Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The Wrath of the Apple Tribe

Posted by kdawson on Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:38 PM
from the blame-it-on-eve dept.
Narrative Fallacy writes "If you've ever written about Apple products with even a hint of negativity, you'll appreciate Salon's excerpt from Farhad Manjoo's True Enough, about why the Apple tribe is so rabid. 'There are many tribes in the tech world: TiVo lovers, Blackberry addicts, Palm Treo fanatics, and people who exhibit unhealthy affection for their Roomba robotic vacuum cleaners,' writes Manjoo. 'But there is no bigger tribe, and none more zealous, than fans of Apple, who are infamous for their sensitivity to slams, real or imagined, against the beloved company.' Wall Street Journal columnist Walt Mossberg has even coined a name for the phenomenon — the 'Doctrine of Insufficient Adulation.' 'If I see the world as all black and you see the world as all white and some person comes along and says it's partially black and partially white, we both are going to be unhappy,' says psychologist Lee Ross at Stanford University. 'You think there are more facts and better facts on your side than on the other side. The very act of giving them equal weight seems like bias. Like inappropriate evenhandedness.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by wanderingknight (1103573) on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:47PM (#22834020)
    ..and their ad campaigns.

    Seriously, market a product as "stylish", "hip" and "different", and you'll raise a troupe of people to whom presenting themselves as different is pretty much their only end. I personally find it one of the most disgusting facets of consumerist capitalism.
    • by plover (150551) * on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:03AM (#22834110) Homepage Journal

      I personally find it one of the most disgusting facets of consumerist capitalism.

      Ooo, someone forgot to take their "Think Different" pills this morning, didn't they?

        • by plover (150551) * on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:09AM (#22834656) Homepage Journal

          I don't know why the Mac hating crowd needs to resort to 6+ year old marketing slogans

          'Cuz I'm too drunk to remember their current slogan, whatever the hell it is. I know there's something folksy about the Macbook Air music, and U2 sings Vertigo for old iPods, and there's a funny "Hi, I'm a PC and I'm a Mac" commercial campaign, but no actual slogans that have sloshed their way to my addled forebrain.

          If they had a good slogan now, I'm sure I would have made my joke about it instead. But I came up empty, like a manila envelope with nothing inside.

          Oh, and I remember Ellen Feiss. She was kind of hot, in that grunge way. But nobody takes Ellen Feiss pills any more, they smoke Ellen Feiss blunts instead. :-)

          • by xenocide2 (231786) on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:45AM (#22834788) Homepage
            They don't even bother with taglines anymore. They know what it is they sell, and sell it without even using words. What they sell is image.

            The macbook air ad tells you exactly what to do with it: pull it out from somewhere like a rabit from a magician's hat, then show it off to your neighbors (then put it away because it can't do shit).
        • by darkpixel2k (623900) <slashdot@darkpixel.com> on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:10AM (#22834662) Homepage
          I don't know why the Mac hating crowd needs to resort to 6+ year old marketing slogans, if there's really that many valid reasons to flame us Mac fans :-)

          No, there are plenty of reasons to flame Mac fans. My experience may not be typical, and I'm certainly not directing it at you specifically, but here goes...

          I have met or interacted with roughly 40 mac users in my last two years of work. I provide contracted IT services to companies. Each and every single one of those 40 mac users were pretentious twats. Every single one of them acted like the whole problem was my fault--even when they were coming to me because their mac was having issues.

          My personal favorite example was a doctor working as a contractor for a company I was contracted to. She had apparently been having no end of issues getting her mac hooked up to the projector.

          So after exchanging a bunch of phone calls and finally agreeing that there was no other possible time she could do it save for 7:30 at night on one reoccurring day each month, I finally gave in and said I would help her.

          She whipped out her macbook and folded her arms...waiting. So I asked her to show me what she did exactly so I could witness the problem. She indignantly sighed as if I was asking too much and booted the thing up. Once it was fired up, she opened up whatever the hell the mac equivalent of powerpoint was and folded her arms again, and once again glared at me. I waited. She finally sighed again and pulled out the DVI to VGA adapter from her laptop bag and plugged it in. The mac immediately froze. The projector hadn't been plugged in, only the adapter. She threw her hands up in the air and whined "Seeee!!!" at me. "Uh, it crashed. Reboot it."

