Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media (Apple) Businesses Media Apple

"iPod's Dirty Secret" 262

akpoff writes "Have you ever made a promise while in tech-support hell to let everyone know how bad the product is? The Neistat brothers followed through after the batteries in an iPod died and Apple told them it would cost US$250 to replace them. The tech rep told the guys they might as well buy a new iPod. The brothers thought differently and made a movie showing how they got the word out in a large metro area. Of course it was made on a Mac with iMovie." Their statement is a bit misleading: many people have iPods that have lasted a lot longer than 18 months (the iPod was released over two years ago). But the batteries don't last forever. What is their life expectancy? Does Apple notify consumers of a life expectancy?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

"iPod's Dirty Secret"

Comments Filter:
  • Oh my gosh! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BobTheJanitor ( 114890 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @09:33PM (#7553464) Homepage
    Batteries don't last for ever and it costs money to replace them!

    Seriously, what were they expecting? When I bought my iPod, I don't remember Apple ever saying they would replace the batteries for free, and I'm sure I don't recall them saying used magical batteries that never die.
  • by hobbestcat ( 473268 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @09:40PM (#7553519) Homepage
    Apple's iPod support page [apple.com] says you can get your battery replaced for $99 - not cheap but not $250 either.

    PDA Smart [pdasmart.com] offers $69 replacement service or a do-it-yourself kit for $59. Which Geek.com raved about [geek.com]

    If the guys can't Google [google.com], they shouldn't buy expensive toys.
  • by dbirchall ( 191839 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @09:41PM (#7553532) Journal
    Quite honestly, if someone insists upon Authentic Apple Parts for everything, when there are commodity parts available -- this goes especially for RAM, and now also apparently for iPod batteries -- I don't see how they've got a leg to stand on whilst griping and moaning about how unfair life is.
  • by danbeck ( 5706 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @09:59PM (#7553729)
    You can't compare this to ram, hard drives or any replaceable computer part. This *isn't* a PC or a Mac, it's a consumer electronics device. Opening the case of a consumer electornic device more often than not voids the warranty. Not only that, since it's not created to be opened at will by someone such as yourself, it's possible to break certain devices unless you know what you are doing.

    Would you pop open the case of your VCR and replace the damaged or worn out heads? Would you buy yourself a new DVD tray and motor and replace it when it goes bad? Would you replace the screen of your Palm when it gets scratched? Would you replace the lense of your digital camera if it gets moisture inside? I could go on.

    Your point is weak.
  • Re:Oh my gosh! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by the eric conspiracy ( 20178 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @10:08PM (#7553801)
    but of course, this will void your "warranty"

    Ugh. If your iPod is under warranty and the battery dies, Apple will fix it for free. No need to put in a 3rd party battery if the iPod is still under warranty.

    I told him the serial, he told me to frigg off.

    Apple states specifically that they don't support some types of G3's on some versions of OS X. For example OS X 10.3 requires a G3 with USB.

    If Apple states on the box that you need a certain hardware level to run a given version of the OS, I think they are well within their rights to tell you to 'frigg off'.

  • Would you pop open the case of your VCR and replace the damaged or worn out heads?

    No, it's cheaper to get a new one, or use it as an excuse to switch to DVD.

    Would you buy yourself a new DVD tray and motor and replace it when it goes bad?

    No, that would be covered under warrantee.

    Would you replace the screen of your Palm when it gets scratched?

    Yes, wouldn't you?

    Would you replace the lense of your digital camera if it gets moisture inside?

    No, I'd probably just dry it.

    I could go on.

    Please do, I don't think we have enough data points to extrapolate your point yet.

  • As you failed to note, the iPod in question was already out of warranty. Ergo, if the customer wasn't a rube and an asshole to boot, he'd crack the case and spend $50 on a replacement battery.

    As a rule, consumer electronics factory repair prices have been at or near replacement cost for all but high end gear (ie. >$2000US) for years. Consumers with enough brains to program their VCR who want to flog their gear a little longer have long been buying DIY books. As others have pointed out, Google is the friend of modern man.

