One more G4 for the PowerBook? 487
PurdueGraphicsMan writes "Much as we'd love to see the next PowerBook revision include a processor evolution to the mighty G5, we know it's not that simple. The Register provides some sound reasoning (and boatloads of model numbers and voltage specs) as to why we'll probably see a 1.5GHz G4 PowerBook before any G5 PowerBooks materialize." I don't want a G5 on my lap anyway. It'd make me feel guilty, having that much power in a small package while other people can't even get it in a PC tower. Oh, and I don't want to burn my lap.
Need the G5 (Score:5, Interesting)
The real beauty of the G5 is that not only do we get the raw power, but that power is coupled with an OS that is the easiest to use for both the basic user (undergrads or grad students coming into our labs to learn science and the research process) and the advanced user (computer science faculty we are collaborating with to build custom tools for data visualization and processing).
Watercool (Score:0, Interesting)
Re:Watercool (Score:5, Interesting)
Water cool a laptop??? That would make it very heavy. the Piping, pump and water itself would add pounds to the weight of the laptop.
Faster or longer battery life? (Score:5, Interesting)
Cache money (Score:2, Interesting)
Now if the bastards at Intel would just release the fucking wireless driver for Linux already, I'd be a happy camper.
Poor performance (Score:5, Interesting)
I really hope that Apple do not release another G4 based PowerBook. Although I am pretty doubtful that this rumour is true.
The 166MHz bus in this thing is hardly going to be able to feed a 1.5GHz G4 CPU since this poor bus performance already cripples the current models. At least it seems they have got the L3 cache back. That should at least make things a little better.
I think Apple is more likely to use these faster G4s in eMac and iBook models rather than in PowerBooks. I think the iMac will also go G5 soon too.
This won't be the last notebook G4 (Score:5, Interesting)
It amazes me that my 1st generation 400 Mhz G4 Powerbook is mostly hindered by lack of RAM (256mb installed) than processing speed. I have no doubt a 1Ghz G4 iBook would satisfy the computing needs of a liberal arts college student. Perhaps for those in engineering or graphics classes they would push the envelope, but teh G4 remains a great chip.
I would rather enjoy the cost savings and power consumption savings of a G4 laptop than the cool factor of a G5 because I just don't have that great a need.
iBook (Score:4, Interesting)
I would expect something like this:
Powerbook G5, 2Ghz, 1.8Ghz, 1.6Ghz
iBook G4, 1.5Ghz, 1.33Ghz, 1.1Ghz
With the new line of iBooks having the bus speed/architecture of the current PowerBooks (essentially I would think the current Powerbooks be given the new G4, changed into a white plastic outfit, and rebadged iBook - well, basically excluding the 17inch model of course...)
Applications (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Guaranteeing Apple speed/feature bumps (Score:3, Interesting)
Thinking back (but not too hard), it's been pretty much the same methodology since Stevie came back.
Speed-bumped/updated current models appear 4-7 months before entirely new machines. This is stretched out over Consumer, Pro, and Pro-sumer lines.
It's kind of like how automakers, well Ford anyway, introduces their cars. They put out the schmancy new Lincolns about the same time they upgrade the Taurus, which is about the same time they let loose a new compact. The high and low end products are the most daring, while bread and butter stays a little conservative.
Re:This won't be the last notebook G4 (Score:4, Interesting)
But the issue isn't whether the G4 is good enough, or whether I need a G5. By all accounts, for what I do, the G4 is great...
BUT - and there is always a but, right? - If I am going to drop $2500 on a high end laptop, I want it to last a good while - not be out-dated in two months... Why would I spend that much money, even on an upgraded G4? I wouldn't. We bought a 12inch 1Ghz PowerBook the day they came out - and that will be the last G4 we buy. My next purchase will be a G5 Laptop, and it would be today if Apple released it...
Apple has great product life. My 500Mhz iMac G3 runs fabulously - and I bought it for $1100 4 years ago! I just don't want to buy an "expensive top line end of product line model" just to have the new one come out in a couple months - because even if they have another speed bump in the G4 PowerBooks - they WILL release the G5 PowerBooks this year.
Re:What a troll post (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Flamebait (Score:5, Interesting)
Besides, my right-click is reserved for Expose. [apple.com]
Re:Need the G5 (Score:2, Interesting)
Laptop performance (Score:5, Interesting)
If Apple doesn't come up within a year with an iBook replacement that has at least 1.5GHz or so CPU, I'll probably just switch to PC laptops.
Re:Need the G5 (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Guaranteeing Apple speed/feature bumps (Score:4, Interesting)
Days Since Update: 161 (Average = 163)
So full of crap! (Score:3, Interesting)
The G4 and G5 both produce WAY less heat then their x86 counterparts, but Apple uses GIANT heatsinks so they can run their fans at very low RPMs.
Get a grip on reality. The 'hot lap' G4 latops are still cooler than PCs of comparable clock speed, from my own experience. Mac users have just been spoiled by the 68K and G3 series, which were passively cooled (read: no fan. at all.).
Re:Heat (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Need the G5 (Score:2, Interesting)
And you know that because you read it 5 years ago on some Mac Fanboi website, right? Well, things change.
Fact is, the G4 was never all that much better than a Pentium-III, and does far less IPC than either a Pentium 4 or a Athlon64. Currently the Pentium-M kicks the G4's ass for portable use (battery life & performance). This is a very obsolete chip that's on a hobbled 2001-era motherboard.
Re:iBook performance (Score:3, Interesting)
Anm
Again, the Megahertz Myth rears it's head. (Score:3, Interesting)
I have an iBook 700, which has continued to get faster with each new OS release. The only real limiting factor for me now is the hard drive size. I'm contemplating a DIY upgrade of the hard drive, as soon as my Applecare runs out.
By contrast, my desktop machine is a Beige G3, with a 400mhz G4 upgrade. That machine seems faster than my laptop, and it probably is, using benchmarks.
Re:Need the G5 (Score:3, Interesting)
Computer graphics will always be cutting-edge. As CPU/Ram/Disk increases in capability, it'll be fully utilized by content creators immediately. So, I entirely agree that a 400MHz CPU is a absolutely great home/office desktop, but it makes a mediocre game/movie development workstation by modern standards.
While graphics could be called a niche market, be aware that it includes MCAD/CAM, too, which isn't trivial by any measure. Basically, if it runs OpenGL, then there is always room for faster and bigger hardware.
Re:Actually, the G4 could have a long life... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This won't be the last notebook G4 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Need the G5 (Score:3, Interesting)
Good points... as you use yours for a recording studio, i use my 17" as a intensive dev environment, with Metroworks Codewarrior, Dreamweaver, Office X, and photoshop all w/ stuff open (and compiling) at the same time -- when you're a shareware dev, you wear a lot of hats, and having that power and instant access to those apps is key. In fact, i just dropped in a 512MB module last week.
The guys does have a point about marketing depts wanting us to think we need to spend all-out for *the* latest hardware in a laptop. Granted, doing hard core recording studio stuff (ie, make-or-break/critical real-time processing) in a laptop would be a good reason for a portable G5, but now we're talking a real minority of users.
Separetly, the heat problem is an interesting one. My 17" already burns a hole in my lap when the CPU is maxed out, so the engineers have their work cut out for them for the heat load of a maxed out G5. whew.