          "It's not supposed to do that!!!". "Nope, probably not. You'll have to call Apple about it--but for now, reboot it and we'll try again."

          This time it came up and didn't crash. So we plugged in the projector and everything worked like a charm...

          Right up until the point where she was completely baffled by her desktop being EXPANDED onto the projector rather than duplicated onto the projector.

          She kept dragging things off the laptop screen onto the projector. This had her totally fucking confused for 5 minutes. Several times I tried to explain what was going on, but she would cut me off and say "See--it's disappearing. Why is it on the projector and not on my laptop. It's broken."

          Idiot. So after 10 minutes she finally listened to what I was explaining and figured out that her desktop was extended. (All of this while huffing about how my projector was messed up and not working correctly--because is sure as shit couldn't be her macbook. It was developed by a deity after all, and they make no mistakes.)

          Next thing I know, she's firing up iTunes...and for the finale I thought "I'll bet she's *the* air america listener".

          Sure enough. Hundreds of air america broadcasts/podcasts/whatever.

          ...which of course the playing of caused the laptop to crash. Another reboot, and an explanation that it's not the projector's fault--especially seeing as it was simply a VGA projector without audio, and she was ready to present.

          ...and all of this without me having to touch the macbook, do anything technical, or provide any advice beyond 'reboot'.

          Oh yeah, and when I said "It looks like you're all set", there was no "Thanks" or "Awesome" or really any positive acknowledgment other than "It's about time".

          And yes, all 39 other mac users displayed the same total lack of technical knowledge and the same "I'm better than you attitude" when really they were just so fucking stupid I'm surprised they didn't die half way through the troubleshooting process because they didn't remember to breathe.

          I suppose I should amend this slightly. I actually do know 2 mac users that are intelligent. My friends parents. They bought it because o
          • by wass (72082) on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:46AM (#22834800)
            Yikes, I don't know what bad karmic deities you pissed off to get that kind of treatment. :-) My exposure to Mac users is rather opposite.

            I'm a physicist in grad school, so maybe my cross section of mac users is entirely from a different demographic. In the past few years I've seen several physicists go from Linux to Mac, just to "get stuff done" easier without having to waste time fiddling with the system (both professors and students, and myself included). A computational/simulational group in my department went from IBM-supplied UNIX boxes (not sure if AIX or Linux) to Mac. I know a few theorists that have gone from Linux to Mac too.

            More interestingly, a huge astro research entity nearby (with ties to NASA) with several hundred employees is in the process of switching almost exclusively to OS X. They used to use predominantly Solaris boxes, which are relatively old by now and need upgrading. So OS X fits their needs nearly exactly, especially with regards to visualization toolkits and software. It's pretty cool for me because sometimes they call in Apple engineers to give technical talks about various features/software of interest for scientists.

            In all these cases, though, I guess the mac users are fairly intelligent and computer savvy. Seems to be opposite to the Mac users you interface with.

            The only potential explanation I can give you, and I hope I'm not accused of being a fanboy, is related to my experience where I've had significantly less problems on my Mac than on Windows (which I had to use in my lab). I'm not saying Macs are problem free, they're not, but IMHO they give much less hassle and I'm more efficient at them.

            So anyway, it could be that when the shit hits the fan and you get a support call from a Mac user, they're far more irate than a Windows user that is relatively used to dealing with problems. Just a hand-wavy guess, but given the exposure you have to mac users versus mine in science, it's a possibility.
            • by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Sunday March 23 2008, @05:11AM (#22835204)
              The big problem I find is that Macs are not nearly as problem free as many of their users think they are, then they get mad if you can't fix it. For example at work we don't support Macs. We support Windows, Solaris, and very specific versions of Linux. That's just how it is going to be when there's like 4 people for 500 computers. None of us have any Mac experience, and the department isn't willing to hire a Mac person. They also aren't willing to pay to train one of us on Macs. Hence, no Mac support.

              However, we get users that insist on buying Macs. Ok, fine, they can support them by themselves. We don't mandate using department support and many research labs have systems that are all their own. Well that would all be fine, except the Mac users come crying to us when things won't work, and then get mad when we can't fix them.