  • website (Score:4, Insightful)

    by dema ( 103780 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @10:21PM (#7553905) Homepage
    Does anyone else find it amusing that they use and advertise Quicktime on a website meant to put down an Apple product?
  • Re:website (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Acidic_Diarrhea ( 641390 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @10:31PM (#7553998) Homepage Journal
    Not really.

    What century have you been living in? Corporations have many product lines and many subsidiary companies these days. I can tell people that I think the PS2 is a great product while also laying claim to being one of the foremost experts on why the Walkman sucks. I mean, Quicktime and the iPod aren't exactly the same product, now are they?

    Amused? No.

  • Re:Oh my gosh! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BobTheJanitor ( 114890 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @10:33PM (#7554019) Homepage
    Yes, I think I would. For starters, they don't actually have to pay $250, as another poster here pointed out, it's actually $99. I'm willing to assume that when he called about getting the battery replaced he got someone new/clueless. Besides, 18 months is hardly 'a few months'. Why are people upset that Apple charges money to replace parts that aren't under warranty?

    IIt really sucks that his iPod battery died as quickly as it did, and it's unfortunate he ended up with an unknowledgeable person on his Tech support call, but they both seem to be isolated incidents. A friend of mine has had his iPod for at least that long and he doesn't have any problems with it.
  • by kenthorvath ( 225950 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @10:42PM (#7554095)
    just recently bought a new car and I had to put gas in it after only 350 miles! They did not warn me about THAT at the dealership. Maybe I had better buy a new car?

    More like buying a car and having to replace the "gas tank" after 350 miles. They were recharging their battery after all with electricity. And I'm sure that Apple didn't advertise the fact that batteries need to be replaced after a year or so. In fact, I'm quite sure that Apple was playing up the "rechargability" as a feature.

  • by mOoZik ( 698544 ) on Monday November 24, 2003 @11:40PM (#7554572) Homepage
    First of all, as many have said before me, the battery costs $99, not $250. Also, the site went up days *after* the announcement, which means they were irresponsible enough to keep it on.

    Second, batteries don't last forever. There can't be a life expectancy because that number is dependent on number of charges, hours used, length of time used, and other factors. If they said "13000 hours" and some fool's iPod went dead before that, then he'd be compelled to put it on a site like these people did, which IMO, is ridiculous.
    It is very possible their tech support guy was a moron, but they shouldn't tarnish the reputation of iPod or Apple. It's so pathetic how they always go for the most successful products and attempt to break them to pieces.
  • 2 bad batteries... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by markyoshi ( 717944 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @01:00AM (#7555089)
    I don't understand why everyone is so quick to jump to Apple's defense. If you are paying $400 or more for a music player, you shouldn't have to pay another $100 every year to replace the freaking battery. I started having battery probs with my 10GB second gen. model a few weeks after i bought it. the replacement they eventually sent me (it took more than a month.) crapped out a few months later. and apparently that's all you get for $400. Two broken ipods and a years worth of headaches. If I had known the batteries would die so soon I wouldn't have bought an ipod in the first place. It was a really big financial sacrifice in the first place which i justified because music is my life and i thought i was buying the greatest device ever. But even $50 dollars is too much for me to spend right now, and i'm afraid i'll just get another bad battery. $400 is a hell of a lot of money, and it should buy you a product that works for longer than a year. I feel like I deserve a better solution.
  • by DDumitru ( 692803 ) <[moc.ocysae] [ta] [guod]> on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @02:03AM (#7555477) Homepage
    It is not acceptible design for a device with a part that will wear out during the useful life of the device not having that part serviceable. This is as bad as the old V-8 Mustang-IIs that required the engine be dropped to replace the back two spark plugs. Even the game boy advance has a user replaceable battery (albeit behind a screw).

    While Apple might not be guilty of any crime in their handling of this, they are definately guilty of:

    o Very poor design
    o Very poor handing of the problem.

    Apple relies on very high customer satisfaction to justify their premium products. This type of incident does not bode well.
  • by jtrascap ( 526135 ) <(bitbucket) (at) (mediaplaza.nl)> on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @02:13AM (#7555523)
    I don't think it's that...

