Virginia Tech Announces Supercomputer Plans 419
CousinVinnie writes "Previously noted in this Slashdot story, the administration of Virginia Tech has announced they're puchasing 1100 G5's (another story) in hopes to build a top-10 supercomputer by October 1. Tech will be spending $5.2 million over five years on the project, which should help it pull in more research money." Maybe VT can use the new computers to beef up their web site.
This is quite cool but... (Score:5, Interesting)
-WS
Yikes.. (Score:2, Interesting)
1100 G5's...that should corner the market for about a week...and give Apple a small boost to it's bottom line..
Anyone have any real specs? (Score:5, Interesting)
So far we've seen that it's a cluster and what the building blocks are. What's the interconnect? What's the OS? What are the nodes using for a network filesystem? Are they at all? Is this intended for parallel jobs or for embarassingly parallel work?
Re:This is quite cool but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Both Dell and HP have recently announced large clusters, so that may be why they were unable to deliver in time.
PowerMac G5s? (Score:5, Interesting)
I haven't seen one, but it looks like the PowerMac G5s are about 4U wide. 1100 x 4U = 4400U / 42 per rack ~= 105 racks.
Not only is this going to take up an enormous amount of room, but the power and cooling requirements are going to be crazy as well. And they don't have rails so getting them in the racks, and working on them once in the rack, is going to be a PITA.
1100 G5 Xserves would need only about 25 racks. Many fewer UPSes and A/C units to power in each rack. Much easier to install and work on.
I know Apple is gung-ho about this validating their "Fastest PC Ever" claims. But it seems a little poorly thought out on the University's part even if they got a sweet up-front price on the machines. Remember: the system price is a small part of TCO.
Their Website (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Overpriced G5s (Score:1, Interesting)
Even if you could make the AMD-based cluster run, you'd have spent so much on cooling that the G5s would end up being cheaper. Just ask DOD...
Re:Anyone have any real specs? (Score:5, Interesting)
Note that 1100*$3000 = $3M. This doesn't include the 4GB RAM, but also doesn't include any volume discounts. Thus the interconnect may cost about $2M.
Oh, and to the guy who said "4 Athlons + Myranet is the same price as one G5" -- can I have some of what you're smoking?
Not really a dupe (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is quite cool but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Well, considering that the G5 has many of the architectural features of those $40k SGI Octanes that I purchased a few years ago, I would consider that pretty impressive. In short, Apple designed the G5 machines with completely independent busses, so that saturating say an I/O bus will not have any effect on the throughput of say memory to CPU. They are pretty impressive and I can see why many folks who are currently using the Octanes etc... would want new G5's.
So, you have a UNIX box with true plug and play, 64-bit, nice GUI, full CLI access, Firewire, USB, REALLY nice archetecture etc...etc...etc... All that makes for a pretty convincing argument for clusters moving to the G5's
Argument for G5 here. (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd love to see the arguments for the different platforms!
I think the argument for G5 came from here [mac.com].
Re:I keep overestimating slashdot... (Score:3, Interesting)
They are very quiet (Score:2, Interesting)
http://homepage.mac.com/aaronsteele/iMovieTheater
Re:Apple ... supercomputer...? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:This is quite cool but... (Score:1, Interesting)
As an alumn... (Score:2, Interesting)
Side Note: While Tech has a great football team, the football program is (other than special discounts to students, and using the VT name) completely independent of the school. The football program is a business venture that does not interact with or require school permission, nor is it governed by the school boards that Steger answers to.
Use Linux!
The G5 really is all that. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I keep overestimating slashdot... (Score:2, Interesting)
Just follow these easy steps:
One: Baseless flame against everyone who disagrees with you:
Two: Copy random specs from Apple's web page:
Three: Straight-out lies and made up stuff:
Four: more flaming everyone else:
Five: Claim to be superior:
That's all it takes!
Sigh.
I haven't done real system administration for quite a while, but it's still blatantly obvious that you've never really had to deal with the administration of a compute cluster.
Apple doesn't have a proven reliability record. At least, not in the enterprise server arena. Sun Enterprise Servers do. HP does. Apple? No.
How can you seriously consider something like this without ECC memory? Do you really think that running 1100 copies of MacOSX on 1100 hard drives is a reasonable way to run a compute cluster? Do you have any idea how unreliable that would be? Do you really believe that Apple's Rondezvous will get everything setup perfectly for Infiniband?
I see. You really do. How unfortunate. If you really are from VT, you represent it poorly.
Rumors getting closer (Score:4, Interesting)
Those who are possible volunteer recruits, there is an info session in Andrews ISB in the Corp. Research Center at 7:30 tonight and tomonrrow night (same presentation both nights). You *cannot* be on wage for VT to be elegible. I'm not sure if GAs count as this, since I'm not one, I didn't check.
Re:Apple marketroid (Score:4, Interesting)
There are an awful lot of scientists using Macs for their research and work. I use them almost exclusively now after retiring my SGI's in favor of the OS X boxes and judging from the meetings I attend, I would say Macs have anywhere from 10-40% penetrance in science depending upon the subfield. For instance the last vision meeting I attended (ARVO, the big one for the vision research community), there were Powerbooks and iBooks everywhere. Probably a good 33% of the laptops I saw.
dual use for these machines? (Score:2, Interesting)