Apple Hardware VP Defends Benchmarks 1081
He said Veritest used gcc for both platforms, instead of Intel's compiler, simply because the benchmarks measure two things at the same time: compiler, and hardware. To test the hardware alone, you must normalize the compiler out of the equation -- using the same version and similar settings -- and, if anything, Joswiak said, gcc has been available on the Intel platform for a lot longer and is more optimized for Intel than for PowerPC.
He conceded readily that the Dell numbers would be higher with the Intel compiler, but that the Apple numbers could be higher with a different compiler too.
Joswiak added that in the Intel modifications for the tests, they chose the option that provided higher scores for the Intel machine, not lower. The scores were higher under Linux than under Windows, and in the rate test, the scores were higher with hyperthreading disabled than enabled. He also said they would be happy to do the tests on Windows and with hyperthreading enabled, if people wanted it, as it would only make the G5 look better.
In the G5 modifications, they were made because shipping systems will have those options available. For example, memory read bypass was turned on, for even though it is not on by default in the tested prototypes, it will be on by default for the shipping systems. Software-based prefetching was turned off and a high-performance malloc was used because those options will be available on the shipping systems (Joswiak did not know whether this malloc, which is faster but less memory efficient, will be the default in the shipping systems).
As to not using SSE2, Joswiak said they enabled the correct flags for it, as documented on the gcc web site, so that SSE2 was enabled (the Veritest report lists the options used for each test, which appears to include the appropriate flags).
I love Apple (Score:2, Funny)
But..but..but... (Score:5, Funny)
Doesn't everyone realize that this is a black and white issue?
Corporate Drones == Lies
Populist Raving == Truth
Always always always. Doesn't matter what the numbers mean. They threw in that one graph with the single processor machine slower than the Intel just to throw off the hounds. But it didn't work.
G4 story icon (Score:5, Funny)
The G4 is so last month.
Re:Honesty (Score:0, Funny)
Flawed logic.
Going against the flow (like the late JesusGeeks) (Score:2, Funny)
Fuck all you poor, dirty, Lunix PC hippies... welcome to the real world.
Steve Jobs owns your ass.
Greg Joswiak... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Honesty (Score:0, Funny)
Well get moddin fanbois!
Re:Honesty (Score:5, Funny)
No. It makes it a container containing homo sapien fecal matter, deposited on June 24 at 16:21 after a lunch of onion rings and a Rodeo cheesburger from the Burger King establishment.
And to top it off, you now have to deal with a shit in a bucket.
Re:Everyone should benchmark with GCC (Score:4, Funny)
"So, Bob's been looking at those Intel diagrams for quite some time now."
"Yeah, I wonder if it's anything to do with his new assistants and Porsche."
Even the OSS community has a price.
Would it really be right.... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:That was fast. (Score:2, Funny)
Probably not, since they'll know there's a 50/50 chance it'll be back up on the front page in a day or two anyway.
simple solution (Score:2, Funny)
Unless you enjoy telling us all how pissed off they make you.
Because, you know, we really care.
Joswiak (Score:5, Funny)
off topic comment on your sig... (Score:4, Funny)
Are you _sure_ those are the people you want voting?
Re:G4 story icon (Score:1, Funny)
But he didn't refute the most damning claim! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Separate compiler from hardware? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:yeah right (Score:1, Funny)
Get over yourself.
Re:Removed one of the processors for the SPEC CPU (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, my favorite was the Mathematica guy who commented (IIRC) "We tried to come up with an example to show how being able to use more than 4GB of memory was helpful, but we couldn't come up with an example that didn't crash the Xeon"
The fastest computer in the world is worthless... (Score:0, Funny)
Re:Greg Joswiak... (Score:3, Funny)
Greg = 2 Steve
Greg (2 Steve) = 2 Greg
Greg (2 Steve) - 2 (2 Steve) = 2 Greg - 2 (2 Steve)
2 Steve (Greg - 2 Steve) = (Greg - 2 Steve) (Greg + 2 Steve)
2 Steve = Greg + 2 Steve
2 Steve = Greg + Greg
2 Steve = 2 Greg
Steve = Greg
Waiting for the ultimate benchmark (Score:5, Funny)
::bangs head on keyboard for giving moderator ideas::
::Slashdot story: Tom's Hardware benchmarks the G5, and compares it to dual Xeons, dual Opterons, and (I guess), the P4::
Me: "Woohoo...I'll finally found out which is better" ::clicks link::
"Page 1: We have tested all these systems, and you will soon see our results." ::scroll down through ads, click next::
"Page 2: These tables show the systems we have tested on" ::scroll down, next::
"Page 3: Tables, cont.." ::yells out profanities, looks on table of contents, chooses "benchmark results"::
"Page 45: And now, let us take a look how the G5 stands against the current x86 and AMD64 processors" ::AAAAAAAAHHHHHH...can't stand it anymore, clicks on conclusion::
"Page 666: And thus, we conclude that the G5 is better in some ways and worse in others" ::NOOOOOOO...Now I'll never know!!!::
Re:Who cares? (Score:5, Funny)
I think Apple will have validity (in the performance arena) when AMD or Intel start publishing benchmarks against APPLE's systems.
Re:Curious (Score:5, Funny)
What, did he use GCC to compile them?! Filth!!! DIE!
Re:Honesty (Score:4, Funny)
I imagine that in that case, there is really only one problem to be solved.
Re:Mac users care =) (Score:3, Funny)
To be pendantic you should also note that they are 'imminent owners of the slowest 64-bit Personal Computer in the World', with the understanding that it is the only 64-bit Personal Computer in the World (at least until the AMD chips start showing up on PC's.)
I do think that it is cool that Apple gets to claim the crown for a while, even if only for a couple of months. On the other hand, how important 64-bit computing will be for the PC market remains to be seen.
Great job! (Score:3, Funny)
Just so you know.
Re:Who cares? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Apple is a Well Run Business? (Score:2, Funny)
What an awesome way to bring in a bunch of new users- chuck away all the old ones. OS X could join the glorious ranks of MS/intel competitors like DR-DOS, PC Geos, OS/2 and BeOS!
Plus they'd be inundated with whingeing users wanting to know why their windows only scanner doesn't work with OS X when they're using a PC,
Plus! with the tremendous advantage of having to support every piece of shit network card and graphics chipset under the sun, they'd be able to take advantage of the same legendary performance and stability offered by Wintel PCs today.
Your genius is wasted on Slashdot, go and apply for a job as a CEO at a multi-millon dollar company today!