              That's why I get tired of. The attitude of "Macs never break so I'll use one, oh wait my Mac has a problem you have to fix it!" This is not the first job I've encountered it at. If a place wants to use Macs and support them, that's great. If a place wants to train me to do Mac support, that's also great. However when the policy is "Macs are unsupported," I get tired of Mac users justifying buying them by saying they won't need support, then bitching about it.

              Also, in many cases recently, it has even been almost completely useless. One of our professors bought a number of Macs for his lab. Since there's a good deal of software we use that isn't for Mac OS, Windows is on there too. His students are always booted in to the Windows side since everything they want to do can be done there. So it wasn't as though he bought the Macs out of a well researched need, he bought them because he's a Mac fan, without consideration as to if that's the right tool for the job.

              Hence, I get a little annoyed.
          • by kevingolding2001 (590321) on Sunday March 23 2008, @05:22AM (#22835248)
            So no, I'm not a mac-hater. I'm a mac-user-hater.

            I'm a mac-user, and I'm also a mac-user-hater. Your experience is unfortunately all too common.

    • by Lemmy Caution (8378) on Sunday March 23 2008, @01:21AM (#22834490) Homepage
      The thing is, because I work in a field connected with the arts, I do actually know a lot of the people who kind of fit that stereotype of the hip, creative mac user. And they aren't rabid fantypes. They like their Macs, yes, and many are design aficionados, but they don't care that much about brand loyalty as such.

      The people I know who fit that rabid fanboy stereotype are the ones for whom Mac ownership is the hippest thing about them, dorks who think their choice of tech moves them one step closer to the cool-kids table.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:48PM (#22834032)
    Step 1: Troll Apple users

    Step 2: Write an article about all the hate mail you get

    Step 3: Ad revenue

    Goto Step 1

    Dvorak has done this so many times he should be selling his technique on an infomercial at this point.

  • It's a religion (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rog7 (182880) on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:49PM (#22834040)
    I do have an unhealthy obsession with my Roomba, but it doesn't come close to the religious outrage that descends on my blog whenever / if-ever I say anything that doesn't approach worship of Apple.

    Honestly, it's the biggest reason I no longer buy products from Apple. The astonishing thing is how many years this keeps going on. I had a friend who started hiding his Newton for fear of the cultists that would swarm him and go on about how great it was while he was just trying to look up an address or whatever.

    The only sane Apple-nut I ever met was Douglas Adams, but then he was at least reasonable enough to acknowledge other OSes, although you wouldn't believe it from the Apple fans who quote him endlessly.

    Why are so many of their consumers complete nutcases?
    • Re:It's a religion (Score:5, Informative)

      by plover (150551) * on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:16AM (#22834172) Homepage Journal
      I'm pretty good friends with an Apple salesman. He loves their products and believes in the company. Both of those are prerequisites to being a successful salesman regardless of the products being sold, but Apple seems to make it easier than just about any other company. It's an amazing cult.

      I personally have purchased only one Apple product -- I recently bought my wife an iPod touch. While I absolutely love the cool user interface experience, the consumer lock down is much worse than I imagined it would be (and I was expecting bad.) Overall I can only rate the thing "half-way above shit." I'll never buy anything else from them and I'm not going to recommend them to other people unless that changes drastically.

              • Re:It's a religion (Score:5, Informative)

                by pmonje (588285) on Sunday March 23 2008, @04:36AM (#22835138)
                You should probably be mad at her for wasting $100 then because itunes will let you play songs from a connected ipod even if they aren't in the itunes library. I just double checked by installing itunes on my XP box, it's never had itunes on it and there are no songs in the library, plugged in the ipod, waited a minute for itunes to come up then clicked on Music in the sidebar underneath the ipod icon. All the songs on the ipod play fine through the computers speakers, you can even plug headphones into the ipod and listen to a different song than it's sending to the computer.

                Was she clicking on the music icon under library? because obviously they're not in the library they're on the ipod. I'm not sure why you, your wife or your "Apple buddy" couldn't get this simple, obvious thing to work for her.

                Piss and moan all you want about not being able to copy them off the ipod, that's entirely true and annoying, but figuring out that you have to double click on a song under the ipod and not in the library really doesn't take geek smarts.

                And just so we can keep track of the fan scores, I own 1 iPod, 1 ancient g4 emac, 1 amd xp/linux box and 1 dell vostro core 2 duo running xp, so could someone explain to me whether i'm palestinian or israeli?
  • by snl2587 (1177409) on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:52PM (#22834060)

    about why the Apple tribe is so rabid

    You mean it's not rabies? Oh...I guess I didn't need those shots after the last time I called the MacBook "useless" and one of them bit me...

