Apple Announces 25 Million Song Downloads 579
Tweder writes "On Apple's iTunes site, Apple has announced that music fans have purchased and downloaded over 25 Million songs from the iTunes Music Store. It seems the launch of the ITMS on the Windows platform has boosted sales tremendously." I suppose this is where I am expected to say something along the lines of, "I thought the recording industry said that this business model wouldn't work, that people won't pay for what they can download for free?" So, there you go.
Re:0 from me thanks to DRM (Score:5, Informative)
Of course, I agree in practice, as this eats CD-Rs like mad, and adds at least $0.02 per track, not including time-costs.
Seems like that's all the copyright police are really demanding. Not that it be impossible to de-DRM stuff, or even hard to understand, just annoying. You can't even say that this is an analog hole attack, because that entire path starts digital and stays digital.
Quality loss? Nope... just byte bloat in that path. You could make a perfect copy to an uncompressed
So really, saying you're boycotting anything that has any DRM at all is throwing a baby out with the bathwater. This is DRM that's so easy to defeat you can't call it a respectable hack.
Re:0 from me thanks to DRM (Score:5, Informative)
I want the freedom to use it on whatever device I want, with whatever software I choose.
God I hate all the moronic comments along these lines every time this topic comes up. YOU DO HAVE THAT FUCKING FREEDOM! At least as much as you do with a CD. Or are you one of those people who wants the freedom to use a CD on whatever device you want? News flash: a CD is also a form of DRM as well as a type of compression (called digitization). It's just that you're so familiar with it and the methods used to access the music that you don't think twice about that stuff. Apple has, by far, the least restrictive online music distribution scheme and all your bitching isn't producing anything better. I'd thank you to put up or shut up.
Re:Why do we need the recording industry? (Score:5, Informative)
Guess what? The iTunes Music Store has hundreds of thousands of songs from independent labels. Labels that are not members of the RIAA. Including many labels that give their artists much better deals.
I'm a jazz fan, so one of my favorite labels is Concord Records [concordrecords.com], with such artists as Poncho Sanchez and Karrin Allyson. Go ahead, log on and listen to them, you might enjoy it. And supporting them doesn't support the RIAA!
RIAA Radar [magnetbox.com] is a neat site that lets you search for your favorite artist or label and find out whether they're RIAA-free or not.
Re:Profit? (Score:4, Informative)
On iPod sales. This bears repeating.
So long as they are making money as the result of iPod sales, there is no "wondering where their money went"--there is a net gain so long as that, as a result of iTMS, they sell enough iPods to make up the difference.
According to their recent report iPod sales increased enormously thanks to iTMS, so they can afford to take a small loss in one area (that they hope to break even in one day) to boost another.
Re:This business model wont work. This is marketin (Score:3, Informative)
Not all music labels are members of the RIAA. Just the big ones. Lots of great artists are signed with independent labels, many of those labels don't screw their artists, and many of those good independent labels are on iTunes.
Wondering whether your favorite band is RIAA-free or not? Click here... [magnetbox.com]
Re:Credit Where Credit's Due (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Where does your money go? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wrong model. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I hate Apple posts on slashdot. (Score:2, Informative)
Then you can do what you want.
The 3 different PC restriction is actually for sharing via iTunes sharing.
This offers more than your CD store. It means that I'm finally able to download the 12 tracks I want to put on _my_ CD compilation without having to buy 5 CDs worth of music.
Re:Profit? (Score:3, Informative)
4) Incomplete albums, and albums over $9.99.
I keep running into incomplete albums when browsing Capitol Records artists, such as The Four Freshmen, and Doris Day. Annoys the hell out of me - I'm about to plunk down the $9.99 for an album when I discover that it's incomplete - and it's priced above $9.99.
Yes I'm a cheap bastard. But I'm thinking about getting an iPod anyways (used/refurb of course.) With the money that they earn from me, the original owner can go out and buy that shiny new iPod - a win-win situation. Apple sells a new iPod, and picks up a new customer that may trade up in the future (me). When they finally get a better selection of classic American music, they'll finally sell me some iTunes tracks as well.
iTunes will continue to grow. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:0 from me thanks to DRM (Score:5, Informative)
Maybe, just maybe, you need to consider different analogies. ;)
Re:Profit? (Score:5, Informative)
1) Apple is actively negotiating for rights and fees in other countries. This is a headache in much of the world. I have no doubth that Apple has the infrastructure in place to roll out any country's service as soon as licensing is ironed out.
2) There are a BUNCH (over100) indie lables that just signed up for iTMS in the past month or two, we should start seeing indi music flood in to the service like a tsunami over the next few months. The indies are tripping over themselves to get on board with this store. on iTMS they are equals with the "big 5" in every respect. (on an interesting side note, I'm wondering if Apple will require all indies to use FairPlay, or will allow non DRM AAC files in the end).
3) DRM is not something I've not heard anyone seriously complain about. The few complaints/gripes I've read are from people who don't understand the rights you get from the store: You are free to use the music on any number of iPods (and what self respecting, RDF susceptible Mac user doesn't use an iPod or four), any number of CDs (which you can give away to friends and family) and in any movies or slide shows you create on DV, DVD, VCD, etc. all of this as long as it's not for commercial use.
Apple's music license specifically allows me to make a copy of songs and give them away; permanantly! This would be considered piracy with a CD or cassette where one archive/backup copy is allowed and there is no secondary distribution/use allowed.
If people think that iTMS has restrictive DRM, I can't imagine how many complaints there must be about other services that charge per CD burn, or limit you to two or three burns of a song or don't allow use of the music in any of your personal movies, or limit you to one or two protable players, etc.
Re:for good or ill (Score:3, Informative)
People say there is no cost to digital ditribution, but bandwidth, servers, backup systems, facilities, disaster recovery plans, and personell all cost money.
The 30 or so cents that Apple collects from each sale just about covers those costs. At some point economies of scale will allow Apple to start eeking out a profit from their share.
Re:DRM (Score:5, Informative)
Not for long [slashdot.org]. And not because the recording industry hasn't tried [slashdot.org] to [slashdot.org] impose [slashdot.org] DRM [slashdot.org] on [slashdot.org] CDs [slashdot.org] (there have been many other
--Mark
Re:DRM (Score:5, Informative)
And amazingly, the QT API calls to play sound files, including
And I think there's a plugin for Winamp now to allow it to use the QT API on Windows to play these files.
So request it and quit complaining... (Score:3, Informative)
Once you've done that, drop a letter to the record company of the artist you want has signed with. Let them know you want them to distribute their music on iTunes. Apple is very good about getting new content, you just have to let them know what you want.
Re:DRM (Score:2, Informative)
Of course if it's your computer that breaks, you'll need that backup mantioned in the parent.
Re:0 from me thanks to DRM (Score:1, Informative)