Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Businesses Media Apple

iTunes Music Store - 'Coolest Invention of 2003' 370

Pingsmoth writes "Time Magazine has just named the iTunes Music Store as their Top Coolest Invention of 2003. Also among this year's favorites are 'fish-skin bikinis, a new love drug, the car that parks itself, and the invisible man'."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

iTunes Music Store - 'Coolest Invention of 2003'

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 10, 2003 @07:26AM (#7433044)
    I mean, the amount of technology that went into that thing rivals the scientific output of the smaller industrialized nations. Gyros that keep you from tipping over, flywheels that recharge the battery when slowing down, even the polymers they make the thing out of are fascinating.

    iTunes integrates a music store with a music player. Ooh. Maybe I'm missing something because I'm only using it on Windows, but it doesn't exactly wow me the way I expected the 'Coolest Invention of 2003' to.

    Frankly, I'm even disappointed with the Segway. They shouldn't be handing out this invention to anything that doesn't have wings at this point.

  • iTunes? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by heironymouscoward ( 683461 ) <heironymouscowar ... .com minus punct> on Monday November 10, 2003 @07:28AM (#7433051) Journal
    This counts as an "invention"?

    Look, the absolutely coolest invention of 2003 is the USB wristwatch. My watch holds all the essential stuff I used to keep on a diskette. Nothing helps bonding like showing people that your watch can store porn. Or a PowerPoint presentation. Or your latest baby photos. Whatever they need: my watch has it.

    But iTunes? I can't carry it on my wrist.
  • Spot the connection (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 10, 2003 @07:31AM (#7433058)
    Much as I like iTunes... spot the AOL Time Warner and iTunes connection [google.com].
  • Fuck Yeah (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cscx ( 541332 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @07:52AM (#7433099) Homepage
    iTunes for Windows is my official new favorite MP3 player.

    I am proceeding to rip all my 500+ CDs into iTunes. With one click.

    Winamp has served me well for many, years, but it lacks the snazzy playlist/library editor, and the ability to transfer music from CD, to the hard drive, tag it, and add it to my playlist at the click of a button. Literally.

    Sure, it's a little slow, but who cares. Its functionality is unmatched. The music store is snazzy, too.

    Good move, Apple, with iTunes for Windows. You may see a future Mac / iPod customer soon...
  • Re:Apple records? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by JulianOolian ( 683769 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @08:33AM (#7433215)

    he Fab Four's label, and - according to legend - the appleinspiration for the name Jobs and Woz gave their kit computer

    I heard the apple of Apple came from the story of Alan Turing's suicide [turing.org.uk].

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 10, 2003 @09:25AM (#7433413)
    I dunno, our esteemed President didn't seem to have such a hard time tipping it over. Bush on a Segway [bbc.co.uk] BTW, a Google image search failed to show a single image of this hilarious event even though it's plastered all over the internet. A search for "bush" and "segway" showed a single image of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush riding one.
  • Re:Invention? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by olafo ( 155551 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @09:28AM (#7433430)
    Here's a bit more regarding ITunes and patents [macworld.co.uk]. Even "double click" is considered an invention and was issued a U.S. patent. It doesn't matter if you don't agree. One of the reasons for computers rapid growth is that no one had a patent on them [about.com] as the court ruled Dr. Atanasoff was clearly the inventor [iastate.edu] and he claimed no patent.
  • Re:Greed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MosesJones ( 55544 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @09:32AM (#7433450) Homepage

    Good point, we are talking here about a 10% profit margin. Something most businesses would consider to be ample. This also says how dumb analysts are for considering 10% profit margins to be nothing and hyping up people who claim bigger, and less reliable, numbers.

    Put it this way, iTunes hasn't bumped up the Apple Share price in any way like the SCO price hike, one has real profits... the other a near suicidal legal case.
  • by EinarH ( 583836 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @09:33AM (#7433454) Journal
    I have not tried Magnatunes so I don't know about the quality of the music.
    But i doubt that its worse than a lot of the crap that the major record companies throws out.
    Imagine a grocery store that only carried generic house-brand items. Wouldn't be very popular or successful, would it.
    A large and significant percentage of Wal-Bart brands are in-house or previously unknown brands.
    Lidl, the largest grocery chain in Germany carries only their own brands.

