Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Apple Businesses Operating Systems BSD

BSD User's Review Of OS X 406

Lally Singh writes: "Getting bored with the latest distribution? Or getting tired of searching for drivers for your 8 bit soundblaster (in)compatible? Then listen to one BSD user's opinion of Mac OS X. And stop complaining about the hardware. Give a Powermac or one of the portables a chance before knocking on it."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

BSD User's Review of OS X

Comments Filter:
  • by kimihia ( 84738 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @03:17AM (#2121360) Homepage

    He pads out his pages with bogus keywords to help the spiders. Here's a quote:

    <font class=hidden> <!-- a few words for the spiders --> Greasy Daemon, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, BSDi, Unix, Internet, Networking, NFS, Netatalk, SMB, Samba, Security, Guide, News, Benchmark, SSH, OpenSSH, Cryptography, TTY,

    (and so it goes on ...)

  • by TotallyUseless ( 157895 ) <totNO@SPAMmac.com> on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @01:12AM (#2123744) Homepage Journal
    i just dont see it that way. I program in c when i can, and in perl for work. As far as hobby programming goes, it has all been geared twoards games, which was about the hardest kind of programming to do on pre OSX macs. Granted, these types of things have gotten easier over the years, but when I started, there were no 'Game Sprockets' and you had to do your own sound/blitter/networking/etc. OSX is changing this dramatically. I was nervous about programming for OSX. I was scared a lot of the skills I had learned would be useless... and you know what? Many of them were... But the thing is, with the way such things work now, it just took me a few days to get up to date with where I had been. BTW, this is using cocoa, the new framework... not carbon, which is meant to migrate apps from os9. If you think programming for OSX is hard, then you flat out havent given it a good try, and that is all there is to it. If you know what you are doing, you can develop a cocoa app in about 1/3 the time of other apps. For an example, purely off the top of my head... take the game Alice. The port to Mac OSX was at first playable within a few *days* and ready for release a few short weeks after that. If you have programmed for Mac OS in the past, you should know this would more than likely not be possible in that timeframe. OSX is a developers dream, just as NextStep was considered a dev's dream. I dont think of OSX as bloated, I tend to think of it as beefy. No matter what your tastes, there should be a good hunk of meat there able to satisfy you
  • by Julius X ( 14690 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @08:47AM (#2148142) Homepage
    I don't understand for the life of me why this guy kept bitching about not being able to compile things...seems like this guy had more trouble than I've ever heard of to get to these things.

    And then there was Apache...why oh why did he feel the need to recompile Apache, when OSX comes with a Native Version [apple.com] of the damned thing that is far easier to use and confiugre than our standard *nix Apache.

    *Sigh*
  • by neo ( 4625 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @09:10AM (#2148455)
    Comparing just the processor does a disservice to the engioneering that apple puts into it's products.

    Oversimplified analogy:

    Which would you rather have. Lego or the combination of building blocks, tinker toys, connectix, and structures.

    Macs are like lego... they just fit together. PC's are like the combination of all the other toy building systems.

    They are attractive for different reasons. I know lots of people who would rather try to put together a robot from 5 different toy sets, but I prefer the design work that Lego (and Mac) have to offer. I don't want to spend hours trying to get two different toys to work together.

    On the outset, Lego costs more. That's because they stress quality and design. You can easily go out and buy building blocks from another company and they will cost much less, but they wont work as well. If money was all that mattered, I'd buy the cheapest toy and play.

    But I want to play and have fun... so I buy Lego.

    neo

  • Re:huh? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by tim_maroney ( 239442 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @07:14PM (#2150698) Homepage
    Actually, many of the latest distributions of Linux make it far easier to deal with than Windows or even Mac.

    No, although they certainly are improving. You might want to read the GNOME Usability Study Report [slashdot.org].

    As long as your hardware is not total crap, Linux is not far from being a "insert CD, click install, come back in 15 minutes, start working" kinda OS. What do I mean by crap hardware? The kind of stuff that no self-respecting kernel hacker would buy, let alone write drivers for. (Like Winmodems, no-name Ethernet cards, old cheap SB-compatible sound cards, scanners with proprietary interfaces made by some company that died 5 years ago, etc.)

    This is an internal myth of the Linux community. There is nothing wrong with reducing the cost of modem hardware by offloading some of its functions onto the main processor. In fact there's a major user benefit, which is lower cost. The reason people say Winmodems are crap is so they don't have to deal with the issue that Linux software support and availability isn't as good as on Windows. The tiny Linux market share doesn't lend itself to broad software or hardware support.