  • by cappadocius (555740) <{moc.edareuqsame ... a} {suicodappac}> on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:53PM (#22834068)
    +1 Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
  • by Psykechan (255694) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:08AM (#22834136)
    I use Apple products all of the time; the only personal computers that I ever have powered on anymore are all Macs. My "promoting" of Macs to friends and family has been more beneficial in convincing some of them to buy Apple products more than any clever advertising. I've even brought Apple into my workplace and who knows, it may even make a decent foothold in the formerly all MS shop. I would consider myself a fan.

    But I will point out the negatives in their products where I see them. There is no point in pretending that they don't exist as all that does is give them time to fester. I am a realist. I'll also point out issues with the company when they deserve it. Yeah, praise is better but only if they are going to work for it.

    I am more judgmental because I've been in the IT field for years and have used, and I mean really used, many different OSes out there. I also wouldn't have considered calling myself a Mac user before OS X. Sorry fans, but OS 9 was pretty terrible.

    I suppose Apple needs the rabid fanbase as they are advertisers that pay the company for the privilege. Maybe Apple should even thank them every now and then for keeping the company afloat for so many years. They also need the realists that speak their mind and truthfully say what is good, what is bad, and what is downright idiotic. Yes, this means that these groups will clash but it is needed.

    How else are they going to move forward?

    • by budcub (92165) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:41AM (#22834322) Homepage
      I couldn't help noticing how Mac fanatics kept on touting their superior OS, until OS X came along, which fixed all of these problems that they never acknowledged having before. Same thing with the switch to Intel. They kept saying how superior their Power PC chip was, then with the switch to Intel they're saying its now working so much better. WTF?

      Even though I'm not a big fan of Apple, I will admit they have some advantages here and there.
      • by wass (72082) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:51AM (#22834374)
        I'm a fan of OS X, and I used to DESPISE macs of OS 9 and earlier. I just didn't like how the old macs felt. I used Linux exclusively from 1998, until my fiancee got a mac mini around 2005, then I got an imac last year, which I've been using exclusively now.

        So I don't know why the mac-hating crowd has to paint all of us Mac users with one big fanatic brush. But I can tell you flat out that OS X is what pulled me to the mac, it's UNIX with an awesome GUI, and no more fiddling to get stuff to work that I had to with Linux. If claiming that makes me a rabid fanboy, then so be it.
  • by ptbarnett (159784) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:18AM (#22834188)
    Earlier in the week, I posted this comment [slashdot.org] to this thread [slashdot.org], about something in the first three paragraphs in the referenced article [wired.com].

    I was amazed at the number of fanboi's that modded it off-topic, only to have it modded it back up, then back down again. Some apparently thought I had committed blasphemy.

  • by tsa (15680) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:30AM (#22834254) Homepage
    Why are Mac fans so quick to see bias everywhere? On issues we're passionate about, we all tend to think our own views are essentially reasonable. Thus when a reporter, editor, news network, or pundit mentions the other side's arguments, it stings.
      That's basically all the article says. And we knew that, of course. But why are Apple fans so extremely sensitive to criticism? I've said many 'bad' things about Apple on this forum, and it inevitably got me modded down. Apple zealots are even worse than the Linux zealots of ten years back.
  • by gelfling (6534) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:42AM (#22834330) Homepage Journal
    His columns for the whole past week were excerpts from his new book. And now he's getting air time from /. His basic thesis is - GEE who's a thought - people on the internet all flock to likeminded opinions to the exclusion of all rational discussion about anything that deviates from their gospel. Wow, never saw that coming.

    BTW Farhad is the biggest Apple Fanboy in the world. Before this week 80% of his columns were about iPhones, iPods, Macs and Apple.
  • by sudog (101964) on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:38AM (#22834758) Homepage
    Apple zealots may be trying, may be annoying, may be pushy, but people.. Apple zealots got *nothing* on old-school Amiga fans. Apple zealots are tame school children stamping their feet in impotent fury compared to the raging, near-psychotic madness that defined the true Amigoid. During its heyday, the Amiga inspired people to dizzying heights of advocacy that I have *never* seen matched. And the weird part was that they were mostly right, so when they frothed at the mouth, they knew what they were talking about. These Apple fanboys these days.. the ones people seem to be complaining about are just parrots. But when you had a worldwide population of millions, all aligned up in the same direction, and augmented with people like Matthew Dillon (of DragonFlyBSD) and Dave Haynie leading them, you have a near-religious movement that I have never again seen since Commodore bankrupted itself.

