Yellow Dog Linux 3.0 Hits Mirrors 71
Morganic writes "After checking periodically for the past couple days, I noticed that YDL 3.0 has hit the mirrors, a day early (in fact, the page above still says it's not available, but the mirrors at the bottom are carrying it). Anyone got a BitTorrent?"
Changes... (Score:4, Informative)
Very nice!
Re:Is Bit Torrent faster? (Score:5, Informative)
For more info on BT, visit the official BitTorrent [bitconjurer.org] site.
There's nothing "OS X-only" about them (Score:5, Informative)
That said, Yellow Dog Linux supports machines as the team has the chance to add such support. It already supports, for instance, the 12" PowerBook and the Xserve family. They may be a little behind the latest product introductions, but support will always be added.
Re:Yellow Dog Linux 3.0 Hits Mirrors (Score:4, Informative)
Re:any reviews (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Yeah, it's out (Score:2, Informative)
Next try was to re-burn install1 on a higher quality CD and it worked fine. It's reminds me of the descriptions of the latest Red Hat, but with mac add ons like pbbuttonsd and the like.
Re:Newbie question. (Score:4, Informative)
I have older PM 6500 and Imac Rev B that can't run Mac OS X (not supported, not enough RAM, not enough CPU power).
I've installed YellowDogLinux 2.3 on both, it just works
I don't feel the need to upgrade to 3.0 since they are used headless, as servers not as desktop.
All iMacs are supported (Score:2, Informative)
I have older PM 6500 and Imac Rev B that can't run Mac OS X (not supported, not enough RAM, not enough CPU power).
Sir - please don't spread misinformation, especially in a post marked 'informative" (and being informative indeed in other aspects). So far all iMacs are "supported" for the latest version of MacOS X - please check the official Jaguar requirements [apple.com]. It's only a a matter of adding RAM, but that's not really that expensive. You are right, of course, that the GUI would crawl on this graphics card, but
(a) I don't think it's a big problem on a machine running, as you described it, a "headless server"; Darwin can be boot up this way as good as Linux
(b) I honestly doubt whether KDE or GNOME would fare any better on this machine.
Re:OS X runs on any iMac; just upgrade to 128MB RA (Score:2, Informative)
Nope, on my RevA iMac it boots, then crawls but never runs (with 160 MB of RAM).
It runs quite smoothly (but I still see the Beach Ball of Death at least once an hour) on my 400 MHz iMac DV, of course the 640MB of RAM help but a faster drive would help too.
Re:All iMacs are supported (Score:2, Informative)
However, the idea I tried to outline is still valid. On older macs , installing Linux may be a better investment than Mac OSX:
To clarify: I didn't question the general idea, I was just in mood for some anal nitpicking
Re:Yeah, it's out (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Yeah, it's out (Score:4, Informative)
Mirrors? (Score:2, Informative)
(In fact, I installed 3.0 a couple weeks ago by doing this -- just add the new apt repositories for 3.0 to your sources.list file.)
--saint