    We have the same problem on the Mac side of the fence. It's a really unfair thing in a lot of ways, but it also is a concrete problem with using a minority platform, and the way to deal with it is not by saying that all the missing hardware and software is crap. (Although that was a good enough answer back when the war was between Mac and DOS!)

    Mozilla, btw, is moving along nicely.

    An ever-increasing number of bugs is not my idea of moving along nicely. I wouldn't ship commercial software that had Mozilla's defect curve [mozilla.org]. I'd link directly to the chart, but the bug chart feature is broken again today.

    I think it's time to face up to the fact that projects people do in their spare time as tinkerers may never catch up to those that are funded, staffed and managed based on the potential for financial reward.

    You need to read Eric Raymond's Cathedral and the Bazaar. http://tuxedo.org/~esr/ Enjoy.

    I read it years ago. It bears no resemblance to reality and has even largely fallen out of favor in the open source community.

    • His understanding of what it means to manage a project is totally wrong.
    • His example program is a trivial small utility program having nothing to do with large software projects.
    • His dictum that "to many eyes, all bugs are shallow" is demonstrably false.
    • His predictions of commercial benefits from open source have caused several companies to crash and burn, but none to achieve profitability.
    • His approach never had a quantifiable business model.
    • He is completely unaware of software engineering as a discipline.
    • He acknowledges that he has never taken a single class in the subject, and it really shows.

    Tim

  • by pjbass ( 144318 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @09:54PM (#2168246) Homepage
    I'm glad to see that OSX is shaping up to what it promised. I saw it in beta and on its first official release on my buddy's dual-G4, and did nothing but drool. It's pretty. And it's pretty quick too. I'm glad to hear that someone who has better access to it and knows what to look for in the OS gave his thumbs up. Apple needs this boost, and it never hurts for BSD to chalk up another feather in its cap.
  • my girlfriend (Score:0, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:05PM (#2168294)
    my girlfriend and i have been dating for almost two years. over the last year, she has packed on about 20-30 extra pounds! what should i do? how can i tell her that it's gross without hurting her feelings?
  • Consumer Unix (Score:3, Interesting)

    by LeyDruid ( 124591 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:06PM (#2168296)
    I'm having fun with OS X on my new 866 G4 tower (plus dual-booting LinuxPPC ;-) . It's fairly quick on my machine, but I'm looking forward to the 10.1 speed jump.

    OS X doesn't get everything right, but I think its probably the closest any Unix variant will come to the general consumer's desktop. OS X is a usable Unix distro, but has the niceties that most home users expect, and really require. Yes, translucent buttons on top of a port scanner are a requirement. Sure, its nice to grep for things, but my next-door soccer mom neighboor isn't going to. But I can use SSH to administer my website. This duality makes OS X the most usable OS - almost. Not enough native apps yet. :-p

    Later,
    Goss
  • by __aaaaxm1522 ( 121860 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:06PM (#2168299)
    Contrary to popular belief in the x86 world (of which I was a part until recently), Apple hardware is not only very spiffy looking, it's very well engineered IMHO.

    After a series of problems with 4 Sony Vaio notebooks (two PCG-748s, a Picturebook, and a PCG-F630), my girlfriend and I decided to look for alternative mobile computing solutions. Both of us being Unix/Linux users, we were drawn to the Apple Powerbooks/iBooks (the new model, not the clamshell).

    The notebooks feel solid. They have excellent battery life (I got 4.5 hours on a charge at the Ottawa Linux Symposium, while surfing wirelessly the whole time). The G3 and G4 processors feel fast. You don't have to have a 1 GHz Intel beast in your notebook - performance isn't measured solely by MHz, and especially not across different chip architectures!

    Sure, I had some minor complaints - only one mouse button for instance. But both YellowDog and LinuxPPC allow you to easily remap keys to mouse buttons. Guess what? That Apple key, and the "enter" key, on either side of the spacebar, just above the mouse pad on a G4 Titanium make excellent mouse buttons! Not to mention full USB support for external keyboards/mice when "docked". Built in antennas for wireless networking reduce the cost of a wireless network card... here in Canada, an 802.11b wireless card typically runs around $220 Cdn, whereas the Apple Airport (OEMed Lucent 802.11b card) runs about $140. And the G4 Titanium's screen is simply the most georgeous thing out there IMHO.

    Price-wise Apple hardware isn't all that bad these days. Sure, the G4 Titanium is expensive when compared to a Dell Latitude. But the G4 Ti is the top of the line Apple - it has more in common with the Dell 8100 series... and when you compare those two, the difference is $50-$100 Cdn.