    90 % of the sucsessful artists on the market producees music that is commodity. What seperates those artists from the less succsessful is marketing. For those that don't succumb to the marketing hype Magnatuse is probably just as good. And it's cheaper.

  • Re:Greed (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jwachter ( 319790 ) <wachter@gmaiCOBOLl.com minus language> on Monday November 10, 2003 @09:57AM (#7433570) Homepage
    'Paltry' and '$50 million dollar profit' don't belong in the same sentence. This mentality is what's screwing the entire downloadable music process. It's not about whether it's profitable, it's about whether it's profitable enough. Just for them saying that, I'm going to download some MP3s tonight. WTF...
    If you're being sarcastic (I suppose you are), you clearly have no understanding of corporate finance.

    Apple, like any corporation, is legally responsible to its shareholders (mostly private US citizens) to make as much money possible. To the extent that that they are deciding whether to invest $100m in some new business project (building an online music store, porting OSX to windows, selling flat panel TVs), they choose amongst those projects by determining which will yeild the highest return on their investment. Initiating an investment that is merely "somewhat" profitable can be an enormous mistake for ANY corporation if it means foregoing an investment that could be hugely profitable.

  • by repetty ( 260322 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @10:28AM (#7433732) Homepage
    "It's a disarmingly simple concept: sell songs in digital format for less than a buck and let buyers play them whenever and wherever they like--as long as it's on an Apple iPod."

    Wrong, wrong, wrong. Again, wrong.

    You can tell the author of this article never actally used iTunes or the iTunes music store. The iPod is completely optional.

    I don't have an iPod and I've been using iTunes for years. I will probably never get an iPod. Still, I'm a daily user of iTunes.

    It was my fault for reading this silly article. I mean, this is Time magazine. What do they know about technology? Just enough to write some copy. The harm here is that it really short-sells iTunes AND the iTunes Music Store by harping on an optional component.

    --Richard
  • Water Purifiers (Score:3, Interesting)

    by heironymouscoward ( 683461 ) <heironymouscowar ... .com minus punct> on Monday November 10, 2003 @10:58AM (#7433898) Journal
    Purifying water (one of the lauded inventions) is a cool thing, very relevant to billions around the world, but doing it by distillation is just a joke.

    There is a much simpler and just as effective way to purify water in tropical or desert countries: place it in a transparent plastic bottle in the sun for a day. The water heats to 80 degrees and after a few hours is totally sterilised. The mud and gunk settle to the bottom, and what's left is clean and drinkable.

    I spent a few days on this once, trying to improve the process of separating the gunk from the water: the principle was to extract the gunk from the bottle which could then be closed and carried some distance. My design requires a straw and a bit of clay. But even that's not worth doing: to solve the problem of drinkable water in most of Africa, all one would need is to ship a billion or so used PET bottles.

    Sigh. People like complex solutions to simple problems.
  • by ianscot ( 591483 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @12:01PM (#7434339)
    C'mon, you've read the other umpty-lumpty stories about iTMS; It's time to remember all those posts about how the licensing arrangements are what's keeping Apple from selling outside the US.

    You think Apple doesn't want to sell you stuff because of some center-of-the-universe conceit or other? They would gladly sell you anything you wanted, anything they could convince you you wanted, if their deals with the labels allowed it. They don't -- and this isn't different from any traditional music licensing in that way.

    The next company you run into that could make a bazillion dollars in a foreign market, but chooses not to because they're a bunch of arrogant Americans, that'll be a first. You post a story about that one then.

  • by dajak ( 662256 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @12:01PM (#7434342)

    The "car that parks itself" was the biggest disappointment of 2003 for me. I sometimes drive around for 40 minutes searching for a parking space near my house in Amsterdam. I would love to have a car that finds itself a space after I get home.

    Turns out it only manages the 2 second parallel parking routine. Now that helps. And it "senses kerbs": I wouldn't try this on the canalside parking spaces we have a lot of here. This system isn't even a good idea for tourist rental cars.

  • by E-Rock ( 84950 ) on Monday November 10, 2003 @01:03PM (#7434839) Homepage
    Honest question since I haven't been to iTunes:
    What portable MP3/Music player will the ACC format play on other than the iPod?

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...