    So *bah* I say.. Give these Apple people a break. The alternatives were quite a bit worse!
    • Re:ratio (Score:5, Funny)

      by ColdWetDog (752185) on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:53PM (#22834066) Homepage

      There is at least ten mac hater[s] (sic) for every fanboy, each posting ten whining comment[s] for every adulation of apple.

      Are you sure you've read the summary correctly AND you know what board you're posting on? You seem to be confusing Microsoft and Apple. One is bad, the other is God.

      Hope this helps. Oh, and you might want to cut back on the schnapps.

    • Re:ratio (Score:5, Interesting)

      by astrosmash (3561) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:28AM (#22834242) Journal
      I'm reminded of this episode [burbia.com] in which some poor schmuck visited an Apple Store for the first time and wrote about it in his blog.
      • Re:ratio (Score:5, Funny)

        by BountyX (1227176) on Saturday March 22 2008, @11:59PM (#22834090)
        I was assualted by a fanboi when I told him my Tapwave was cooler than his iPhone. Luckliy, I had a stylus as a weapon, while all he had was his finger. He didn't want to drop his iPhone either becuase it didn't have applecare.
      • Re:ratio (Score:5, Interesting)

        by frdmfghtr (603968) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:19AM (#22834192)

        Don't forget the whining fanboi apple adulations. "Mac OS X is perfect, but I'm going to switch to Windows because of the translucent menu bar!!"
        You exaggerate, but not by much. I've also heard nitpicks about the top menu bar having (gasp!) square corners on top instead of rounded corners. Oh for the love of all that is good in this world, are you going to let THAT bother you?
        • Re:ratio (Score:5, Funny)

          by tsa (15680) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:40AM (#22834312) Homepage
          Oh yes. And don't get me started on the reflections in the new 3D Dock. They're all wrong.
            • Re:ratio (Score:5, Funny)

              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 23 2008, @07:49AM (#22835700)

              Well you can have that look even when it's on the bottom of the screen by doing this:

              "defaults write com.apple.dock no-glass -bool YES; killall Dock"
              Clearly OS X is not ready for the desktop. How is Joe User supposed to use a computer that can only be configured by typing cryptic commands into a terminal window? Come back when you can change settings like that with a simple graphical interface, like in Linux.
    • by wanderingknight (1103573) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:12AM (#22834156)

      For instance, intelligent design.
      That's not a fair comparison. Intelligent design cannot _ever_ hope to partake in a scientific discussion, because there's no science behind it, and that's _it_. No point in debating something that's completely wrong in any way you look at it. Different opinions on different products, however, are a different issue altogether.
    • by wass (72082) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:15AM (#22834168)
      The author of the article (yes I actually read it) went as far as comparing the pro/anti Apple crowd to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Yes, he seriously did. And not by briefly alluding to it, but over the course of several paragraphs.

      I've heard of some crazy stretches for comparison, but come on, a journalist actually comparing a group of people that have an affinity for a company's products to a deeply-complicated bloody 60+ year old conflict? Talk about going off the deep end.
      • by AaronLawrence (600990) * on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:37AM (#22834292)
        He didn't compare the situations, but he compared people's pyschology, and the fact is we all like to have a tribe to rally around and see others as the enemy. A bit of maturity is hopefully learning when you're doing that and try to avoid it.
      • by wass (72082) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:45AM (#22834348)
        Apparently it's not just Apple Fanboys that can't handle criticism!
      • by recoiledsnake (879048) on Sunday March 23 2008, @03:33AM (#22834942)
        You're wrong. Details here [computerworld.com.au].
      • by TeknoHog (164938) on Sunday March 23 2008, @04:34AM (#22835134) Homepage Journal

        The author of the article (yes I actually read it) went as far as comparing the pro/anti Apple crowd to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Yes, he seriously did. And not by briefly alluding to it, but over the course of several paragraphs.