    Ultimately, it's up to the individual user to decide which notebook best suits them. But at least give an Apple notebook a chance before dismissing it. They are really quite nice (and quite popular with the Linux coder crowd at the Ottawa Linux Symposium - there were many, many, many Powerbook G4s, and a few iBooks).

  • by pinkpineapple ( 173261 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:08PM (#2168302) Homepage
    I have been using MacOS X since the first ports, and before that OpenStep. I still have a slab running at home. Still a nice system after all these years. I got hooked to objective-c the first day I tried it. The language and the OS where well integrated. The beautiful interface and high-quality of the whole system was a nice achievement. Not like MacOS X unfortunately. Nothing seems to make sense in the gut of the architecture. You have a mixture of C for kernel and foundation, add a little bit of embedded C++ for the IOKit and addtional drivers, drop some C++ with a CodeWarrior PowerPlant on top in what is known as the Finder (a cross between Destop manager and MacOS 9 Finder), then of course, objective C framework renamed Cocoa to go with the trend and add Java in case you get bored to the mix. You end up with this hideous monster of bloatware, hard to program system, slow as hell for loading all the libraries. In short : a kludge. So you know what I did: I installed linux on my PowerMac instead and then things got useable and snappy again. Linux could have even run without the 512MB of RAM I had to put in there ot run OS X. Oh! and finally, I can play DVDs with ut region code, and burn any type of CDs too BTW. And I won't get IE to crash all the time, and Quicktime reminding me to buy the upgrade everytime I watch a movie. Things are so much better now.
  • Re:Why? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by tm2b ( 42473 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:09PM (#2168309) Journal
    "Insightful?"

    Anybody who complains that Apple hardware prices are high hasn't been pawing attention for a couple of years.

    Compare the price/performance of an iMac with similarly powered x86 systems. Compare the price of an iBook with similarly powered portables.

    They're very competitive these days.
  • by jchristopher ( 198929 ) on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @10:19PM (#2168357)
    Sure, the G4 Titanium is expensive when compared to a Dell Latitude. But the G4 Ti is the top of the line Apple - it has more in common with the Dell 8100 series... and when you compare those two, the difference is $50-$100 Cdn.

    I agree, the Ti is an awesome laptop, but let's allow it to stand on it's own merits. It STARTS at US $2599. I just configured a Dell 8100 for $2,148.00 through their 'small business' store.

    $450 is nothing to sneeze at, and will buy you a shitload of memory, giant hard drive, case, docking station, whatever. The Dell also has the best laptop video card avaiable (GeForce2go) whereas the Mac has the older ATI graphics.

    So Apple is not quite there yet on price, but they are getting closer with the portables. Unfortunately, the G4 tower and iMac are getting further away...

  • by znu ( 31198 ) <znu.public@gmail.com> on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @11:13PM (#2168579)
    Calling OS X "hard to program" is just kooky. It has one of the nicest development environments ever created, and all the tools are free. Don't waste your time with Cocoa/Java. Cocoa still works much better with Obj-C. And if you're still complaining about speed, you obviously missed all that stuff about 10.1, due in September. Folks playing around with developer builds report that speed problems are totally gone.
  • by gig ( 78408 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @12:17AM (#2168837)
    Everybody knows you get hosed on additional RAM from brand-name computer vendors. You can fill up any Mac from TransIntl.com for a few hundred dollars just by picking out your Mac model from a list that I believe usually includes pictures. Macs can all take a lot of RAM, and that extends their working lives quite a bit.
  • by DaLinuxFreak ( 252942 ) on Wednesday August 08, 2001 @12:23AM (#2168860) Homepage
    Perhaps it's their attitude we're steered away from, or maybe it's because we like Athlons. The truth is, the G4 is a old platform, but so is a PIII (you said PII, but nevermind). It so happens that apple only posts tests on Intels, and only tests on photoshop - which is optimized for macos.

    I said attitude... Maybe a G4 really is the best thing scince the microchip, but even if it is, it's not Apple's doing. They need to emphisize that. It's a very similar attitude that microsoft takes... 'you do the works, we'll steal it, and get all the credit.' Truth is, Apple isn't a stable company right now, they're way to dependent, on IBM (for PPC processors), and on NVidia (for releasing video cards first).

    Perhaps apple is the best for content creation, on the low level, but SGI's are running lower costs now (used machines), and these things run for 3 months uptime overclocked! In fact, on the "max uptime" list on netcraft (which doesn't truely reflect acutal computer uptime, just site uptime) Irix trails Freebsd only. Maybe it's not a coincidence that AOL uses IRIX on their servers.

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...