Mac OS X 10.3 vs. Linux 659
M.Broil writes "This is a nice and fairly complete 'first look' at Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther), but author Chris Gulker, who I happen to know was an Apple PR guy years ago, spends a lot of time comparing the Mac 'Panther' release to Linux, which he seems to use most of the time these days. He obviously likes a lot about Panther, but he doesn't think many Linux users will switch to it, and that a lot of 'Classic' Mac OS users may not want to move to it, either."
In college I went through a Mac phase (Score:3, Funny)
I always loved the Mac interface because of its easy of use and very solid color support. I found that it was easy to make rainbows for my group's posters using the PageMaker software, much easier than anything on an IBM PC.
I eventually grew out of my 'rainbow' phase and am back using Windows and sometimes even Linux (Yellow Dog, for when I'm feeling a little 'crazy'!), but the experience just isn't the same. We Mac users are a happy community, and sometimes I just want to give old Steve Jobs a hand.
Re:In college I went through a Mac phase (Score:5, Funny)
Am I the only one that finds this remark a little disturbing? My Gods, the mental image I got from this!
Stability (Score:5, Funny)
"I think nothing of leaving apps and files open for days or even weeks on the Linux machine.".
Now that is cool. Nice endorsment of Linux's stability. However I still think he should say that he does save once in a while as stable as Linux is it can't survive the power cord being pulled out the back or a child putting a pop tart in the CD-ROM drive
Rus
Re:external hdd (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Here are the applications... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Here are the applications... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What makes MacOS X better... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:MacOS (Score:3, Funny)
I had a Mac LCII many years ago. That thing was a POS.