when you're hiking.
  • by bennomatic ( 691188 ) on Wednesday March 31, 2004 @01:53AM (#8722715) Homepage
    Funny... I was thinking about this from another angle. If it's the cool factor that sells the iPods, I was thinking about auctioning off my white headphones on eBay...
  • by Drakonian ( 518722 ) on Wednesday March 31, 2004 @02:51AM (#8722978) Homepage
    I sort of agree. I have an original 5 GB and felt like it attracted a lot of attention. I mostly stopped using the white headphones coz I didn't like them - uncomfortable and not the best sound. I bought some other more comfortable, better quality earbuds (Sennheiser MX400s) and have used them since.

    I have friends in a similar situation to yours. My friend originally shunned the iPod, saying he'd never pay that much money for a music toy. But now he's gave in and bought one (and totally loves it, of course). But he feels like such a trend follower that he won't wear the white headphones.

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...