    Everyone gets a bad phone rep - these things are farmed-out, But instead of asking for a supervisor, or calling back and getting someone with a braincell, or getting his name and then writing Apple, or doing any research themselves to find out about replacing batteries and why batteries fail, they decided to go ballistic and go to war with Apple.

    They remind me of he people you see in a store, who - if they don't get what they want, right then - decide to start yelling at the tops of their voices to get a crowd. You know the types - they want what they want because the "client is king", which is always true until they start acting like one.

    I can be an Apple apologist, but I have an iPod too and if I thought I was going to get screwed, I'd complain. And I have - my iPod was 4 weeks old when one of the earbuds gave up. They sent me a new set in 3 days. The pod skipped the first song occasionally (Toshiba HD issue - known in the forums) and the screen, while it worked, didn't seem to be the bright-blue screen you see in the commercials but instead a weaker green that washed-out a bit in the sun (polarizing, I guessed). I even scuffed the screen and back a bit - it looked old.

    All this is 6 weeks after I buy one in NY and take it home to The Netherlands.

    Called them up, told them the story, got a rep who sent a box Airborne the next day. It was in for repair. Then, a week and a half later, I get a brand-new iPod with a new blue screen and un-skipping drive, just as I asked. Perfect condition, just as I expected.

    They idiots plain lie on their site. Their guerrilla tactics don't impress me because I know their tactics aren't about respect but about public embarrassment.

    They should enjoy their 10 min/MB of fame. I hope Apple sues 'em.
  • by Artifex ( 18308 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @05:30AM (#7556188) Journal
    Not taking the first no for the final answer, and working a bit with the company, goes a long way towards fixing most issues.

  • by Dominic_Mazzoni ( 125164 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @05:56AM (#7556275) Homepage
    The cost for repairing an iPod is $250, however if the battery is the only problem it costs $100. So either:

    1. There was something wrong with the iPod other than the battery (maybe it fell our of their pocket one too many times?)

    2. Or, the tech support rep from Apple goofed and forgot that battery service is cheaper. Heck, not all of the Apple tech support reps can be stellar. If you don't like what you hear, call back.
  • by andyt ( 149701 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @07:27AM (#7556596)
    Not taking the first no for the final answer, and working a bit with the company, goes a long way towards fixing most issues.

    Yeah, but y'know so would not being given the first no by the company in the first place.

    I mean come on, what, we're all telemarketers now and have to ignore the first three times a company says "no" until we get what we want?
  • Re:Oh my gosh! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by capmilk ( 604826 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @07:58AM (#7556708)
    it's unfortunate he ended up with an unknowledgeable person on his Tech support call

    I'd rather think he called tech support before Apple introduced the $99 battery exchange program.

  • Re:Oh my gosh! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dave1212 ( 652688 ) * on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @02:54PM (#7560541) Homepage
    What matters is that Ryan in Apple support blew it.

    Yes, he certainly deserves to have the hate of millions, for the unpardonable sin of being new and not being clear on all aspects of all products.
    I hope I get a question that I don't know at the computer store where I work, just so I can hope to see a movie about people protesting the company/device and my name plastered all over /. That's the plan, man.
  • Post from Mac/ (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SavoWood ( 650474 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @04:48PM (#7561810) Homepage
    So basically, if I go out and buy a new portable CD player, a pair of AA batteries to go with it, and start feeding it CDs for me to listen to, I should expect to get more than 18 months out of the batteries? If that's the case, then we all need to be suing the Energizer, and Duracell makers.

    I typically listen to my iPod for about 6-8 hours a day. I charge it up every two days. I've had it for almost a year now. The battery is fine for me. But of course, being an audio engineer, I don't listen at earsplitting levels so my battery isn't used up by driving the output amplifier.

    Let's do a little basic math here. I spend $3 on some batteries...long life Duracell or Energizer. I go through a pair in two days at my usual listening rate of 6-8 hours per day. So that's $1.50 a day in batteries. In a month, I've spent $30 (an average of 20 work days a month, at $1.50 per day). In a year, I will spend $360 in batteries. If you stretch that out to the 18 months the guy is complaining about, you end up spending $540.