        I've heard of some crazy stretches for comparison, but come on, a journalist actually comparing a group of people that have an affinity for a company's products to a deeply-complicated bloody 60+ year old conflict? Talk about going off the deep end.

        It's a bit like the word "feminazi", which draws a completely unfair analogy, as it is deeply insulting to any proud member of the National Socialist party.

        • by MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:22AM (#22834704)

          I dunno. The levels of insanity reached in both Apple fanboyism and the Israeli/Palastenian conflict seems equivalent sometimes. Hey, you hear that? That's the sound of my karma level going through the floor!
          Funny? Sure. But it has gotten extreme at times. I've been the victim of some of that bs. A couple of years ago there was a story about Apple recieving some critcism over its iTunes market ownership. Lots of people were poo-poo'ing the criticism. I didn't agree with them, I said my bit. It initially earned a couple of insightful mods. Then I was hit with a shitstorm of comments that largely had nothing really to do with my opinion on the matter. Several had gone on to invent theories about why I was so 'bitter'. Whatever. Anyway, that's to be expected, right? Go against popular opinion, popular opinion goes against you. Nothing new here. At least until the mod bombing happened. All of my recent posts had been negatively modded so many times that I was actually banned from Slashdot for WEEKS. Weeks. The last I had bothered to count, I had been modded down over thirty times. I registerred a new account, and kept on moving. A few months later, I logged in with the original account, posted something completely unrelated to Apple. It was modded down, too. Yep, they were still watching me to 'teach me a lesson'.

          I wouldn't compare Apple fanboyism to the Israeli/Palastenian conflict, but I can certainly understand why somebody would. I mean, how extreme is that? I don't even know how you get that many people with mod points to come in for the attack. Very extreme. The worst part? I wasn't trolling. I might have been more respectful of it if I had said something snide or shitty, but I didn't. I sat down and explained where I was coming from on it. (Hence the positive mods.) But .. oh no.. Apple can do no wrong. The sad thing? That sort of BS is what gets people outspoken about the downsides of Apple's products.

          Oh well. That's the internet for you.
            • by MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) on Sunday March 23 2008, @02:46AM (#22834794)

              One poorly modded comment does not make a conspiracy against you!
              Sure. But that's not what I said.

              "All of my recent posts had been negatively modded so many times that I was actually banned from Slashdot for WEEKS. Weeks. The last I had bothered to count, I had been modded down over thirty times."

              You can't mod down one comment 30 times. Nor can one comment be modded down so many times you get banned. If you have a better explanation behind it, I'm all ears, but at least read what I said before passing judgement.
                • by MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) on Sunday March 23 2008, @04:09AM (#22835068)

                  Perhaps you were just being a douchebag? Just checking...

                  Your profile page - I only see one thing modded down and that was: this one. Yep, douchebaggery.
                  If by 'douchebag' you mean "didn't join the pitchfork party when I was called to do so", then yes, you've got a point. If you mean that I made a comment just for the sake of trolling, no. I felt I had a point to make. I did. It was modded up. Then it was yo-yo'd back down a long with a number of other posts I made.

                  Care to post the other username (assuming there really is one) with all the downmodded comments so we can pass judgement on you?
                  The main reason is that Slashdot's search engine sucks and Google's not being completely helpful, either. There was a story back in early-2006 about Napster's CEO criticizing Apple's de-facto monopoly stifling innovation. I said he had a point: Apple, for example, wasn't considering a subscription service. Because they have control of the market, that sort of service isn't getting attention to the masses. If you find that story, look for several -1 posts by NanoGator. Now, agree with me or disagree, I'm cool either way. I dare you though, to look at it objectively. Did my comment actually warrant a ton of negative moderations? Well, since I haven't been able to cook up the fabled link, I'll paint you a worst case scenario: Let's say that my post merely said that Steve Jobs takes it up the butt from Bill Gates on a nightly basis. Seriously, as silly and childish as that is, that was a heck of a co-ordinated attack. You can see the remains of it here [slashdot.org]. This was months after the event, and they were still watching me.

                  Even if I were the biggest douchebag in the world (yet somehow still posting at +2...) and I made the douchiest comment in the universe, could you really deny that that sort of Apple fanboism is (or at least was) extreme?

