Recycle some of your 100 million Pepsi Songs 383
grub writes "If you're one of the people that wins a free download from Apple's iTunes during the upcoming 100 million song giveaway from Pepsi, then check out Tune Recycler. They say: "With the Tune Recycler, you can send us your unwanted iTunes bottlecap codes and we'll use them to support independent music. Easy for you, and good for musicians" Sounds like a great idea for payments that may otherwise be tossed in the trash."
Honest indies (Score:5, Insightful)
Just because a label is independent doesn't make them honest. There are shady businesses everywhere.
pepsi supports independent artists!? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killing the golden goose? (Score:5, Insightful)
So while it's a nice thing, I hardly think it'll have a significant impact on the number of caps claimed.
Kjella
Don't feel bad for the poor guitar player... (Score:4, Insightful)
Their machine would be pretty impressive to me if there weren't other types of artists out there in much greater need. I mean, you can't swing a friggin' cat without hitting some longhair with a guitar. But a painter, sculptor etc? Have fun trying to "get paid" for that.
No need to mail the physical cap... (Score:5, Insightful)
Cheers. :)
Where are the files going? (Score:4, Insightful)
Wouldn't a better plan be to link to some of the better indie artists on the service and tell people to download their songs, therefore allowing people to actually listen to the music their code purchased?
this is interesting (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Killing the golden goose? (Score:5, Insightful)
There's no way this project will even cause a blip on the radar. In fact, I'd be really surprised if they got many submissions at all. Generally, the people who do not participate in the contest will either be those who threw the cap away without even looking at it, or people who are not net-savvy enough to be 'hip' to iTunes and anyone who falls into that category certainly isn't going to know about this project.
Neat idea, I suppose, but ultimately unpractical.
No good (Score:4, Insightful)
Buy your own indie music (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how long (Score:3, Insightful)
Many coupons specify a "cash redemption value" of 1/20 or 1/100 cent. But a thing is still worth what it will bring. Think about it. If this weren't true, why would anyone pay a premium for a 1943 copper penny which technically has a cash value of 1 cent? You may be a relatively smart person but you are nonetheless wrong.
Why not use the winning bottlecaps yourself? (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't download that song you've heard a million times on the radio or something like that. Explore the musical frontiers...even if they're not that good, you'll never know unless you look. And you may find a gem.
If you DO find a gem of a song out there, you've "won" again in addition to the free download itself!
Just a thought.
Re:Where are the files going? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm all for musicians getting a decent cut of the profit their music generates, but this doesn't do that at all.
This gives big chunks of money to a few specific bands chosen by downhillbattle, and gives the consumer no music in return.
Hell, this actually discurages perople from listening to these indie bands' music, by taking a potential listener's free song and essentially throwing it away. That sounds alot more like what a corporate money grubing weasel would do than an honest musician who actually wants to be heard.
C'mon, why trust these guys? (Score:2, Insightful)
If you want to support independents, then fer cryin' out loud, go out and buy their CDs, records, tapes, and online music. And especially support local live music---you won't regret it. Don't turn to these really strange self appointed messiahs. If you don't want major record companies to dictate what you should listen to, why would you want anyone else to either?
troll, my karma sucks anyways (Score:1, Insightful)
honeslty, tune recylcer is being stupid. i for one will not give them my bottle caps and im wondering if anyone else will i mean there is good music that i want that i can get off of itunes and by golly is anyone really going to give them their bottlecaps?
why not just give them to someone you know rather than mailing them something, hell just go and buy some "open source zealot musicians" cd if its that big of a deal, but if you give them to tune recycler your almost wasting it in my opinion the artitsts only get 50 cents so send them a check and save yourself a stamp or some effort sending them an e-mail.
hmm we could sign with a non-evil label and get lots of money back, or we could sign on a evil label get promoted better possibly make less money per cd, but sell more of them and make more money from volume
i mean honestly sharing music is illegal if you are violating the copyright and whatnot. I dont give a crap about the RIAA being evil except i wish cd's were cheaper, but now i have itunes, im happy to pay for a good cd, but when i only want one song itunes is a much better deal. if music was open source we wouldnt have good music. because people wouldnt be very inspired to make music, they would like to go and make money in a real job, and you guys wouldnt support it and you know it. if you got it for free, for most of you freeloaders you wouldnt give anything back. how many people who use linux give things back willingly, i honestly have not given one distribution one cent so condemn me to hell. honestly, would we start open source music labs or something? The RIAA is definatley in it for themselves but its almost a neccesary evil.
Re:Killing the golden goose? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why would it? Pepsi (with Apple's cooperation) is the one running the contest, not any of the music labels. The music labels (both the "Big Five" and the indies) care which songs consumers choose to download, but there's no reason for Pepsi to do so (well, unless you make the stretch of saying they hope to groom more corporate teen pop a la Britney for use in their future ads), and there's certainly no reason for Apple to care. From their perspective, it's all the same - the sponsor (Pepsi) will pay the same 99 cents for an indie song that it does for an RIAA-associated one. Apple will the same cut from payment for an indie song as for a major label one, and will pass on the rest to the label.
Assuming Apple and Pepsi want more of the winning codes to be redeemed (certainly Apple probably does; Pepsi may not, since it has to pay for them), then the more of these things get cashed in at all, the more successful the promotion will be deemed to have been. To them, it doesn't matter what particular music is downloaded, because it's all the same to them. It only matters to the labels and artists. Someone might choose to download a tune from an artist on a Sony label, or from one on the indie Matador label, and either way, Pepsi will pay the 99 cents, and Apple will take its cut of that and pass on the rest to the label. The only ones who'll care what song it is are the label, possibly the artist (if not getting screwed by the label), and of course the consumer.
Re:code?? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:how long (Score:3, Insightful)
Because e-mail addresses are so hard to come by.
Re:Why do I feel this is a scam (Score:3, Insightful)
I see the normally caveat but heres some reading for you. (Can't let these fascism supporting slashdotters get away with saying crap like that.)
1 [wikipedia.org]
2 [wikipedia.org]
3 [wikipedia.org]
4 [wikipedia.org]
5 [wikipedia.org]
Bad news for Pepsi (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Mountain Dew? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Whoa, I answered my own question. (Score:2, Insightful)
iTMS in Canada? (Score:2, Insightful)
As an avid death metal fan... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killing the golden goose? (Score:3, Insightful)