    So, in 18 months, he can spend $540 on batteries, or $499 on a new iPod and $41 on music from the iTMS.

    Or, he could spend $499 on a new iPod, and in 18 months, for only an additional $10 investment, get a new battery. So he now spends $550 and get's an iPod for 36 months.

    This is utter silliness.
  • Re:Oh my gosh! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jellomizer ( 103300 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @06:44PM (#7563118)
    But $250 for a battery or as some of the other post suggest $99 for a battery, a battery!. I like Apple as much as any moderate Apple fan, I have a slightly dated PowerBook G4, but yes batteries die, and it does cost money to replace them, but I think $25 is a fair price to replace an iPod battery, if this is not the case then they should redesign the iPods to use more affordable/standard rechargeable batteries.
  • Apple Support (Score:3, Insightful)

    by customjake ( 662717 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2003 @11:28PM (#7565423)
    I am almost ashamed to call myself an iPod user. First there was yelling about how the older iPods didn't get the features from software v3.x. Boo Hoo Hoo.

    Now they're complaining that the battery doesn't last forever. I find it amazing that after Li-ION batteries have been out for years that people don't understand that these things don't last forever.

    When i purchased my Powerbook G4, i was told by the reseller that i would go through about a battery every year. I opted for the Applecare and they have given me a new battery every year. My first battery dropped to about 50% life after a year and now i'm on number 2. While this isn't great, it's certainly better than my fathers Dell laptop that has about 20mins of life after about 1 year. For those of you who don't understand why Apple will not repair things like powersupplies, it's because it would cost more to fix one, than buying a new one.

    As for batteries, has anyone looked the market full of portable electronics lately. A large share of PDAs do not have replacable batteries. Once your Clio battery dies, you have a $200 paperweight.

    Unfortunately, i have yet to find a battery that lasts forever. You have to change the battery in your car every 3-5 years, and it's only really used to start the car. PDA, Laptops, Cellphones, none of these devices have batteries that last more than a couple years, yet it is the iPod that gets complained about.

    People need to realize that every device has a "cost of ownership." With most devices this consists of purchase cost, maintanence costs, repair costs and so on. Having a battery fail in a device after 18 months is not out of the ordinary, especially with heavy use. You have to change the oil in your car, rotate the tires, and tune it up every 60,000 miles, yet none of these things anger people as much as the battery failing in the ipod.

    Just sit down, shut up, and stop blaming Apple for the simple fact that their hardware makes it through the warrenty period without issue.
  • Product Safety (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Detritus ( 11846 ) on Wednesday November 26, 2003 @07:08AM (#7567155) Homepage
    I believe there are some relevant issues with lithium batteries and product safety. If the iPod is only designed to work safely and reliably with Apple specified and tested batteries, they may want to prevent end-users from mucking with the battery. Nokia has been blamed for catastrophic battery failures that were caused by sub-standard counterfeit battery packs. Apple may have decided that making it a user-replaceable part wasn't worth the risk. Plus, it avoids the added cost and reliability issues of a case with a user-accessible battery compartment.
  • by thatguywhoiam ( 524290 ) on Wednesday November 26, 2003 @12:57PM (#7569881)
    ... the point stands that the iPod could use a detachable battery.

    I don't think these guys had all the info, or were possibly led astray by the Apple rep. But really, as big an issue as this has become, Apple would do well to offer a 4G iPod with an external battery pack. I mean, c'mon, Ives and crew are more than up to it. If the design was more or less exactly like the PowerBook design is, it would make no difference at all to daily use (i.e. battery flush with the body, like a cell phone).

    In fact one of the unexpected bonuses to this kind of design I've observed, on my T68i, is that if I drop it the phone has tended to land on one of the bottom corners, or scrape the back - which is the battery itself. I can remove the cosmetic damage to the phone by changing that battery.

If God had not given us sticky tape, it would have been necessary to invent it.

Working...