                  That said, I will be up front about one thing: You won't catch me at my best behaviour if you find that. After my posts started getting modded down I got annoyed and rather defensive. You might look at that and think I was being a douche. That's one thing about looking at this stuff from the past, you can't see what order the events (like moderations) took place in. That's why I don't expect you guys to be kind to me. That's fine, I'll deal with it. Have a good night.

        • by Cadallin (863437) on Sunday March 23 2008, @03:50AM (#22835010)
          Hah! Wanna see a real shit storm go down? Suggest the possibility that automobiles are not God's Gift to the American people. The merest hint that people ought to think about Public Transportation and the benefits that a robust transportation infrastructure could provide, and you'll hit 0 faster than you can say "RDF." You'll also get a ton of posts about how Public transport sucks from people that have never been to Europe, or Asia, and who's only experience with Public Transportation is "That one time I had to ride the bus when my car was in the shop." Which totally ignores that, Duh, Public transportation in the USA does suck, because everyone is expected to drive a car.
    • by AHumbleOpinion (546848) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:23AM (#22834220) Homepage
      Anybody who wants to experience this first hand.. just flame apple on slashdot :) and see your post mod down to hell

      Been there, done that. Points drops almost as fast as when you suggest Linux may not represent perfection. ;-)
    • Re:I dunno.. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Joe Tie. (567096) on Sunday March 23 2008, @12:27AM (#22834236)
      I think the apple fanboys easily win for the moment. I'm a long time linux user, and often found the zelotry a bit embarrassing. But looking at the comments on digg when apple comes up actually make me feel a bit uneasy in general. It actually can be borderline scary seeing the amount of nerd rage apple stories can unleash there.
    • Re:I dunno.. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by DaleGlass (1068434) on Sunday March 23 2008, @01:02AM (#22834412) Homepage
      IMO, the Linux zealots are less scary.

      It's a difference in philosophy. Linux is about freedom and choice. If you say "Linux lacks X", most of the time if you get a negative reply it'll be something like "well, go fix it, the source's there". You generally won't be flamed to a crisp for daring to suggest that say, the state of audio in Linux isn't ideal. Constructive criticism could get a positive reply. Take the guy who did Linux boot benchmarking -- it quickly resulted in optimizations of the process.

      Now try to do the same with Apple. Apple is about the "experience". Either you get it, or you can go look somewhere else. If you try to suggest the iPod, iPhone or something else isn't ideal you'll often get a reply from somebody who thinks nothing Apple makes might be a bit imperfect, and that if you don't like it, something is wrong with you. Mac OS was perfect before OS X came out. I've never seen a fan reply to the complaint of the iPod's lack of ability to play Ogg Vorbis as "You know, they should really include that". If it was a Linux device somebody would have added that within a month of the iPod's release.
    • Re:Mac Pride (Score:5, Informative)

      by menkhaura (103150) <espinafre@gmail.com> on Sunday March 23 2008, @01:21AM (#22834498) Homepage
      I see two mistakes in your comment. First, black*, foreign (whatever country you are from; I'm assuming U.S.) and (arguably) gay people are born the way they are; they cannot change that, and even if they could, many, or most, wouldn't. On the other hand, a consumer has the choice to either spend more than he earns in a month (and, believe me, it happens more often than not down here in the Third World) on an item he believes (often correctly) that will give him more social status, or spend half or two-third his monthly wage on something that will be useful to him, running some OS and graphic DE that is at least as beautiful as Apple's.

      The second mistake I see is that the Free and/or Open Source (internal feuds do exist; let them sort themselves out) Software fanboys are even more plentiful than Apple ones. Being one of those myself, I think the reason is that we believe in an ideal, fulfilled by the hard work of those seeking recognition among their peers, or money, or plain and simple sense of self-fulfillment. Yes, there are very vocal FOSS fanboys out there, but they are either novices to the belief or prophets of the cult; most of us fall in-between, prowd of our sense of judgement, knowing what is good and what isn't for our families and for our our stranded relative's PHD about-to-be-lost-to-a-virus thesis.

      * That PC crap hits my nerves; I'm black, but I was born in Brazil; I'm not a fucking African-American, I'm BLACK, thank you very much! And I wasn't born in a "developing country", I was born and live in an UNDERDEVELOPED country; the notion that we are in a "developing country" has deluded our leaders to think we are "getting there". No country "gets there" when 32 million of its population STARVES.